Standard 13 Related Educational Activities. What does it cover? The institutions programs or activities that are characterized by particular content,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

Interpreting & Applying the Standards October 4, 2006 Dr. Luis J. Pedraja, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Substantive Change Requesting Commission Approval of Substantive Changes at Institutions MSCHE Annual Meeting December 2009.
The Commissions Expectations on Reporting Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Substantive Change Process
Graduation and Employment: Program Evaluation Using Dr. Michele F. Ernst Chief Academic Officer Globe Education Network.
STANDARD IIC LIBRARY AND LEARNING RESOURCES The little standard that could.
Washington's I-BEST Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges The Comprehensive I-BEST Pathway Models.
Flexible Assessment, Tools and Resources for PLAR Get Ready! Go! Presenter: Deb Blower, PLAR Facilitator Red River College of Applied Arts, Science and.
Standard 13 Related Educational Activities Robert K. Clark Cumberland County College Vineland, NJ.
Special Meeting on ICT Education in Tertiary Institutions Towards a Regional Perspective on Quality and Academic Standards in ICT Education and Training.
Substantive Change: Understanding Middle States Policy and Process
ABET-ASAC Accreditation Workshop ABET Criteria and Outcomes Assessment
Program Review: The Foundation for Institutional Planning and Improvement.
A specialized accrediting agency for English language programs and institutions Accreditation Presentation ABLA conference 2012.
Matriculation March 10, :45-5:00. WHAT IS MATRICULATION? Matriculation is a process that enhances student access to the California Community Colleges.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
February 13, From NEW to MAINSTREAM 6.7 million students took at least one online course in the Fall % of all higher education students.
The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.
TRENDS CONFERENCE OCTOBER 12, 2012 Developing Quality Online Courses for Successful Learning Experiences.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Presented by: Dr. Gail Wells Vice President for Academic Affairs and Dr. Carole Beere Associate Provost for Outreach (retired) Northern Kentucky University.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Co-op at PCC Sylvania Co-op Task Force Findings and Recommendations.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Curriculum Design. A Learner Centered Approach May, 2007 By. Rhys Andrews.
Dr. Constance Ray Vice President, Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness.
Middle States Steering Committee Overview of Standards March 20, 2008.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
SACS COC (Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges) Overview and Update.
Higher Learning Commission North Central Association Accreditation Visit April 2016.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
Student Support Services Standard II B & C. II.B. The institution recruits and admits diverse students who are able to benefit from its programs, consistent.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
What CIOs Need to Know.  Meridith Randall – ACCJC ALO for 17 years for 3 different colleges; never had a college receive a sanction; has written multiple.
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
16 OCTOBER 2015 JOACHIN ARIAS, SLO COORDINATOR EDWARD PAI, DEAN OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Program Review 2.0 Training: SLO Assessment Participation.
Prepared for New Faculty orientation August 15, 2012.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
The Substantive Change Process: What is it and why should you care? ASCCC Accreditation Institute February 11, 2012.
Regardless of Location or Means of Delivery: Meeting the Standards for Every Student Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Alice Taylor—West Los Angeles College.
1 NYS Operational Criteria for Distance Education Dr. Susan Merritt Dean School of Computer Science & Information Systems.
October 14, 2014 Reaffirmation of UofL.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Transfer Course Credit – Institutions of Higher Education Credit for Prior Learning Industry Recognized Credentials/Test Credit AGC – April 2016.
Practice learning of social work students is composed of practical education and field education and has visible place in a curricula of higher education.
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Accreditation 2007 Undergraduate Council September 26, 2005.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Quality Assurance in Distance Education.
Accreditation 101 STEVEN SHEELEY, PHD VICE PRESIDENT – SACSCOC GACRAO NOVEMBER 2, 2015.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Lead-Off Batter: Applying New Accjc standards
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
Matchmaker, Matchmaker Make Me a Match
Atta Girl/Boy: Acing your Accreditation Review
Preparing for the NWCCU 10-year Self-Study
Curriculum and Accreditation
Curriculum and Accreditation
Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Alice Taylor—West Los Angeles College
Accreditation and curriculum
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Vernon Martin, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, Sierra College
CURRICULUM AND ACCREDITATION
Get on Board: Reaffirmation 2016
Presentation transcript:

Standard 13 Related Educational Activities

What does it cover? The institutions programs or activities that are characterized by particular content, focus, location, mode of delivery, or sponsorship meet appropriate standard Basic Skills Basic Skills Certificate Programs Certificate Programs Experiential Learning Experiential Learning Non-Credit Offerings Non-Credit Offerings Branch Campuses, Additional Locations, etc Branch Campuses, Additional Locations, etc Distance Learning Distance Learning Contractual Relationships Contractual Relationships

Challenges The Mickey of Standards! Covers everything the others dont Often overlooked by institutions and evaluators Complexity of areas makes it difficult to evaluate Areas covered are critical to Higher Education today

What do I need to look at? If there are problems in other areas, they will often affect this standard too Outcomes Assessment Outcomes Assessment Resource Allocation Resource Allocation Planning Planning Governance Governance Mission Mission

Types of questions & issues Do the programs flow from and are appropriate to the institutions mission? Are they comparable to other programs at the institution? Are adequate resources allocated? Is there sufficient oversight? Are the programs assessed adequately? How well do they fit in at the institution? What impact do they have?

Specific issues to look at Basic Skills Are there sufficient measures to identify students in need of these skills? Are there sufficient measures to identify students in need of these skills? Are there sufficient resources to provide these skills? Are there sufficient resources to provide these skills? Are remedial / pre-college level courses non- credit? Are remedial / pre-college level courses non- credit? Do they assess the effectiveness of these courses in providing skills? Do they assess the effectiveness of these courses in providing skills?

Specific issues to look at Certificate Programs / Non-Credit Are they consistent with the mission? Are they consistent with the mission? Are there appropriate learning goals? Are there appropriate learning goals? Are there appropriate processes for transferring courses that might be applied to degrees? Are there appropriate processes for transferring courses that might be applied to degrees? Are students given adequate services? Are students given adequate services? Is there proper assessment? Is there proper assessment? Is there sufficient oversight & expertise in the areas offered? Is there sufficient oversight & expertise in the areas offered?

Specific issues to look at Experiential Learning Is there a clear and consistent process for reviewing portfolios and awarding credits? Is there a clear and consistent process for reviewing portfolios and awarding credits? Is there evidence to support the level, quality, and quantity of the learning? Is there evidence to support the level, quality, and quantity of the learning? Are the people evaluating the portfolios experienced and knowledgeable of the subject matter? Are the people evaluating the portfolios experienced and knowledgeable of the subject matter? Are the processes and procedures assessed regularly? Are the processes and procedures assessed regularly?

Specific issues to look at Branch campus, additional locations, sites Visit appropriate number and types of locations Visit appropriate number and types of locations Interview persons and students at sites Interview persons and students at sites Are services & resources adequate and comparable? Are services & resources adequate and comparable? Is there sufficient oversight of the program? Is there sufficient oversight of the program? Are assessment processes in place for the locations? Are assessment processes in place for the locations? Is there sufficient faculty/staff for the site? Is there sufficient faculty/staff for the site? Are programs comparable to main campus? Are programs comparable to main campus? Is the quality of the programs comparable? Is the quality of the programs comparable?

Specific issues to look at Distance or Distributed Learning Are they consistent with the mission? Are they consistent with the mission? Do they fit with the programs? Do they fit with the programs? Are resources and support comparable? Are resources and support comparable? Is there special assessment measures? Is there special assessment measures? Is there sufficient faculty oversight? Is there sufficient faculty oversight? Is there sufficient technical infrastructure? Is there sufficient technical infrastructure? How do they impact other areas? How do they impact other areas? Is there sufficient rigor? Is there sufficient rigor? Do students have access to other services via technology? Do students have access to other services via technology?

Specific issues to look at Contractual Relationships Does the institution review the quality, rigor, and appropriateness of the contracted party? Does the institution review the quality, rigor, and appropriateness of the contracted party? Are courses/program consistent with institutional mission? Are courses/program consistent with institutional mission? Is there proper oversight? Is there proper oversight?

Other things to consider Are all the related activities properly documented and reviewed by the self- study? Is the self-study analytical of the programs or simply descriptive? Are there programs, activities, or sites that are not covered by the institutions scope of accreditation or listed in the Statement of Accredited Status?