Budget 2002-2003 Montrose Area Public Budget Presentation June 3, 2002 Lewis Plauny.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preliminary Budget March 18, Previous Year’s Budget Reductions Elimination of Teaching Positions Special Education/Two Elementary Elimination.
Advertisements

Detroit Public Schools FY 2005 Adopted Budget June 30, 2004.
Spring Cove School District 2014/15 Budget Workshop April 28, 2014.
Parkview School District Budget Hearing and Annual Meeting Monday, August 18, :30 p.m. Parkview Jr./Sr. High School LMC Monday, August.
Getting the Community Involved in Dealing with Current Financial Realities May 17, 2012 Mohsin Dada CFP® CFO North Shore School District 112, Highland.
Thornton Township High School District 205 September 8, /2011 Budget Presentation.
Funding Georgia’s Public Schools: An Overview. What We’ll Cover… An overview of public school funding The difference between federal, state and local.
Maner Costerisan  There are 882 Public School Districts within the State of Michigan as of ◦ Intermediate School Districts – 56 ◦ Local Education.
BOARD OF EDUCATION Finance Presentation Thursday, February 9, 2012.
May 29, Budget Presentation School Board Meeting.
PARKSTON SCHOOL DISTRICT 2012 State of the District Address.
AUDIT HIGHLIGHTS YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, Audit Opinion- “Unqualified Opinion” audit report Pages 2-3 District’s Financial Position Improving!
Public Hearing June 23, 2009 Berkeley County School District FY General Fund Budget.
Budget Proposal MISSION STATEMENT We will support student achievement by developing and sustaining exemplary educational experiences; creating.
1 McKinney isd PROPOSED budget June 22, 2009.
Budget Workshop Fiscal Year 2011 December 4, 2009.
Illini Central Community Unit School District # Budget (FY ’09) Presented to the Board of Education August 21, 2008.
WELCOME TO THE BUDGET HEARING AND ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SOUTH MILWAUKEE.
EDUCATION NEEDS TO BE VIEWED AS AN INVESTMENT NOT AN EXPENSE.
AUDIT HIGHLIGHTS YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 MINNEWASKA SCHOOL DISTRICT #2149.
Budget Information. 1 OUR School District…OUR Children This helps to maintain and increase property values We achieve this through a serious.
Budget Information. 1 OUR School District…OUR Children This helps to maintain and increase property values We achieve this through a serious.
School District of Upper Dublin Preliminary Budget January 13, 2014.
Proposed Final Budget Presentation (May 12, 2014) Selinsgrove Area School District.
MOSHANNON VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED BUDGET
WELCOME TO THE BUDGET HEARING AND ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SOUTH MILWAUKEE.
Proposed Budget Update Finance Committee Meeting June 19, 2014.
Proposed Final Budget Presentation (May 11, 2015) Selinsgrove Area School District.
East Penn School District Budget Outlook May 23, 2011.
Budget Work Session January 7, The Finance Committee is recommending the following:  The Board authorize the intent to adopt the Proposed Preliminary.
May 14, 2013 Dr. Phyllis A. Edwards, Superintendent City Schools of Decatur will be one of the top community school systems in the nation.
Goodhue School District 2015 Payable 2016 Truth In Taxation Public Meeting Time: 6:30pm Date: December 21, 2015 at the Goodhue School District Board Room.
Methacton School District Budget Presentation February 19, 2013.
Purpose The purpose of tonight’s meeting is to present the Proposed Final 2015/2016 Budget, following the required Act 1 timeline. SFASD must receive.
Spring-Ford Area School District Proposed Preliminary January 2015/16 Budget Presentation January 28, 2014.
Spring-Ford Area School District May 2013/14 Budget Presentation 1.
Proposed Final Budget Presentation (May 13, 2013) Selinsgrove Area School District.
GENERAL FUND BUDGET PRESENTATION FISCAL YEAR April 22, 2014 John T. Scully Business Administrator.
Spring-Ford Area School District Preliminary January 2013/14 Budget Presentation.
WORKING BUDGET PRESENTATION September 12, Revenue Unaudited Carry Forward Balance - $5,934, Increased $564, from draft budget (only.
May 16, 2016 Diane J. Richards, CPA, M.Ed. Director of Finance 2016 – 2017 Proposed Final Budget.
Thornton Township High School District 205 Presentation of Final Budget Preparing Today for the Challenges of Tomorrow September
Budget Forum 6:30 P.M., May 25, 2017.
Spring-Ford Area School District Final 2014/15 Budget
Trimble County Public Schools
HARPURSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL
HARPURSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL
Budget Overview Review of Last Years Budget
Spring-Ford Area School District 2012/2013 Proposed Final Budget
Spring-Ford Area School District 2012/2013 Proposed Final Budget
Preliminary Budget February 12, 2018.
Purpose The district is following the Act 1 timelines, and the purpose of tonight’s meeting is to present the Proposed Final 2014/15 Budget Receive approval.
Spring-Ford Area School District Proposed Preliminary January 2014/15 Budget Presentation January 27, 2014.
Proposed Final Budget May 8, 2018.
Keyport Public Schools Budget Budget Basics
HARPURSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL
Mechanicsburg Area School District
Preliminary Proposed Budget April 26, 2016
HARPURSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL
Preliminary Budget February 11, 2019.
MECHANICSBURG AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
HARPURSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL
Octorara Area School District
HARPURSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL
EXPLANATION The following slides describe the changes between the first draft of the general fund budget presented to the Board on March 28, 2017 and the.
Spring-Ford Area School District Final 2015/2016 Budget
HARPURSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL
REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT #16 PROSPECT / BEACON FALLS
WSD PROPOSED FINAL GENERAL FUND BUDGET
Crestwood School District
Presentation transcript:

Budget Montrose Area Public Budget Presentation June 3, 2002 Lewis Plauny

Budget Montrose Area Presentation Agenda Current “Draft Budget” key numbers Current “Draft Budget” key numbers Explain Budgetary Reserve & Fund Balance Explain Budgetary Reserve & Fund Balance Major Revenue & Expenditure Increases Major Revenue & Expenditure Increases Our Continuing Budget Improvement Plan Our Continuing Budget Improvement Plan Insights on Grants & Budget Problems Insights on Grants & Budget Problems Standard & Poors Review Standard & Poors Review Answer questions & ask for decisions Answer questions & ask for decisions

Budget Montrose Area Budget Draft Status Budget $18,000, Budget $18,000, Budget approx. $19,500, Budget approx. $19,500,000 Increase of$ 1,500,000or8.3% Increase of$ 1,500,000or8.3%

Budget Montrose Area Review of “Budget Draft” content 155 Page Board Document Itemizes all anticipated expenses and revenues 155 Page Board Document Itemizes all anticipated expenses and revenues Current Expenses are $ 18,221,995 Current Expenses are $ 18,221,995 Current Revenues are $ 18,171,324 Current Revenues are $ 18,171,324 Difference is $ -50,671 Difference is $ -50,671 Difference in millage equivalent is.28 mill Difference in millage equivalent is.28 mill –1.0 mill = 2.6 % tax increase –.5 mill = 1.3 % tax increase

Budget Montrose Area How We Calculate “Millage Equivalent” In the District collected $ 6,901, in current real estate taxes. In the District collected $ 6,901, in current real estate taxes. This was 90.4% of the levied taxes. This was 90.4% of the levied taxes. Amount collected divided by 37.5 mills levied equals 184, dollars collected for each mill levied. Amount collected divided by 37.5 mills levied equals 184, dollars collected for each mill levied.

Budget Montrose Area Why We Should “Think” “Millage Equivalent” Proactive - To be “fiscally responsible” local Boards should fund “Current Revenues”=“Current Expenditures” and “Think of all newly created budget costs in terms of millage increases” Proactive - To be “fiscally responsible” local Boards should fund “Current Revenues”=“Current Expenditures” and “Think of all newly created budget costs in terms of millage increases” Reactive - The State & Federal govts are always one to three years behind (if) they fund school needs Reactive - The State & Federal govts are always one to three years behind (if) they fund school needs

Budget Montrose Area Millage Impacts Average Real Estate Parcel is assessed at 27,340 (after Clean & Green) Average Real Estate Parcel is assessed at 27,340 (after Clean & Green) One mill is $ increase on the average parcel. One mill is $ increase on the average parcel.

