FDA/Industry Statistics Workshop - 29 September 2006

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 5 Transfer of Training
Advertisements

Dimitri Kutsenko (Entimo AG)
CDISC based eSubmission Key Points of the CDISC SDTM/ADaM Pilot
Using Matrices in Real Life
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
Labeling claims for patient- reported outcomes (A regulatory perspective) FDA/Industry Workshop Washington, DC September 16, 2005 Lisa A. Kammerman, Ph.D.
Implementation of a Validated Statistical Computing Environment Presented by Jeff Schumack, Associate Director – Drug Development Information September.
NCATS REDESIGN METHODOLOGY A Menu of Redesign Options Six Models for Course Redesign Five Principles of Successful Course Redesign Four Models for Assessing.
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
By Rick Clements Software Testing 101 By Rick Clements
Aviation Security Training Module 4 Design and Conduct Exercise II 1.
Click to edit Master title style Page - 1 OneSky Teams Step-by-Step Online Corporate Communication Support 2006.
State of New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services Patient Safety Reporting System Module 2 – New Event Entry.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Making the System Operational
Grants 3.0 Departmental Administrator Review January 22, 2014.
Integrify 5.0 Tutorial : Creating a New Process
1 Implementing Internet Web Sites in Counseling and Career Development James P. Sampson, Jr. Florida State University Copyright 2003 by James P. Sampson,
Introduction Lesson 1 Microsoft Office 2010 and the Internet
Solve Multi-step Equations
Week 2 The Object-Oriented Approach to Requirements
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop MICS Technical Assistance MICS Survey Design Workshop.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan Evaluation February 16, 2005.
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 6 and 7.
Software Testing and Quality Assurance
1 Undirected Breadth First Search F A BCG DE H 2 F A BCG DE H Queue: A get Undiscovered Fringe Finished Active 0 distance from A visit(A)
VOORBLAD.
1 Breadth First Search s s Undiscovered Discovered Finished Queue: s Top of queue 2 1 Shortest path from s.
Factor P 16 8(8-5ab) 4(d² + 4) 3rs(2r – s) 15cd(1 + 2cd) 8(4a² + 3b²)
Individual Assisted Living Planning and Rate Negotiation Tool Testing Version Sponsored by Aging and Adult Services MN Department of Human Services Testing.
CMPT 275 Software Engineering
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
Executional Architecture
Global Analysis and Distributed Systems Software Architecture Lecture # 5-6.
1 How Do I Order From.decimal? Rev 05/04/09 This instructional training document may be updated at anytime. Please visit and check the.
GEtServices Services Training For Suppliers Requests/Proposals.
25 seconds left…...
H to shape fully developed personality to shape fully developed personality for successful application in life for successful.
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
©2004 Brooks/Cole FIGURES FOR CHAPTER 12 REGISTERS AND COUNTERS Click the mouse to move to the next page. Use the ESC key to exit this chapter. This chapter.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
PSSA Preparation.
Statistically-Based Quality Improvement
A lesson approach © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. a lesson approach Microsoft® PowerPoint 2010 © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
© Paradigm Publishing, Inc Access 2010 Level 2 Unit 2Advanced Reports, Access Tools, and Customizing Access Chapter 8Integrating Access Data.
Benchmark Series Microsoft Excel 2013 Level 2
Presented by: HCN Clinical Operations Team. 2 TopicPage Top Reasons to have and use the Patient Portal3 Sample Portal Websites4 Portal 1016 Meaningful.
12-CRS-0106 REVISED 8 FEB 2013 PRESENTS Payment Functionality.
© 2011 Octagon Research Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this document are confidential and proprietary to Octagon Research Solutions,
Contents Integrating clinical trial data Working with CROs
Overview and feed-back from CDISC European Interchange 2008 (From April 21 st to 25 th, COPENHAGEN) Groupe des Utilisateurs Francophones de CDISC Bagneux.
Second Annual Japan CDISC Group (JCG) Meeting 28 January 2004 Julie Evans Director, Technical Services.
Implementation of CDISC Standards at Nycomed PhUSE, Basel (19-21 October 2009) Nycomed GmbH, Dr. B Traub CDISC Implementation at Nycomed.
CDISC©2009 February CDISC INTRAchange Carey Smoak Device Team Leader Li Zheng Submission Data Standards Team Member Thurday, April 2, 2009.
Traceability between SDTM and ADaM converted analysis datasets
An FDA Statistician’s Perspective on Standardized Data Sets
Presentation transcript:

FDA/Industry Statistics Workshop - 29 September 2006 An Update on the CDISC SDTM/ADaM Pilot Project Cathy Barrows, Ph.D. GlaxoSmithKline Co-Leader of CDISC Pilot Project CDISC ADaM Team FDA/Industry Statistics Workshop - 29 September 2006

http://www.cdisc.org/

CDISC Pilot Project was to… Demonstrate that data submitted to the FDA using the CDISC Standard will meet the needs and expectations of both medical and statistical FDA reviewers. Produce a worked example implementation of the available CDISC standards.

