NCAR ΔX O(10 -2 ) m O(10 2 ) m O(10 4 ) m O(10 7 ) m Cloud turbulence Gravity waves Global flows Solar convection Numerical merits of anelastic models.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stable Fluids A paper by Jos Stam.
Advertisements

Governing Equations III
ECMWF Governing Equations 3 Slide 1 Numerical methods IV (time stepping) by Nils Wedi (room 007; ext. 2657) In part based on previous material by Mariano.
Introduction Irina Surface layer and surface fluxes Anton
The equations of motion and their numerical solutions I by Nils Wedi (2006) contributions by Mike Cullen and Piotr Smolarkiewicz.
Error Indicator based on the Multidimensional Positive Definite Advection Transport Algorithm (MPDATA) Joanna Szmelter Piotr K. Smolarkiewicz Cranfield.
Navier-Stokes.
(c) MSc Module MTMW14 : Numerical modelling of atmospheres and oceans Staggered schemes 3.1 Staggered time schemes.
Fluent Lecture Dr. Thomas J. Barber
A Non-oscillatory Forward in Time Formulation for Incompressible Fluid Flows Joanna Szmelter, Pradeep K Manickam.
Introduction to numerical simulation of fluid flows
1 Internal Seminar, November 14 th Effects of non conformal mesh on LES S. Rolfo The University of Manchester, M60 1QD, UK School of Mechanical,
Introduction to surface ocean modelling SOPRAN GOTM School Warnemünde: Hans Burchard Baltic Sea Research Institute Warnemünde, Germany.
SSL (UC Berkeley): Prospective Codes to Transfer to the CCMC Developers: W.P. Abbett, D.J. Bercik, G.H. Fisher, B.T. Welsch, and Y. Fan (HAO/NCAR)
Non-hydrostatic algorithm and dynamics in ROMS Yuliya Kanarska, Alexander Shchepetkin, Alexander Shchepetkin, James C. McWilliams, IGPP, UCLA.
Types of Governing equations
A TWO-FLUID NUMERICAL MODEL OF THE LIMPET OWC CG Mingham, L Qian, DM Causon and DM Ingram Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Flow Analysis Manchester.
Heat Transfer and Thermal Boundary Conditions
NCAR EULAG: a computational model for multi-scale flows, an overview *National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A. Piotr K Smolarkiewicz*,
Finite Differences Finite Difference Approximations  Simple geophysical partial differential equations  Finite differences - definitions  Finite-difference.
NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION K. Lagouvardos-V. Kotroni Institute of Environmental Research National Observatory of Athens NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION.
Lecture Objectives: -Define turbulence –Solve turbulent flow example –Define average and instantaneous velocities -Define Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes.
The equations of motion and their numerical solutions III by Nils Wedi (2006) contributions by Mike Cullen and Piotr Smolarkiewicz.
Development of WRF-CMAQ Interface Processor (WCIP)
Chapter 9: Differential Analysis of Fluid Flow SCHOOL OF BIOPROCESS ENGINEERING, UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS.
C M C C Centro Euro-Mediterraneo per i Cambiamenti Climatici COSMO General Meeting - September 8th, 2009 COSMO WG 2 - CDC 1 An implicit solver based on.
1 A Framework for The Analysis of Physics-Dynamics Coupling Strategies Andrew Staniforth, Nigel Wood (Met Office Dynamics Research Group) and Jean Côté.
ECMWF 2015 Slide 1 Lagrangian/Eulerian equivalence for forward-in-time differencing for fluids Piotr Smolarkiewicz “The good Christian should beware of.
A Unified Lagrangian Approach to Solid-Fluid Animation Richard Keiser, Bart Adams, Dominique Gasser, Paolo Bazzi, Philip Dutré, Markus Gross.
NCAR EULAG: high-resolution computational model for research of multi-scale geophysical fluid dynamics *National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder,
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods Li, Yang FerienAkademie 2008.
Incompressible Flows Sauro Succi. Incompressible flows.
