JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Advertisements

WASC Review: Whats happened so far. May 19, 2008 In-service.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Assessment Plans Discussion Career Services Julie Guevara, Accreditation & Assessment Officer February 6, 2006.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Student Learning Outcomes
- McKinsey & Co. Report Thought to ponder… “It’s a system thing, not a single thing.” -McKinsey & Co. Report.
NCCEA Annual Conference Waynesville, NC Assessment Basics: Implementing and Sustaining a Comprehensive, Outcomes-Based Assessment Plan October 19, 2006.
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Institutional Effectiveness & B-CU Dr. Helena Mariella-Walrond VP of Institutional Effectiveness Cory A. Potter Director of Assessment Academic.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Outcomes Assessment 101 Assessment Showcase 2009: Best Practices in the Assessment of Learning and Teaching February 11, 2009 Gwendolyn Johnson, Ph.D.
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
Helping Your Department Advance and Implement Effective Assessment Plans Presented by: Karen Froslid Jones Director, Institutional Research.
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration – Initiated in 2003 – Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
Strategic Planning Retreat for UWF Boards and Leadership Teams June 12, 2013 Charting the Future: Pursuing Our Vision.
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
Dr. Geri Cochran Director, Institutional Research, Assessment and Planning.
Hazlet Township Public Schools
NAVIGATING THE PROCESS OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES: DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND IMPROVEMENT Shannon M. Sexton, Julia M. Williams, & Timothy Chow Rose-Hulman.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Undergraduate Academic Assessment Plans: What’s New for Timothy S. Brophy, Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of.
Strategic Academic Visioning and Empowerment (SAVE) Final Report to UWF BOT December 2011.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Fall 2015 Professional Development Days C. Cruz-Johnson & R. Gamez August 28, Walking with Integrity Towards Student Success.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
Self-Study Report in Support of Reaffirmation of Accreditation Final Discussion and Approval Academic Senate Executive Committee June 13 and 20, 2011.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
1 Roles and Responsibilities of The Learning Evidence Team at CCRI Presented at CCRI Peggy Maki
Assessment & Program Review President’s Retreat 2008 College of Micronesia - FSM May 13 – 15, 2008 FSM China Friendship Sports Center.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT PLAN/REPORT By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Superintendent Formative Evaluation April 26, 2015.
CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Student Affairs Assessment Council October 2013 Dr. Barbara Copenhaver-Bailey Assistant Vice President for Student Success.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT DR. SHEMEKA MCCLUNG DIRECTOR ARNITRA HUNTER RESEARCH ASSOCIATE.
INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT DR. SHEMEKA MCCLUNG DIRECTOR ARNITRA HUNTER RESEARCH ASSOCIATE.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
February 21-22, 2018.
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING FY’17
NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT REPORTING FY’17
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT REPORTING FY’19
2010 NEASC Self-Study and Evaluation Visit
Presentation transcript:

JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research Planning and Assessment

Session Goals To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for annual completion. To understand submission processes of annual assessment plans and reports.

Agenda All About JSU Assessment-Definitions and Importance Assessment Process Annual Assessment Plan/Report Templates Components (when and why?) When and how to submit? Question and Answer Session

JSU MISSION AND VISION MISSION The University produces technologically-advanced, diverse, ethical, global leaders who think critically, address societal problems and compete effectively. VISION Building on its historic mission of empowering diverse students to become leaders, Jackson State University will become recognized as a challenging, yet nurturing, state-of-the-art technologically-infused intellectual community. Students and faculty will engage in creative research, participate in interdisciplinary and multi-institutional/ organizational collaborative learning teams and serve the global community.

University Priorities Priority 1: Review and restructure academic programs and budgets. Priority 2: Accelerate the integration of technology throughout the institution. Priority 3: Improve management and increase the size of JSU’s available resources. Priority 4: Enhance the image of JSU. Priority 5: Create a model learning and working environment for the entire JSU Family. These are priorities are to move JSU forward. What better way to start with assessment plans.

