Practice-Based Inquiry ® Better methodology for better accountability.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Roles of a Facilitator. What is a Facilitator Facilitators are to use various tools, techniques and methodologies to assist teams with increasing the.

Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -

SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION

Assessment Assessment should be an integral part of a unit of work and should support student learning. Assessment is the process of identifying, gathering.

Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?

Main Idea Teresa Sellers. Goals: The literacy team will engage in multiple activities that heighten awareness of their meta- cognitive processes esp.

Developing consistency of teacher judgment Module 2.

Supporting Teachers to make Overall Teacher Judgments The Consortium for Professional Learning.

Copyright 2001 by Allyn and Bacon Social Cognitive and Constructivist Views of Learning: Chapter 9.

Looking at Student Work. Engage in a structured discussion focused on student learning Develop a shared understanding of what constitutes evidence of.

The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.

Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.

Module code: RES503 Date: March 2, 2013 Student ID: Name: Marwa Hamdi El Tanahy Master of Education 1 Creativity, Inquiry, or Accountability? Scientists.

Customer Focus Module Preview

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT Improvement Coach The purpose of this session is to introduce participants to the role of the improvement coach and prepare for.

Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 18 Action Research Designs.

What is Science? Review This slide show will present a question, followed by a slide with an acceptable answer. For some questions, there is a definite.

AiZ and FT&LQ project Teachers working collaboratively in teams (PLTs, Triads) Teachers developing a shared understanding of effective teaching (PoLT,

Designing 1-1 Interviews and Focus Groups Desmond Thomas, University of Essex.

Literacy Partner’s Meeting Wednesday, October 22 nd Moderated Marking: The What, The Why, The How.

Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.

Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.

Puzzled by Inquiry? Try the Big 6 Method!. Six steps to help you solve problems or make decisions. Task Definition Information Seeking Strategies Location.

Rhona Sharpe, Head of OCSLD Liz Turner, Head of APQO 11 th April 2013 CHAIRING VALIDATION PANELS.

ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.

Assessment Professional Learning Module 5: Making Consistent Judgements.

South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.

Ethnography. Anthropological tradition: Research that focuses on culture. Focus on cultural themes of community roles and behavior Patterns of behavior,

Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)

OVERVIEW PRESENTATION

1 Assessment Professional Learning Module 5: Making Consistent Judgements.

AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.

SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,

What is Science? Review This slide show will present a question, followed by a slide with an acceptable answer. For some questions, there is a definite.

Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Principal Evaluation: Different? One Year Later Coaching Principals Collect evidence Support your local.

Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Thursday, Feb 1.

LEAP in School Staff. Training Objectives  Understand the changes to LEAP for  Have questions answered.

What is Science?. Competency Goal 1: The learner will design and conduct investigations to demonstrate an understanding of scientific inquiry.. –1.03.

The Nursing Process ASSESSMENT. Nursing Process Dynamic, ongoing Facilitates delivery of organized plan of nursing care Involves 5 parts –Assessment –Diagnosis.

 Check Job description for accuracy.  Ensure expectations are mutually understood.  Keep notes and other documentation.  Review progress frequently.

Collaboration for Student Empowerment

Evidence in Evaluations. What is Evidence? ITED Document – Evidence refers to data, information, artifacts and performances that educators and evaluators.

Julie Boyle & Sarah Kluge, Berrien RESA

A brief introduction to

© 2005 by Prentice Hall Chapter 6 Determining System Requirements Modern Systems Analysis and Design Fourth Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer Joey F. George Joseph.

Hannah Love LSIS 5645 Core Assessment IV. Why is information literacy necessary?  To fulfill the goals of education by preparing students for The workplace.

Chapter Nine: Qualitative Procedures

What is Science? This slide show will present a question, followed by a slide with an acceptable answer. For some questions, there is a definite correct.

Development of the Egyptian Code of Practice for Student Assessment Lamis Ragab, MD, MHPE Hala Salah, MD.