J.-Ph. Braeunig CEA DAM Ile-de-FrancePage 1 Jean-Philippe Braeunig CEA DAM Île-de-France, Bruyères-le-Châtel, LRC CEA-ENS Cachan
The equations of motion and their numerical solutions II by Nils Wedi (2006) contributions by Mike Cullen and Piotr Smolarkiewicz.
Measurements in Fluid Mechanics 058:180:001 (ME:5180:0001) Time & Location: 2:30P - 3:20P MWF 218 MLH Office Hours: 4:00P – 5:00P MWF 223B-5 HL Instructor:
Numerical simulations of inertia-gravity waves and hydrostatic mountain waves using EULAG model Bogdan Rosa, Marcin Kurowski, Zbigniew Piotrowski and Michał.
© Fluent Inc. 11/24/2015J1 Fluids Review TRN Overview of CFD Solution Methodologies.
KoreaCAM-EULAG February 2008 Implementation of a Non-Hydrostatic, Adaptive-Grid Dynamics Core in the NCAR Community Atmospheric Model William J. Gutowski,
Toward all-scale simulation of moist atmospheric flows with soundproof equations Wojciech W. Grabowski 1, Marcin J. Kurowski 2, Zbigniew P. Piotrowski.
3D Spherical Shell Simulations of Rising Flux Tubes in the Solar Convective Envelope Yuhong Fan (HAO/NCAR) High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center.
Implementation of Grid Adaptation in CAM: Comparison of Dynamic Cores Babatunde J. Abiodun 1,2 William J. Gutowski 1, and Joseph M. Prusa 1,3 1 Iowa State.
Richard Rotunno National Center for Atmospheric Research, USA Dynamical Mesoscale Mountain Meteorology.
FREE CONVECTION 7.1 Introduction Solar collectors Pipes Ducts Electronic packages Walls and windows 7.2 Features and Parameters of Free Convection (1)
CIS/ME 794Y A Case Study in Computational Science & Engineering 2-D conservation of momentum (contd.) Or, in cartesian tensor notation, Where repeated.
FALL 2015 Esra Sorgüven Öner
Discretization Methods Chapter 2. Training Manual May 15, 2001 Inventory # Discretization Methods Topics Equations and The Goal Brief overview.
Discretization for PDEs Chunfang Chen,Danny Thorne Adam Zornes, Deng Li CS 521 Feb., 9,2006.
Bogdan Rosa 1, Marcin Kurowski 1 and Michał Ziemiański 1 1. Institute of Meteorology and Water Management (IMGW), Warsaw Podleśna, 61
Standardized Test Set for Nonhydrostatic Dynamical Cores of NWP Models
Sarthit Toolthaisong FREE CONVECTION. Sarthit Toolthaisong 7.2 Features and Parameters of Free Convection 1) Driving Force In general, two conditions.
Mass Coordinate WRF Dynamical Core - Eulerian geometric height coordinate (z) core (in framework, parallel, tested in idealized, NWP applications) - Eulerian.
Governing Equations II
Modeling orographic flows on unstructured meshes Piotr Smolarkiewicz, National Center for Atmospheric Research*, USA; Joanna Szmelter, Loughborough University,
Computational Modeling of 3D Turbulent Flows With MC2 Claude Pelletier Environment Canada MSC / MRB.
Time Integration Schemes Bill Skamarock NCAR/MMM 1.Canonical equations for scheme analyses. 2.Time-integration schemes used in NWP models.
1 On forward in time differencing: an unstructured mesh framework Joanna Szmelter Piotr Smolarkiewicz Loughborough University NCAR UK Colorado USA.
Modelling of Marine Systems. Shallow waters Equations.
ECMWF 2015 Slide 1 A hybrid all-scale finite-volume module for global NWP Piotr Smolarkiewicz, Willem Deconinck, Mats Hamrud, George Mozdzynski, Christian.
Computer Animation Rick Parent Computer Animation Algorithms and Techniques Computational Fluid Dynamics.
04, 2016, Reading Unified Framework for Discrete Integrations of Compressible and Soundproof PDEs of Atmospheric Dynamics.
GEM Student Tutorial: GGCM Modeling (MHD Backbone)
CE 3305 Engineering FLUID MECHANICS
© Fluent Inc. 1/10/2018L1 Fluids Review TRN Solution Methods.
Distributed Flow Routing
Perturbation equations for all-scale atmospheric dynamics
National Center for Atmospheric Research
Global simulations of MHD solar convection
EULAG-MHD: simulation of global solar dynamo
Low Order Methods for Simulation of Turbulence in Complex Geometries
Conservative Dynamical Core (CDC)
Presentation transcript:

NCAR ΔX O(10 -2 ) m O(10 2 ) m O(10 4 ) m O(10 7 ) m Cloud turbulence Gravity waves Global flows Solar convection Numerical merits of anelastic models Piotr K Smolarkiewicz*, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A. * The National Center for Atmospheric Research is supported by the National Science Foundation * The National Center for Atmospheric Research is supported by the National Science Foundation

NCAR Two options for integrating fluid PDEs with nonoscillatory forward-in-time Eulerian (control-volume wise) & semi Lagrangian (trajectory wise) model algorithms, but also Adams-Bashforth Eulerian scheme for basic dynamics Preconditioned non-symmetric Krylov-subspace elliptic solver, but also the pre-existing MUDPACK experience. Notably, for simple problems in Cartesian geometry, the elliptic solver is direct (viz. spectral preconditioner). Generalized time-dependent curvilinear coordinates for grid adaptivity to flow features and/or complex boundaries,but also the immersed-boundary method. PDEs of fluid dynamics (comments on nonhydrostacy ~ g, xy 2D incompressible Euler): Anelastic (incompressible Boussinesq, Ogura-Phillips, Lipps-Hemler, Bacmeister-Schoeberl, Durran) Compressible Boussinesq Incompressible Euler/Navier-Stokes’ (somewhat tricky) Fully compressible Euler/Navier-Stokes’ for high-speed flows (3 different formulations). Boussinesq ocean model, anelastic solar MHD model, a viscoelastic ``brain’’ model, porous media model, sand dunes, dust storma, etc. Physical packages: Moisture and precipitation (several options) and radiation Surface boundary layer ILES, LES, LES, DNS Analysis packages: momentum, energy, vorticitiy, turbulence and moisture budgets EULAG’s key options Supported (operational in demo codes) and “private” (hidden or available in some clones) Supported (operational in demo codes) and “private” (hidden or available in some clones)

NCAR Example of anelastic and compressible PDEs

NCAR Numerics related to the “geometry” of an archetype fluid PDE/ODE Lagrangian evolution equationEulerian conservation law Kinematic or thermodynamic variables, R the associated rhs  Either form is approximated to the second-order using a template algorithm:

NCAR Compensating first error term on the rhs is a responsibility of an FT advection scheme (e.g. MPDATA). The second error term depends on the implementation of an FT scheme Forward in time temporal discretization Second order Taylor sum expansion about =nΔt Temporal differencing for either anelastic or compressible PDEs, depending on definitions of G and Ψ

NCAR explicit/implicit rhs  system implicit with respect to all dependent variables. On grids co-located with respect to all prognostic variables, it can be inverted algebraically to produce an elliptic equation for pressure solenoidal velocitycontravariant velocity subject to the integrability condition Boundary conditions on Boundary value problem is solved using nonsymmetric Krylov subspace solver - a preconditioned generalized conjugate residual GCR(k) algorithm (Smolarkiewicz and Margolin, 1994; Smolarkiewicz et al., 2004) Imposed on implicit: all forcings are assumed to be unknown at n+1

NCAR

implicit, ~7.5 minutes of CPUexplicit, ~150 minutes of CPU

NCAR Implicit/explicit blending, e.g., MHD:

NCAR

Other examples include moist, Durran and compressible Euler equations. Designing principles are always the same:

NCAR A generalized mathematical framework for the implementation of deformable coordinates in a generic Eulerian/semi-Lagrangian format of nonoscillatory- forward-in-time (NFT) schemes Technical apparatus of the Riemannian Geometry must be applied judiciously, in order to arrive at an effective numerical model. Dynamic grid adaptivity Prusa & Sm., JCP 2003; Wedi & Sm., JCP 2004, Sm. & Prusa, IJNMF 2005 Diffeomorphic mapping Example: Continuous global mesh transformation (t,x,y,z) does not have to be Cartesian!

NCAR Example of free surface in anelastic model (Wedi & Sm., JCP,2004)

NCAR Example of IMB (Urban PBL, Smolarkiewicz et al. 2007, JCP) contours in cross section at z=10 mnormalized profiles at a location in the wake

NCAR

Toroidal component of B in the uppermost portion of the stable layer underlying the convective envelope at r/R≈0.7 