Budget Montrose Area Budgetary Reserve for A Budgetary Reserve is a “non-itemized placeholder amount” that is used to anticipate unforeseeable expenses during the budget year that “must” be recorded in the General Fund. A Budgetary Reserve is a “non-itemized placeholder amount” that is used to anticipate unforeseeable expenses during the budget year that “must” be recorded in the General Fund. –Example: a “special needs” student enrolls during the year and the district must pay his/her tuition Budgetary Reserve is approx. $ 198,000 Budgetary Reserve is approx. $ 198,000 $ 198,000 is approx. 1% of a $ 19,500,000 $ 198,000 is approx. 1% of a $ 19,500,000

Budget Montrose Area Beginning Fund Balance for ’s budget total is $ 18,000, ’s budget total is $ 18,000,000 The District budgets to a 7 ½ % fund balance The District budgets to a 7 ½ % fund balance 7 ½ % of $ 18,000,000 is $ 1,350,000 7 ½ % of $ 18,000,000 is $ 1,350,000 Tentative Budget is approx. $ 19,500,000 Tentative Budget is approx. $ 19,500,000 7 ½ % of $ 19,500,00 is $ 1,462,500 7 ½ % of $ 19,500,00 is $ 1,462,500

Budget Montrose Area Budget Expenditure Increases Blue Cross (211 only) Increase $ 1,128, $ 1,071,400 57,271 Blue Cross (211 only) Increase $ 1,128, $ 1,071,400 57,271 Salary (100s) Increases $ 9,554, $ 8,787, ,421 Salary (100s) Increases $ 9,554, $ 8,787, ,421

Budget Montrose Area Budget Subsidy Increases ESBE Increase $ 128,755 (1%) = 0.69 mills ESBE Increase $ 128,755 (1%) = 0.69 mills Special Education Increase $ 46,959 (6.6%) = 0.25 mills Special Education Increase $ 46,959 (6.6%) = 0.25 mills Retirement Rate Decrease ????? Decrease in name only $ 231,928 = mills Retirement Rate Decrease ????? Decrease in name only $ 231,928 = mills

Budget Montrose Area Three Year Budget Improvement Plan Improving budgeting practices do not increase funding or decrease costs Improving budgeting practices do not increase funding or decrease costs Improves the methods and procedures with which we create the budget Improves the methods and procedures with which we create the budget Improves identifying costs and purchasing accountability Improves identifying costs and purchasing accountability

Budget Montrose Area A Balanced Educational Plan Increasing one side causes the other two sides to increase Increasing one side causes the other two sides to increase Decreasing one side causes the other two sides to decrease Decreasing one side causes the other two sides to decrease Continuous Improvement Plan Expenditure Plan Budget Plan

Budget Montrose Area Electronic Equipment Depreciation Philosophy A recommended “Sustainability Guideline” A recommended “Sustainability Guideline” –If you can not afford to “replace” it, you can not afford to “maintain” it –If you can not afford to “maintain” it, you can not afford to “buy” it –If you can not afford to “train staff to use it properly”, you can not afford to “buy” it

Budget Montrose Area Grant Insights Funding allocations are determined primarily by the availability of funds at higher levels of government Funding allocations are determined primarily by the availability of funds at higher levels of government Funding for all grants will change and the funding changes will not always be positive Funding for all grants will change and the funding changes will not always be positive Higher government levels do not have “downward” accountability Higher government levels do not have “downward” accountability

Budget Montrose Area Entitlement Type Grants Expect continuing State & Federal support Expect continuing State & Federal support –Example: Title 1 for poor & needy families Grant amounts controlled by State & Federal funding allocations Grant amounts controlled by State & Federal funding allocations –Funding will increase or decrease –“Allowable uses” will change May be “carefully” used for continuing salaries and benefits May be “carefully” used for continuing salaries and benefits

Budget Montrose Area Entitlement Type Grants Applied for annually 1. Social Security Reimbursement 2. Retirement Reimbursement 3. Building Debt Service Reimbursement 4. Special Education 5. Cafeteria Reimbursement 6. Title 1 – Poor and needy families and Reading First 7. Title II – (Part A) Improving Teacher Quality and (Part D) Enhancing Education Through Technology 8. Title V – Innovative Programs

Budget Montrose Area Competitive Type Grants “Sunset” type legislation Politically motivated (can occur midyear) Politically motivated (can occur midyear) Used to “start” but not “continue” support of Federal and State education initiatives Used to “start” but not “continue” support of Federal and State education initiatives Be thankful for them but, Be thankful for them but, –Only spend after you have received funds –Use grant funds for non-recurring expenses –Consider carefully future program maintenance costs

