Jorge Corujo Sandín Wilfredo Mercado Torres Débora Pagán Díaz Anthony Silva Reyes Faculty Advisor : Vijay K. Goyal, PhD Course: INME 4058 University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez Campus Mechanical Engineering Department
Problem Description Literature Survey Design Selection Optimization ANSYS Cost Conclusion
Actual car clothes carriers hold only a few hangers Visibility of the driver can be affected when using the standard carrier Sometimes a great amount of clothes is needed to be carried, Wrinkle Free! Placement of clothes in seats affect available seating space
Hanger Extensions Pro: Provides Space for 10 comfortably placed slim hangers. Clothes can travel and be Wrinkle Free Economic Compact and simple to use. Rear passengers next to the window is not bothered
Hanger Extensions (cont) Cons: It limits the hanging space to 5-8 garments The placement of the garments affects the drivers visibility It may be weak to sustain heavier loads.
Cross Car Bars Pros It can hold large number of clothes as well as heavy loads. It provides hanging surface even if there is no clothe hanger Cons Limits the driver’s visibility May cause discomfort to rear passenger. When kept inside the vehicle; its difficult to store.
Design a clothes carrier system for a Toyota Sienna Should not compromise safety Should not compromise seating space Hold up to 20 pounds in clothes Cost less than $20.00 USD Be ergonomic and easy to use
Need Generate Idea Final DesignAnalysisConclusions 321 Optimization Structure Analysis Cost Analysis Final RemarksRecommendations
Long slot to hang up many clothes hangers Idea # 1 Idea # 2 Idea # 3
Pughs Method Criteria Score (0-10) Design #1Design #2Design #3 DATUM : Standard clothes carrier Backpack strapped to the back of a car seat Retractable handle Headrest device 1. Safety Cost Ease of use Style Available hanging space Strength Space occupied50 0 Total43 50 Total Positive Total Negative Weighted Total
Idea # 3
Optimize the arms Most critical part of the system Supports clothes’ weight Subjected to bending stresses Clothes’ weight creates a moment at the pins Design the arms to be: Strong Light Arms to be analyzed
Material: Al alloy 2024 Analyzed as supported by 2 pins Modeled as a hollow cylinder Distributed force of 1.66 lb/in Greatest pin B Pin B
Design variables x 1= R o x 2= R i Objective function
Constrained optimization problem Constraints
Method of Lagrange Multipliers The Lagrangian Function Lagrangian equation for our problem
Lagrangian problem: System of nonlinear equations
Solution Optimum inner radius: R i = in Selected radius: R o = 0.5 in R i = in
Optimized Segment can be modeled as a simply supported beam Each support element carries half of the design weight (i.e. 10 lbs each)
The applied force was simulated perpendicular to the beam. This is a worst case scenario, since in practice said force would be in an angle. Therefore reducing the actual force applied. Element chosen was Pipe 16 Max Deflection at free point was inches Additional analysis proved troublesome and where ignored, since they provided questionable answers.
MaterialQuantityUnit Price High-Strength Aluminum (Alloy 2024) 1$15.16 Sheet 0.025" THK, 12" x 12" High-Strength Aluminium (Alloy 2024) 1$29.68 Tube 0.500" OD, 3' L High-Strength Aluminum (Alloy 2024) 1$4.22 Tube 0.375" OD, 1' L *Miscellaneous1$10.00 Prototype Total $59.06 * Miscellaneous = Washers and Bolts
There is still room for improvement: Stronger and less expensive materials Adaptability for multiple vehicles Optimization of the rest of the elements will yield an even better design. Design parameters where reached: Simple Design Ease of use Supports desired weight Does not affect visibility Does not take up a passenger’s seat
Our Motto: “SIMPLICITY, EFFECTIVENESS & STRENGHT”.