Erasmus Project Reports (Interim and Final)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BUDGETING Training Unit 13.2 Principles and financial rules of mobility.
Advertisements

Characteristics of projects in EU research programmes
1 Financial Procedures in FP7 Projects Reporting and Audits Karolina Lis Research Assistant DCU, Finance Office
FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS AND CLOSURE OF THE FINANCIAL BUDGET Antonio Meloni Valentina Orlandi INGV, Roma.
Support and Inclusion of students with disabilities at higher education institutions in Montenegro – Procedure for collecting valid documentations.
European Commission DG for Fisheries and Maritime Affairs Research & scientific analysis SSP Kick-off meeting The 6 th Framework Programme
Contractors’ Day, June 2008 to the Framework Partnership Agreement & the Specific Grant Agreement Financial Guidelines for co-ordinators and co-partners.
Sustainable Energy Systems Overview of contractual obligations, procedures and practical matters KICK-OFF MEETING.
Not legally binding FP7 Rules for Participation and Grant agreement FP7 Helpdesk 
Financial Aspects EQUADE KICK-OFF MEETING. EU - REGULATIONS SPECIAL CONDITIONS Financing the Action (Article I.4) - Annex II – Estimated budget - Maximum.
Vilte Gridasova, Alina Ivanovaite Project Meeting 3 Cyprus Sep 2007 FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE INTERIM REPORT.
LIFE Platform meeting Denmark 2008 Tommy Sejersen, Financial Desks EC DG ENV – LIFE Unit Telephone
Large Scale Projects Aleksejs Šaforostovs LSP Project Manager Joint Technical Secretariat.
KA2 – Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of good practices Capacity Building in the field of Higher Education (CBHE) Application and selection.
ESPON 2013 Programme 3 rd Financial Managers Seminar Brussels 19 May 2010.
JERICO KICK OFF MEETINGPARIS – Maison de la recherche - 24 & 25 May 2011 JERICO PROJECT The contract management Overview By Dominique Guéguen / Ifremer.
SOCRATES PROGRAMME ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCIAL HANDBOOK FOR BENEFICIARIES Selection 2005.
Reporting requirements (2)
Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.
DAPHNE II Programme An investigation into forms of peer-peer bullying at school in pre-adolescent and adolescent groups: new instruments and preventing.
NOV-3733-SL-9715 Carbones KOM - May 10-11, 2010 – Toulouse, France 1 KICK-OFF MEETING May 10-11, 2010.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
LINKED Administrative & Finance overview18/03/2010 LINKED Leveraging Innovation for a Network of Knowledge on Education LIFE LONG LEARNING PROGRAMME LLP.
Operational and Financial aspects Part 1 Gilles GERVAIS and Misia COGHLAN Project Advisors Brussels, 23rd January 2012.
ELESA Project “Financial and administrative Management” Jan Neyens Finance & Project administration.
Project Closure Guidelines Riga, Legal framework 2 EC Regulation 1828/2006 § 8, 9: Explanatory plaque, billboard, emblem of the EU, reference to.
Mónika HOLIK Head of Unit: Erasmus, Jean Monnet Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.
Basic principles of FP7 Grant Agreement Financial management and reporting.
1 Workshop Reporting on activities and outcomes Tempus project representatives’ meeting Antwerp 6-7 December 2010.
PATCH-WORLd PArenTs and CHildren Working, ORganising and Learning together 23/24 October 2009 Sofia Final Conference This project has been funded with.
1 SOCRATES PROGRAMME TN Projects 2004 & 2005 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook Maryline Fiaschi, 13/02/2006.
SOTERIA Reporting May 30, 2011 K.U.Leuven Research & Development Myriam Witvrouw.
School Leadership Toolkit for Accelerating Achievement London 17 th November 2014.
Leonardo da Vinci Partnerships: an opportunity to work together Italian National Agency for LLP - Leonardo da Vinci Sectoral Programme.
Financial Management MW-Sonet 16 th – 19 th of March 2011, Turkey.
