IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: Initial Network Selection in WLAN Date Submitted: June, 2007 Presented at IEEE session in ETRI Authors or Source(s): Vivek Gupta, Stephen McCann, Dave Stephenson Abstract: This provides an update on initial Network Selection procedures/flow in network using services.

IEEE presentation release statements: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE Working Group. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEEs name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEEs sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE The contributor is familiar with IEEE patent policy, as outlined in Section 6.3 of the IEEE- SA Standards Board Operations Manual and in Understanding Patent Issues During IEEE Standards Development Section 6.3 of the IEEE- SA Standards Board Operations Manualhttp://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3

Comment 5583 in LB-1d Add this in Annex H8 in Draft D5.1: Network Selection in (WLAN) using :

MIH Protocol NAP Core Network Mobile Devices with WLAN local IS AAA Proxy IS AAA SSPN # IS AAA SSPN #2 SSPN: Subscription Service Provider Network MIH: Media Independent Handover IS: MIH Information Service NAP: Network Access Provider Internet Hotspot-2 Hotspot-1 MIH Protocol Network Selection in WLAN with & : Fig u

IS (home SSPN) IS (local Access Network) APSTA Pre-configuration Advertising protocol ID (APID) = IS Maximum acceptable length (LEN) for query responses Pre-configuration Beacon (Interworking IE, GAS:APID) Probe Request Probe Response (Interworking IE, GAS:APID) GAS initial request (request IE, APID) Query content (list of SSPNs?) Relay MIH frame (with query content) Transport method: (1) 802.3, (2) IP GAS Initial Response (Query ID, Dialog Token, comeback delay) MIH Response (transaction ID, answer information); may be delayed until answer is ready GAS Comeback Response (Query ID, answer information) GAS Comeback Request (Query ID) Comeback delay (optional – STA to PS mode) Use Case: Query SSPN List: Fig-2 Legend

Steps in Network Selection Fig-1 shows the general topology of an (WLAN) network operating with an IS. The steps in Network selection as shown in Fig-2 are as follows: 1) Pre-configuration: The AP is preconfigured with advertising protocol identifier (APID) of choice and is pre-configured to use MIIS. The AP may discover the MIIS through a variety of different mechanisms that are outside the scope of specification. The maximum length of response messages from MIIS is also set. The AP may communicate with MIIS at L2 or at L3 using a protocol defined elsewhere. 2) Discover AP/Access Network Capabilities: The AP sends out a beacon with Inter-working IE set and APID set to GAS (Generic Advertisement Service). The STA may discover access network capabilities by listening to beacons or it could also send a probe request and discover access network capabilities through the probe response. 3) Query list of SSPNs: The STA sends out a query asking for list of available SSPNs? The query is defined using an specific MIH frame. The MIH frame is then relayed by the AP to the MIIS. Meanwhile the AP sends out the initial GAS response to the STA with initial delay (comeback delay) 4) GAS response: The MIIS interprets the query and retrieves the response either from local or remote repository. It then packs the response in an appropriate MIH frame and sends it to the AP. Subsequently when the STA sends the GAS comeback request to the AP, the AP responds with the available information in the MIH frame. The STA then retrieves the information out of the MIH frame and obtains the answer to the query.

Backup

Questions and notes What is the AP-to-IS communication? –What is the protocol used? Is it direct L2 connection, MIPSHOP, RADIUS/DIAMETER, or something else entirely? Potential resolution: needs to create an IP-based transport protocol. –Is a query ID necessary to match STA query to IS responses? Potential resolution: AP assures that Transaction ID is unique on a per-STA basis for a reasonable time interval, and rewrites Transaction ID if necessary for uniqueness This works as a long as transactions are not integrity protected. There is no security in state 1, so this may not be a big drawback. Does the STA need to refrain from using integrity protection in state 1? How much interpretation does AP do of MIH requests? –If none, then will any claimed frame from STA be relayed to IS? –How much of the MIH packet does the AP need to understand? Query and response should be opaque. How much of the header is necessary?