Chamber parameters that we can modify and that affect the rising time Number of ionisation clusters produced in the drift gap: Poisson Distribution Probability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Triple-GEM detector operation for high-rate particle triggering W. Bonivento, G. Bencivenni, A. Cardini, C. Deplano, P. de Simone, F. Murtas, D. Pinci,
Advertisements

GEM Chambers at BNL The detector from CERN, can be configured with up to 4 GEMs The detector for pad readout and drift studies, 2 GEM maximum.
Drift velocity Adding polyatomic molecules (e.g. CH4 or CO2) to noble gases reduces electron instantaneous velocity; this cools electrons to a region where.
BUILD-UP SIMULATIONS FOR DAFNE WIGGLER W/ ELECTRODES Theo Demma.
Micro MEsh GASeous Detectors (MicroMegas)
1 VCI, Werner Riegler RPCs and Wire Chambers for the LHCb Muon System  Overview  Principles  Performance Comparison: Timing, Efficiency,
1 Pixel Readout of GEMs Motivation The Setup Results Next Steps A. Bamberger, K. Desch, J. Ludwig, M. Titov, U. Renz, N. Vlasov, P. Wienemann, A. Zwerger.
PNPI in LHCb A.Vorobyov HEPD Scientific Board meeting, December 26,2003 Status report for 2003.
D. Peterson, “The Cornell/Purdue TPC”, LCWS05, Stanford, 21-March The Cornell/Purdue TPC Information available at the web site:
Prototype TPC Tests C. Lu 12/9/98 V = 0. Gas gain test for the low pressure chamber The chamber is constructed with the following parameters: D anode.
D. Peterson, “Status of the Cornell/Purdue Program” TPC R&D Mini Workshop, Orsay 12-January Status of the Cornell/Purdue Program: first events with.
Edda Gschwendtner1 RF test of a small TPG detector prototype F. Ambrosino,C. D’Addio, F. Caspers, U. Gastaldi, E. Gschwendtner, E. Radicioni, G. Saracino.
D. Peterson, “ILC Detector Work”, Cornell Group Meeting, 4-October ILC Detector Work This project is supported by the US National Science Foundation.
D. Peterson, “The Cornell/Purdue TPC”, ALCPG, Snowmass, 23-August The Cornell/Purdue TPC Information available at the web site:
RF test of the GEM detector prototipe Detector description RF test area (LINAC3) detector working conditions RF field measurement Detector measurements.
Tests of a 10cm by 10cm triple GEM detector
Requirements to RICH FEE Serguei Sadovsky IHEP, Protvino CBM meeting GSI, 10 March 2005.
Gain measurements of Triple Gas Electron Multiplier (GEM) detector with zigzag readout strips V. BHOPATKAR, E. ESPOSITO, E. HANSEN, J. TWIGGER M. HOHLMANN.
2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Anaheim, California S. Colafranceschi (CERN) and M. Hohlmann (Florida Institute of Technology) (for the CMS GEM Collaboration)
Experiences with RPC Detectors in Iran and their Potential Applications Tarbiat Modares University Ahmad Moshaii A. Moshaii, IPM international school and.
Measurement of gas gain fluctuations M. Chefdeville, LAPP, Annecy TPC Jamboree, Orsay, 12/05/2009.
G.Bencivenni LNF/INFNMuon Meeting 21-October-2002 Status Report on triple-GEM detector M.Alfonsi 1, G. Bencivenni 1, W. Bonivento 2,A.Cardini 2,C. Deplano.
1 Small GEM Detectors at STAR Yi Zhou University of Science & Technology of China.
New Developments in Large Area THGEMs & APV Exercise INFN – Sezione di Trieste Carlos Alexandre Fernandes dos Santos 11/December/2014.
LHCb F. Murtas Servizio elettronica G. Corradi D.Tagnani P.Ciambrone HV_GEM per LHCB M1R1 HV power supply Introduction Introduction HV_GEM Technical specification.
Updates on GEMs characterization with APV electronics K. Gnanvo, N. Liyanage, K. Saenboonruang.
TIDE TESTS AT GDD LAB M. Casiraghi and F. Vasi. New detector configuration Low pressure chamber anode.
DC12 Commissioning Status GOALS: establish operating conditions, determine initial calibration parameters and measure operating characteristics for the.
Prototypes For Particle Detectors Employing Gas Electron Multiplier
Beam Test June 2010 CMS SUMMARY REPORT 1 Stefano Colafranceschi.
NanoPHYS’12 – December 17-19, 2012 K. Nakano, S. Miyasaka, K. Nagai and S. Obata (Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology) Drift Chambers.
