Doc.: IEEE 802.15-05-0340-00-004a Submission June, 2005 Mc Laughlin, DecawaveSlide 1 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE i TG4i November 2010 James Gilb (self) Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE r0 Submission July 2010 John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /147r0 Submission March 2001 Stanley K. Ling, Intel Corporation Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /021r1 Submission December 2000 Jeyhan Karaoguz, Broadcom CorporationSlide 1 Project: IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE xxx a Submission May 2005 Zafer Sahinoglu, Mitsubishi Electric Research Labs Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE /081r0 Submission January 2001 Shoemake, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
June 2005 doc:IEEE b Slide 1 Submission Liang Li, Vinno Inc. Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Nov 2004 doc:IEEE b Slide 1 Submission Liang Li, WXZJ Inc. Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE b Submission April 2005 Liang Li, WXZJ Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /0200r0 Submission Jan 2008 Rick Roberts, IntelSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE g TG4g Presentation Dec 2010 Chin-Sean SumSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE Submission November 2013 Dotlic, Li, Hernandez, Miura (NICT), Verso, McLaughlin (Decawave) Project: IEEE P Working.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission May X Wang, YX Fu, J Shen Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE k Submission November, 2011, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Apr. 2007doc.: c Slide 1 Submission Chenyang Yang, BUAA Liang Li, Vinno Technologies Inc. Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE f Submission March 2011 Paul Gorday, Sunrise Micro DevicesSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /443r0 Submission October 2001 Anuj Batra, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE XXX g Submission May FX. Fu, J.ShenSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE g Submission March 15, 2011 Steve Jillings, SemtechSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE r3 Submission November 2004 Michael Mc Laughlin, decaWaveSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 2004 Michael Mc Laughlin, decaWaveSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE −05−0393−00−004a Submission July, 2005 Mc Laughlin, DecawaveSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc>
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc>
Submission Title: [Add name of submission]
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Scenarios for Usage Model Document.
Submission Title: [Spectral Properties of tg4a Signals]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
July 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [FCC-UWB-certifications-below-1-GHz] Date Submitted:
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
March 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Toumaz response to TG6 Call for Applications]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
Submission Title: [DecaWave UWB SFD Proposal]
November 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Schedule] Date Submitted: [18 July,
Submission Title: [Rate one over four code for TG4a]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Date Submitted: [26-Oct-2005]
Submission Title: [Spectral Properties of tg4a Signals]
Submission Title: [Codes for preamble and data]
Submission Title: [FEC Options summary for TG4a ]
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Rate 1/4 code for TG4a]
Date Submitted: [26-Oct-2005]
Submission Title: [Uniform bandplan for TG4a Modulation]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 June 2009
Submission Title: [Frame and packet structure in ]
November 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Simplified geometry for the usage model.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Pulse Compression for TG4a]
Submission Title: [Preamble structures for 4a]
Submission Title: [Pulse code proposal] Date Submitted: [June 2005]
Submission Title: [FEC Multipath performance for TG4a ]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution for FSK/GFSK Prior Comments]
Submission Title: [SFD comparison] Date Submitted: [18−July−2006]
Submission Title: [SFD comparison] Date Submitted: [18−July−2006]
Submission Title: [SFD comparison] Date Submitted: [18−July−2006]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
Project: IEEE Study Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
Submission Title: [Consolidation of Ranging Results]
Jan 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TeraHertz Closing Report Date Submitted: January.
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE a Submission June, 2005 Mc Laughlin, DecawaveSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Spreading sequences properties] Date Submitted: [7 June, 2005] Source: [Michael Mc Laughlin] Company [Decawave Ltd.] Address [25 Meadowfield, Sandyford, Dublin 18, Ireland] Voice:[ ], FAX: [Whats a FAX?], Re: [ a.] Abstract:[Discusses the desirable properties of spreading sequences] Purpose:[To promote discussion in a.] Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release:The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P

doc.: IEEE a Submission June, 2005 Mc Laughlin, DecawaveSlide 2 Spreading sequences: Desirable properties