Narrative reporting: good practices. Joint Technical Secretariat Seminar for Beneficiaries February 2012 Narva, Estonia.
ADMINISTRATIVE & FINANCIAL ISSUES DG ECHO HUMANITARIAN AID AND CIVIL PROTECTION Finance, Legal Affairs and Partner Support unit-C3.
Financial reporting Linda Wormö, MA Per Dahlström, MA 1st October,2015 Kuopio, Finland.
TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Tajikistan, 18 November 2011 Alba-Chiara Tiberi, Project Officer EACEA TEMPUS IV- FIFTH CALL FOR.
Technical Assistance Office SOCRATES / Lingua 1 and 2 Information seminar for co-ordinators of successful pre-proposals Carla Donda 28 January 2005.
Technical Assistance Office 1 SOCRATES - MINERVA GRANT AGREEMENT 2004 Kick-Off Meeting, Brussels 22 October 2004.
Participation and dissemination Rules and Contracts FP6.
Project Management Birutė Markevičiūtė Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 13 October 2008, Riga.
Grant contract and annexes Training for Auditors Estonia/Latvia/Russia ENPI CBC Programme Riga, Tartu, April 2012.
Reporting and payment claims Black Sea Basin ENPI CBC Programme Training for Grant Beneficiaries and Partners Bucharest 18 June 2014 Financial Unit.
Reporting requirements - contractual and financial issues NGO Kick-off meeting Lorenzina Bruno, Senior Financial Officer Manuel Montero Ramírez, Project.
OBSERVAL CONTRACT 25/01/2008 2/10/ Summary 2/10/ Agreement & its annexes First pre-financing payment Progress report 2 nd pre-financing payment.
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the.
Technical Assistance Office 1 SOCRATES - MINERVA GRANT AGREEMENT 2004 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook.
Technical Assistance Office 1 Contract, Reports and errors to avoid! GRANT AGREEMENT 2005 Comenius coordinators’ meeting, 17/10/2005 Maryline Fiaschi,
Technical Assistance Office TCP Projects 2005 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook Prepared by IA, 14/12/2001 SOCRATES.
1. TEMPUS PROGRAMME PROJECT REPRESENTATIVES’ MEETING Brussels, March 2010 Management of the Grant Agreement.
DG Justice and Consumers Project Management Some points of attention JUST/2014/JCOO/AG/CRIM and JUST/2014/JCOO/AG/CIVI Kick-off meeting 26 January2016.
Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Priština in K. Mitrovica Administrative Issues (from the guidelines) – Siniša ILIĆ – Belgrade, The School.
Erasmus+ Capacity Building projects in the field of Higher Education Call 2015 CONTRACTUAL MANAGEMENT OF THE GRANT Project Representatives Meeting 18 February.
MATcHES Project Ruse, February 26, 2014 Nohelia Morales Martínez Project number: TEMPUS BG-TEMPUS-JPHES This project has been funded with.
- Special Education Needs (SEN) Network Administrative and Financial Aspects.
FUSE TEMPUS Project Coordination Meeting Belgrade University, 27 and 28 November, 2014 INTERMEDIATE REPORT (IR) PREPARATION (+ Statement of the Costs Incurred.
EU - China 11 Guidelines for Applicants rules for applications European Union Delegation to China & Mongolia Beijing Information Session 14 th November.
Management of the Grant Agreement By Philippe Ruffio & Nathalie Hoste-Luxen Tempus project representatives’ meeting Brussels December 2011.
1 FP6 – Financial Management and Reporting 1 April 2006 Sofia, Bulgaria.
The LIFE Programme: the EU funding tool for the Environment and Climate Action Lorenzina Bruno, Senior Financial Officer EASME – C.1.6 LIFE NGO Kick-off.
WP8 Project management Milan Gocić University of Niš
Third PMC meeting University of Priština, Kosovska Mitrovica
By Lillian Irene Stormo, HiB
Participation and dissemination Rules
Administrative and financial management, monitoring and reporting
Financial management of DBBT project
Technical and Financial Reporting
Action Kick-off Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Erasmus Project Reports (Interim and Final) Katia DE SOUSA, Project Adviser Guido DI FIORE, Financial Coordinator

Overview of the presentation Purpose, structure and requirements Assessment of the reports Common strenghts and weaknesses Financial reporting requirements Checks and audits

Purpose of the reports For the Agency's benefit and use For the benefit of the entire project consortium Measure the state of progress Adopt solutions to improve certain aspects Improve visibility in the consortium and in the wider community Reinforce the dissemination strategy For the Agency's benefit and use Monitoring by the Agency through external expertise Decision on evaluation – next payment Identification of good practices or projects needing following up Feedback to the Commission for policy-making

Reporting period Projects selected in 2010 CONTRACTUAL DATES Length of eligibility period Event Deadline   24 months Starting period of eligibility 1/10/2010 End date of period of eligibility 30/09/2012 Submission of the progress report 31/10/2011 Submission of the final report 30/11/2012 36 months 30/09/2013 30/04/2012 30/11/2013 *For projects with other eligibility periods, please consult your grant agreement

Reporting period Projects selected in 2011 CONTRACTUAL DATES Length of eligibility period Event Deadline   12 months Starting period of eligibility 1/10/2011 End date of period of eligibility 30/09/2012 Submission of the final report 30/11/2012 24 months 30/09/2013 Submission of the progress report 31/10/2012 30/11/2013 36 months 30/09/2014 30/04/2013 30/11/2014 *For projects with other eligibility periods, please consult your grant agreement

Structure of the reports Public part (including executive summary) Project objective Project Approach Outcomes and Results Partnership Plans for the future Contribution to EU Policies Confidential part Declaration Page Concrete Outcome / Results / Products Implementation of the work plan / tasks Impact Involvement of partners Involvement of Staff Management Aspects Dissemination and Exploitation Annexe 1 – Financial reporting Table Number of copies to be sent: 1 original and 2 copies on CD or USB key

Progress and Final reports Progress reports Monitoring after which corrective measures can still be applied Allows stocktaking of the project’s achievements up to date – stop and think! Coincides with the project’s turning point from preparatory stages to implementation Allows evaluation of how the project corresponds to original objectives and is responding to implementation realities Allows to EVALUATE and DO dissemination (public Part) Final reports Final is final! Prove that the contractual obligations have been fulfilled Present project’s results for accountability (both parts) and dissemination purposes (Public part) Prove that hopefully products/results are able “to live their own life” – are valid, relevant , meet quality standards and/or are transferrable to other areas/fields of higher education

Processing the reports Submission to the Agency: report must reach the Agency not later than the date appearing on the contract Eligibility check (e.g. signed by the Legal Representative, all requested documentation provided) Analysis of the Report: by external experts (peer review) Request for supplementary information on content or financial matters if necessary Decision and feedback on the report to the beneficiary including recommendations from the Agency

7 assessment criteria – not only results but also process Objectives, results, products Are results/outcomes available Are they in accordance with aims as in original application Coherence between workplan and activities carried out to date Are activities in accordance with the project’s work plan of the original application Have variations been justified Partnership Are all partners involved Do all of them contribute to the project Are there any changes in partnership Project management Mechanisms used for effective monitoring Are decision making and problem solving adequate Internal communication strategy (video conferencing, etc..) Financial management Are expenditures in line with project’s activities Evaluation and QA How evaluation strategy is being implemented (internal & and external) How recommendations of the PR and monitoring have been implemented Dissemination What is the quality of dissemination activities do they start from the beginning How the issue of exploitation of project’s results is addressed

Common strengths and weaknesses 1. Needs analysis not prominent; 2. over ambitious work programmes; 3. underestimated accreditation; 4. Impact too vague; 5. inability to get rid of “project speak” in web and dissemination information; 6. Standard and loosely targeted dissemination activities ; 7. Staff costs cat. 1 Weaknesses: 1. balanced leadership of work packages; 2. partners used according to their competences; 3. clear added value (countries languages, curricula, cross sector cooperation); 4. specific and tangible progress indicators; 5. in some cases well developed and targeted web-site Strengths:

Impact of scoring – Final report Final Assessment Corresponding reduction in eligible staff costs within the final Community contribution Grade Rating Very Good 10 0% 9 Good 8 7 Acceptable 6 5 Weak 4 25% 3 50% Very Weak 2 75% 1 85% A second expert opinion will be asked before reducing the eligible staff costs.

Progress report and 2nd pre-financing (1) Projects lasting up to 18 months: - No progress report, no 2nd pre-financing. 24 month duration projects: - Progress report but no 2nd pre-financing. - Payment arrangement 70% - 30%. 36 month duration projects: - Progress report and 2nd pre-financing if at least 70% of 1st pre-financing payment is reported/spent (if less than 70% of the 1st pre-financing payment is reported/spent, the 2nd pre-financing is reduced by the unspent part of the 1st pre-financing). - Payment arrangement 40% - 40% -20%.

Progress report and 2nd pre-financing (2) Example: Grant: 100.000 € (40% - 40% - 20%) 1st pre-financing: 40.000 € (70% of 1st pre-financing = 28.000 €) Total expenditure reported in progress report: 26.000 € (< 28.000 €) Not spent from 1st pre-financing: 40.000 € - 26.000 € = 14.000 € 2nd pre-financing (max 40%) = 40.000 € - 14.000 € = 26.000 € If expenditure reported were 29.000 €, 2nd pre-financing = 40.000 €

Progress report and 2nd pre-financing (3) Approval of the Progress report does not imply a confirmation of the eligibility of expenditures declared in the financial reporting tables at the end of the project. A complete financial analysis on the eligibility of the expenditures declared will be made at the Final Report stage only. Comments following the analysis of the financial reporting table (annexed to the approval letter of your progress report) must be taken into consideration for the final implementation and final reporting of your project.

Final report - Financial analysis (1) Covers full eligibility period Deadline for submission: end of eligibility period + 2 months Report all actual expenses (even if they exceed the ceiling) and revenues (costs must be incurred during the eligibility period but can be paid after but before submission of the final report) Use EACEA excel financial reporting 2010/2011 templates. Only provide supporting documents upon request by the Agency staff or in the framework of an audit.

Final report – Financial analysis (2) Total expenditures = total revenues (i.e. sources of financing) Any ineligible cost will be deducted from the total amount of expenditures reported, in order to calculate the total eligible costs of the project (max 10% equipment, 30% subcontracting, 7% indirect costs will be based on this latter amount) Bank interests generated (bank statements should allow clear calculation) on pre-financing payment(s) must be declared if pre-financing exceeded 50.000 EUR. Interests will be deducted from the final grant Queries or objections must be submitted not later than 60 days after receipt of the closure letter of the final payment or pre-information letter of a recovery order.

Calculation of the final grant The final grant is determined as follows: Declared expenditures from the Excel financial reporting table LESS Ineligible costs found during the financial analysis EQUAL Eligible costs of the project Final grant = Eligible costs of the project X percentage of EU co-financing stated in the agreement Calculated Final grant is the lowest of 3 ceilings: Eligible expenditures x EU co-financing percentage Maximum EU contribution amount (agreement) Final grant cannot result in any profit (non profit rule) Calculated final grant > pre-financing payment(s)  FINAL PAYMENT Calculated final grant < pre-financing payment(s)  RECOVERY ORDER

Checks and audits (1) The coordinator undertakes to provide any detailed information requested by the Agency or by any other outside body authorised by the Agency. In case of a multi-beneficiary agreement a co-beneficiary can also be asked directly to do so The beneficiaries shall keep at the Agency’s disposal all original documents (or, in exceptional and duly justified cases, certified copies of original documents), accounting and tax records relating to the agreement for a period of 5 years from the date of payment of the balance/debit note The beneficiaries agree that the Agency or the Commission may have an audit of the use made of the grant carried out either directly by its own staff or by any other outside body authorised to do so on its behalf The beneficiaries undertakes to allow Agency or the Commission the appropriate right of access to sites and premises where the action is carried out and to all information

Checks and audits (2) Project are selected either based on a risk analysis made by the Agency or chosen randomly, for a check or an (ex-post) audit An ex-post audit can result in an (additional) recovery order (even if a final balance payment was made by the Agency) The European Anti Fraud Office (OLAF) may also carry out on the spot checks and inspections

Original documents to be kept (examples only: please refer also to Handbooks 2010/2011) Staff costs: pay slips and time sheets, employment contracts; Travel and subsistence: (e-)tickets, (e-)boarding pass, minutes of meetings, travel agency invoices, signed receipts by travelling staff receiving an allowance; Equipment costs: invoices, proof that procurement rules were complied with; Subcontracting costs: invoices, proof that procurement rules were complied with (invitation to submit an offer, offers received, minutes of evaluation/selection of the best offer); Other costs: invoices.

Time sheet minimum requirements Time sheets  to document the number of working days x person Title and reference number of the EU project For each staff member working on the EU project Minimum on a monthly basis Mention the hours and project activities spent on the EU project Signed by the staff member and by an authorised person Dated

CONTACTS María Luisa GARCIA MINGUEZ (coordination) EACEA-ERA-MULTILATERAL@ec.europa.eu Gilles GERVAIS, Natalia RIESGO, Alba PRIETO GONZALEZ, Misia COGHLAN, Mireia FABREGA-IGLESIAS, José MATOS MARTINS, Magalie SOENENS EACEA-ERA-NETWORKS@ec.europa.eu Katia DE SOUSA EACEA-ERA-ACCOMPANYING@ec.europa.eu Natalia RIESGO 22