Super Goals 1: JSU will provide quality instruction to ensure our students are prepared for the 21st century for work, graduate, and professional schools. 2: JSU will create a marketing plan to increase presence in the Jackson Metro area, the state, the region as well as nationally and globally. Through this plan, we will communicate our mission and goals to our stakeholders. 3: JSU will improve its organizational efficiency for administration, faculty, and students. (Redesign the way we do business) 4: JSU will make strategic investments in people to ensure they achieve their best work. 5: JSU will grow the alumni donor base. (Diversification of Resources)

Assessment Reporting Planning and Reporting Create Goals/Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) Establish Means of Assessment & Criteria for Success Assess Performances Against Criteria Attain/Review Assessment Results Using Evaluation Results to Improve Services

Institutional Effectiveness/Assessment “..relates to a process of planning, collecting assessment data related to those plans on a annual basis, comparing this feedback with planned expectations (expected outcomes), recognizing and continuing successes, making corrections and improvements when indicated, and using the results in the next planning cycle

Assessment Goal Goal —To maintain a culture of assessment at Jackson State University in both academic and non-academic areas whereby improvements in organizational efficiency is observed for administration, faculty, staff, students, and other stakeholders.

What is Assessment? Assessment is defined as an ongoing process aimed at understanding and improving student learning. It involves making our expectations explicit and public; setting appropriate criteria and high standards for learning quality; systematically gathering, analyzing, and interpreting evidence to determine how well performance matches expectations and standards; and using the resulting information to document, explain, and improve performance. (Thomas A. Angelo, AAHE Bulletin, November 1995, p.7)

Why is Assessment Important? Goal Attainment Decision Making Accountability Accreditation—SACS 3.3 Institutional Effectiveness (The Institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves these outcomes, and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of the results. Improvement in Service STUDENT LEARNING

Assessment Time for IE Plans/Reports Phase I: Created an Educational Awareness of Institutional Effectiveness (IE)/Assessment university-wide Phase II: Modified the evaluation process of the IE/Assessment Plans using the existing Rubric Phase III: Completed the AY’15 IE/Assessment Plans (Due date is September 08, 2014) Phase IV: Assess the 2014-2015 IE/Assessment Plans will begin September 22, 2014 AY—academic year

Mission statement for accuracy Departmental Mission Mission statement for accuracy Describes the services of the College/Department Describes the existence

Assessment Plan and Report Student Learning Outcomes (SLO) Means of Assessment/Criteria for Success Data Collection/Results for Outcome Use of Results to Improve Instructional Programs for SLOs Major Difficulties Academic Goals for AY’16

Student Learning Outcomes Instructional Units - What do you want students to know, think or do when they have completed the program? -3-5 student learning outcomes (SLO’s) - Educational Program Outcomes - Student Achievement Outcomes - SLOs should be measurable - Reflect outcomes of the prescribed curriculum Educational program goal is to ensure that all students reach challenging academic standard that prepares them for the future. Ex. Student Achievement will be what the student accomplished after they have completed the program.

Means of Assessment Assessment Measures How will the success of the outcome be measured? Multiple Measures 2 per objective Use methods that evaluate more than one objective. Direct Measures (portfolios, papers, projects, internships, performances, standardized tests) Indirect Measures (surveys, focus groups, interviews, etc.)

Criteria for Success Success Criteria Standards of Success Define your goals and targets to reach for each goal Include dates for which objectives will be reached Written in anticipation of desired results

Data Collection Results Describe the process used to analyze and summarize results. Document your results! Does the data fail to meet, meets, or exceeds the criterion for success?

Use of Results to Improve Instructional Programs and Services Data Results should indicate steps to improve or revise assessment processes. Results > Criteria for Success Revise the assessment process to increase success criteria or assessing another outcome/aspect of outcome may be necessary. Results < Criteria for Success Specific improvements are necessary.

Submission Review Assessment Plans AY’15 - September 8, 2014 (Upload-via website) Peer Review of Assessment Plans (Assessment Committee Members ONLY) – September 22, 2014 Academic Units Feedback – October 27, 2014 Annual Reports AY’15 – May 11, 2015 (Upload-via website) Peer Review of Assessment Plans AY’16/Assessment Reports AY’15 - September/October/November 2015

ARNITRA HUNTER arnitra.r.hunter@jsums.edu 601-979-0203 CONTACT INFORMATION ARNITRA HUNTER arnitra.r.hunter@jsums.edu 601-979-0203