Barbara Sims, Co-Director National SISEP Center FPG Child Development Center University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Greensboro.NC March 20, 2013 Implementation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementation Science overview
Advertisements

SISEP Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai
Barbara Sims Dean Fixsen Karen Blase Caryn Ward National SISEP Center National Implementation Research Network FPG Child Development Center University.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
The Council of Chief State School Officers State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE) February 14, 2012 Implementing Your Educator Effectiveness.
A Quick Look at Implementation Science Mary Louise Peters Technical Assistance Specialist National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase Ph.D., Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University.
Building Implementation Capacity to Improve Youth Outcomes Allison Metz, Ph.D. Associate Director National Implementation Research Network University of.
Planning for Success: Using Implementation Data to Action Plan for Full and Sustained Implementation Barbara Sims Caryn Ward National SISEP Center National.
Welcome Oregon Scaling-up EBISS Coaching Makes a Difference Expanding and Refining the Coaches Role Oregon 1.
April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.
Iowa Support System for Schools and Districts in Need of Assistance Phase III: Design AEA 267 SINA Process Se.
Continuing QIAT Conversations Planning For Success Joan Breslin Larson Third webinar in a series of three follow up webinars for.
Striving for Quality Using continuous improvement strategies to increase program quality, implementation fidelity and durability Steve Goodman Director.
Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill University of Oregon University of Connecticut Scaling.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Stages of Commitment to Change: Leading Institutional Engagement Lorilee R. Sandmann, University of Georgia Jeri Childers, Virginia Tech National Outreach.
Allison Metz, Ph.D., Karen Blase, Ph.D., Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D., Rob Horner, Ph.D., George Sugai, Ph.D. Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.
No, Not the Drivers Again! (Or, RTI is a Journey Not a Destination)
Building Capacity with Implementation Drivers
V Implementing and Sustaining Effective Programs and Services that Promote the Social-Emotional Development of Young Children Part I Karen Blase, Barbara.
SectionVideo/PresentSlidesTotal Time Overview + Useable Intervention8:30 min Stages7:19 min Teams PDSA Terri present Drivers8:50 min Lessons Learned +
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Karen A. Blase, PhD & Allison Metz, PhD Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill Terms of Reference:
MiBLSi Systems of Support for Training October 9,
Improving Outcomes for All Students: Bringing Evidence-Based Practices to Scale March 25, 2009 MN RtI Center Conference Cammy Lehr, Ph.D. EBP & Implementation.
Michelle A. Duda, Barbara Sims, Dean L. Fixsen, Karen A. Blase, National Implementation Research Network FPG Child Development Institute University of.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
Critical Elements Effective teaching Alignment of curriculum and instruction to standards Instructional program coherence Fidelity of implementation Evaluation.
EngageNY.org ©2012 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Barbara Sims Brenda Melcher Dean Fixsen Karen Blase Michelle Duda Washington, D.C. July 2013 Keep Dancing After the Music Stops OSEP Project Directors’
Scaling Up in Illinois Integrated System for Student Achievement (ISSA)
Systemic Improvement:
Barbara Sims Dean L. Fixsen Karen A. Blase Michelle A. Duda
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase Ph.D., Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University.
Scaling Up Improved Education Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase, Ph.D. University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill Rob Horner, Ph.D. University of.
: The National Center at EDC
© 2015 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. &
State Scaling-up Workgroup March 6, SWG Agenda 9:00 Welcome & Introductions 9:15 Review Agenda/TIPS Meeting Form 9:20 Purpose of the Scaling-Up.
Welcome To Implementation Science 8 Part Webinar Series Kathleen Ryan Jackson Erin Chaparro, Ph.D University of Oregon.
© 2014 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Barbara Sims Debbie Egan Dean L. Fixsen Karen A. Blase Michelle A. Duda Using Implementation Frameworks to Identify Evidence Based Practices 2011 PBIS.
Circe Stumbo, West Wind Education Policy Inc. and CCSSO CCSSO/SCEE National Summit on Educator Effectiveness April 10, 2013 Implementation Science: Closing.
Min.cenmi.org Michigan Implementation Network Michigan Implementation Network 15 WAYS TO IMPROVE YOUR INNOVATION.
State Implementation and Scaling up of Evidence-based Practices U.S. Department of Education July 2010 Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D., Karen A. Blase, Ph.D. Michelle.
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE OVERVIEW. CONTEXT & RATIONALE.
Understanding Implementation and Leadership in School Mental Health.
Michelle A. Duda Barbara Sims Dean L. Fixsen Karen A. Blase October 2, 2012 Making It Happen With Active Implementation Frameworks: Implementation Drivers.
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION: EXPLORATION
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION: INSTALLATION
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
Translating Aspiration to Operation: Developing Active Implementation Capacity and Infrastructure W. Oscar Fleming; MSPH Tuesday, September 29 th 2:30-4:00pm.
Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION: FULL IMPLEMENTATION
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION: FULL IMPLEMENTATION
RDQ 5 District Coaching Capacity Discussion Leader: George Sugai, University of Connecticut.
Outcomes Identify three categories of coaching activities needed to develop competence List the components of a Coaching Service Delivery Plan Define the.
An Introduction to Implementation Tools to Help Build Implementation Capacity SPDG Evaluators May 2012 Michelle A. Duda, Dean L. Fixsen,
State Scaling-up Workgroup
Selection Practices & Communication
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Zelphine Smith-Dixon, State Director of Special Education
CEEDAR-IRIS Cross State Convening
February 21-22, 2018.
Installation Stage and Implementation Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Barbara Sims, Co-Director National SISEP Center FPG Child Development Center University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Greensboro.NC March 20, 2013 Implementation Teams: Getting the Work Done NC SIP Spring Networking Meeting

