The KOS spectra: a tentative typology of Knowledge Organization Systems Renato Rocha Souza Douglas Tudhope Maurício Barcellos Almeida 11 th ISKO International.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Institute for Atmospheric Pollution – Environmental Terminology Unit Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Environmental Thesaurus/Terminology Workshop UNEP.
Advertisements

1 Open Ontology Repository Planning Meeting for Ontology repositories: approaches, technologies, collaboration Ken Baclawski June 15, 2009.
University of Toronto Michael Gruninger University of Toronto, Canada Leo Obrst MITRE, McLean, VA, USA February 6, 2014February 6, 2014February 6, 2014.
ISO TC 37 Terminology and Other Language and Content Resources OntoIOp Telecon Sue Ellen Wright October 20,
Dr. Leo Obrst Information Semantics Command & Control Center July 17, 2007 Ontologies Can't Help Records Management Or Can They?
8th ISKO Spain conference León: April 2007 A new relationship for multidisciplinary knowledge organization systems: dependence Claudio Gnoli (University.
Knowledge Organization Research in the last two decades: Fidelia Ibekwe-SanJuanEric SanJuan.
Toward an International Sharing and Use of Subject Authority Data
Terminology Services Diane Vizine-Goetz Senior Research Scientist OCLC Research.
European Research Policy: from coordination and cooperation to integration and the ERA Dr. Maria Nedeva MIoIR, MBS. The University of Manchester EULAKS.
Consistent context scenarios: a new approach to ‘story and simulation’
Knowledge and the Geography Curriculum
BS 8723 advances to encompass interoperability Stella G Dextre Clarke Convenor, IDT/2/2 Working Group of BSI.
Applications of NKOS: some examples and questions Doug Tudhope Hypermedia Research Unit University of Glamorgan DC-2005 NKOS Special Session.
Alexandria Digital Library Project Integration of Knowledge Organization Systems into Digital Library Architectures Linda Hill, Olha Buchel, Greg Janée.
© 2011 TIBCO Software Inc. All Rights Reserved. Confidential and Proprietary. Towards a Model-Based Characterization of Data and Services Integration Paul.
Quo Vadis indexing? Skills in building taxonomies and controlled vocabularies for a transformed South Africa Gavin R Davis PhD DEPARTMENT OF LIBRARY AND.
KR-2002 Panel/Debate Are Upper-Level Ontologies worth the effort? Chris Welty, IBM Research.
C U L. OER definitions “... digitised materials offered freely and openly for educators, students and self-learners to use and.
Name ____________________ Date ___________ Period ____.
A Stepwise Modeling Approach for Individual Media Semantics Annett Mitschick, Klaus Meißner TU Dresden, Department of Computer Science, Multimedia Technology.
CS570 Artificial Intelligence Semantic Web & Ontology 2
IPY and Semantics Siri Jodha S. Khalsa Paul Cooper Peter Pulsifer Paul Overduin Eugeny Vyazilov Heather lane.
Basics of Knowledge Management ICOM5047 – Design Project in Computer Engineering ECE Department J. Fernando Vega Riveros, Ph.D.
Helping people find content … preparing content to be found Enabling the Semantic Web Joseph Busch.
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University1 metadata considerations for digital libraries.
Module 6a: Intro to Controlled Vocabularies, Taxonomies and Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2007 Michael Crandall.
Conceptual modelling. Overview - what is the aim of the article? ”We build conceptual models in our heads to solve problems in our everyday life”… ”By.
University of Toronto Michael Gruninger University of Toronto, Canada Leo Obrst MITRE, McLean, VA, USA July 15, 2015July 15, 2015July 15, 2015 Ontology.
Introduction to Bloom’s Taxonomy. The Idea Purpose ◦ Organize and classify educational goals ◦ Provide a systematized approach to course design Guided.
Some facets of knowledge management in mathematics Wolfram Sperber (Zentralblatt Math) Patrick Ion (Math Reviews) Facets of Knowledge Organization A tribute.
