Www.unfccc.int UNFCCC secretariat Session 4 Meeting eligibility requirements First UNFCCC workshop on implementation of Article 6 projects under the Kyoto.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key provisions and institutional arrangements of the CDM Christine Zumkeller UNFCCC/Cooperative Mechanisms
Advertisements

NATIONAL SYSTEMS UNDER ARTICLE 5 OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL EC workshop on Quality Control and Quality Assurance of Greenhouse Gas Inventories and the Establishment.
The Monitoring Mechanism of greenhouse gas emissions from the European Community Hartmut Behrend European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels.
1 Workshop on inventories of greenhouse gas emissions from aviation and navigation May 2004, Copenhagen EU greenhouse gas emission trends and projections.
CDM – LULUCF Project Cycle Winrock International Sandra Brown Training Seminar for BioCarbon Fund Projects.
Registry system data exchange General design requirements Pre-sessional Consultations on Registries 19 October 2002 New Delhi, India UNFCCC secretariat.
Session 5 :E-PRTR (EU-ETS) QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSESSMENT Iksan van der Putte.
James Grabert Manager, Joint Implementation, UNFCCC secretariat Joint Implementation Overview & Status Kyoto Protocol and Carbon Market.
1 Andrew Howard UNFCCC secretariat International transaction log Roles and functions Intersessional consultations on.
1 Andrew Howard UNFCCC secretariat International transaction log Checks, public information and modalities Intersessional.
GRETA GREENHOUSE GAS REGISTRY FOR EMISSIONS TRADING ARRANGEMENTS Overview of the UNFCCC registries Workshop on China’s National administration and approval.
1 Andrew Howard UNFCCC secretariat Checks to be performed by the international transaction log Consultations on registry.
Draft Operational procedures for registry systems 09 November 2004 Bonn, Germany Technical Breakout Group.
Greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting under the UNFCCC process 5th session of the Joint Task Force on Environmental Indicators Geneva, 4-6 July 2012 Hinko Vincar,
Presentation title Workshop on the implications of the implementation of decisions 2/CMP.7 to 4/CMP.7 and 1/CMP.8 on the previous decisions on methodological.
Revision of key attributes and transitional measures relating to possible changes in the JI guidelines Wolfgang Seidel, Chair of the Joint Implementation.
1 Georg B ø rsting Chair of the JI Supervisory Committee Joint Implementation 1-3 April 2008 Bangkok, Thailand AWG-KP 5 In-session workshop on means to.
Swedish International Development Agency S ESSION 6 United Nations Environment Program Division of Technology Industry and Economy JI Joint Implementation.
Presentation title Overview of measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) for developing country Parties under the Climate Change Convention Asia Pacific.
1 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change UNFCCC press conference, Bonn, 20 November 2007 Kyoto Protocol “go-live”: data, policies, infrastructures.
1 Andrew Howard UNFCCC secretariat Registry systems and transaction types Consultations on registry systems prior to.
1 Andrew Howard UNFCCC secretariat Cooperation among administrators of registry systems Consultations on registry systems.
1 Andrew Howard UNFCCC secretariat Registry systems and the data exchange standards Intersessional consultations on registry.
National Inventory System in Finland Workshop on QC and QA of GHG Inventories and the Establishment of National Inventory Systems 2-3 September 2004, Copenhagen.
Accounting of Emissions and Assigned Amount under the Kyoto Protocol Clare Breidenich UNFCCC Consultant.
WMO UNEP INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE NATIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORIES PROGRAMME WMO UNEP IPCC Good Practice Guidance Simon Eggleston Technical.
1 Andrew Howard UNFCCC secretariat Progress in implementing the international transaction log Consultations on registry.
Data Exchange Standards for the interaction with the ITL 08 November 2004 Bonn, Germany Peggy Quarles Perrin Quarles Associates, Inc.
1 Andrew Howard Climate Change Secretariat Emissions trading and project-based mechanisms 1-3 April 2008 Bangkok, Thailand AWG-KP 5 In-session workshop.
CONTRACTING FOR CARBON Legal Framework for JI Projects under the Kyoto Protocol.
UNFCCC Information Event
Romania’s Reporting Activities under the UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol Mr. Vlad Trusca Head of Climate Change Unit, UNFCCC National Focal Point Ministry of.
1 Transaction log and the data exchange standards Introduction Pre-sessional consultations on registries 2 June 2003 Bonn, Germany Andrew Howard UNFCCC.
Data Exchange Standards in support of transaction processes 08 November 2004 Bonn, Germany Peggy Quarles Perrin Quarles Associates, Inc.
1 Andrew Howard UNFCCC secretariat International transaction log Transaction checks Intersessional consultations on registry.
Introduction of technical paper Funding adaptation in developing countries: extending the share of proceeds used to assist in meeting the costs of adaptation;
Joint implementation, eligibility and the Compliance Committee Andrew Howard, Reporting Data and Analysis Cam Carruthers, Legal Affairs Bonn, October 2007.
Options and Recommendations Pre-sessional consultations on registries June 2002, Bonn, Germany DEVELOPMENT OF A NATIONAL REGISTRY IN BULGARIA Options.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Monitoring, Reporting and Registries Pierre Boileau Greenhouse Gas Division Presentation for the Kyoto Mechanisms Seminar for the.
The African CDM Training Workshop and Preparatory UNFCCC COP9 Meeting Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, October 20 – 21, 2003 INSTITUTIONAL SET-UP FOR CDM Dr Youba.
Possible elements of the technical standards Pre-sessional consultations on registries Bonn, 2-3 June 2002 Andrew Howard UNFCCC secretariat
OPTIONS TO USE EXISTING INTERNATIONAL OFFSET PROGRAMS IN A DOMESTIC CONTEXT Case Study: The use of CDM in support of domestic offset schemes Sacramento,
Quality assurance / Quality control system for the Greek GHG emissions inventory Yannis Sarafidis, Elena Georgopoulou UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems.
Presentation title Current and emerging data needs of the global climate change regime - requirements/guidelines for data reporting - the review/verification.
COMPLIANCE. Importance Environmental integrity Credibility of the carbon market Transparency in actions of Parties.
Cooperative Mechanisms UNFCCC secretariat JI under UNFCCC - An overview -
Motoharu Yamazaki Project-based Mechanisms UNFCCC secretariat JI under UNFCCC - An overview -
UNFCCC secretariat Ruta Bubniene, Programme officer, Reporting and Review unit, Mitigation and Data Analysis programme Overview of the synthesis report.
CDM Project Cycle & Project Design Document Project Design Document First Extended & Regional Workshops CD4CDM Project Siem Reap, Cambodia March.
First UNFCCC Workshop on the implementation of JI projects under Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol Moscow, May, 2004 Proposal on procedures of registration.
European Commission: Environment Directorate General Slide: 1 Registry systems for the EU emissions trading scheme SBSTA pre-sessionals Bonn, Germany,
CDM Project Cycle LGED Bhaban, Dhaka 8 – 9 April 2008 Presented by Khandaker Mainuddin Fellow, BCAS.
Björn Zapfel UNFCCC secretariat JI section JI Track 2 Project Cycle Side event at COP/MOP 2: “JI Track 2 Project.
EU Study development of registries specifications IETA – Bonn SBSTA Laurent Segalen June 2003.
1 NATIONAL SYSTEMS UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems under Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Kyoto Protocol 11–12 April 2005 Wissenschaftszentrum, Bonn,
Compliance Issues – Kyoto Protocol ______________ M.J. Mace, FIELD Workshop for LDC Negotiators UNFCCC COP 11 and Kyoto Protocol COP/MOP November.
Canada’s CDM & JI Office First UNFCCC Workshop on the Implementation of Article 6 Projects Under the Kyoto Protocol May , 2004 Moscow, Russia Canadian.
1 Andrew Howard UNFCCC secretariat Cooperation among administrators Overview and evolution Intersessional consultations.
Introduction to the Project Cycle Jane Ebinger Senior Energy Specialist Sustainable Development Department The World Bank.
1 Andrew Howard UNFCCC secretariat Cooperation among administrators Structure and modalities Intersessional consultations.
Policy, normative base and experience of Kyoto Protocol implementation in Bulgaria and other Central European Countries Daniela Stoycheva Consultant emissions.
Introduction to registry systems
Jozsef Feiler, Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Future Generations.
Determinations / verifications under JI – Experience to date UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation Bonn, February 13 th, 2007 For the benefit.
Francisco Arango UNFCCC secretariat JI section Joint Implementation State of Play UNFCCC Technical Workshop on.
Eligibility issues and joint implementation
Issues in linking registries and the transaction log
The various tracks of JI…
Session 1 Guidelines for projects under Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol First UNFCCC workshop on implementation of Article 6 projects under the Kyoto Protocol.
Joint implementation and eligibility requirements
Presentation transcript:

UNFCCC secretariat Session 4 Meeting eligibility requirements First UNFCCC workshop on implementation of Article 6 projects under the Kyoto Protocol Moscow May 2004

Overview of presentation Eligibility requirements safeguard the integrity of the Kyoto Protocol JI projects and their credits the underlying carbon market Three linked questions to be examined here What do Annex B Parties require for JI eligibility? -regarding emissions -regarding assigned amounts How do JI credits fit into the targets of the Kyoto Protocol? How is the compliance of Parties with targets verified?

Crediting JI projects Conversion (“issuance”) of existing units of the host Party to emission reduction units (ERUs) based on the project ERUs are transferred to investing Party/entity ERUs may be used by Annex B Parties for compliance ERUs differ from CDM credits, which are newly generated units AAU RMU ERU for emission reducing projects for LULUCF projects

Compliance with Annex B targets Emissions side Assigned amount side Projected emissions Annex B assigned amount Final emissions LULUCF activities Mechanisms acquisitions <=><=>

Verifying compliance with the targets >=<>=< Emissions Secretariat compilation and accounting database Kyoto Protocol Compliance Committee Review, adjustment, compliance processes National systems Annex I Party systems Emissions inventories Reporting process National registries Assigned amount info Assigned amount

Eligibility requirements for JI a.Party to the Kyoto Protocol b.Assigned amount calculated c.National system in place for estimating emissions/removals d.National registry in place for tracking assigned amount e.Submission of most recent required emissions inventory f.Accurate accounting of assigned amount and submission of information Track 1 (full eligibility) a.Party to the Kyoto Protocol b.Assigned amount calculated d.National registry in place for tracking assigned amount Track 2

Issuance, transfer and acquisition All Annex B Parties may develop and run JI projects  eligibility relates to ERU issuance, transfer and acquisition Can issue, transfer and acquire ERUs  May verify the project and reductions by its own procedures Track 1 (full eligibility) No eligibilityCannot issue or transfer ERUs Track 2Can issue and transfer ERUs  only after verification of the project and reductions by the Article 6 Supervisory Committee

Reporting and review processes relating to eligibility

Key points on reporting/review procedures Determination of eligibility requirements is normal outcome of reporting, review and compliance procedures –All Annex I Parties report and are subject to review annually –All review reports considered by the Compliance Committee 2 phases -Initial reporting and review calculates and records assigned amount under 3.7 and 3.8 and determines eligibility -Ongoing (annual) reporting and review maintains or suspends eligibility during commitment period Compliance Committee makes determination of eligibility

Initial reporting and review Initial report and review is “to facilitate calculation of assigned amount and demonstrate capacity to account for emissions and assigned amount” GHG inventory  focus on base year (1990 or other) National system National registry Calculation of initial assigned amount under Articles 3.7/8 Calculation of commitment period reserve Selection of sinks activities under Article 3.3/4

Annual reporting and review Annual greenhouse gas inventory Annual assigned amount information Changes in the national registry Changes in national system Calculation of commitment period reserve Information recorded in the compilation and accounting database of the secretariat after review and consideration by Compliance Committee

Compliance Committee Facilitative Branch Considers questions related to reporting and accounting prior to commitment period Can provide advice, and facilitate financial and technical assistance Enforcement Branch Can apply adjustments to inventories Make corrections to Party’s accounting Suspend and reinstate eligibility to participate in mechanisms

Requirements relating to the emissions side

Key points on the emissions side Reliable inventories are fundamental for determining compliance of Parties with their Kyoto targets -calculation of assigned amount under Articles 3.7/8 -maintaining mechanisms eligibility -end of commitment period compliance test Difference between track 1 and 2 hinges on ongoing provision of annual inventory that meets requirements Initial inventory with full time-series is important for calculation of assigned amount under both track 1 and 2

National systems for estimating emissions Institutional, legal and procedural arrangements necessary to prepare national greenhouse gas inventory in accordance with 7.1 Single national entity Planning (define responsibilities, choice of methods and data) Preparation (Use of good practice, inventory estimation, documentation) Quality assurance and quality control procedures Archive inventory information Requirements are functional Flexibility for national circumstances Compliance depends on ability of system to produce reliable inventory

National GHG inventory requirements All gases and sources  LULUCF removals not required for base year Full geographic coverage Complete time-series  All years from base year (1990 or other) up to most recent available Use of methods that are consistent with IPCC methodologies and Good Practice Guidance Common Reporting Format  Standardized electronic reporting tables National inventory report  Description of methods used, data sources, etc.

