Doc.: IEEE 802.15-05/290r0 Submission May, 2005 Celestino A. Corral et al., FreescaleSlide 1 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /513r0 Submission November 2001 Anuj Batra, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /189r0 Submission July 2003 Ed Callaway, Motorola Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE xxx a Submission May 2005 Zafer Sahinoglu, Mitsubishi Electric Research Labs Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE a Submission June, 2005 Mc Laughlin, DecawaveSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /081r0 Submission January 2001 Shoemake, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc: IEEE /0360r0 Submission July 2004 K. Siwiak, TimeDerivative, Inc.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /341r0 Submission 12Sept2003 John R. Barr (Motorola) Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
June 2005 doc:IEEE b Slide 1 Submission Liang Li, Vinno Inc. Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Hitachi Cable.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [The relationship between DAC and TX LPF to satisfy the.
Doc.: IEEE /443r0 Submission October 2001 Anuj Batra, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission March 15, 2011 Steve Jillings, SemtechSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 2005 Jim Lansford, AlereonSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE c Submission May, 2008 NewLANSSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE /270 Submission July 2003 Liang Li, Helicomm Inc.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE a Submission April 2005 Welborn (Freescale) Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [TG3a Performance Considerations in UWB Multi-Band] Date.
Doc.: IEEE xxx a Submission November 2004 Welborn, FreescaleSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE a Submission November 2004 Welborn, FreescaleSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Submission July 2012 Soo-Young Chang (CSUS) Slide 1 doc.: IEEE m Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /081r0 Submission February 2004 McCorkle, MotorolaSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
May 2003 doc.: IEEE /141r3 September 2004
May 2003 doc.: IEEE /141r3 November, 2004
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 2003 doc.: IEEE /141r3 January 2004
<month year> doc: IEEE a April 2005
<month year> doc: IEEE c September 2005
Nov 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Impact of MB-OFDM and DS-UWB Interference on.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Spectral Properties of tg4a Signals]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 2003 doc.: IEEE /141r3 July, 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Ultra-Wideband.
Submission Title: [Multi-band OFDM Proposal References]
July 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [FCC-UWB-certifications-below-1-GHz] Date Submitted:
Submission Title: [TG3a Closing Report July 2005]
Submission Title: [Compromise Proposal] Date Submitted: [12Sept2004]
Submission Title: [Harmonizing-TG3a-PHY-Proposals-for-CSM]
1/2/2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Modulation Simulation Results] Date Submitted:
<month year> doc: IEEE a April 2005
Submission Title: [Spectral Properties of tg4a Signals]
May 2003 doc.: IEEE /141r3 May 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Rake Span.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Compromise Proposal] Date Submitted: [12Sept2004]
September g Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Recognition of Hiroshi.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 2003 doc.: IEEE /141r3 May, 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Ultra-Wideband.
Submission Title: [TG3a Closing Report September 2005]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [PC Closing Report] Date Submitted: [19 May 2005]
Submission Title: [Regulatory Update]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> doc: IEEE c November, 2005
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [TG3a Closing Report November 2005]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [TG3a Compromise Proposal]
Oct 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [ICI Analysis] Date Submitted: [4 Oct 2005]
June, 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [OFDM PHY Mode Representation] Date Submitted:
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
Submission Title: [Consolidation of Ranging Results]
January 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Band plan and PRF considerations] Date.
Oct 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [ICI Analysis] Date Submitted: [4 Oct 2005]
12/15/2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [AWGN Simulation Results] Date Submitted:
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /290r0 Submission May, 2005 Celestino A. Corral et al., FreescaleSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Ultra-Wideband Peak Power Limits] Date Submitted: [15 May, 2005] Source: [Celestino A. Corral, Shahriar Emami and Gregg Rasor] Company [Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.] Address [6100 Broken Sound Pkwy., N.W., Suite 1, Boca Raton, Florida USA 33487] Voice:[ ], FAX: [ ] Re: [Recent FCC Waiver] Abstract:[This document provides analytical and theoretical comparison of MB-OFDM and DS-UWB under peak power limited applications.] Purpose:[For discussion by IEEE TG3a.] Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release:The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P

doc.: IEEE /290r0 Submission May, 2005 Celestino A. Corral et al., FreescaleSlide 2 Ultra-Wideband Peak Power Limits Celestino A. Corral, Shahriar Emami and Gregg Rasor Freescale Semiconductor, Inc Broken Sound Parkway., N.W., Suite 1 Boca Raton, Florida USA May 17, 2005

doc.: IEEE /290r0 Submission May, 2005 Celestino A. Corral et al., FreescaleSlide 3 Motivation Goal: To provide a comparison between DS-UWB and MB- OFDM for peak-limited applications under the recent FCC waiver. Note: Recent FCC waiver is technology-neutral. Devices can be measured under normal operating conditions. These conditions can include hopping or gating. Approach: Consider DS-UWB and MB-OFDM waveforms under average- and peak-power measurements. Emphasis is on peak-to-average power ratio of waveforms. Additionally: Provide peak-power headroom levels for actual implementation considerations.

doc.: IEEE /290r0 Submission May, 2005 Celestino A. Corral et al., FreescaleSlide 4 Average Power Measurements Spectrum analyzers measure average value of the total signal power quantized within resolution bandwidth by making a fixed number of measurements and computing a corrected average figure of power density normalized to that bandwidth. Radiated Waveform

doc.: IEEE /290r0 Submission May, 2005 Celestino A. Corral et al., FreescaleSlide 5 Average Power Measurements Resolution bandwidth filter Block Diagram of Typical Spectrum Analyzer For FCC emission measurements, the resolution bandwidth is 1 MHz with 1 msec integration time for the RMS power and resulting EIRP. Resolution bandwidth is 50 MHz for peak power measurements.

doc.: IEEE /290r0 Submission May, 2005 Celestino A. Corral et al., FreescaleSlide 6 Gated Signals T Gating allows greater power transmissions over narrower time intervals. This power can be used to improve SNR, SIR or range. Limit is now peak power. gated signal ungated signal

doc.: IEEE /290r0 Submission May, 2005 Celestino A. Corral et al., FreescaleSlide 7 Peak Power Measurements key determinant for peak-power levels Minimize PAPR to achieve more headroom in peak power levels Peak power measurements actually made with spectrum analyzer on peak hold capturing over a long time period (several minutes). 50 MHz1 MHz

doc.: IEEE /290r0 Submission May, 2005 Celestino A. Corral et al., FreescaleSlide 8 Direct-Sequence UWB Sinusoidal carrier, PAPR = 3 dB Data spread by chipping code Upconverted to desired freq. Shaped by RRC filter with = 0.3. Spectral BW = 1.5 GHz. Waveform has 40% fractional bandwidth between 3.1 and 4.6 GHz and consequently good fading resilience ns data code4.1 GHz adjust RRC Filter

doc.: IEEE /290r0 Submission May, 2005 Celestino A. Corral et al., FreescaleSlide 9 What Spectrum Analyzer Measures 1 MHz Filter 50 MHz Filter DS-UWB Waveform Signal over air has 5.5 dB PAPR DS-UWB has 8.5 dB PAPR (ungated) in 50 MHz filter.

doc.: IEEE /290r0 Submission May, 2005 Celestino A. Corral et al., FreescaleSlide 10 Worst-Case PAPR of MB-OFDM Subcarrier spacing is MHz. In 50 MHz resolution bandwidth this corresponds to 12 subcarriers. Worst-case PAPR is 10log(12)=10.8 dB. Above occurs even if MB-OFDM waveform is clipped to 9 dB PAPR. If we consider that hopping contributes 5.8 dB additional PAPR for 3 hops, the total worst- case PAPR is 16.6 dB. As a result, we have about 7.7 dB headroom for MB-OFDM. 50 MHz

doc.: IEEE /290r0 Submission May, 2005 Celestino A. Corral et al., FreescaleSlide 11 How Often Does This Happen? QPSK Constellation 270 o 90 o 180 o 0o0o

doc.: IEEE /290r0 Submission May, 2005 Celestino A. Corral et al., FreescaleSlide 12 Impact of Filtering Operation Worst-Case OFDM Symbol 12 Subcarriers Filter Impulse Response (50 MHz) Output of Filter (Convolution) The filter impulse response is very narrow relative to the OFDM waveform, so convolution results in OFDM symbol and PAPR is conserved. pulse width Pulse width is about 8% of the length of OFDM symbol.

doc.: IEEE /290r0 Submission May, 2005 Celestino A. Corral et al., FreescaleSlide 13 What Spectrum Analyzer Measures 1 MHz Filter 50 MHz Filter Multi-Band OFDM Waveform Signal over air has 9 dB PAPR On average, peak power is dBm and PAPR is 15 dB. Worst-case PAPR is 16.6 dB and peak-power is -7.7 dBm.

doc.: IEEE /290r0 Submission May, 2005 Celestino A. Corral et al., FreescaleSlide 14 Summary of Results ParameterDS-UWBMB-OFDM PAPR at transmit pin3.0 dB9.0 dB PAPR over air after pulse shaping5.5 dB9.0 dB PAPR at output of 50 MHz filter8.5 dB16.6 dB Peak power in 50 MHz bandwidth-15.8 dBm-7.7 dBm Thus, DS-UWB has 8.1 dB more headroom than MB-OFDM. This can be employed to overcome cable losses, antenna losses, etc. DS-UWB has a net 15.8 dB headroom for exploiting gating.

doc.: IEEE /290r0 Submission May, 2005 Celestino A. Corral et al., FreescaleSlide 15 Conclusions DS-UWB is generated from a sinusoid having 3 dB peak-to- average that grows to 5.5 dB over air after pulse shaping. The PAPR of DS-UWB in the 50 MHz filter is 8.5 dB (ungated). Hence, DS-UWB has 8.1 dB more headroom than MB-OFDM for overcoming cable, filter and antenna losses. DS-UWB has 15.8 dB maximum headroom for transmission which can be exploited for gated signals. This corresponds to about 3% duty cycle. Multi-band OFDM, even if clipped to 9 dB peak-to-average over the air can still result in up to 16.6 dB PAPR in a 50 MHz resolution bandwidth. The 16.6 dB level is due to 10.8 dB of signal PAPR for 12 subcarriers captured and 5.8 dB PAPR due to duty cycle of 3-hop sequence.