1 Verification Overview What is Verification?  Independent, third-party review of reported emissions Why is it Important?  Ensures that an inventory.

13-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved CHAPTER THIRTEEN Multiple Parties and Teams.

A research design or method is a plan for an entire qualitative research project Of course, you need to be flexible and possibly change the plan as your.

Collaborative Assessment Conference Protocol Qualitative Data Example Source Protocol recommended group size of: 5-10 people.

Assessment Literacy and the Common Core Shifts. Why Be Assessment Literate? ED Test and Measurement 101 was a long time ago Assure students are being.

SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN LAB NARZU TARANNUM(NAT)

Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”

Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,

Appraisal It’s about learning It’s about growth It’s about accountability.

Coaching in Early Intervention Provider Onboarding Series 3

Where We Are and Where We Want to Be

Action Research Designs

Alignment Dr. Mary Clisbee

[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO]

Enquiry Based Learning (EBL) and Human Rights

فلوشیپ اخلاق زیست پزشکی استادیار دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ایران

Learning Intentions We are learning to (W.A.L.T.):

Professional Learning for the e-Learning Context

Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)

The Assessing Cycle Module 1 Assessment Assessment Accountability Data

Elements of evaluation quality: questions, answers, and resources

Presentation transcript:

Practice-Based Inquiry ® Better methodology for better accountability

© 2005 Catalpa Ltd. PBI AT WORK Foundation Components  Actual Practice  Dynamic Evidence  Professional Judgment  Deliberated Consensus

© 2005 Catalpa Ltd. Being there

© 2005 Catalpa Ltd. Getting the evidence

© 2005 Catalpa Ltd. Evidence What you see, hear and read  Becomes the substance of conclusions  Pushes further inquiry  Shapes the team ’ s judgment

© 2005 Catalpa Ltd. Sources of Evidence  Following a student  Observing classes and schools  Conversations, Interviews and Meetings  Documents  Test assessments

© 2005 Catalpa Ltd. Building team ’ s judgment

© 2005 Catalpa Ltd. Professional Judgment “Out of the closet and onto the table”  Reflects team members ’ knowledge about learning and teaching for learning  Answers the questions: “ So what? ” “ How well…? ”  Speaks the voice of the team

© 2005 Catalpa Ltd. Finding team consensus

© Catalpa Ltd. and RIDE, 2003 Deliberated Consensus Creates valid conclusions  Pushes inquiry  Forms team ’ s judgment  Requires deliberate agreement, not negotiation  Eliminates personal agendas

© 2005 Catalpa Ltd. Deliberated Consensus

© 2005 Catalpa Ltd. Necessary constraints  Focus  Definition of conclusions  Review-criteria for conclusions  Schedule  Team composition  Logistics  Dynamics

Building Conclusions

© Catalpa Ltd. and RIDE, 2003 Tests for conclusions A conclusion must:  Accuracy  Importance  Explicit team judgment  Direct, common language  Team says what it means, without being mean

© 2011 Catalpa Ltd. Perspective as evidence What program participants think about what they do  Allows team “ to walk in the shoes ” of candidates, program leaders, and funders  Helps the team understand the context and meaning of what they see, hear, and read  Requires the team to figure out how Chicago perspectives about NBC affect program efficacy

© 2005 Catalpa Ltd. Solving the puzzles

© 2005 Catalpa Ltd. Stages At the School’s Door: Initial Perceptions In the School: Working Evidence & Judgment In the Team Room: Working Conclusions Final Conclusions ` `

© 2005 Catalpa Ltd. Final Conclusions

© 2005 Catalpa Ltd. TESTS for a PBI report  Accurate  Fair  Useful  Persuasive

© Catalpa Ltd. Procedures for Legitimacy  System for school’s challenge of reports legitimacy  Report editing and publication  Certified chair  Certified protocol  Certified team composition  Code of conduct  Report endorsement