IMPLEMENTATION TEAMS Organized, expert assistance to develop and sustain an accountable and effective structure

Impl. TeamNO Impl. Team Effective Making it Happen IMPLEMENTATION INTERVENTION 80%, 3 Yrs 14%, 17 Yrs Balas & Boren, 2000 Green & Seifert, 2005 Fixsen, Blase, Timbers, & Wolf, 2001 Letting it Happen Helping it Happen Implementation Teams

Who Makes Change Happen? Invest in the development of implementation capacity and expanded, diversified leadership  Vendors vs. Implementation Teams  Linked Teaming Structures  Adaptive Problem Solving Units Implementation Teams

“We tend to focus on snapshots of isolated parts of the system and wonder why our deepest problems never seem to get solved.” —Senge, 1990 Linked Team Structures Implementation Teams School-based Implementation Team School-based Implementation Team District-based Implementation Team District-based Implementation Team Regionally-based Implementation Team State-based Implementation Team State-based Implementation Team

Provide Implementation Support  Focus is on  Quality, integration, sustainability of Drivers  Data-based decision-making  Problem-solving and analytical engagement  Purposeful adaptation and planned supports  Alignment and Sustainability  Provide accountable structure to move intervention through stages of implementation for any initiative Implementation Teams

Essential Functions Team Structure Intervention Implementation Improvement Cycles System Change Implementation Teams Implementation Teams know and apply:

Building Capacity to Lead Building capacity requires more than just forming Implementation Teams…There needs to a be new way of…  Organizing to address complex problems  Talking about issues  Making decisions  Relating to one another Implementation Teams

Forming the Team Selection Criteria Stakeholders vs. Implementation Team Interviews Existing staff working intentionally Moving from “hand picked” to specific criteria Frustration as a motivator Requisite variety Duplication of skill sets Implementation Teams

Initial Team Functioning Clear understanding of the mission (or reason) for the work  Important enough to warrant the effort required to develop effective and sustainable implementation infrastructure Clear relationship between the identified intervention and overall mission Clear definition of the critical components and operationalization of the intervention Implementation Teams

Intervention Training Develop Intervention Training Plan  Implementation team members as initial trainers  If outside experts are used you need to assess »Innovation Fluency »Use of Training Best Practices »Data from people they have ‘trained’ Implementation Teams

Intervention Training Plan Aspects requiring new knowledge Description Purpose Supporting data Examples Critical components Key behaviors Implementation Teams

Intervention Training Plan Identify what will be taught by whom Duration of each topic Aspects requiring new skills  Behavior rehearsals  Identify and prepare behavior rehearsal leaders and confederates Implementation Teams

Intervention Training Plan Prioritize training topics Develop order of training and assessment Identify (or develop) fidelity measures  Direct observation  Interviews/surveys  Records reviews Implementation Teams

Fidelity Assessment Immediately after initial training Usability testing approach  Rapid cycle problem solving  Designed to build skills of team members »Assessment process »Training »Intervention Implementation Teams

Coaching Plan Initial coaching may be done by Implementation Team members  Team members who know the innovation  Team members who know how to coach Initial topics result from:  Debriefing  Weekly observations  Usability testing Implementation Teams

Coaching Plan Weekly Implementation Team meetings Develop selection criteria for coaches Coaches as pivot point  PDSA to identify »Skill deficiencies »Time and opportunity barriers »Systems issues Implementation Teams

Indicators of Success Indicators Essential Functions Representative, Accountable Terms of Reference, Communication Protocols Develop Team Structure Demonstrate fluency in strategy Operationalize Interventions when needed Know and apply the Intervention Develop infrastructure Conduct Stage-appropriate work Know and apply Implementation Institutionalize communication cycles Use data for decision making, problem solving and communication cycles Know and apply Improvement Cycles Demonstrate knowledge of system components and skills for system building Know and apply Systems Change Implementation Teams

Build capacity to do what? Essential Functions Representative, Accountable MOU, Communication Protocols Develop Team Structure Demonstrate fluency in strategy Operationalize Interventions when needed Know and apply the Intervention Develop infrastructure Conduct Stage-appropriate Work Know and apply Implementation Institutionalize feedback loops Use data for decision making, problem solving and feedback loops Know and apply Improvement Cycles Demonstrate knowledge of system components and skills for system building Know and apply Systems Change Implementation Teams RESULTS …can effect change throughout the system and make decisions …can promote implementation of core components, adaptations, and infrastructure …can guide implementation and build capacity throughout the organization and system …can address challenges and do action planning …can improve access, reach or scale, connection, and influence decision-making

©Copyright Dean Fixsen and Karen Blase This content is licensed under Creative Commons license CC BY- NC-ND, Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs. You are free to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work under the following conditions: Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work); Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes; No Derivative Works — You may not alter or transform this work. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder.

Get Connected! For more on Implementation Science