John Clem and Paul Evenson University of Delaware 30-June-2010 Source of Funding/Grant : NASA Solar and Heliospheric Physics SR&T / NNX08BA62G AESOP Anti-Electron.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ELENA VANNUCCINI ON BEHALF OF PAMELA COLLABORATION Measurement of the Hydrogen and Helium absolute fluxes with the PAMELA experiment.
Advertisements

E. Mocchiutti, INFN Trieste - CALOR th June 2006, Chicago E. Mocchiutti 1, M. Albi 1, M. Boezio 1, V. Bonvicini 1, J. Lund 2, J. Lundquist 1, M.
At the start of the 20th century, scientists have been puzzled by the fact that the air in electroscopes-instruments became charged or ionized no matter.
GLAST The GLAST Balloon Flight experiment was performed with the collaboration of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center,
Study of Galactic Cosmic Rays at high cut- off rigidity during solar cycle 23 Partha Chowdhury 1 and B.N. Dwivedi 2 1 Department of Physics, University.
1 Observations of Charge Sign Dependence in Solar Modulation Kiruna 2006 LEE (Low Energy Electrons) August 17, 2005 John Clem and Paul Evenson GSFC Collaborators:
Paul Evenson, Waraporn Nuntiyakul,
PAMELA Payload for Antimatter Matter Exploration and Light Nuclei Astrophysics.
ANtarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna NASA funding started 2003 for first launch in 2006 Phase A approval for SMEX ToO mission 600 km radius, 1.1 million.
Neutron Monitor Detection Efficiency John Clem University of Delaware 2004 Annual CRONUS Collaboration Meeting.
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
Paul Evenson January Low Energy Electron Observations (LEE, AESOP and the Historical Context) Paul Evenson and John Clem University of Delaware.
MP BACH MultiPixel Balloon-borne Air CHerenkov Detection of Iron Cosmic Rays Using Direct Cherenkov Radiation Imaged with a High Resolution Camera University.
Search for Cosmic Antiparticles First Workshop on Underground experiments and Astroparticle physics October 23, 2002 Eun-Suk Seo University of Maryland.
SHINE 2008 June, 2008 Utah, USA Visit our Websites:
Solar Modulation: A Theoretical Perspective Modeling of cosmic ray charge-sign dependence in the heliosphere Marius Potgieter Unit for Space Physics North-West.
SHINE Meeting, July 31 – August 4, 2006 Neutron Monitor Observations of the January 20, 2005 Ground Level Enhancement John W. Bieber 1, John Clem 1, Paul.
Ground Level Enhancement of May 17, 2012 Observed at South Pole SH21A-2183 Takao Kuwabara 1,3 ; John Bieber 1 ; John Clem 1,3 ; Paul Evenson 1,3 ; Tom.
LSU 09/11/07SE Space Grant - Sept 14, The HASP 2007 Flight and Call for Payloads 2008 T.G. Guzik and J. P. Wefel Dept. of Physics & Astronomy and.
System for Radiation Environment characterization (fluxes, doses, dose equivalents at Earth, Moon and Mars) on hourly thru yearly time frame Example: Snapshots.
Aspen 4/28/05Physics at the End of the Galactic Cosmic Ray Spectrum - “Below the Knee” Working Group “Below the Knee” Working Group Report - Day 3 Binns,
RBSP SWG Meeting 1 3/5/2009 BARREL Update (Balloon Array for RBSP Relativistic Electron Losses) R. M. Millan and the BARREL Team.
Cosmic Rays The discovery of cosmic rays Discoveries made with cosmic rays Cosmic rays in modern physics education Let’s count cosmic rays around us.
Keep the standard candle of electron observations burning Provide an intercalibration with PAMELA and AMS Search for the origin of the turn up in the low.
The PLANETOCOSMICS Geant4 application L. Desorgher Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern.
Observations of Charge Sign Dependence in Solar Modulation John Clem and Paul Evenson GSFC Collaborators: Louis Barbier John Krizmanic University of Delaware.
Effect of Geomagetic Activity on Cosmic Ray Muon Rate Mendon High School Regents Physics Honors Period 9 Class A group of Honors physics students plotted.
Cosmic-Ray Induced Neutrons: Recent Results from the Atmospheric Ionizing Radiation Measurements Aboard an ER-2 Airplane P. Goldhagen 1, J.M. Clem 2, J.W.
1 Observations of Charge Sign Dependence in Solar Modulation Kiruna 2011 LEE Low Energy Electrons P.I.C. June 30, 2010 John Clem and Paul Evenson.
O After integration and test at SLAC and GSFC, BFEM was shipped to the National Scientific Balloon Facility (NSBF) at Palestine, Texas. The experiment.
P. Bobik, G. Boella, M. J. Boschini, M. Gervasi, D. Grandi, K. Kudela, S. Pensotti, P.G. Rancoita 2D Stochastic Monte Carlo to evaluate the modulation.
COSMIC RAY PHYSICS WITH AMS Joseph Burger MIT On behalf of the AMS-02 collaboration EPS2003 Aachen Particle Astrophysics July 17, 2003
Aa GLAST Particle Astrophysics Collaboration Instrument Managed and Integrated at SLAC/Stanford University The Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST)
Trapped positrons and electrons observed by PAMELA Vladimir Mikhailov NRNU MEPHI, Moscow, Russia For PAMELA collaboration ICPPA 2015, PAMELA workshop,
Cosmic Rays2 The Origin of Cosmic Rays and Geomagnetic Effects.
H, He, Li and Be Isotopes in the PAMELA-Experiment Wolfgang Menn University of Siegen On behalf of the PAMELA collaboration International Conference on.
GLAST The GLAST Balloon Flight experiment was performed with the collaboration of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center,
LA ACES Neutron Detector (NeD)
Russian Aviation and Space Agency Institute for Space Research NASA 2001 Mars Odyssey page 1 Workshop HEND Radiation environment on Odyssey and.
Chicago Projects/Facilities Simon Swordy - University of Chicago 28th January 2009, PEBS meeting CERN.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
Physical Description of IceTop 3 Nov IceTop Internal Review Madison, November 3-4, 2010 Physical Description of IceTop Paul Evenson, University.
February 7, Long Term Decline of South Pole Neutron Monitor Counting Rate – A Possible Magnetospheric Interpretation Paul Evenson, John Bieber,
In high energy astrophysics observations, it is crucial to reduce the background effectively to achieve a high sensitivity, for the source intensity is.
Direct measurements of cosmic rays in space ROBERTA SPARVOLI ROME “TOR VERGATA” UNIVERSITY AND INFN, ITALY Vulcano Workshop 2014 Vulcano Island (Italy),
10 Feb 2009PS638 T. Gaisser1 Lecture 1: Introduction Cosmic-ray spectrum and measurements.
Charge Sign Dependence in Cosmic Ray Solar Modulation John Clem and Paul Evenson Bartol Research Institute, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University.
Cosmic Ray Positron Fraction Observations during the A- Magnetic Solar Minimum John Clem and Paul Evenson* * Presenter AESOP Departing Esrange, Sweden.
After integration and test at SLAC and GSFC, BFEM was shipped to the National Scientific Balloon Facility (NSBF) at Palestine, Texas. The experiment was.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
O After the integration and test at SLAC/GSFC, BFEM was shipped to National Scientific Balloon Facility (NSBF) at Palestine, Texas. The experiments was.
Minerva Test Beam 2 Status Geoff Savage for the Test Beam 2 Team March 23, /23/2015AEM - Minerva Test Beam 2 Status1.
E. W. Grashorn, for the MINOS Collaboration Observation of Shadowing in the Underground Muon Flux in MINOS This poster was supported directly by the U.S.
Paul Evenson University of Delaware
Paul Evenson University of Delaware
CHARGE SIGN DEPENDENCE OF LONG TERM COSMIC RAY MODULATION
Search for Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station G. LA VACCA University of Milano-Bicocca.
Pradiphat (ฝุ่น) Muangha2 David J Ruffolo2
Early Alert of Solar Radiation Hazard
Development of a GLE Alarm System Based Upon Neutron Monitors
CALET-CALによる ガンマ線観測初期解析
Electron Observations from ATIC and HESS
Secondary positrons and electrons measured by PAMELA experiment
Measurements of Cosmic-Ray Lithium and Beryllium Isotopes
R. Bucˇık , K. Kudela and S. N. Kuznetsov
for the PAMELA collaboration
Cosmic Ray Electron Spectrum in 2009
Preparation of the CLAS12 First Experiment Status and Time-Line
Analysis of GLAST Balloon Experiment Data
Presentation transcript:

John Clem and Paul Evenson University of Delaware 30-June-2010 Source of Funding/Grant : NASA Solar and Heliospheric Physics SR&T / NNX08BA62G AESOP Anti-Electron Sub-Orbital Payload

1) Objectives 2) Instrument description 3) Flight Observations 4) Campaign Work area and Flight requirements 5) Current Status and Schedule Outline

AESOP Scientific Objectives To quantify this effect we intend to measure the time evolution of electron and positron particle fluxes spanning two solar cycles (22 years) 2 To determine the extent to which the large scale structure of the heliospheric magnetic field is important in the propagation of charged cosmic ray particles in the heliosphere.

AESOP detects electrons with plastic scintillators T1, T3 and G (anticoincidence) and the gas Cherenkov detector T2. The instrument measures the electron energy in scintillator (T4) mounted below a 1cm lead disk and a leadglass (T5) calorimeter. Scintillator T6 also assists in particle identification and energy determination by counting the number of particles that escape the calorimeter. A permanent magnet hodoscope system determines the charge sign and momentum of the electron event. 25 (Chickens can fly) To achieve this goal, AESOP was designed to measure the positron abundance in electrons from 200MeV to 5GeV over a full 22 year cycle.

Vertical axis: Energy measured in the Pb-Glass (T5) calorimeter Horizontal: Deflection in the magnet in units of inverse rigidity. Curve represents the ideal instrument response for positrons (positive side) and electrons (negative side). Red symbols are events tagged as high energy protons Particle ID and energy of each event are assigned using a likelihood analysis AESOP 2006 Flight Electrons Positrons

2009 AESOP Flight Data Analysis is On-Going

The AESOP summary of positron abundance measurements as a function of energy for different epochs of solar magnetic polarity Solid line is the local interstellar space abundance as calculated by Protheroe (1982). Dashed lines are from Clem et al. (1996) for A+ (top line) and A-. Solid symbols show data taken in the A+ state, while the open symbols represent data taken in the A- state. As expected the observed positron abundances during the 2000s (A-) are clearly lower than that measured during the 1990s (A+). These data are consistent qualitatively with charge sign models, however we are in throes developing a new 3D model that incorporates Heliospheric curvature and gradient drifts

The world summary of the same plot on prior slide 29 Consider only data at ~1.2GV…..

Time dependence of positron abundance Black line is a Positron abundance prediction based on the analysis of Clem et al. (1996). Blue line is a very preliminary model based on cosmic ray drifts near the current sheet and drifts over the Solar poles. Vertical was scaled to fit the data Flight2009 Flight

Time dependence of positron abundance (black) and anti-proton ratio (red) at a rigidity of roughly 1.3GV. Black line is a Positron abundance prediction based on the analysis of Clem et al. (1996). Same on previous slide. Red line is an antiproton/proton ratio model Bieber et al. (1999). Dashed lines are the predicted results for future observations. Anti-protons were measured by the series of BESS flights 2011 Flight 2009 Flight

AESOP flight requirements Min Float Altitude: 100kft Min Float Duration: 60hrs Desired Float Altitude: 130kft Desired Float Duration: 40hrs (Altitude excursions are very helpful) Flight Path should remain North of the 0.5GV geomagnetic cutoff

Estimated positron background (1.2GeV bin) for Solar min A- period as a function of depth 1990s 2000s Altitude is a Priority Prior Flight

AESOP Instrument Flight Power: Power 100watts Plan to re-fly Charge Controller originally from PSL. SunCat type Solar Panels AESOP Telemetry: Downlink: TDRSS high rate, LOS Uplink: TDRSS, Iridium, LOS, 4 Discrete Lines (Instr. Power, Black Box) Reliable Fast Internet Service to OCC (Palestine) Flight Gas: 265cft bottle of Neon (Metric thread adapter and Valve Helmet )

Work Space Requirement for LEE and AESOP 40x40ft work space 2ton overhead lift 5 x 60Hz,115V power outlets 50amp Phone line Reliable internet service to OCC (Palestine) Office Space

Gas Bottles Palestine: 3 x Neon265cft (2400psi) 4 x Nitrogen ( Comm Grade) 265cft (2400psi) 2 x He 265cft (2400psi) 2 x C 3 F 8 (R218)15lbs (vapor pressure) 1 x SF6 15lbs ( vapor pressure ) Esrange: 4 x Neon265cft (2400psi) 5 x Nitrogen (Comm Grade) 265cft (2400psi) 3 x He 265cft (2400psi) 2 x C 3 F 8 (R218) 15lbs (vapor pressure) 1 x SF 6 15lbs (vapor pressure)

Milestones: AESOP Refurbish Spark Chambers Replace Trigger Photomultiplier Tubes Calibrate Flight Detectors Check out full integrated science instrument LEE Ready to be shipped We expect to be in Palestine late January and ready for compatibility hanging mid-late February.

Field Personnel: John Clem – Scientist Paul Evenson – Scientist Chris Elliott – Tech James Roth - Tech Jessica Sun – Engineer Jeff Townsend - Student A total 21 day lead-time is required to prepare both AESOP and LEE for flight. This could be reduce to ~15 days if both payloads could be staged simultaneously. Preparation Time in Field:

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar May June Calibrate Flight Detectors and Check out full Flight Instrument pack Arrive CSBF Integration LEE Hanging pack 1 st crew arrivals into Esrange LEE Integration Lee Flight Ready Refurbished Chambers Integrate New Trigger PMTs AESOP Hanging PVs arrive AESOP Integration AESOP Flight Ready

We are looking forward to another successful balloon campaign !!