Friends of Milwaukee’s Rivers Citizen-Based Water Quality Monitoring in the Milwaukee River Basin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of Aquatic Programs Administered by the WV Division of Natural Resources Dan Cincotta WVDNR P. O. Box 67 Elkins, WV
Advertisements

Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
WDNR Citizen Based Stream Monitoring Pilot Project: (VERY) Preliminary Results Wisconsin Citizen Based Monitoring Conference, October 5, 2006 Ellison Bay,
Community-Based Water Quality Monitoring: A Viable Path to Cleaner Waters 306 E. Wilson St., Ste. 2W Madison, WI
Yakama Nation Pacific Lamprey Recovery Project Core Data And Monitoring Framework.
Water Resources Monitoring Strategy for Wisconsin: Building on Experience Mike Staggs, WDNR Bureau of Fisheries Management and Habitat Protection Acknowledgements:
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
Program Satisfaction Among Level 2 Citizen Stream Monitors Bret Shaw Department of Life Sciences Communication UW Extension & UW-Madison Chris Clayton.
Water Action Volunteers’ Citizen Stream Monitoring Program Kris Stepenuck - UW EX/WI DNR Statewide WAV Coordinator Mike Miller - WI DNR Baseline Stream.
Delaware River Keeper Caio Costa and Andrew Wirstiuk.
Water Action Volunteers’ Citizen Stream Monitoring Program.
Cary Denison Gunnison Basin Project Coordinator & Brian Hodge Yampa & White Basin Project Coordinator Trout Unlimited in The Colorado Basin.
GSWA Stream Team A sub-committee of the GSWA Land and Water Stewardship Committee.
Laying the Ground Work. Successful Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Programs are…. Well organized Well organized Sound scientific basis Sound scientific.
Conclusion -Velocity affects the temperature, pH and DO of a stream; the greater the velocity, the greater the water quality -The positive correlation.
Wisconsin’s Citizen-Based Stream Monitoring Program enter your local program information here.
Mattabesset River Watershed Management Plan Julie Foley.
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
River Revitalization Foundation By: Aaron Schwerma and Jeremy Turnmeyer board.html.
Water Quality Trends across 319 Monitoring Sites Brian E. Haggard Director, Arkansas Water Resources Center Funding provided by ANRC.
Rogue Basin Water Quality Implementation Plans Greg Stabach, Natural Resources Project Manager Rogue Valley Council of Governments.
 Secretarial Order No establishes Landscape Conservation Cooperatives, which focus on on-the-ground strategic conservation efforts at the landscape.
Kyle Abraham Effectiveness Monitoring Coordinator Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board.
Why Water? Water is fundamental to life. It flows throughout our State, our community, and within each of us. IntroductionActionAwarenessAdvocacyPrograms.
Georgia Adopt-A-Stream Introduction Georgia Adopt-A-Stream 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. SW Suite 1462 East Atlanta, Georgia
Name of presenter Date of presentation.  To help preserve and protect Wisconsin’s over 15,000 lakes and 86,000 miles of rivers.
Ohio Chapter Clean Water Campaign “Protecting our water at the Source” Matt Trokan Ohio Chapter Conservation Manager x311
Sustaining Long Term Regional Coordinated Monitoring Programs Todd Running, H-GAC May 9, 2006.
Water Quality Standards, TMDLs and Bioassessment Tom Porta, P.E. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Quality Planning.
Washington State Steelhead Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING JON ANDERSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 9-11, 2010.
