Understanding and Preventing Cognitive Errors in Healthcare Marjorie Stiegler, M.D. Department of Anesthesiology University of North Carolina at Chapel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marriage of Professional and Technical Tasks: A Strategy to Improve Informed Consent Susan Steinemann, MD, Daniel Furoy, BA, Frederick Yost, MD, Nancy.
Advertisements

Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence on Diagnostic Tests Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for.
Wisconsin Department of Health Services Richard Miller Research Scientist Wisconsin Office of Health Informatics October 28, 2014 Matching Traffic Crash.
Decision Making Decisive: How To Make Better Choices in Life and Work Chip Heath and Dan Heath, Crown Business, 2013.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT October 3, 2013 Dr. V. Antao MD, CCFP FCFP, MHSc, Dr. G. Mand MBBS, CCFP, Dr. J. McCabe, MD, CCFP, Dr. Yves Talbot and Dr. Yee-Ling.
Reducing Diagnostic Error Tim Shoen, MD Campaign for Quality October 17, 2014.
Errors in the diagnostic process Hierarchy of Qualities in Medicine Frequency of diagnostic Errors Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases The.
Dual Process and Cognitive Bias in Clinical Decision Making
Decision making Satisficing is a decision-making strategy that entails searching through the evidence and available alternatives until an acceptability.
Biases and debiasing Pat Croskerry MD, PhD
1 Patient – Doctor Communications Shlomo Mizrahi Rutgers University.
Clinical Policy / Practice Guideline Development Andy Jagoda, MD, FACEP Professor of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine New York, New York.
Division of Biomedical Informatics Beyond Interoperability: What Ontology Can Do for the EHR William R. Hogan, MD, MS July 30 th, 2011 International Conference.
Overview of Medical Decision Making HINF Medical Methodologies Session 2.
Diagnosing – Critical Activity HINF Medical Methodologies Session 7.
Computer-Assisted Decision Making in the Twenty-First Century James J. Cimino, M.D. Departments of Medical Informatics and Medicine Columbia University.
Clinical decision making Carl Thompson UK, Centre for Evidence Based Nursing Editor, Evidence Based Nursing
Simplification Tactics Dr. Saeed Shiry Amirkabir University of Technology Computer Engineering & Information Technology Department.
Practicing Evidence Based Medicine
2025: 20% doctor included? an exercise in technology speculation & musings vinod
421 MDS Course Course Director: Dr Asmaa Faden Faden Course Contributors: Prof. A AlDosari.
1 Debra Thornton Clinical Librarian, Royal Preston Hospital James Allen Assistant Librarian, Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport A Journal Club for Librarians.
Slide 1 © Crown copyright 2009 Talk for learning Session 3.
Dr.F Eslamipour DDS.MS Orthodontist Associated professor Department of Oral Public Health Isfahan University of Medical Science.
How to Read Systematic Reviews : An Approach For The Clinician Part (1) Akbar Soltani. MD,MS, Endocrinologist Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS)
Medical Error Jeff Plant MD FRCPC June 27, Outline Importance of the issue Why are we prone? Personal error Systemic error Dealing with error Where.
My role Being part of the core MAGIC team for primary care Imbedding shared decision making into the culture of the surgery Writing patient decision aids(PDAs)
Health Profession Education for Patient Safety” Blink or Think? Pat Croskerry MD, PhD The Safety Competencies Enhancing Patient Safety Across the Health.
Component 2: The Culture of Health Care Unit 9: Sociotechnical Aspects: Clinicians and Technology Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health.
Developing learner competency in the clinical environment GRACE Session 3 GRACE Program.
Expertise Novices and experts Expertise and perception Expertise and memory Expertise and judgment Expertise and domain-specificity.
Evidence-Based Medicine Presentation [Insert your name here] [Insert your designation here] [Insert your institutional affiliation here] Department of.
What Happens After Medical Graduation? Knowledge of best current pneumonia care Years in medical school graduation.
Teaching Problem Solving Skills Doris Young Professor of General Practice University of Melbourne.
Introduction For best practice, clinicians must make numerous decisions during the therapeutic process Clinical reasoning: “ Complex multi-faceted cognitive.
TEACH ON THE RUN! SESSION 3: HELPING LEARNERS THINK! DIAGNOSTIC REASONING Created by Dr. Leslie Ann Sadownik.
Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US Lecture a This material (Comp1_Unit9a) was developed.
Promoting higher order thinking and reasoning University of BC Faculty of Medicine Department of Family Practice Post Graduate Program.
Thinking Twice Fast Cognition, Slow Cognition, and the Challenge of Critical Thinking.
Why Study Implementation? Health Care Organizations from the Inside-Out Why Study Implementation? Health Care Organizations from the Inside-Out Laura Schmidt,
Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US Lecture b This material (Comp1_Unit9b) was developed.
The Diagnostic Process A BRIEF OVERVIEW diagnostic process What is it? to figure out to problem solve method scheme.
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :呂宥達 Date : 2005/10/27.
1 DECISION MAKING Suppose your patient (from the Brazilian rainforest) has tested positive for a rare but serious disease. Treatment exists but is risky.
Structuring Clinical Decisions NUR 603 Dr. Julie Sebastian.
421 MDS Course Course Director: Dr Asmaa Faden Faden Co-Course Director: Dr Sally ElHaddad.
Clinical Reasoning. Clinical Reasoning in Differential Diagnosis Experts use 3 main methods or a combination:  Analytic or Hypothetico-deductive  Non-analytic.
Complex Cognitive Processes
WHAT DO JUNIOR DOCTORS KNOW ABOUT INCIDENT REPORTING? – A SURVEY BASED AUDIT Dr E Mathew FY1 Mr R McCulloch Audit & Project Lead – Mr A. Marsh Russell’s.
Conference on Medical Thinking University College London June 23, 2006 Medical Thinking: What Should We Do? Edward H. Shortliffe, MD, PhD Department of.
Diagnostic errors in medical education: Where wrongs can make rights Kevin W. Eva Centre for Health Education Scholarship University of British Columbia.
Dawn Dowding PhD RN VNSNY Professor of Nursing
Poster Title Researchers’/Presenters’ Names Institution/Organization/Company Isolating Red Flags to Enhance Diagnosis (iRED): An Experimental Vignette.
Reflection Win May.
Human error A. H. Mehrparvar, MD Occupational Medicine department
Chris Feddock, MD, MS Andrew Hoellein, MD, MS
CITE THIS CONTENT: PETER YARBROUGH, “DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS”, ACCELERATE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH CURRICULUM, SEPTEMBER 14, AVAILABLE AT: 
Kevin W. Eva Department of Medicine
Failure Taxonomies Bruce Thomadsen University of Wisconsin and
Making the Most of Your Life
Expert Medical Opinion Program
Dawn Dowding PhD RN VNSNY Professor of Nursing
Expert Medical Opinion Program
(A) The right precordial leads V1 to V3 in a chest pain patient ultimately diagnosed with AMI. (B) Additional posterior leads V8 and V9 reveal STE, confirming.
A study of two UK hospitals found that 11% of admitted patients experienced adverse events of which 48% of these events were most likely preventable.
Expert Medical Opinion Program
Cost-effectiveness acceptability frontier for three risk-assessment strategies related to pressure-injury prevention best practices from a US societal.
Top alleged medical error named in claims where the patient expired (Physician Insurers Association of America (PIAA) Data Sharing Project Data 1985–2009,
Excess mortality risk associated with weekend admission per diagnosis related group may exhibit different temporal patterns depending on whether the cause.
Expert Medical Opinion Program
Presentation transcript:

Understanding and Preventing Cognitive Errors in Healthcare Marjorie Stiegler, M.D. Department of Anesthesiology University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Safety Experts Agree Most errors are “thinking mistakes” Decision-making is key in up to 80% of medical errors Cognitive errors may be the #1 contributor to missed diagnoses and patient injury

Insufficient knowledge Insufficient practice Technical slips Novel diagnoses “Cognitive Errors” are not:

Making mistakes even though you “know better” Being influenced, often subconsciously, by non-rational or non-statistical decision factors Cognitive Errors are:

“Cognitive Errors” result from many processes:

There are many biases and subconscious phenomena

“Whatever falsehoods each of us believes are necessarily invisible to us. We can be wrong, or we can know it, but we can’t do both at the same time.” - Kathryn Schulz Error Blindness

Diagnostic – For any diagnosis, consider at least three plausible alternatives Therapeutic – Never repeat a maneuver for a third time without considering alternatives Stiegler MP, Ruskin KJ. Curr Opin Anaesth Counterbalancing Strategy: “Rule of Three”

Universal antidote: “Could this be something else?” Practice “worst case” medicine Prospective hindsight Test to exclude alternatives, not just confirm suspicions Graber BMJ Qual Saf 2012 Counterbalancing Strategies

Well known and ubiquitous human nature tendency Might prevent clinicians from using counterbalancing strategies or cognitive aids for decision support We recommend automatic use of decision support strategies, whether or not clinicians feel confident in their diagnoses and plans Berner ES, Graber ML. Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. Am J Med 2008;121:Suppl:S2-S23 Overconfidence

Trust experience and familiarity, but do not base diagnoses on these senses alone Use decision support tools such as counterbalancing strategies, cognitive aids, and deliberate engagement with Type II analysis Eva KW, et al. Teaching from the clinical reasoning literature: combined reasoning strategies help novice diagnosticians overcome misleading information. Med Educ 2007;41:1152–8. Encourage Combined Reasoning

NOTE: Errors may be made at any point, including at the point of pattern recognition. This underscores the need to use decision support as an automatic matter of course, rather than only when unsure. Also, it emphasizes the need to engage in analytical thinking and calibration. From: Stiegler MP, Tung A: Cognitive processes in anesthesiology decision making. Anesthesiology 2014; 120: