District Instruction Planning April 29, 2013 Wm Murphy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Principal Professional Development Mathematics KCAS June 13 and June 16, 2011 Analytical and Applied Sciences June/July
Career and College Readiness Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Assessment Literacy MODULE 1.
Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 1.
Common Core at CPS Scope and Sequence Implementation Plan
Lessons Learned on CCSS
Central Union High School District Board of Trustees Meeting April 16, 2013.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Transition To The Common Core Transforming Teaching & Learning Santa Clara County Office of Education August 27, 2012.
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Linda Nickel EPSB Project Specialist 1.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Alaska School Leaders Institute Moving Toward Implementation of Alaska’s ELA & Math Standards.
Louisiana Reading Association Update April 21, 2012.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
1 Curriculum and Instruction Report Pocantico Hills School February 28, 2005.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
COMMON CORE for SCHOOL COACHES Pat Fitzsimmons and Gail Taylor representing the VT DOE Common Core Team: Marty Gephart, CC Program Manager and MS/HS ELA.
Leaders with Leaders Summer Institute 2012 JH Rose High School July
Expeditionary Learning Elementary School Meeting June 10,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
State Role in Supporting Educators C HRIS M INNICH M AY 2012 | SCEE M EETING.
Montgomery County Public Schools, Maryland Middle School Reform in Montgomery County Public Schools Linda Ferrell Director Director Middle School Instruction.
Marietta Rives, DE Consultant, Co-Chair of Instruction & Assessment Team Jan Norgaard, AEA 13 Associate Director, Network Team Member Deb Johnsen, AEA.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Our Road to Success PIONEER SCHOOL DISTRICT. Student Demographics  Enrollment 734 students pre-K through 8 th  2.1% American Indian/Alaskan Native 
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
College Board EXCELerator Schools Site Visit Preparation.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
YOUR LOGO March 9, 2015 Lead Partner Mid Year Update Presentation – PPSD School Board.
Connecting the Dots PLC AfL DI Higher Order Thinking TLCP Multi- Literacies Arts Technology Inquiry BIP SEF SIP.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Parma City School District Professional Learning Model Committing to the Core Rethinking Mathematics & Literacy for the 21 st Century LITERACY COACHES.
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
CMC South Conference November 1, 2013 Sacramento City Unified School District Iris Taylor Mikila Fetzer Suzie Craig.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
CCSS Road Map: The goal of implementing the Common Core State Standards is to ensure that instruction in our schools is changing dramatically.
Bremerton School District ACT System. OVERVIEW OF THE INTER ACT IVE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT MODEL.
A Primer. What Are the Common Core State Standards? The Common Core State Standards identify what students need to know and be able to do in each grade.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Kent ISD Collaborative Five Year Transition Plan to the Common Core State Standards Collaboration + Communication = Success!
Instructional Leadership and the Iowa Core ELA Standards Great Prairie AEA Burlington: April 9, 2013 Ottumwa: April 16, 2013.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
A Guide for Professional Development Planning for Implementation of the CCSS November 2011 Updated February 2012
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
Proposed Areas of Focus & District Priority Board Meeting April 22, 2014 Kevin. L. O’Gorman, Chief Academic Officer Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
Getting Ready to Teach the New York State Common Core-aligned K-2 ELA Curriculum Introduction July 2013.
EARLY LEARNING & KINDERGARTEN STANDARDS ALIGNMENT: A CLEAR PATH TO SUCCESS THROUGH ALIGNED STANDARDS August 18, 2015.
Common Core State Standards Implications for Leadership Curriculum Leadership Council Networking Session.
Transition To The Common Core Transforming Teaching & Learning for Equity, Access, and Excellence Council of the Great City Schools October 17, 2012.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
PENFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: K-5 LITERACY CURRICULUM AUDIT Presented by: Dr. Marijo Pearson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction,
Transition to the Common Core Sequim School District.
A Strategy for Connecting Teachers, Iowa Core, & Changing Instruction IA ASCD Curriculum Academy April 2013 Kevin Vidergar Director of Teaching & Learning.
MISIC Regional Webinar
Shelton School District
Implementing Race to the Top
Bethel School District CCSS Plan
Presentation transcript:

District Instruction Planning April 29, 2013 Wm Murphy

District Network School Proportional Implementation Responsibility

District Network School Proportional Implementation Responsibility

District Instructional Focus Areas Common Core "What we teach" Quality Teaching & Learning "How we teach" Literacy "What/how we teach" Culture "What we believe"

District Instructional Focus Teams Common Core "What we teach"

6 Stages of Curricular Implementation Pre-awareness 2-3 years from implementation Materials and assessments aligned to state standards. Practice may be misaligned to state standards Build knowledge and excitement about the rationale for and format of CCSS Initiation 2-3 years from implementation Materials and assessments of varying degrees of alignment Create a strategic plan. Help make meaning/assuage fear.

7 Stages of Curricular Implementation Implementation 0-1 year from implementation Partial implementation transitioning to full implementation Evaluating progress and making necessary revisions to the strategic plan Readiness 1-2 years from implementation Assessments aligned to CCSS, materials continue transitioning to CCSS. Possible partial implementation. Focusing on program development/adoption and accessing the full range of assessment strategies Awareness 1-2 years from implementation Rigor of assessments shift/increase, possible materials transitioning to CCSS Identify, understand, and experiment with sig.instructional shifts in Math and ELA

Principals acting as lead learner and meaning maker This content is new to everyone. School leaders must help the community make the transition District acting as organizer of support - not yet an issue of compliance. Everyone in the system needs to appreciate this initiative for what it is, an opportunity to reform education. Teachers acting learners and experimenters Need opportunities to learn and process these expectations Not just a new scope and sequence. Recognize this as hard work, worth doing. 8 Build Capacity for Fall 2013

Look for people to go through the stages of awareness, application and experimentation, and ownership. 9 Stages of Capacity Building August 2012 January 2013

10 TARGETSUPPORT TREATMENT State Teacher Leaders We have identified 15 support treatments ranging from individual coaching to Common Core Green Belt Certification to provide every school with at least one teacher who is considered an expert in the new curriculum. Green Belt Certification – School Level Leading Educator Masters/Teacher Leader Cert State Toolkit Training - Lafayette State Toolkit Training 1– JP Specific Math Text Book Adoption training Toolkit Viewing party* K-2 Individual School Training – State * ANet & TFA Math and ELA Sessions* HS CCSS Roadshow OR K-8 Central Common Core 101 * Test Construction activity with Human Capital MDC/LDC – HS ELA and Math State Training* IB and AP training Mid. Grades Summer and LAP CCSS Training Coaching from the School Support Specialists JASON Science Training Investing in Educator Excellence

TARGETINITIATIVE Principals We have identified 12 support treatments targeting principals so that every school leader has the skills needed to not only coach teachers in the new curriculum but help engage them in change leadership. Black Belt Certification – School Leader State Toolkit Training - Lafayette State Toolkit Training – JP Specific Math Text Book Adoption training K-2 Individual School Training – State ANet & TFA Math and ELA Sessions HS CCSS Roadshow OR K-8 Central Common Core 101 COMPASS norming MDC/LDC – HS ELA and Math State Training* IB and AP training Mid. Grades Summer and LAP CCSS Training JASON Science Training 11 Investing in Educational Leadership

SAMPLE ACTIVITY State Teacher Leader (STL) Toolkit 1 (April 18 and 19) K-2 CCSS 101 – State School Site visits (various) High School CCSS Roadshow (various) 12 Phase 0 – Build Awareness (April – June) Phase 1 – Build Knowledge (May – July) SAMPLE ACTIVITY State Teacher Leader (STL) Toolkit 2 – June HS & MS MDC – Arizona – July 8-11

Phase 2 - SAMPLE ACTIVITY COMPASS norming – July STL – CCBlackBelt Training – August Phase 2 – Build Readiness (June – August) Phase 3 – Build Capacity (August – December) SAMPLE ACTIVITY STL – CCBlackBelt Training Ongoing STL - Leading Educators Fellows Ongoing Twice monthly centralized offered on COMPASS skills

14 Performance Evaluation * Represents average presentation value score on a four point scale for 7 sessions held thus far by central staff and state partners.

15 Performance Evaluation QuestionScore 1. Objectives of the training were clearly stated Objectives of the training were met Information can be applied in my work as both a teacher and a Teacher Leader Ideas and skills presented will enhance student learning/work performance Presentation was effectively delivered Materials were appropriate and useful Time was used effectively Questions and needs were addressed This training helped me acquire the intended knowledge and skills This training will integrate materials discussed in my work as a Teacher Leader.3.81