The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

The Periodic Review Report: Evidence of Linked Institutional Planning & Budgeting John Palmucci Vice President for Finance & Treasurer, Loyola College.
Standard 2: Planning, Resource Allocation and Institutional Renewal Michael F. Middaugh Assistant Vice President Institutional Research and Planning University.
The PRR and Linked Institutional Planning and Budgeting Lisa Marie McCauley, Kings College, VP/CFO.
Meeting MSCHE Assessment Expectations
Standard 2: Planning, Resource Allocation, and Institutional Renewal Some Things to Consider Andrea A. Lex, Ph.D. Dean, Planning, Assessment, & Institutional.
International Students: Best Practices for Recruitment, Admission, and Retention ACCU Annual Meeting Washington, D.C. February 2013.
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Outcomes and impact of the Project at the Cape Peninsula University of Technology, and remaining challenges.
The Periodic Review Report and the Assessment of Institutional Effectiveness Presentation by: Karen Froslid Jones and Robin Beads, American University.
SEM Planning Model.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP: SESSION 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES ACADEMIC AND STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES PRESENTED BY THE DIVISION OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
Planning & IPS An overview and timeline. Timeline Term 1: 19 th April Annual Report Business Plan Operational Plan Performance Agreement.
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
Program Assessment, WASC and Cal Poly Pomona Bob Hurt Faculty Associate for Program Assessment and Academic Program Review.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Program Assessment Workshop Kathleen Harring. What is Assessment? Assessment is the systematic gathering and analysis of information to inform and improve.
Alignment in Planning Outcomes from a Focus Session ”Planning for Transformation” Worcester, MA, March 17, 2001.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) 101 Del Mar College January 8, 2007 Loraine Phillips, Ph.D. Interim Assessment Director Texas A&M University.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
What the *!# Is Middle States Looking For? A Review of Standards 7 and 14—Institutional & Student Learning Assessment Presentation to the Association of.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Middle States Steering Committee Overview of Standards March 20, 2008.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Program Framework Review November 2011 Pamela Miller, Ph.D. AVP for Learning.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.
The Periodic Review Report: Linked Institutional Planning and Budgeting Some Things to Consider Andrea A. Lex, Ph.D. Dean, Planning, Assessment, & Institutional.
Assessing and Planning for Institutional Effectiveness Jasmine R. Ray AVP for Planning and Effectiveness 8/26/15.
Dr. ERINDA PAPA.  This manual is a clear proof of “Fan S. Noli” University’s commitment to assure its internal quality. It demonstrates not only that.
MVC – Outcomes Assessment FLEX –Day February 8, 2013.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Curriculum Renewal in the Faculty of the Professions: Overview.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
Strategic Planning for the Department of Health and Human Performance Iowa State University T. Gilmour Reeve Director of Strategic Planning Office of the.
Capabilities Analysis Briefing for Chancellor and Senior Leaders.
1 University Compacts Dorothy J. Minear, Ph.D. December 6, 2007.
Student Success  What is it?  How can we assess it?  Whose responsibility is it?  What role do you play?
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
The Essentials of Strategic Enrollment Planning James Mager Associate Vice President.
In the Framework of: Financed by: Developed by: Business Planning for Water Associations Prepared by Water Supply and Sewerage Association of Albania SHUKALB.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.
Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Development of Key Performance Indicators: Lebanese Case Study
Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
Assessment Committee Meeting Continuous Program Improvement
The City University of New York Performance Management Process (PMP)
Assessment Leadership Day Continuous Program Improvement
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
The City University of New York Performance Management Process (PMP)
Cañada College Full-Time Equity Director Position
Overview of Program Review Categories
Fort Valley State University
Presentation transcript:

The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University

(2) PRR Objectives To determine the current status of the implementation of processes for the assessment of institutional effectiveness + assessment of student learning outcomes (Standards 7 & 14) To assess the extent to which linked institutional planning + budgeting processes are in place (Standards 2 & 3)

Institutional Effectiveness + Student Learning Outcomes Demonstration of organized, documented + sustained assessment processes Clearly articulated institutional + unit-level goals – Student learning outcomes at institutional, program + course level Implemented strategies to achieve those goals Assessed achievement of those goals

Institutional Effectiveness + Student Learning Outcomes Used the results of assessments to: – Improve programs, services, teaching, + learning – Inform planning – Inform resource allocation decisions

Institutional Effectiveness + Student Learning Outcomes Note: – Evidence provided of assessment results – Processes + results are documented – Structures in place to ensure success – Evidence of a culture of assessment – faculty, staff, senior leadership – Guidelines, policies, resources + support of assessment initiatives – Communication-sharing of results

Institutional Effectiveness + Student Learning Outcomes Primary Context: – Standard 7: Institutional Assessment – Standard 14: Assessment of Student Learning Resource: Assessing Student Learning + Institutional Effectiveness: Understanding Middle States Expectations

Assessing Institutional Effectiveness Development of linkages: – Institutional Mission + Institutional Goals – Administrative Unit + Academic Program Goals (Annual Reports; Measures of Success; Assessment Results; Budget Resources) – Strategic Plan Goals (Performance Indicators)

Assessing Institutional Effectiveness Examples of Institutional Effectiveness College/University Measurements: – NSSE – Graduating Senior Surveys – Alumni Surveys – Retention + Graduation Rates

Assessing Institutional Effectiveness Strategic Plan Annual Review Process = oversight + tracking progress of strategic plan goals (in terms of goal achievement) Assessment of Key Factors in Strategic Plan: – Timely completion of action steps – Progress of quantitative performance indicators toward goals – Achievement of financial targets – Need for changes in context of plan or implementation

Assessment of Student Learning Academic Programs – Links between program goals, institutional mission and related institutional goals, strategic plan goals + general education program – Program learning outcomes (align course outcomes with program-level outcomes) – Methods of assessment – Implementation of assessment plans – Use of results to improve student learning

Assessment of Student Learning Example: Academic Program Annual Report – Documented program assessment plan – Student learning outcomes assessment report – Anticipated changes based on assessment results – Resources (budget requests) required for improvements

Assess Institutional Effectiveness + Student Learning Summary Points: Evidence of organized + sustained processes Evidence that results are being used to improve programs + services Evidence that results are being used to inform planning + resource allocation decisions

Linked Institutional Planning + Budgeting Processes Thorough overview + analysis of institutions planning + budgeting processes Demonstration of how those processes are integrated + linked Evidence of key planning documents Primary Context: Standard 2: Planning, Resource Allocation, + Institutional Renewal

Linked Institutional Planning + Budgeting Processes Note: – Ongoing planning + resource allocation based on mission + goals – Objectives developed to achieve goals – Use assessment results for institutional renewal – Evidence of strategic plan implementation + resource allocation – Evaluation of success of strategic plan + resource allocation as quality improvement

Budget Process Goals Support the Strategic Plan – Allocate resources needed to implement successfully – Congruence of the annual budget with strategic plan objectives + action steps Support Department + Academic Program Operational Needs = Annual Budget Development Process

Annual Budget Development Process Organization of Administrative Department/ Academic Program Annual Report – Link department/program goals to institutional goals – Enrollment trends/ SWOT/ Student Support – 3-year forecasts – enrollment expectations, faculty/ staff requests, expense requirements, capital needs – Resources required for improvements based on assessment information

Linked Institutional Planning + Budgeting Processes Summary Points Evidence of documented + inclusive processes Evidence of integrated strategic, department + academic program plans – Ensure that institutions mission + vision remain central – Revenues + expenses are in proper relationship – Capital needs are defined