The National Environmental Agency of Georgia L. Megrelidze, N. Kutaladze, Kh. Kokosadze NWP Local Area Models’ Failure in Simulation of Eastern Invasion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to data assimilation in meteorology Pierre Brousseau, Ludovic Auger ATMO 08,Alghero, september 2008.
Advertisements

A NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF LOCAL ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES A.V.Starchenko Tomsk State University.
The Problem of Parameterization in Numerical Models METEO 6030 Xuanli Li University of Utah Department of Meteorology Spring 2005.
Jaekwan Shim, Yoon-Jeong Hwang, Yeon-Hee Kim, Kwan-Young Chung Forecast Research Division, National Institute of Meteorological Research, KMA The Experiments.
Atmospheric Boundary Layer evening transitions: a comparison between two experimental sites (CIBA-Spain and BLLAST-France) M. Sastre (1), C. Yagüe (1),
5/18/2015 Prediction of the 10 July 2004 Beijing Flood with a High- Resolution NWP model Ying-Hwa Kuo 1 and Yingchun Wang 2 1. National Center for Atmospheric.
Aspects of 6 June 2007: A Null “Moderate Risk” of Severe Weather Jonathan Kurtz Department of Geosciences University of Nebraska at Lincoln NOAA/NWS Omaha/Valley,
NOAA/NWS Change to WRF 13 June What’s Happening? WRF replaces the eta as the NAM –NAM is the North American Mesoscale “timeslot” or “Model Run”
Dynamical Downscaling of CCSM Using WRF Yang Gao 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yun-Fat Lam 1, John Drake 1, Kate Evans 2 1 University of Tennessee, USA 2 Oak Ridge.
Recent performance statistics for AMPS real-time forecasts Kevin W. Manning – National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR Earth System Laboratory Mesoscale.
The Effect of the Terrain on Monsoon Convection in the Himalayan Region Socorro Medina 1, Robert Houze 1, Anil Kumar 2,3 and Dev Niyogi 3 Conference on.
Nesting. Eta Model Hybrid and Eta Coordinates ground MSL ground Pressure domain Sigma domain  = 0  = 1  = 1 Ptop  = 0.
Rapid Update Cycle Model William Sachman and Steven Earle ESC452 - Spring 2006.
Update of A Rapid Prototyping Capability Experiment to Evaluate CrIS / ATMS Observations for a Mesoscale Weather Event Valentine G. Anantharaj Xingang.
Island Effects on Mei-Yu Jet/Front Systems and Rainfall Distribution during TIMREX IOP#3 Yi-Leng Chen and Chuan-Chi Tu Department of Meteorology SOEST,
Huang et al: MTG-IRS OSSEMMT, June MTG-IRS OSSE on regional scales Xiang-Yu Huang, Hongli Wang, Yongsheng Chen and Xin Zhang National Center.
The Puget Sound Regional Environmental Prediction System: An Update.
Weather Research & Forecasting Model (WRF) Stacey Pensgen ESC 452 – Spring ’06.
LAKE EFFECT SNOW SIMULATION John D McMillen. LAKE BONNEVILLE EFFECT SNOW.
Some Preliminary Modeling Results on the Upper-Level Outflow of Hurricane Sandy (2012) JungHoon Shin and Da-Lin Zhang Department of Atmospheric & Oceanic.
Numerical simulations of the severe rainfall in Pula, Croatia, on 25 th September 2010 Antonio Stanešić, Stjepan Ivatek-Šahdan, Martina Tudor and Dunja.
Mesoscale Modeling Review the tutorial at: –In class.
Jerold Herwehe 1, Kiran Alapaty 1, Chris Nolte 1, Russ Bullock 1, Tanya Otte 1, Megan Mallard 1, Jimy Dudhia 2, and Jack Kain 3 1 Atmospheric Modeling.
Atmospheric Modeling in an Arctic System Model John J. Cassano Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences and Department of Atmospheric.
Introducing the Lokal-Modell LME at the German Weather Service Jan-Peter Schulz Deutscher Wetterdienst 27 th EWGLAM and 12 th SRNWP Meeting 2005.
Russ Bullock 11 th Annual CMAS Conference October 17, 2012 Development of Methodology to Downscale Global Climate Fields to 12km Resolution.
Oceanic and Atmospheric Modeling of the Big Bend Region Steven L. Morey, Dmitry S. Dukhovksoy, Donald Van Dyke, and Eric P. Chassignet Center for Ocean.
Convective Parameterization Options
In this study, HWRF model simulations for two events were evaluated by analyzing the mean sea level pressure, precipitation, wind fields and hydrometeors.
winter RADIATION FOGS at CIBA (Spain): Observations compared to WRF simulations using different PBL parameterizations Carlos Román-Cascón
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
Earth-Sun System Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPoRT SAC Nov 21-22, 2005 Regional Modeling using MODIS SST composites Prepared.
Meteorological Data Analysis Urban, Regional Modeling and Analysis Section Division of Air Resources New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
The Rapid Evolution of Convection Approaching the New York City Metropolitan Region Brian A. Colle and Michael Charles Institute for Terrestrial and Planetary.
On the Dynamical Predictability of Summer Monsoon Depressions over South Asia --- The Impact of Cloud-System-Resolving Modeling Yi-Chi Wang and Wen-wen.
3 rd Annual WRF Users Workshop Promote closer ties between research and operations Develop an advanced mesoscale forecast and assimilation system   Design.
WRF Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation (FDDA) Jimy Dudhia.
Higher Resolution Operational Models. Major U.S. High-Resolution Mesoscale Models (all non-hydrostatic ) WRF-ARW (developed at NCAR) NMM-B (developed.
12/3/2015 3:16 AM 1 Influence of Land Use Land Cover (LULC) on Cyclone Track Prediction – A Study during AILA Cyclone COSPAR Training and Capacity Building.
Tropical Transition in the Eastern North Pacific: Sensitivity to Microphysics Alicia M. Bentley ATM May 2012.
Are Numerical Weather Prediction Models Getting Better? Cliff Mass, David Ovens, and Jeff Baars University of Washington.
By Dr. H. Kabelwa. What is WRF? Is the Weather Research and Forecasting Model Is a next-generation meso-scale numerical weather prediction system Is designed.
International Workshop on Antarctic Clouds Columbus, OH Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Ensemble variability in rainfall forecasts of Hurricane Irene (2011) Molly Smith, Ryan Torn, Kristen Corbosiero, and Philip Pegion NWS Focal Points: Steve.
Progress Update of Numerical Simulation for OSSE Project Yongzuo Li 11/18/2008.
Bogdan Rosa 1, Marcin Kurowski 1 and Michał Ziemiański 1 1. Institute of Meteorology and Water Management (IMGW), Warsaw Podleśna, 61
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System 2015 Cliff Mass and David Ovens University of Washington.
Modeling and Evaluation of Antarctic Boundary Layer
Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi
Simulations of MAP IOPs with Lokal Modell: impact of nudging on forecast precipitation Francesco Boccanera, Andrea Montani ARPA – Servizio Idro-Meteorologico.
COSMO model simulations for COPS IOP 8b, 15 July 2007 Jörg Trentmann, Björn Brötz, Heini Wernli Institute for Atmospheric Physics, Johannes Gutenberg-University.
WRF-based rapid updating cycling system of BMB(BJ-RUC) and its performance during the Olympic Games 2008 Min Chen, Shui-yong Fan, Jiqin Zhong Institute.
Model calculationsMeasurements An extreme precipitation event during STOPEX I J.Reuder and I. Barstad Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, Norway.
Numerical simulations of the severe rainfall in Pula, Croatia, on 25 th September 2010 Antonio Stanešić, Stjepan Ivatek-Šahdan, Martina Tudor and Dunja.
Numerical Weather Forecast Model (governing equations)
WRF Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation (FDDA)
MM5- and WRF-Simulated Cloud and Moisture Fields
Grid Point Models Surface Data.
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System 2013
  Robert Gibson1, Douglas Drob2 and David Norris1 1BBN Technologies
Dynamical downscaling of ERA-40 with WRF in complex terrain in Norway – comparison with ENSEMBLES U. Heikkilä, A. D. Sandvik and A.
IMPROVING HURRICANE INTENSITY FORECASTS IN A MESOSCALE MODEL VIA MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERIZATION METHODS By Cerese Albers & Dr. TN Krishnamurti- FSU Dept.
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System 2017
The West Coast Thermal Trough
Dept. of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
Rita Roberts and Jim Wilson National Center for Atmospheric Research
2007 Mei-yu season Chien and Kuo (2009), GPS Solutions
NWP Strategy of DWD after 2006 GF XY DWD Feb-19.
A Multiscale Numerical Study of Hurricane Andrew (1992)
Presentation transcript:

The National Environmental Agency of Georgia L. Megrelidze, N. Kutaladze, Kh. Kokosadze NWP Local Area Models’ Failure in Simulation of Eastern Invasion of Cold Air Masses in Georgia NWP Application in Meteorology 2009

Evaluation of NWP LAM skills for simulation of synoptic situations related to eastern invasion of air masses in Georgia Case of Global and mesoscale model performances gave different outputs: EMS NMM and HRM, which run operationally, 3 days ahead predicted rainfall over the most of part of Georgia whereas global models (GFS, ARPEGE) outputs as well observations were different. Objective

Main types of synoptic processes and concerning weather conditions on the South Caucasus territory are following:  western type  eastern type  anticyclonic situation  frontal activities from the South The capture of eastern and southern processes is the most difficult issue for NWP models, when main difficulties raised during the prediction of spatial-temporal distribution of precipitation fields.

Data and methods Observation (only surface: Temperature, Precipitation); Satellite images; Analysis maps (surface, 500, 700, 500/1000 mb) Global models: GFS, ARPEGE LAMs:  Environmental Modeling System Non-hydrostatic Mesoscale Model (EMS NMM) - initialized directly from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Global Forecast System (GFS) with resolution 12 km and 31 vertical levels (operational);  High Resolution Model (HRM) - initialized from GME with resolution 14 km and 40 vertical levels (operational);  WRF ARW - initialized from GFS with resolution 15 km (research) and 27 vertical levels;  No: Data assimilation  No: Objective verification

Data and methods  Outer domain over the Caucasus region with 167x117 points in the north-south and east-west directions respectively  Nested domain fixed in space over Georgia and contained 145x115 points in the north-south and east-west directions respectively on a 5-km mesh The forecasts were integrated beginning at 00 UTC 72, 48 and 24 hours ahead of invasion using:  1-way (no feedback) and  2-way nesting runs, also with  three-dimensional analysis nudging for both domains, with identical nudging coefficients for u, v, theta and q. but for both domains within the PBL the analysis nudging were turned off for temperature and moisture fields and within the lowest 10 model layers for wind

 Microphysics: WSM 3 (5) - class simple ice scheme with ice and snow processes suitable for mesoscale grid sizes.;  Cumulus Parameterization : Kain-Fritsch (new Eta) scheme: Deep and shallow sub-grid scheme using a mass flux approach with downdrafts and CAPE removal time scale Data and methods

5 th of November  In surface layers - cold air masses propagation from European territory to the southward direction and their invasion in South Caucasus, mostly from the East.  In upper levels of atmosphere (700, 500 mb) - south-western currents  It was not pure eastern type, but with influence from the south-west, characterized with rainfall also in West Georgia

WRF ARW: mean sea level pressure based 00Z 03/11/2009 T+48 VT 00z05nov2009 Surface analysis map for 00z05nov mb analysis map for 00z05nov2009 WRF ARW: 500 mb geopotential height based 00Z 03/11/2009 T+48 VT 00z05nov2009

Fig. 2b. GFS: Relative humidity at 850 mb based 00Z 03/11/2009 T+48 VT 00z05nov2009 Fig. 2a. Eumetsat 0 degree MPE image for 00z05nov2009 GFS vs. Satellite

.ARW_outer domain: 12-h precipitation based 00Z 03/11/2009 T+48 VT 18z04nov-06z05nov2009 ARW_inner domain: 12-h precipitation based 00Z 03/11/2009 T+48 VT 18z04nov-06z05nov2009 ARW_outer domain: 12-h precipitation based 00Z 04/11/2009 T+24 VT 18z04nov-06z05nov2009 ARW_inner domain: 12-h precipitation based 00Z 04/11/2009 T+24 VT 18z04nov-06z05nov2009 WRF ARW vs. Observation Observation: 12-h precipitation 18z04nov- 06z05nov2009

Conclusions  precipitation was forecasted 12 hours earlier and overestimated  capture of factual situation WRF ARW could only 24 hours ahead  for 3-day forecast nesting does not improve precipitation forecast: overestimation was increased  for 2-day forecast there was some improvement using nesting: more detailed precipitation distribution  relatively better results (among all simulations) have been obtained using analysis nudging