Developing facets in UDC for online retrieval Claudio Gnoli (University of Pavia) Aida Slavic (UDC Consortium) 8th NKOS Workshop, Corfu, 1 Oct 2009.
1/ 27 The Agriculture Ontology Service Initiative APAN Conference 20 July 2006 Singapore.
Teaching Metadata and Networked Information Organization & Retrieval The UNT SLIS Experience William E. Moen School of Library and Information Sciences.
Of 39 lecture 2: ontology - basics. of 39 ontology a branch of metaphysics relating to the nature and relations of being a particular theory about the.
A tentative typology of KOS: towards a KOS of KOS? Doug Tudhope Hypermedia Research Unit University of Glamorgan NKOS Workshop, ECDL, 2006.
INF 384 C, Spring 2009 Ontologies Knowledge representation to support computer reasoning.
Semantic Interoperability and Retrieval Paradigms Paradigms and conceptual systems in KO February 23, 2010 – February 26, 2010 Prof. Winfried Gödert Felix.
THE LEGACY OF FACETED CLASSIFICATION Brian Vickery and the Classification Research Group.
Nancy Lawler U.S. Department of Defense ISO/IEC Part 2: Classification Schemes Metadata Registries — Part 2: Classification Schemes The revision.
An Ontology-Based Approach for Sharing Digital Resources in Teacher Education 7 th International Workshop on Ontologies and Semantic Web for E-Learning.
The Agricultural Ontology Service (AOS) A Tool for Facilitating Access to Knowledge AGRIS/CARIS and Documentation Group Library and Documentation Systems.
updated CmpE 583 Fall 2008 Ontology Integration- 1 CmpE 583- Web Semantics: Theory and Practice ONTOLOGY INTEGRATION Atilla ELÇİ Computer.
Semantic Data & Ontologies CMPT 455/826 - Week 5, Day 2 Sept-Dec 2009 – w5d21.
A Context Model based on Ontological Languages: a Proposal for Information Visualization School of Informatics Castilla-La Mancha University Ramón Hervás.
ISKO 2010, Rome, Feb 2010 Workshop on Levels of reality as a KO paradigm Levels, types, facets: three structural principles for KO Claudio Gnoli.
10/24/09CK The Open Ontology Repository Initiative: Requirements and Research Challenges Ken Baclawski Todd Schneider.
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
Oreste Signore- Quality/1 Amman, December 2006 Standards for quality of cultural websites Ministerial NEtwoRk for Valorising Activities in digitisation.
Metadata Common Vocabulary a journey from a glossary to an ontology of statistical metadata, and back Sérgio Bacelar
Theme 2: Data & Models One of the central processes of science is the interplay between models and data Data informs model generation and selection Models.
Controlled Vocabulary & Thesaurus Design Course Introduction and Background.
6 th ECDL NKOS Workshop Organisers: Doug Tudhope Traugott Koch Marianne Lykke Nielsen NKOS Workshop, Budapest, 2007.
Metadata for OBJECTS or metadata for LEARNING? Tom Boyle Learning Technology Research Institute (LTRI) London Metropolitan University Metadata Workshop.
FSR, Feb 2014, Rome Which knowledge organization systems for conceptual interoperability? Claudio Gnoli ISKO Italy.
The Agricultural Ontology Server (AOS) A Tool for Facilitating Access to Knowledge AGRIS/CARIS and Documentation Group Food and Agriculture Organization.
Ontologies COMP6028 Semantic Web Technologies Dr Nicholas Gibbins
The teaching of KO in Higher Education DOES IT DO THE JOB? ROLES, SKILLS, FUTURE Sylvie Davies Robert Gordon University 14 th March.
UNIFIED MEDICAL LANGUAGE SYSTEMS (UMLS)
Information Organization
COMP6215 Semantic Web Technologies
TRSS Terminology Registry Scoping Study
Information Organization
ece 627 intelligent web: ontology and beyond
Kenneth Baclawski et. al. PSB /11/7 Sa-Im Shin
knowledge organization for a food secure world
From Knowledge Organization (KO) to Knowledge Representation (KR)
Diane Vizine-Goetz OCLC Research
Taxonomies and Classification for Organizing Content
Semantic Interoperability and Retrieval Paradigms
Presentation transcript:

