RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL COMPARING FOLFIRINOX (5FU/LEUCOVORIN, IRINOTECAN AND OXALIPLATIN) VS GEMCITABINE AS FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR METASTATIC PANCREATIC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

516 (32723) Phase III trial comparing AC (x4)taxane (x4) with taxane (x8) as adjuvant therapy for node-positive breast cancer: Results of N-SAS-BC02.
I I. B.- T R E A T M E N T P L A N: DOCETAXEL 75 mg/m2 40 mg/m2 THORACIC RT (66 Gys: 180 cGy/d) CISPLATIN 40 mg/m2 Days E V A L U A.
1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
A pooled analysis of the final results of the two randomized phase II studies comparing Gemcitabine (G) vs Gemcitabine + Docetaxel (G+D) in patients (pts)
Pilot Experience with Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer – NCCTG Intergroup N0147 J. Huang*, D. J. Sargent*,
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. Case presented by Dr Schwartz 44 yo woman with 4 mo hx of abdominal pain –Imaging = pancreatic.
Pancreatic Cancer Ali Shamseddine MD Proessor of Medicine AUBMC
ASCO 07, June 3rd. ADVANCED PANCREATIC CANCER TREATMENT : NOTHING NEW ?? Christophe Louvet Hôpital St-Antoine Paris, France.
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Targeting VEGF for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Herbert Hurwitz Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina, USA.
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. Faculty National GI Tumor Board Clinical Investigators Provide Their Perspectives on Current.
Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
T Andre, E Quinaux, C Louvet, E Gamelin, O Bouche, E Achille, P Piedbois, N Tubiana-Mathieu, M Buyse and A de Gramont. Updated results at 6 year of the.
BASED ON PROTOCOL VERSION 1 SEPTEMBER 2012 A new study evaluating an investigational drug to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal.
Phase I/II Trial of Docetaxel plus Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil (D-FOX) in Patients with Untreated, Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Cancer Jaffer.
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
MAX: International multi-centre randomised phase II/III study of capecitabine (Cap), bevacizumab (Bev) and mitomycin C (MMC) as first-line treatment for.
0 Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer NCCTG Intergroup Phase III Trial N0147 Jocelin Huang, Daniel J Sargent,
Ruan J et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 247.
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Cmab might have therapeutic benefit in Japanese patients with KRAS p.G13D mutant colorectal cancer. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design.
The Combination of Bevacizumab (Bev) with capecitabine/irinotecan (CapIri/Bev) or capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CapOx/Bev) is highly active in advanced colorectal.
Preliminary Results from a Phase II study of FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Abstract #3579) S. Kopetz,
. Background Paclitaxel and Irinotecan in Platinum Refractory or Resistant Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Galician Lung Cancer.
Phase II trial of chemotherapy with high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
C.P. Belani 1, D.M. Waterhouse 2, H.H. Ghazal 3, S. Ramalingam 4, J.M. Waples 5, R.E. Bordoni 6, G.A. Reznikoff 7, C.P. Curran 8, R. H. Greenberg 9 1 Penn.
Niall C. Tebbutt International randomised phase III study of capecitabine, bevacizumab, and mitomycin C in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal.
Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC): Results of a Multicentre, Randomized Phase III.
CB-1 Background of Pancreatic Cancer & NCIC CTG PA.3 Study Design Malcolm Moore, MD Professor of Medicine and Pharmacology Princess Margaret Hospital Chair,
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
EORTC OSN/CTOS11 Safety of Caelyx combined with ifosfamide in previously untreated adult patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. Final.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Surgery of colorectal metastasis in the Optimox 1 study. A GERCOR Study. N. Perez-Staub, G. Lledo, F. Paye, B. Gayet, M. Flesch, A. Cervantes, A. Figer,
A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Eribulin Mesylate versus Capecitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast.
Discussant: M Ducreux, MD, PhD Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif France TH-302 plus Gemcitabine vs. Gemcitabine in Patients with Untreated Advanced Pancreatic.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
Single-agent nab-Paclitaxel Given Weekly (3/4) as First-line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (An International Oncology Network Study, #I )
POPLAR: Atezolizumab Improved Survival vs Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced NSCLC and Increasing Levels of PD-L1 Expression CCO Independent Conference.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 Phase II MONARCH 1: CDK4/6 Inhibitor Abemaciclib in HR+/HER2- MBC.
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
12 th Annual CTOS Meeting 2006 SINGLE AGENT DOXORUBICIN VS DOSE INTENSIVE COMBINATION THERAPY WITH EPIRUBICIN / IFOSFAMIDE IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED ADULT.
Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone inpatients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status.
Belani CP et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract CRA8000. (Oral Presentation)
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Phase II Study of Docetaxel (D) and Oxaliplatin (O) in Recurrent Metastatic Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder Davar D1, Appleman LA1, Friedland.
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
NCI/CTEP 7435: Eribulin Active, Tolerable in Urothelial Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 - June 2,
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
What do we do after FOLFIRINOX? Gemcitabine-Based Therapy is Standard
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 857.
or other irinotecan-based regimens
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo-)adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: safety results of a randomized phase III.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
MITO 26 PHASE II TRIAL ON TRABECTEDIN IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED UTERINE AND OVARIAN CARCINOSARCOMA (CS)
Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) +/- cetuximab for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the.
Presentation transcript:

RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL COMPARING FOLFIRINOX (5FU/LEUCOVORIN, IRINOTECAN AND OXALIPLATIN) VS GEMCITABINE AS FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR METASTATIC PANCREATIC ADENOCARCINOMA FIRST RESULTS OF THE ACCORD 11/0402 TRIAL M. Ychou 1, F. Desseigne 2, R. Guimbaud 3, M. Ducreux 4, O. Bouché 5, Y. Bécouarn 6, A. Adenis 7, C. Montoto-Grillot 8, E. Luporsi 9, T. Conroy 9 1. Centre Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier 2. Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon 3. Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse 4. Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif 5. Centre Hospitalier R. Debré, Reims 6. Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux 7. Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille 8. Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer- BECT, Paris 9. Centre Alexis Vautrin, Nancy, FRANCE

Abstract # 4516 RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL COMPARING FOLFIRINOX (5FU/LEUCOVORIN, IRINOTECAN AND OXALIPLATIN) VS GEMCITABINE AS FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR METASTATIC PANCREATIC ADENOCARCINOMA FIRST RESULTS OF THE ACCORD 11/0402 TRIAL M. Ychou 1, F. Desseigne 2, R. Guimbaud 3, M. Ducreux 4, O. Bouché 5, Y. Bécouarn 6, A. Adenis 7, C. Montoto-Grillot 8, E. Luporsi 9, T. Conroy 9 Background: In a phase II trial of Folfirinox (F) in 35 MPA patients (pts), we reported a 26% response rate and median survival of 9.5 months (mo) with quality of life improvement (Conroy, JCO 2005). The aim of this phase II trial was to compare the response rate and safety of F vs G in patients with MPA.

Methods: Chemotherapy-naïve patients aged years with histologically or cytologically confirmed measurable MPA were randomized to receive G (1000 mg/m2 IV weekly x 7 for 8 weeks [wks] then weekly x 3 out of 4 wks) or F (O 85mg/m2 d1 + I 180mg/m2 d1 + LV 400mg/m2 d1 followed by 5FU 400mg/m2 bolus d1 and 2400 mg/m2 46h continuous infusion biweekly). Patients were stratified by centre, performance status (ECOG 0 versus 1), and primary tumor location (head vs other). Primary endpoint was response rate.

Results: From 01/05 to 11/06, all planned 88 pts (44 per arm) were enrolled. Median age was 56 yrs [35-76]. Currently, safety data for 81 pts (41F/40G) and efficacy data for 65 pts (31F/34G) are available (17 too early). One pt was ineligible in arm F. Two pts, one in each arm, did not receive protocol therapy. Median number of wks on treatment was 18 (F) and 7 (G). No toxic death occurred. Main grade 3-4 toxicities (arm F vs G) were G3 neutropenia (32%/17.5), G4 neutropenia (19.5%/0), G3-4 thrombocytopenia (12%/0), G3 vomiting (17%/2.5), G3 transaminases (0%/15) and G3-4 fatigue (27%/15).Confirmed partial responses (PR) rates (F/G) were 38.7% (12/31) and 11.7 % (4/34) according to the investigators and median duration of response was 6,3 and 4,6 mo. PR and stable disease (SD) were documented for 21/31 evaluable pts in arm F and expert review confirmed 13 PR (41.9 %) and 6 SD (19.3%). Conclusions: Folfirinox induces a response rate > 30% with manageable toxicity in ECOG 0-1 pts with MPA. According to these interim results, this trial will continue as a phase III study. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Supported by a PHRC 2004 grant from the French Ministry of Health.

Background Advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains an incurable disease with few good treatment options. Weekly gemcitabine has been widely adopted as the standard of care, with median survival of 4.6 to 7.3 months in phase III randomized studies.

Background Folfirinox regimen (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, bolus and continuous infusion 5-FU plus leucovorin) was assessed in a phase II study and seems promising in good performance status patients (Conroy T et al. J Clin Oncol 2005;23: ). A confirmed response rate of 25.7 % and a median overall survival of 9.5 months was described in 35 patients with metastatic disease. Quality of life (assessed with EORTC QLQ-C30) was improved.

Background Therefore, we launched a phase II-III randomized study comparing Folfirinox regimen to gemcitabine alone. We report here the first results of the randomized phase II step.