How? By conducting a case study legacy data (real clinical trial data, warts and all)  CDISC SDTM domains and ADaM datasets and associated metadata submission of case study package to FDA for mock review And in the process, identify any issues to be resolved in SDTM and ADaM models

FOCUS: the package not the process Choices/decisions guided by timeline realities of a team of volunteers from multiple companies quick, efficient, effective - not necessarily the most preferred option are not making recommendations re process!

Pilot Submission Deliverables Submission package Includes SDTM datasets, analysis datasets, all relevant metadata, analysis results, abbreviated report Review package tied together using metadata in DEFINE.XML Summary report of the pilot submission project issues encountered, strengths and weaknesses incorporate what we learned from the FDA feedback Both to be made available to the public on the CDISC website

Criteria for success of the Pilot Project FDA statistical and medical reviewers will evaluate the submitted datasets (SDTM and AdaM), metadata and documentation Usable with their tools? Reproducibility of analyses, derivations? Navigable? Contents – what and where are OK? etc.

And the verdict? We DID produce an electronic submission that met the reviewers’ needs The overall tone of the reviewers’ feedback was very positive noted easier learning curve The FDA review was very thorough and they provided constructive criticism Issues encountered both by team and in FDA feedback are already beginning to be addressed by CDISC teams

Now to details…

Who? 15 core team members from industry FDA involvement Interactions: Unprecedented level of involvement Provided co-leadership 18-20 employees involved  12 consistently in contact with team includes medical and statistical reviewers Interactions: regular team teleconferences Feb. face-to-face meeting to define the project (expectations/requirements) Pre-submission encounter Feedback from review

FDA representatives - expectations, requirements, wish list Key messages: Consistency, accuracy, completeness are extremely important - follow the specifications! Define file crucial, but needs to be accurate Clear mapping between the plans for analysis, the tabulation data, the analysis data, and the analyses performed SDTM and Analysis datasets should be available for both medical and statistical reviewers

Presubmission “Encounter” Important opportunity to communicate about those crucial data-type issues that we run out of time for at “usual” meetings Discussed data to be submitted - structures, variables FDA was able to make specific requests, for example: Hy’s Law analysis dataset (liver hepatotoxicity)

Legacy data used in the pilot submission Real clinical trial data, provided by Eli Lilly Data de-identified, documents redacted Indication: Alzheimer’s Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study Three treatment arms: low dose, high dose, placebo Approximately 300 patients, multiple centers Representative set of endpoints and analyses included in package

CDISC Pilot Submission Package Content PDF TOCs and eCTD folder structure

Building the CDISC Pilot Legacy documents received Building the CDISC Pilot Submission Package Decisions regarding data analysis Note that “create” includes QC steps. Map blank CRF to SDTM (aCRF) Write SAP Receive legacy data Coding of events data & con.med. data Create SDTM data metadata Create analysis data metadata Create SDTM datasets (little derived data) Write reviewer’s guide Create 0-obs SDTM datasets Create 0-obs analysis datasets Create analysis datasets Generate analyses Write cover letter Derived data to SDTM Write study report Create DEFINE Create XPT files Finalize SDTM datasets Create analysis results metadata

Presentation of the Define FDA expectation: Pilot package in Define.xml The Define file integrates tabulation dataset (SDTM) metadata analysis dataset (ADaM) metadata analysis results (ADaM) metadata New implementation! Exciting!

Illustration of the Pilot Submission Package

Ideally would also have included a link to reviewer’s guide Top of Define file Table of Contents Ideally would also have included a link to reviewer’s guide

Define file: List of Analysis Datasets

Define file: Metadata for ADSL

Define file: Code List

Define file: Computation Method

Define file: List of Tabulation Datasets

Define file: List of Analysis Results

Define file: Analysis Results Metadata

Define file: Linked to Study Report

Inclusion of Programs? Elected to not include entire “program” Included program code in metadata for repeated measures analysis This WAS used in the review

Next Steps: Wrap up tasks for this iteration Some revisions to current package Implement some of the FDA feedback Fix a few things that are errors or oversights Incorporate some things we wish we had done Complete the project report Publish the package and the project report

Future iterations might: Fully and completely work this example (rather than a subset) More fully develop the metadata Include datasets in the DEFINE file, instead of separately XPT files Use studies from other therapeutic areas Go beyond a single study Test submitting different sets of sponsor data (e.g., NDA, safety update) Address how to send updates (e.g. additional derived variables) effectively Test newer versions of models, e.g.: ADaM PK data Pre-clinical data ODM Test other analysis strategies

Wisdom is scar tissue in disguise Our Advice - It’s worth it! Or, as one FDA Review Team member said: In order to get a standard we have to suffer

Thank you! CDISC Pilot XML and You SDTM ADaM ODM