doc.: IEEE a Submission June, 2005 Mc Laughlin, DecawaveSlide 3 Five KEY properties Sequence Length Pulse Repetition Frequency Autocorrelation properties –Periodic autocorrelation (Channel sounding) –Aperiodic autocorrelation (Data mode) Spectral peak to average ratio (SPAR) –FCC requirements Temporal peak to average ratio (TPAR) –Power supply requirements

doc.: IEEE a Submission June, 2005 Mc Laughlin, DecawaveSlide 4 Periodic Autocorrelation (1) For channel sounding, a repeated sequence is appropriate. => Periodic autocorrelation function is the important property for a channel sounding sequence Ipatov ternary sequences have perfect periodic autocorrelation. i.e. the periodic autocorrelation function is a single pulse at one sample period and zero everywhere else. m-sequences have ideal periodic autocorrelation, i.e. their autocorrelation function is N (the sequence length) at one sample period and -1 everywhere else.

doc.: IEEE a Submission June, 2005 Mc Laughlin, DecawaveSlide 5 Periodic Autocorrelation (2) This means that the output of a correlator operating on repeated Ipatov Transmitted sequences is EXACTLY, the channel impulse repeated, plus noise. The output of a correlator operating on a repeated m-sequence is CLOSE TO the channel impulse response + noise.

doc.: IEEE a Submission June, 2005 Mc Laughlin, DecawaveSlide 6 Example Correlator Outputs

doc.: IEEE a Submission June, 2005 Mc Laughlin, DecawaveSlide 7 Aperiodic Autocorrelation For transmitting data, aperiodic autocorrelation function (AACF) is appropriate. –Previous and next sequences may not be the same. –Good AACF means low ISI –Golay Merit Factor (GMF) is a common measure of goodness of AACF. (Golay 1977)

doc.: IEEE a Submission June, 2005 Mc Laughlin, DecawaveSlide 8 Golay Merit Factor GMF is defined as where ac is the aperiodic auto correlation function of a length n sequence The average GMF of binary sequences is 1.0 Best known GMF for binary sequences is for the Barker 13 sequence, next is 12.1 for the Barker 11 sequence. GMF greater than 6 is rare

doc.: IEEE a Submission June, 2005 Mc Laughlin, DecawaveSlide 9 Spectral Peak to Average ratio (SPAR) In absence of ITU recommendations, use the FCC requirements. Spectrum measured in 1MHz frequency bins for 1ms intervals. Need Low SPAR. SPAR in dBs converts to power backoff required.

doc.: IEEE a Submission June, 2005 Mc Laughlin, DecawaveSlide 10 Temporal Peak to Average Ratio Need low TPAR, otherwise need high voltage power supply. Best GMF (Infinite) is a single impulse. Implulse has 0dB SPAR TPAR of Impulse is worst Need to balance sequence length and PRF to get a good SPAR and a good TPAR.

doc.: IEEE a Submission June, 2005 Mc Laughlin, DecawaveSlide 11 Example sequences One of the Ipatov length 57 sequences: –GMF is 3.75 A Length 63 m sequence : –GMF is 3.52 Both of these sequences, if transmitted repeatedly back to back, have a completely flat spectrum Can be used for data because good periodic ACF means GMF is also quite good. –Still, it could be better. Ipatov sequences are available at the following lengths: 7,13,21,31,57,73,91,133,183,273,307,381,553,651,757,871,99 3,1057,1407,1723

doc.: IEEE a Submission June, 2005 Mc Laughlin, DecawaveSlide 12 Sequence length and PRF If sequence is repeated, spectral lines spaced at the 1/sequence length apart. Want these to be < 1MHz apart for FCC compliance and low SPAR Needs to be longer than Channel Impulse Response –e.g. CM8 has significant energy to ~850ns. For a 1000ns duration sequence, a length 553 Ipatov requires ~10 times lower TPAR than length 57, but ~10 times larger PRF.

doc.: IEEE a Submission June, 2005 Mc Laughlin, DecawaveSlide 13 TG4a CM8 Magnitudes