Inventory adjustment procedure Identification of problem during individual review -Opportunity for Party to correct problem -Review team calculates and recommends adjustment based on technical guidance -Party has opportunity to accept or reject adjustment If Party does not accept adjustment, Enforcement Branch of Compliance Committee determines whether to apply it Adjustments can be removed later during commitment period if inventory problem is corrected -Not for base year, since initial assigned amount fixed

Inventory adjustments Intended to correct inventory problems for purpose of accounting for emissions and assigned amount Adjustments are conservative -Estimates adjusted downwards in base year -Upward for year of commitment period Applied only after Party has had opportunity to correct problems If adjustment applied, then adjusted estimate is recorded in compilation and accounting database Adjustments allow Party to remain in compliance with inventory and eligibility requirements in event of minor inventory problems

Recording assigned amount (Articles 3.7/8) Based on reviewed initial GHG inventory Assessment of consistency with the IPCC methodologies and Good Practice Guidance (GPG) Review of entire time-series Adjustments recommended to base year inventory if GPG not correctly applied Assigned amount recorded only after review and consideration by the Compliance Committee AA based on adjusted base year, if applied Once recorded, is fixed for entire commitment period

Failure to meet annual inventory requirements Decision on Article 7.1 of the Kyoto Protocol defines Complete annual inventory (both Common Reporting Format and National Inventory Report) not submitted within 6 weeks of due date Omission of large key source that accounts for 7% or more of annual emissions Total adjustments in any year greater than 7% of submitted inventory Sum of the total adjustments for any years of commitment period exceeds 20% of submitted emissions A key source that accounts for 2% or more of emissions is adjusted in three consecutive years

Requirements relating to the assigned amount side

Key points on the assigned amount side National registries to be established by all Annex B Parties Registries to interact with other registries and the transaction log Accurate accounting in accordance with Article 7.4 Reporting of additions and subtractions to assigned amount

What national registries have to do National registries established by Annex B Parties Electronic databases for tracking the -issuance and holdings of units -transfers of units under the mechanisms -replacement and cancellation of units -retirement of units for compliance purposes -carry-over of units to the next commitment period Accounts for governments and entities Independent transaction log established by the secretariat Checks transactions when they are proposed against rules Ensures the integrity of transactions before completion

National registry accounts Issuance of AAUs and RMUs Cancellation (not for compliance) Retirement (for compliance) Czech registry Party account Legal entity a/c Retirement a/c Cancellation a/c Replacement a/c Canadian registry Party account Legal entity a/c Retirement a/c Cancellation a/c Replacement a/c Transfers tCER ERU lCER CER RMUAAU

Registries, the ITL and STLs NR 2 NR 3 NR 4 CDM-RNR 1 Independent transaction log Communications hub Virtual private network Base checks Supplementary transaction log 1 Supple- mentary checks Supplementary transaction log 2

Sufficient harmonization International rules define Basic registry requirements (decision 19/CP.7)  Parties have significant scope to implement as they wish Basic data exchange standards (decision 24/CP.8)  Recognized that exact technical specifications are needed Detailed specifications of the data exchange standards Define how registries enact the mechanisms Being developed by the secretariat, with registry developers Version 1.0 to be completed by July 2004 To be enhanced through registry administrator cooperation

Data exchange standards Management of secure communications over the Internet Transaction and reconciliation sequences Serial numbers, account numbers and transaction numbers Transaction log response codes Message formats to ensure all communications can be read Processes for initializing registry activities with the ITL Change management procedures for the data exchange standards

Assigned amount info in reporting Annual electronic reporting Aggregate registry information on holdings and transactions LULUCF accounting under Article 3.3 (mandatory) LULUCF accounting under Article 3.4 (optional) Reporting at end of the commitment period Additions and subtractions to assigned amount Total retirement for compliance purpose Units available for carry-over the next commitment period Accurate accounting of additions and subtractions to assigned amount required for continued eligibility

In conclusion

Timing … when is it all to happen? Eligibility requirements for Annex B Parties are integral to the system to safeguard the integrity of the Kyoto Protocol Parties are to meet requirements for the following prior to 2007 (or one year after entry into force of the Protocol for the Party), National system GHG inventory Calculation of assigned amount under Articles 3.7/8 National registry Notification of Article 3.3/4 information Selection of Article 3.4 activities