Budget Montrose Area Standard & Poors Review Local-Source Revenue Per Student (Definition) – Includes revenue for instruction, support services, and other operating purposes obtained from local sources including real estate property and other district-levied taxes, investment earnings, and tuition. Revenue is divided by total enrollment to determine per- student basis. Local-Source Revenue Per Student (Definition) – Includes revenue for instruction, support services, and other operating purposes obtained from local sources including real estate property and other district-levied taxes, investment earnings, and tuition. Revenue is divided by total enrollment to determine per- student basis.

Budget Montrose Area Standard & Poors Review MASD Key Factors “Well below-average operations and maintenance expenditures per student” “Well below-average operations and maintenance expenditures per student” “Exceptionally above-average transportation expenditures per student” “Exceptionally above-average transportation expenditures per student” “Well below-average local-source revenue per student” “Well below-average local-source revenue per student”

Budget Montrose Area Standard & Poors Quotes “On a per-student basis, the district’s operations and maintenance expenditures of $460 are exceptionally below the state average of $658, and lower than the peer group average. Statewide, only 6.0% of Pennsylvania’s school districts report lower per-student operations and maintenance expenditures. Spending on operations and maintenance represents 6.8% of the district’s operating expenditures, compared with the state average of 9.0%. During the period examined, the district’s per-student operations and maintenance expenditures have decreased by 7.2%. This is counter to the state trend, which has increased, and counter to the peer trend, which has remained relatively unchanged over the same time period.” “On a per-student basis, the district’s operations and maintenance expenditures of $460 are exceptionally below the state average of $658, and lower than the peer group average. Statewide, only 6.0% of Pennsylvania’s school districts report lower per-student operations and maintenance expenditures. Spending on operations and maintenance represents 6.8% of the district’s operating expenditures, compared with the state average of 9.0%. During the period examined, the district’s per-student operations and maintenance expenditures have decreased by 7.2%. This is counter to the state trend, which has increased, and counter to the peer trend, which has remained relatively unchanged over the same time period.”

Budget Montrose Area Standard & Poors Quotes “Transportation expenditures of $814 per student are exceptionally above the state average of $414, and higher than the peer group average. Statewide, only 1.2% of Pennsylvania’s school districts spend more per student than the district. Spending on transportation represents 12.1% of the district’s operating expenditures, compared with the state average of 5.7%. During the period examined, the district’s per-student transportation expenditures have increased by 17.4%. This is greater than the state and peer increases over the same time period.” “Transportation expenditures of $814 per student are exceptionally above the state average of $414, and higher than the peer group average. Statewide, only 1.2% of Pennsylvania’s school districts spend more per student than the district. Spending on transportation represents 12.1% of the district’s operating expenditures, compared with the state average of 5.7%. During the period examined, the district’s per-student transportation expenditures have increased by 17.4%. This is greater than the state and peer increases over the same time period.”

Budget Montrose Area “Postponing” Capital Expenditures Postponing “real” and “needed” costs is not “budget cutting”. Postponing “real” and “needed” costs is not “budget cutting”. The “need” does not “go away”. The “need” does not “go away”. Not budgeting a “need” results in “hidden deficit budgeting”. Not budgeting a “need” results in “hidden deficit budgeting”. The negative impact is even worse in future budgets. The negative impact is even worse in future budgets.

Budget Montrose Area “Inherent Structural Budget Deficiencies” “built-in” budget problems Employee Contracts, Benefits & Services Cost Increases Employee Contracts, Benefits & Services Cost Increases Proportionally Reduced State & Federal Funding Proportionally Reduced State & Federal Funding –Decrease in State subsidies from 52% to 3x% “Hidden” problems “Hidden” problems –“Work loads shifted” from Federal and State staff to Local education staff –Unfunded State & Federal Mandates“ shift tax burden” from Federal & State tax levies to Local tax levies“

Budget Montrose Area What we need to do Decide on any final budget changes Decide on any final budget changes Decide on a total final budget amount Decide on a total final budget amount Decide the millage rate for next year Decide the millage rate for next year Approve both items at Friday’s meeting Approve both items at Friday’s meeting