Objectives Primary objective (for the phase II step) : to assess the response rate in both arms Secondary objective to assess the toxicity profile of each arm using NCI-CTC version 3.0, especially grade 3-4 toxicities

Study design Multicenter (n=17) randomized phase II trial Randomization between the 2 arms with stratification according to : center performance status : 0 versus 1 location of the tumor : head versus other location of pancreatic tumors

Treatments Arm A: FOLFIRINOX Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 in 2 hours infusion, Folinic acid 400 mg/m 2 in 2 hours infusion, Irinotecan 180 mg/m 2 in 90mn infusion, Bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m 2, Continuous infusion 5-FU 2.4 g/m 2 on 46 hours. 1 cycle = 14 days 1 h 30 2 h 46 h L-OHP 85 mg/m2 CPT mg/m2 Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 Continuous 5-FU mg/m 2 Bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m 2

Treatments Arm B: Gemcitabine Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 over 30 minutes given weekly X 7/8 and then weekly X 3/4 1 cycle = 28 days A 6 months duration of chemotherapy was advised for both arms

Statistical considerations The sample size calculation was calculated to reject a 10% response rate in favor of a target response rate of 24% for the experimental arm, with a significance level of 0.05 and a power of 92% by using Fleming's method: - In the initial stage, a total of 20 evaluable patients were to be entered and evaluated for response. If there was less than 3 responses, accrual was to be terminated. - If more than 3 responses were observed in the first stage, then 10 additional patients were to be entered in the second stage to achieve a target sample size of 30 evaluable patients. - Further accrual of 10 patients was planned if more than 4 responses were observed in the first 30 patients in the Folfirinox arm. A sample size of 80 patients (40 patients per study arm) was needed. Taking into consideration the estimate of approximately 5% of patients which will not be evaluable, a total number of 88 patients had to be randomized.

Inclusion criteria Histologically or cytologically proven adenocarcinoma of the pancreas ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 Measurable metastases (outside a radiotherapy field) No prior cytotoxic chemotherapy No prior abdominal radiotherapy Age years Adequate hematopoietic, hepatic and renal function No unstable angina or myocardial infarction within 12 months before the study Written informed consent

Non inclusion criteria Other pancreatic tumor (endocrine, acinar cell…) Central nervous system metastases Chronic diarrhea Previous or concomitant other malignant disease Locally advanced pancreatic cancer without distant metastases (stage III)

Efficacy assessment Tumor Response investigator assessment every 8 weeks according RECIST criteria independent blinded review of Objective Response (OR) and Stable Disease (SD) Quality of life assessment with EORTC QLQ-C30 (results not shown)

RESULTS Inclusion period from January 2005 to October PS (WHO) [35-71] 58 [38-76] Median age (years) [range] 26/1829/15Sex ratio M / F Gemcitabine (B) n = 44 FOLFIRINOX (A) n = 44 Patients characteristics (1)

RESULTS Measurable Site Liver Pancreas Nodes Peritoneal Lung Other 26 Pancreatic Tumor Resected Tumor Location Head Other Gemcitabine (B) n = 44 FOLFIRINOX (A) n = 44 Patients characteristics (2)

RESULTS 0 2 (4%) 7 (16%) 6 (14%) Anemia 0 1 (2%) Febrile neutropenia 16 (37%)38 (88%) Neutropenia Gemcitabine (B) n = 43 Number of patients (%) FOLFIRINOX (A) n = 43 Number of patients (%) Main grade 3-4 hematological toxicities Thrombopenia

RESULTS 2 (4%) 6 (14%) 2 (4%) 3 (7%) 0 (0%) 15 (35%) 10 (23%) 6 (14%) 1 (2%) 2 (4%) 10 (23%) 15 (35%) Vomiting Gemcitabine (B) n = 43 Number of patients (%) FOLFIRINOX (A) n = 43 Number of patients (%) Main grade 3-4 non hematological toxicities Nausea Diarrhea Abdominal cramps Neuropathy Fatigue

RESULTS – EFFICACY 9 (20.4 %) 27 (61.4 %) 3 (6.8 %) 12 (27.3 %) 15 (34.1 %) 3 (6.8 %) Stable Disease (SD) 5 (11.4 %) [ %] 14 (31.8 %) [ %] Partial Response (PR) [ 95 % IC ] 00Complete Response (CR) Gemcitabine (B) n = 44 FOLFIRINOX (A) n = 44 Investigators Response Rate* (ITT Population) Progressive Disease (PD) Non Evaluable (NE)** * Panel confirmed 15 PR in arm A and 4 in arm B ** 2 non treated and 4 ineligible

Conclusions Folfirinox induces a response rate > 30% with manageable toxicity in ECOG 0-1 pts with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. According to these interim results, this trial will continue as a phase III study to demonstrate an improvement in overall survival.

Acknowledgments  Patients  Co-investigators  Sponsor : J. Genève, M. Torres, F. Do Nascimento, AC. Le Gall (FNCLCC, BECT, Paris)  Data center : C. Kadouci (Centre Alexis Vautrin, Nancy)  Supported by a Clinical Research Hospital Program grant (PHRC 2004) grant from the French Ministry of Health  Grants from Pfizer and sanofi-aventis