The KOS spectra: a tentative typology of Knowledge Organization Systems Renato Rocha Souza Douglas Tudhope Maurício Barcellos Almeida 11 th ISKO International Conference Rome, 2010

The KOS spectra: a tentative typology of Knowledge Organization Systems 11 th ISKO International Conference Knowledge Representation: in the core of many scientific fields, but paramount in LIS Representational artifacts: known generically as Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) – Vary enormously in structure and display, but share some general (broad) characteristics; – Used for: Knowledge representation, organization and management; Information retrieval; Vocabulary control; Communication of concepts and ontological agreements; etc.

The KOS spectra: a tentative typology of Knowledge Organization Systems 11 th ISKO International Conference How to define a KOS?...encompass all types of schemes for organizing information and promoting knowledge management. (...) include classification and categorization schemes that organize materials at a general level, subject headings that provide more detailed access, and authority files that control variant versions of key information such as geographic names and personal names. (...) also include highly structured vocabularies, such as thesauri, and less traditional schemes, such as semantic networks and ontologies Hodge (2000) Very arbitrary concept. Our basic assumption: – Knowledge Representation structures used for KO, IR, and/or KM; Our main principle for classification – Structure as the main dimension to form hierarchies.

The KOS spectra: a tentative typology of Knowledge Organization Systems 11 th ISKO International Conference

The KOS spectra: a tentative typology of Knowledge Organization Systems 11 th ISKO International Conference How to classify KOS? And why should we? What dimensions can we use to evaluate them? Previous work: – Tend to focus on small subsets of KOS; – Only using one or two dimensions to compare them; – Great ambiguity on the dimensions meaning; – Treat KOS and representational languages alike; – Very machine-oriented, when it comes to semantics.

The KOS spectra: a tentative typology of Knowledge Organization Systems 11 th ISKO International Conference KOS Spectrum by Obrst (2004)

The KOS spectra: a tentative typology of Knowledge Organization Systems 11 th ISKO International Conference KOS Spectrum by Daconta et al (2005)

The KOS spectra: a tentative typology of Knowledge Organization Systems 11 th ISKO International Conference KOS Spectrum by Bergman (2007)

The KOS spectra: a tentative typology of Knowledge Organization Systems 11 th ISKO International Conference KOS Spectrum by Lassila e McGuiness (2001)

The KOS spectra: a tentative typology of Knowledge Organization Systems 11 th ISKO International Conference KOS Spectrum by Guarino (2006)

The KOS spectra: a tentative typology of Knowledge Organization Systems 11 th ISKO International Conference KOS Spectrum by Smith e Welty (2001)

The KOS spectra: a tentative typology of Knowledge Organization Systems 11 th ISKO International Conference KOS Spectrum by Zeng & Salaba (2005)

The KOS spectra: a tentative typology of Knowledge Organization Systems 11 th ISKO International Conference Hodge (2000) Structure and complexity, Relationship between terms, Historical function Soergel (2001a and 2001b) Purpose, Coverage of concepts and terms, Sources, Quality of usage analysis, Conceptual analysis and conceptual structure, Terminological analysis, Use of precombination in the index language, Access and display, Format of presentation of the vocabulary, Updating Tudhope (2004) Entities (types, coordination, size, depth), Relationships (types, expressiveness, formality), Typical application to objects in domain of interest (purpose), Relationship applying concepts to objects in domain Wright (2006 and 2008) Communities of Practice, Systematic resources, Non-systematic resources, Technology orientation, Degrees of indeterminacy, Language & knowledge-oriented standards, Standards bodies Almeida & Souza (2009) Representational power, Semantic Expressiveness, Intelligibility (for Humans), Formalization (machine oriented) Zeng & Salaba (2005) Language Control, Structural strength Bergman (2007) Semantic Strength, Time/Money Lassila & McGuiness (2001) Ontology Level Guarino (2006) Ontological Precision Smith & Welty (2001) Complexity Obrst (2004); Daconta et al (2005) Semantic Strength

The KOS spectra: a tentative typology of Knowledge Organization Systems 11 th ISKO International Conference

The KOS spectra: a tentative typology of Knowledge Organization Systems 11 th ISKO International Conference Key contributions: – Multidimensionality; – Integrated and coherent set of dimensions; – Intrinsic / extrinsic characteristics (KOS and Context); – Essential / accidental (KOS types/ KOS Instances). Previous (ambiguously used) dimensions (i.e. complexity, semantic, formality) are, in fact, emergent properties of the basic ones (i.e. entities, relationships, language) Collateral work: taxonomy of KOS and its dimensions.

The KOS spectra: a tentative typology of Knowledge Organization Systems 11 th ISKO International Conference Future (ongoing) work – Appreciation, feedback and enhancing the model; – Faceted (?) approach; – Represent as a Domain Ontology of KOS (populated with instances) An effort to take in account the richness of dimensions and its cross relationships; Also, a knowledge base that can be used for pedagogical and other practical purposes; Freely available online resource.

Thank you! Renato Rocha Souza Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil Visiting Fellow at the University of Glamorgan, UK Douglas Tudhope University of Glamorgan, UK Maurício Barcellos Almeida Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil