MSCHE Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2010 Mary Ellen Petrisko Linda Suskie.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation Team Chair Training
Advertisements

The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Interpreting & Applying the Standards October 4, 2006 Dr. Luis J. Pedraja, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Evaluator 102: An Introduction to Interpreting the Standards Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
Evaluator 101: An Introduction to Serving as a MSCHE Evaluator Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
Substantive Change Requesting Commission Approval of Substantive Changes at Institutions MSCHE Annual Meeting December 2009.
Chairs & Evaluators Workshop: Interpreting the Standards Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.
Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.
The Commissions Expectations on Reporting Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Accreditation Liaison Officers (ALOs) MSCHE annual conference 2010 Mary Ellen Petrisko, Vice President.
Follow-up Reporting Expectations Part II MSCHE 2009 Annual Conference Mary Ellen Petrisko.
Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2009 Mary Ellen Petrisko.
Meeting MSCHE Assessment Expectations
Tips and Strategies for Chairing a Successful Team Visit
THE PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT: RE-ACCREDITATION AT THE MID-POINT MSCHE Annual Conference – 2010 Debra G. Klinman Vice President, MSCHE.
Accreditation Liaison Officers (ALOs)
THE PERIODIC REVIEW REPORT: RE-ACCREDITATION AT THE MID-POINT MSCHE Annual Conference – 2011 Debra G. Klinman, PhD Vice President.
Understanding MSCHE Expectations for Follow-Up Reports Linda Suskie Website:
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Presented by Dr. Tanmay Pramanik Overview of On-Site Team Evaluation.
Orientation for New Site Visitors Site Visitor Responsibilities, Expenses, and Training.
Rejected! Rebounding From and Moving Forward Following a Monitoring Report Requirement.
How to Interpret and Apply the Characteristics of Excellence: A Framework for Determining Compliance Karen Stout, President Montgomery County Community.
Evaluation Team Chair Training Presented By Dr. Tim Eaton TRACS Regional Representative.
Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.
The Application for Renewal Accreditation: Electronic Submissions.
DEBRA G. KLINMAN, PH.D. ELLIE A. FOGARTY, ED.D. VICE PRESIDENTS, MSCHE Tips, Strategies, and Best Practices for Team Chairs.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
WELCOME TO THE PROCUREMENT SEMINAR Procurement and Contracts An Overview of Contract Administration.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the New Members of the Board of Trustees, September.
A Possible SE 685 Project Automated Reviewers’ Report For ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology)
Commission on Accreditation for Respiratory Care The Site Visitors Are Coming! Transitioning from Successful Self- Study to Successful Site Visit Bradley.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
The Institutional Effectiveness Plan An Excellent Way to Convey Evidence of Assessment Ellen M. Boylan, Ph.D. Marywood University NEAIR – 33 rd Annual.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Orientation for New Site Visitors Site Visitor Responsibilities, Expenses, and Training.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the Board of Trustees, May 11, 2012.
RISE Grant: Proposal Writing Workshop UAF RISE Board February 21, 2014.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Safety Auditors Conference 2005 A Practical Approach…….
What the *!# Is Middle States Looking For? A Review of Standards 7 and 14—Institutional & Student Learning Assessment Presentation to the Association of.
2006 BYU Reaffirmation of NWCCU Accreditation Executive Accreditation Committee February 12, 2006.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation 7/28/09 Academic Affairs Retreat Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
SACS Compliance Certification Orientation Meeting June 23, 2008.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 8 Competitive.
Year Seven Mission Fulfillment and Sustainability Report and Comprehensive Visit Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU)
SELF STUDY: COUNTDOWN TO THE TEAM VISIT MSCHE ANNUAL CONFERENCE – 2009 Debra Klinman.
THE EVALUATION AND POST EVALUATION Evaluator Training Workshop November 4, 2014.
Overview of SACS-COC Reaffirmation Process Prepared for Reaffirmation Steering Committee April 10, 2006.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Accreditation Pathway
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation
Fort Valley State University
Agenda for Overview SBCUSD Commission-approved Programs
Accreditation: Working towards the self-study
ECA Quality Control Arrangements
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

MSCHE Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2010 Mary Ellen Petrisko Linda Suskie

MSCHE Guidelines Click on Policies on left side. Click on Policies on left side. Scroll down to Follow-Up Reports & Visits Scroll down to Follow-Up Reports & Visits

What is Follow-Up? A Commission request for a A Commission request for a –Progress report –Monitoring report –Supplemental report –Commission liaison guidance visit –Small team visit

Why Did You Get a Follow-Up? Concern about compliance with one or more Concern about compliance with one or more –Standards –Requirements of Affiliation See Characteristics of Excellence See Characteristics of Excellence

USEDs Two-Year Rule If MSCHE finds your institution out of compliance… If MSCHE finds your institution out of compliance… –Warning –Probation Accreditation must be reaffirmed within two years. Accreditation must be reaffirmed within two years. Short extensions possible for good cause Short extensions possible for good cause

Progress Reports Meet the Commissions standards Meet the Commissions standards But MSCHE needs assurance that activities planned or being implemented are carried out But MSCHE needs assurance that activities planned or being implemented are carried out –Improved governance structure –Rewritten strategic plan –Revised assessment plan

Monitoring Reports #1 Meet the Commissions standards Meet the Commissions standards But MSCHE has concerns about ongoing compliance with one or more standards But MSCHE has concerns about ongoing compliance with one or more standards –Financial future looks dicey –Enrollment management plan doesnt seem based on realistic assumptions –Maintaining quality during a time of dramatic change

Monitoring Reports #2 Warning or probation Warning or probation –Lack of evidence that the institution is in compliance with one or more standards

Supplemental Reports Postponement of an accreditation decision Postponement of an accreditation decision Insufficient evidence to verify compliance Insufficient evidence to verify compliance –Topic not addressed in report –Assurances but no evidence –Evidence not yet available Audited financial statements Audited financial statements Short time-frame Short time-frame

Preparing an Effective Follow-Up Report

Read the Directions! Read carefully & understand the Commissions action Read carefully & understand the Commissions action

Understand MSCHEs Underlying Concerns & Expectations Characteristics of Excellence Characteristics of Excellence –Introduction –Standard –Context –Fundamental Elements –Requirement of Affiliation? Reports from MSCHE reviewers Reports from MSCHE reviewers –Evaluation team –PRR reviewer –Small team

Address Everything That is Required Clearly document compliance with standard(s) Clearly document compliance with standard(s)

Focus on Past and Present, Not Future Current and sustained compliance Current and sustained compliance No Im a gonnas No Im a gonnas Concrete details on work to be done Concrete details on work to be done –Action plans –Timelines –Accountabilities –Benchmarks

Focus on Outcomes More than structures & processes More than structures & processes –What is the governance structure? –Is the governance structure fulfilling its responsibilities?

Provide Documented Evidence Not just platitudes or assertions Not just platitudes or assertions –We have made major progress toward creating a thriving culture of assessment. –Faculty are dedicated to meeting student needs. –Budget decisions are linked to strategic goals.

Be Forthright & Honest Honesty is the best policy! Honesty is the best policy! Standard 6: Integrity Standard 6: Integrity If theres a problem… If theres a problem… –Explain why. –Provide clear, specific plans.

Be Concise & Well-Organized Respect readers time and energy. Respect readers time and energy. Avoid data dumps. Avoid data dumps. Cull out irrelevant documentation. Cull out irrelevant documentation. Make the report easy to follow. Make the report easy to follow. –Headings –Charts –Links to supporting documentation –Document names/labels

Submit the Report On Time! MSCHE may consider your institution to have voluntarily allowed its accreditation to lapse! MSCHE may consider your institution to have voluntarily allowed its accreditation to lapse! Electronic submissions ( or CD) are usually fine. Electronic submissions ( or CD) are usually fine.

Report Format Title page template Title page template Introduction Introduction –Overview –Context Progress to date and current status Progress to date and current status –Summary, discussion, analysis –What does documentation say to you? –Next steps to sustain compliance? Appendices of supporting documentation Appendices of supporting documentation Conclusion Conclusion

Report Length Proportionate to number and complexity of issues Proportionate to number and complexity of issues Self-studies are 100 pages Self-studies are 100 pages Relatively short report with well-organized appendices of documentation Relatively short report with well-organized appendices of documentation

Follow-Up Visits

Commission Liaison Guidance Visit To help you get an A! To help you get an A! NOT an accreditation visit NOT an accreditation visit –No Commission action Schedule depends on issues Schedule depends on issues –Key administrators –Faculty/staff representatives –Governing board representatives –Often an open meeting

Small Team Visit To verify information in your report To verify information in your report Required for warning & probation Required for warning & probation Smaller than evaluation team Smaller than evaluation team Shorter than evaluation team visit Shorter than evaluation team visit Shorter timeframe to complete team report & institutional response Shorter timeframe to complete team report & institutional response

Small Team Dates & Members Developed by MSCHE VP liaison Developed by MSCHE VP liaison Written confirmation to institution & team Written confirmation to institution & team

Hosting a Successful Small Team Visit

Travel Arrangements Hotel reservations Hotel reservations Ground transportation Ground transportation –Airport/train station to hotel –Hotel to campus

Private, Secure Meetings Rooms on Campus & in Hotel Computer & printer Computer & printer Internet access Internet access Phone & on-call technical support Phone & on-call technical support Supplies (paper, flash drives) Supplies (paper, flash drives) Refreshments Refreshments Check with team for additional needs Check with team for additional needs

Meals Check with team chair. Check with team chair. Generally private working meals Generally private working meals No interruptions (buffet or pre-plated) No interruptions (buffet or pre-plated) Meals with campus representatives? Meals with campus representatives?

Small Team Visit Schedule Depends on issues Depends on issues –President –Key administrators –Faculty/staff representatives –Governing board representatives –Open meeting –Private team meetings –Oral exit report

Respond to reasonable requests for additional information Respond to reasonable requests for additional information Emergency contact info (travel delays) Emergency contact info (travel delays)

After the Visit Draft team report Draft team report Correction of errors of fact Correction of errors of fact Institutional response Institutional response Chairs confidential brief Chairs confidential brief Committee on Follow-Up Committee on Follow-Up –Late January –Late May –Early November Commission Meeting Commission Meeting

Your MSCHE VP Liaison is Your Friend! or telephone with questions. or telephone with questions. Meet in Commission offices? Meet in Commission offices? Meet during MSCHE Annual Conference? Meet during MSCHE Annual Conference? Commission Liaison Guidance Visit Commission Liaison Guidance Visit Campus visit? (Fee charged) Campus visit? (Fee charged) Cannot review drafts Cannot review drafts