What is a Watershed? Goals for this module Discuss the goals and objectives of the project Discuss the goals and objectives of the project Learn who.
Andrew Heath Executive Director PA Growing Greener Coalition 1.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Leetown Science Center Research in the Shenandoah Valley Presented to the Shenandoah Valley Natural.
National Monitoring Conference May 10, 2006 Westchester County Department of Planning Westchester County Citizens’
Citizen Outreach in Loudoun County, Virginia Source Water Protection Webcast Communication, Regulatory, and Non- Regulatory Tools March 22, 2006 Presented.
Friends of Texas Creek OHV Area A Network Initiative Kalem Lenard Outdoor Recreation Planner Royal Gorge Field Office Bureau of Land Management 9/29/2010.
Wisconsin Ephemeral Pond Project (WEPP) Spring 2010.
Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper Kristina Robertson 4/14/2011 Clemson University ENR 613 The trouble with.
Water Quality Partnership Meeting LOTT Alliance Regional Service Center November 18, 2010 Rob Duff and Josh Baldi Washington State Department of Ecology.
Mississippi River Network 1 Mississippi Campaign.
Florida Keys Water Watch
The Meadows Center Texas Stream Team Prepared in cooperation with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and U.S. EPA. The preparation of this presentation.
Phase II National Storm Water Regulations What’s in it for you?
HYDROELECTRIC POWER AND FERC. HYDRO 101A ”Water Runs Down Hill”
Dam Removal as a Solution to Increase Water Quality Matthew Nechvatal, Tim Granata Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science.
Water Resources of the Clinton River Watershed: Angling Opportunities & Interests.
Flathead River to Lake Initiative Conservation and restoration through a diverse collaborative effort Part I – How it began Part II – Conservation Successes.
State of the Streams Loudoun County: 2005 Loudoun Strategic Watershed Management Planning Conference February 23, 2006 Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun.
Watershed Alliance Approach to Stream Monitoring
Friends of the Shenandoah River Mission A non-profit, scientific organization dedicated to the preservation and restoration of the aquatic environment.
Adaptive Management Strategies - Making It Work - Brian Kemp GM – Conservation Lands Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority Ontario, Canada.
Kettle River Watershed Management Plan Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting #3 – July 19, 2012.
Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview MARY ANDREWS NOAA JULIE DEVERS USFWS ERIK MARTIN THE NATURE CONSERVANCY CHESAPEAKE BAY FISH PASSAGE.
Born from the Governor’s efforts to engage all stakeholders to solve problems Designed to provide technical support to local organizations ODEQ Program.
The Bear Creek Watershed Association protects & restores water & environmental quality within the Bear Creek Watershed from the effects of land use. Bear.
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Vision for Menomonee River Valley Economically, with strong companies and jobs near workers’ homes; Geographically, with renewed ties to the surrounding.
Dodge County Water Monitoring Update
Connecting at a BBQ - Aligning Citizens with Utah's Monitoring Needs
VOLUNTEER TRAINING FOR MACROINVERTEBRATE MONITORING
Protecting the Quality of our Water
CMC: Who we are and how we can collaborate with the
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
Creating and Managing Watershed Stewardship Programs Session 5
WESt Sammamish park project
Building a Community of Stewardship Through Water Monitoring
River Basin Report Card
Presentation transcript:

Friends of Milwaukee’s Rivers Citizen-Based Water Quality Monitoring in the Milwaukee River Basin

Friends of Milwaukee’s Rivers Our mission is to protect water quality and wildlife habitat and advocate for sound land use in the Milwaukee, Menomonee, and Kinnickinnic River Watersheds. Our mission is to protect water quality and wildlife habitat and advocate for sound land use in the Milwaukee, Menomonee, and Kinnickinnic River Watersheds.

We are the Milwaukee Riverkeeper® One of 157+ Keepers licensed by the Waterkeeper Alliance, based in New York An independent watchdog for the river Responds to citizen concerns and complaints Finds solutions to environmental problems Eventual goal is to have a physical presence on the river, to do more pro-active monitoring, and expand citizen monitoring network

Protecting Water Quality

Protecting Recreational Uses

Water Trail Map

Protecting Wildlife Habitat

Advocating Sound Land Use

River Clean-ups

Illicit Discharge Detection

WATER QUALITY TESTING PROGRAMS

Goals of Monitoring Program: Establish a watershed-wide network of trained citizen volunteers monitoring streams, collecting information in a consistent and useable format Establish a watershed-wide network of trained citizen volunteers monitoring streams, collecting information in a consistent and useable format Training volunteers to recognize and respond appropriately to questionable practices (erosion violations, illicit discharges, etc.) Training volunteers to recognize and respond appropriately to questionable practices (erosion violations, illicit discharges, etc.) Improve the quantity and quality of data that can be used to monitor the health of our waters Improve the quantity and quality of data that can be used to monitor the health of our waters

Recruiting Volunteers Letters sent out to all past water quality monitoring volunteers Letters sent out to all past water quality monitoring volunteers Targetted high priority areas Targetted high priority areas Posters distributed to businesses, nature centers, etc. Posters distributed to businesses, nature centers, etc. s/listserves used heavily s/listserves used heavily Newsletter articles (FMR, Sierra, etc.) Newsletter articles (FMR, Sierra, etc.)

Water Quality Trainings May 6 th —trained 12 Level II advanced volunteers at UEC May 6 th —trained 12 Level II advanced volunteers at UEC June 3 rd —trained 13 Level I (WAV) volunteers at Havenwoods June 3 rd —trained 13 Level I (WAV) volunteers at Havenwoods June 10, trained 20 Level I volunteers at Riverside Park, West Bend June 10, trained 20 Level I volunteers at Riverside Park, West Bend Trained 45 volunteers total at three trainings!

WQ Parameters Monitored Level II volunteers- monitored pH, DO, turbidity, and temperature (using automated thermistors). Level II volunteers- monitored pH, DO, turbidity, and temperature (using automated thermistors). Level I volunteers measured DO, temperature, turbidity, flow, and macroinvertebrates Level I volunteers measured DO, temperature, turbidity, flow, and macroinvertebrates Volunteers monitor on at least a monthly basis. Volunteers monitor on at least a monthly basis. Data will be entered into either the DNR “SWIMS” or WAV databases Data will be entered into either the DNR “SWIMS” or WAV databases

Monitoring Sites in the Milwaukee River Basin Data was collected for 24 Level II sites by 12 volunteers; 20 thermistors deployed (2 lost) Data was collected for 24 Level II sites by 12 volunteers; 20 thermistors deployed (2 lost) Data collected for 24 Level I stream sites by our 33 WAV volunteers Data collected for 24 Level I stream sites by our 33 WAV volunteers

Preliminary Results two potential streams for coldwater trout introductions: Mole Creek and Riveredge Creek. Several volunteers’ data demonstrates negative effects of dams on water quality in Grafton (2 dams), Menomonee Falls, Milwaukee (Estabrook Dam), West Bend, and Thiensville (Seminary Dam). Some potential positive effects of restoration projects (e.g. North Ave dam removal, Trinity Creek project)

Citizen Enforcers?! Level I and II volunteers both identified problem areas/places of concern in the Basin (e.g. algal outbreaks, poor erosion controls, cows in the stream, etc.), and FMR staff have tried to address these concerns and/or refer to DNR staff.

Conclusions There is tremendous potential for citizens to contribute valuable water quality data to help WDNR and others manage our water resources, esp. in densely populated areas. There is tremendous potential for citizens to contribute valuable water quality data to help WDNR and others manage our water resources, esp. in densely populated areas. In 2006, over 45 volunteers were trained in the Milwaukee River Basin—48 sites monitored. In 2006, over 45 volunteers were trained in the Milwaukee River Basin—48 sites monitored. Level I and II Volunteers are anxious to continue, and interest is growing. Level I and II Volunteers are anxious to continue, and interest is growing. We look forward to building on WDNR’s efforts to systematize and improve the quality and quantity of citizen-collected data used to monitor our waters. We look forward to building on WDNR’s efforts to systematize and improve the quality and quantity of citizen-collected data used to monitor our waters.