High Energy Physics Group Department Of Physics Banaras Hindu University Prakhar Garg (A. Kumar, A. Prakash, B.K Singh, V. Singh & C.P Singh)
1 TRD-prototype test at KEK-FTBL 11/29/07~12/6 Univ. of Tsukuba Hiroki Yokoyama The TRD prototype is borrowed from GSI group (thanks Anton).
EPS-HEP 2015, Vienna. 1 Test of MPGD modules with a large prototype Time Projection Chamber Deb Sankar Bhattacharya On behalf of.
Ionization Detectors Basic operation
GEM R&D Update Kondo Gnanvo. Outline  GEM R&D and assembly facilities at UVa  Cosmic test results  Update on the 40 × 50 cm 2 GEM prototype  Plans.
Performance of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
Preliminary results of a detailed study on the discharge probability for a triple-GEM detector at PSI G. Bencivenni, A. Cardini, P. de Simone, F. Murtas.
Study of GEM Structures for a TPC Readout M. Killenberg, S. Lotze, J. Mnich, A. Münnich, S. Roth, M. Weber RWTH Aachen October 2003.
Test of the GEM Front Tracker for the SBS Spectrometer at Jefferson Lab F. Mammoliti, V. Bellini, M. Capogni, E. Cisbani, E. Jensen, P. Musico, F. Noto,
 The zigzag readout board is divided into eight η-sectors; each sector has a length of ~12 cm and comprises 128 zigzag strips; zigzag strips run in radial.
The effect of surface roughness
Proposal for LST-based IFR barrel upgrade Roberto Calabrese Ferrara University Workshop on IFR replacement, SLAC, 11/14/2002.
Abstract Beam Test of a Large-area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System V. Bhopatkar, M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
Beam Test of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, A.
Construction and beam test analysis of GE1/1 prototype III gaseous electron multiplier (GEM) detector V. BHOPATKAR, E. HANSEN, M. HOHLMANN, M. PHIPPS,
Construction and Characterization of a GEM G.Bencivenni, LNF-INFN The lesson is divided in two main parts: 1 - construction of a GEM detector (Marco Pistilli)
RD51 GEM Telescope: results from June 2010 test beam and work in progress Matteo Alfonsi on behalf of CERN GDD group and Siena/PISA INFN group.
NoV. 11, 2009 WP meeting 94 1 D. Attié, P. Colas, E. Ferrer-Ribas, A. Giganon, I. Giomataris, F. Jeanneau, P. Shune, M. Titov, W. Wang, S. Wu RD51 Collaboration.
Single GEM Measurement Matteo Alfonsi,Gabriele Croci and Bat-El Pinchasik June 25 th 2008 GDD Meeting 1.
Development of a Single Ion Detector for Radiation Track Structure Studies F. Vasi, M. Casiraghi, R. Schulte, V. Bashkirov.
Fast Grid Pulse Modulation
Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab 6-8 March 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chamber Electronics R. Chris Cuevas Group Leader -- Fast Electronics Jefferson Lab Physics.
Large GEM test beam November 2012 C. Armaingaud, J. Merlin, S. Colafranceschi, A. Marinov Y. Maghrbi, P. Barria, S. Salva.
Gas Electron Multiplier
RPCs with Ar-CO2 mix G. Aielli; R.Cardarelli; A. Zerbini For the ATLAS ROMA2 group.
R&D on Hadron Blind detector, recent results Issues addressed: - gain limits in CF 4 with heavily ionizing particles - operation.
TRIPLEGEM and VFATs at The Test Beam Area TRIPLEGEM and VFATs at The Test Beam Area N. Turini……reporter Eraldo Oliveri! Eraldo Oliveri main worker! N.
Trigger & Tracking detector for CMS
1 straw tube signal simulation A. Rotondi PANDA meeting, Stockolm 15 June 2010.
THE USER “POINT OF VIEW” ABOUT THE VFAT2 The first day.... The first week.... The first month.... The first year... But at the end you will be a friend.
Activities on straw tube simulation
From: A fast high-voltage switching multiwire proportional chamber
Entrance Muon Counter (EMC)
Saikat Biswas, A. Abuhoza, U. Frankenfeld, C. Garabatos,
Results from a preliminary analysis of the MWPC test at the GIF
Ionization detectors ∆
Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers
Resistive Plate Chambers performance with Cosmic Rays
Engineering Design Review
Presentation transcript:

Chamber parameters that we can modify and that affect the rising time Number of ionisation clusters produced in the drift gap: Poisson Distribution Probability distribution of the distance x of the ionisation cluster NEAREST to the first GEM : P (x )=n ・ e ( - nx ) With: Space Probability Distribution of the first GEM NEAREST Cluster  (x)=1 /n where n is the average number of ionisation clusters per unit length Time Probability Distribution of the first GEM NEAREST Cluster  (t)= 1 /( n ・ v drif t ) Intrinsic Resolution: Single cluster/electron Signal Formation: Each electron produce a current pulse for a time t = d induction gap / v drift Parameter that we can change: v drift Induction Field - Gas nGas

Drift Velocity vs Electric Field in Ar/CO2 70/30 magboltz Ar-CO2 (70-30) If we apply -4kV, it means that we will have 4kV/5.5M~727  A In the induction region we will have 727  A x 1M=727V across 2mm, i.e. ~3.6kV/cm In the plot we can find that at ~3.6kV/cm we have ~7cm/  s. If we decided to use 1.5M, it means that we will have ~5.5kV/cm With this field the drift velocity will be ~8cm/  s. In the actual configuration we have 1M+0.55M+1M+0.5M+1M+0.45M+1M I~3.6kV/cm T2~3.6kV/cm T1~3.6kV/cm D~2.4kV/cm

Changing only the induction field: effects on the signal induced Each electrons cloud produced by a cluster will produce a current pulse for a time t = d induction gap / v drift The current induced will be approximately I ~~ (N(ionization)x Gem GAIN x e) x (v drift / d induction gap ) This mean that we will have a factor 1.15 (in the current induced by each clusters), if we change the drift velocity from 7cm/  s to 8cm/  s

Changing the gas Two effects

Changing the gas: Effects on the GAIN

Changing the gas: effects on the signal induced Each electrons cloud produced by a cluster will produce a current pulse for a time t = d induction gap / v drift The current induced will be approximately I ~ (N(ionization)x Gem GAIN x e) x (v drift / d induction gap ) This mean that, if we change the drift velocity adding CF4 to the gas mixture, we will have a factor 1.5/1.3 (in intensity of the signal induced by each clusters).

One Example: LHCb GEMs A factor of ~1.5/2 is possible respect with Ar/CO2 For LHCb the induction gap is only 1mm Efficiency in 20ns time window

H.V. Board Resistors Modification (in Ar/CO 2 ). If we want to maintain the same fields in the other gaps and the same  V across the GEM(*) We will need:  V(ind) = 5kV/cm x 0.2cm = 1kV R(ind) = 1kV / 728  A ~ 1.38M  [728  A in order to have  VG1+  VG2+  VG3 = 1090V as now] Resistors Std value: field[kV/cm]Power [W]  V[V] respect with mA 1.2M ~ ~150V 1.5M~5.51.5~370V (*) if we change the gas we need to do also other consideration about the gain (**) this is the maximum current from the module (to be extremely conservative).

H.V. Board Resistors Modification (in Ar/CO 2 ). Power Supply Module: -5kV, 1mA (maximum possible power 5W) HV Divider : (let me say) 200k(filter)+5.5M(actual version)+  R(Induction Gap) If I consider in total 6.2M (i.e. with 1.5M on induction), the max current available will be ~800  A It means that respect with 728uA we could eventually increase the voltage of ~400V in total and 100V on GEM. In terms of gain this is ~~ a factor If I consider in total 5.9M (i.e. with 1.2M on induction), the max current available will be ~845  A It means that respect with 728uA we could eventually increase the voltage of ~700V in total and ~175V on GEM. In terms of gain this is ~~ a factor

TripleGEM timing properties from H8 test Beam: MSPL Considerations… H.V. on TripleGEM ~ -4.1kV

The needed MSPL with the actual configuration The first MSPL that guarantees that all the signals are collected for a time period bigger than 1 clk cycle is 4CLK. We need “for a time period bigger than 1 clk cycle” because we can change the latency in steps of 1clk.

Threshold Scan: Acquisition Mode (40k triggers/point) MSPL:2clk and 4clk No differences. OK

Timing Studies: MSPL tests revealed the possibility of using more clk cycles without degrading the level of the noise. To increase the drift velocity we can replace the induction gap resistor in the H.V. divider. A good value could be 1.2/1.5M. In order to have a bigger improvement of the rising time we could use Ar/CO2/CF4 that increase not only the drift velocity but also the number of primary clusters in the drift gap (more effective than changing only the induction field).(We have to be careful because using CF4, the gain of each GEM foil will be reduced.) In order to have margin in the increase of the gain, taking into account the HV power supply output range, a value of 1.2/1.3M for the induction gap resistors could be a good compromise between the increase of the drift velocity and the possibility to increase the voltage across the GEM foil if we will change the gas. For the system set-up in H8: –relief available –we will check the additive connectors needed and we will have to install them. –we will have to clean the rotameter in order to have all the gas lines needed to flux 10 chambers. –we will have to check the functionality of the mass flow-meter for the mixing unit.