Christopher Geer, MBA Meaningful Use Project Manager Unity Health System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange
Advertisements

Dedicated to Hope, Healing and Recovery 0 Dec 2009 Interim/Proposed Rules Meaningful Use, Quality Reporting & Interoperability Standards January 10, 2010.
Meaningful Use Stage I Core Objectives
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
Eligible Hospitals (EH) & Critical Access Hospitals (CAH)
2014 Certification Criteria associated with MU Menu Stage 2: 2014 Certification Criteria associated with MU Core Stage 2: 2014 Certification Criteria associated.
Implementing the American Reinvestment & Recovery Act of 2009.
Meaningful Use Performance Measures Report Carmen Land Meaningful Use National Team Business Analyst Data Networks Corporation contractor for US Indian.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Improve Quality Safety, Efficiency and Reducing Health Disparities Subgroup 1 Meaningful Use Workgroup Improve Quality Safety,
TWS July2011 Stimulation Part 2. TWS July 2011 Objective: Implement drug formulary checks. Measure: The EP has enabled this functionality and has access.
TWS July 2011 Stimulation. TWS July 2011 The ARRA Stimulus Reimbursement from an ifa Customer Perspective.
Practice Management System Electronic Medical Records Accelerate Your Practice Stage 2 Meaningful Use with MVE 2014 Practice Management.
Meaningful Use and the EHR Incentive Program Tribal Self-Governance Conference.
GOVERNMENT EHR FUNDING: MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 UPDATE October 25, 2012 Jonathan Krasner Healthcare IT Consultant BEI
Meaningful Use Monitoring Methodology © 1 Meaningful Use Monitor (MUM) Initial Gap Assessment (IGA) Phase Kit 4/6/2010 Meaningful Use Monitor Indiana Radiology.
Proposed Meaningful Use Criteria for Stage 2 and 3 John D. Halamka.
The Standards Rule and the NPRM for Meaningful Use John D. Halamka MD.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
PR’s Journey Towards Electronic Health Records Adoption & Meaningful Use PRESENTATION TO PR HIT SUMMIT Antonio Fernandez Regional Extension Center for.
WV HFMA January 23,  Understand Stage 1 changes starting in 2014  Understand Stage 2 Objectives & Quality Measures – changes from Stage 1 and.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Moderator Kevin Larsen, MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Washington, D.C. Using.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
EHRS as a Tool to Improve BP Control 1.Brief history of OQIUN, CCI. Began 1999 using data cards. Started working with multiple practice sites using different.
Protecting Your Peace of Mind Meaningful Evaluation: Assessments for Meaningful Use Success September 21, 2010 Presented by: Beth Schultz, RN, Implementation.
Installation and Maintenance of Health IT Systems Unit 8-2 System Selection- Software and Certification Component 8/Unit 2 1 Health IT Workforce Curriculum.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
Practice Management System Electronic Medical Records Accelerate Your Practice Stage 1 Meaningful Use with MVE 2014 Practice Management.
New Jersey Institute of Technology Enterprise Development Center (EDC) 211 Warren Street, Newark, NJ Phone: Fax:
Meaningful Use Stage 1 & 2 Helping Colorado Providers Achieve Meaningful Use Tracy Rue Senior Consultant, Colorado Regional Extension Center.
NWH TRANSITION OF CARE DOCUMENT FOR MU STAGE 2 JUNE 6, 2014.
Prepared by: Health Technology Services Regional Extension Center A division of Mountain-Pacific Quality Health.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Universal Adoption of the EHR What is Meaningful Use and why should it be important to me?
Meaningful Use Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC Update: 2015 Sponsored by.
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Implementation days 10 Days Onsite Training Additional Hardware Automated Workflow Paperless Environment MD with PC Tablet / iPad Workflow Analysis.
INTRODUCTION TO THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD CHAPTER 1.
Configuring Electronic Health Records Meaningful Use and Implementation Lecture a This material (Comp11_Unit8a) was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
GloStream and Meaningful Use August, Table of Contents Final rule from the ONC and CMS The gloStream path to truly meaningful use Medicare payment.
HIT Policy Committee: Meaningful Use Workgroup Stage 3 – Preliminary Recommendations Debrief Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak,
Component 11: Configuring EHRs Unit 2: Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Jason McNamara Technical Director for Health IT.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome HIT Standards Committee
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Robert Anthony HIT Policy Committee March 7, 2012.
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
HITECH/MEANINGFUL USE Danielle Smith Trends and Issues in Healthcare December 2, 2014 Power Point Project.
HIT Policy Committee Stage 2 Recommendations Presentation to HIT Standards Committee June 22, 2011.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Maine Health Information Technology (HIT)Status Report for MaineCare and Office of the State Coordinator for HIT Project Team: Andy Coburn Cathy McGuire.
Meaningful Use Made Easy Step by Step Approach to Stage 1 Compliance and 2013 Changes My Vision Express Practice Management and EMR Software Presented.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview 1 Robert Anthony.
Configuring axiUm for Meaningful Use
Moving Toward HITECH Healthcare EHR Adoption at the Dawn of a New Era
 By phone: 1) Dial ) Enter conference ID: # Join the audio conference:  Via internet: 1) Click the phone icon 2) Click “Connect”
Meaningful Use Update 2015: How Does It Impact Family Medicine? Ryan Mullins, MD, CPE, CPHQ, CPHIT.
Stage 2 Beyond the First Year on MU in 2014 Presenters: Randy Marsden – Chief Client Officer Leo Vilenskiy – Senior Customer Support Representative Rebecca.
Configuring Electronic Health Records
Presentation transcript:

Christopher Geer, MBA Meaningful Use Project Manager Unity Health System

 The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act  Enacted as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009  Promotes the adoption and meaningful use of health information technology. x

Data Capture and Sharing Advanced Clinical Process Improved Outcomes 1 2 3

First Payment Year Payment Year Stage 1 (100%) Stage 1 (75%) Stage 1 (50%) Stage 2 (25%)Stage 2Stage Stage 1 (100%) Stage 1 (75%) Stage 2 (50%) Stage 2 (25%)Stage Stage 1 (100%) Stage 1 (75%) Stage 2 (50%) Stage 2 (25%)Stage Stage 1 (75%) Stage 1 (50%) Stage 2 (25%)Stage Stage 1 Stage Stage 1 “If there will be a stage 4 of Meaningful Use, we expect to update this table in the rulemaking stage 3” – CMS, Stage 2 NPRM

Possess Certified EHR Technology Attest to Meaningfully Using CEHRT Incentive Payment Is your vendor certified?

Meaningful Use Eligible Hospitals MedicaidMedicare Eligible Professionals MedicaidMedicare Dually-eligible Hospitals can participate in both programs Dually-eligible providers must pick 1 program

Medicaid ProgramMedicare Program Administered by the StateAdministered by Federal Government No payment reductionsPayment reductions begin in 2015 Adopt, Implement, Upgrade option for 1 st year Must demonstrate MU in year 1 Maximum EP incentive $63,750 Maximum incentive $44,000 for EP’s (10% bonus for EP’s in HPSAs) Fixed incentive over 6 years (EP) and 4 years (EH) in NYS (may vary by state) EP incentive paid over 5 years based on 75% of net allowable charges Require 30% (EP) and 10%(EH) minimum Medicaid volume No minimum volume threshold Can skip years once startingMust be done in consecutive years

Medicaid EP’s 30% Medicaid Volume Required Medicare EP’s No Volume Requirement PhysiciansDoctor of Medicine or Osteopathy Dentists Doctor of Oral Surgery or Dental Medicine Certified Nurse MidwifeDoctor of Podiatric Medicine Nurse PractitionerDoctor of Optometry Physician Assistant*Chiropractor *Must be practicing in a Rural Health Center or Federally Qualified Health Center led by a PA. Must render <90% of services in an Inpatient Acute or Emergency Setting

 Subsection (d) hospitals or Critical Access Hospitals in the 50 states or DC that are paid under the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS)

Eligible HospitalStage 1Stage 2 Core1416 Menu104 Menu Required52 Eligible ProfessionalStage 1Stage 2 Core1517 Menu105 Menu Required53

 Yes / No Attestation  Percentage-Based Measure Numerator / Denominator = Requirement Possible Denominators:  Unique Patients  Transitions of Care  Orders  There are exclusions for many of the objectives

STAGE 1 EP: CORE EH: CORE PROPOSED STAGE 2 EP: CORE EH: CORE  Requirement: 30%  Numerator: At least 1 medication order  Denominator: Unique patients with at least 1 medication in their med list  Requirement: 60 %  Numerator: Total orders entered using CPOE  Denominator: Total medication, lab, and radiology orders Objective : Use CPOE for orders entered

STAGE 1 EP: MENU EH: MENU PROPOSED STAGE 2 CONSOLIDATED  Enable drug formulary checks  Consolidated into the eRx objective Objective: Implement drug-formulary checks

STAGE 1 EP: CORE EH: N/A PROPOSED STAGE 2 EP: CORE EH: MENU  Requirement: 40%  Numerator: E-prescriptions  Denominator: Prescriptions written  Requirement: EP: 65% EH: 10%  Numerator: E-prescriptions  Denominator: Prescriptions written (EH: Discharge Prescriptions)  Must be checked against at least 1 formulary Objective: Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically (eRx).

STAGE 1 EP: MENU EH: MENU PROPOSED STAGE 2 EP: CORE EH: CORE  Requirement: 10%  Numerator: Number of patients who are provided patient education specific resources  Denominator: Unique patients  Requirement: 10%  Numerator: Number of patients who are provided patient education specific resources  Denominator: EH: Unique patients EP: Office Visits Objective: Use clinically relevant information from Certified EHR Technology to identify patient-specific education resources and provide those resources to the patient.

STAGE 1 EP: MENU EH: MENU PROPOSED STAGE 2 EP: CORE EH: CORE  Requirement: 50%  Numerator: Patients where medication reconciliation was performed.  Denominator: Transitions of care  Requirement: 65%  Numerator: Patients where medication reconciliation was performed.  Denominator: Transitions of care Objective: The EP or EH who receives a patient from another setting of care or provider of care or believes an encounter is relevant should perform medication reconciliation

STAGE 1 EP: MENU EH: N/A PROPOSED STAGE 2 EP: CORE EH: N/A  Requirement: 20%  Numerator: Patients who were sent reminders  Denominator: Number of unique patients 65 years old or older or 5 years older or younger.  Requirement: 10%  Numerator: Patients who were sent reminders  Denominator: Unique patients Objective: Send reminders to patients per patient preference for preventive/follow-up care.

STAGE 1 EP: CORE EH: CORE PROPOSED STAGE 2 EP: CORE EH: CORE  Requirement: 50%  Numerator: Number of patients will all elements captured  Denominator: Unique patients  Race/Ethnicity Standard: OMB Standards  Requirement: 80 %  Numerator: Number of patients will all elements captured  Denominator: Unique patients  Race/Ethnicity Standard: OMB Standards Objective : Record the following demographics: preferred language, gender, race and ethnicity, date of birth, and date and preliminary cause of death in the event of mortality in the eligible hospital or CAH

STAGE 1 EP: CORE EH: CORE PROPOSED STAGE 2 CONSOLIDATED  Requirement: 80%  Numerator: Unique patients with at least 1 recorded problem, medication, medication allergy, or an indication of none.  Denominator: Unique patients  Consolidated into the requirements for other objectives Objectives : Maintain an up-to-date problem list, medication list, and medication allergy list

STAGE 1 EP: CORE EH: CORE PROPOSED STAGE 2 EP: CORE EH: CORE  Requirement: 50%  Numerator: Number of patients with all elements captured  Denominator: Unique patients  Requirement: 80 %  Change BMI to age 3, and eliminate height/weight age restriction  Numerator: Number of patients will all elements captured  Denominator: Unique patients Objective: Record and chart height, weight and blood pressure and calculate and display body mass index (BMI) for ages 2 and over; plot and display growth charts for children years, including BMI

STAGE 1 EP: CORE EH: CORE PROPOSED STAGE 2 EP: CORE EH: CORE  Requirement: 50%  Numerator: Number of unique patients with smoking status captured  Denominator: Unique patients  Requirement: 80 %  Numerator: Number of unique patients with smoking status captured  Denominator: Unique patients Objective: Record smoking status for patients 13 years old or older

STAGE 1 EP: MENU EH: MENU PROPOSED STAGE 2 EP: CORE EH: CORE  Generate 1 list Objective: Generate lists of patients by specific conditions to use for quality improvement, reduction of disparities, research, or outreach

STAGE 1 EP: CORE EH: CORE PROPOSED STAGE 2 REMOVED AS AN OBJECTIVE  Submit quality measures  Still required to submit to be considered a meaningful user  Electronic Submission Objective : Report quality measure to CMS or the states

STAGE 1 EP: CORE EH: CORE PROPOSED STAGE 2 EP: CORE EH: CORE  1 Rule  5 Rules related to the improvement of selected quality measures  Drug-Drug / Drug Allergy Checks included as part of this objective Objective : Implement clinical decision support rules related to specialty or high clinical priority

STAGE 1 EP: CORE EH: CORE PROPOSED STAGE 2 CONSOLIDATED  Enable drug-drug / drug- allergy checks  Consolidated into the Clinical Decision Support Objective  Enable drug-drug / drug- allergy checks Objective : Implement drug-drug and drug-allergy checks

STAGE 1 EP: CORE EH: CORE PROPOSED STAGE 2 EP: CORE EH: CORE  Perform Security Risk Assessment Objective: Protect electronic health information created or maintained by the certified EHR technology through the implementation of appropriate technical capabilities

STAGE 1 EP: N/A EH: MENU PROPOSED STAGE 2 EP: N/A EH: MENU  Requirement: 50%  Numerator: Number of patients where an indication of an advance directive is entered  Denominator: Unique patients  Requirement: 50%  Numerator: Number of patients where an indication of an advance directive is entered  Denominator: Unique patients Objective: Record whether a patient 65 years old or older has an advanced directive as structured data

STAGE 1 EP: MENU EH: MENU PROPOSED STAGE 2 EP: CORE EH: CORE  Requirement: 40%  Numerator: Lab orders received electronically  Denominator: Lab orders  Requirement: 55%  Numerator: Lab orders received electronically  Denominator: Lab orders Objective: Incorporate clinical lab-test results into EHR as structured data

Measure Stage 1 Requirement Stage 2 Hospital Status Stage 2 Ambulatory Status Immunization DataCore Lab DataCoreN/A Surveillance Data Core Menu Cancer Cases N/A Menu Other Specific Cases N/A Menu

STAGE 1 EP: N/A EH: N/A PROPOSED STAGE 2 EP: CORE EH: N/A  New with for stage 2  Requirement: 10%  Numerator: The number of patients who send a secure message to the provider  Denominator: Unique patients Objective: Use secure electronic messaging to communicate with patients on relevant health information.

STAGE 1 EP: N/A EH: N/A PROPOSED STAGE 2 EP: MENU EH: MENU  New with for stage 2  Requirement: 40% images captured 10% submitted to another provider of care  Numerator: Results accessible through the EHR  Denominator: Number of scans and tests whose result is one or more image ordered Objective: Imaging results and information are accessible through Certified EHR Technology.

STAGE 1 EP: N/A EH: N/A PROPOSED STAGE 2 EP: N/A EH: MENU  New with for stage 2  Requirement: 10%  Numerator: The number of orders tracked using eMAR.  Denominator: Medication orders Objective: Automatically track medications from order to administration using assistive technologies in conjunction with an electronic medication administration record (eMAR).

STAGE 1 EP: N/A EH: N/A PROPOSED STAGE 2 EP: MENU EH: MENU  New with for stage 2  Requirement: 20%  Numerator: Patients with structured data entry for one or more first-degree relatives.  Denominator: Unique Patients Objective Record patient family health history as structured data

STAGE 1 EP: CORE EH: N/A PROPOSED STAGE 2 EP: CORE EH: N/A  Requirement: 50%  Numerator: Patients provided a clinical summary within 3 business days  Denominator: Unique Patients  Requirement: 50%  Numerator: Patients provided a clinical summary within 24 hours  Denominator: Unique Patients  Expanded requirements Objective Provide clinical summaries for patients for each office visit

STAGE 1 EP: CORE EH: CORE PROPOSED STAGE 2 CONSOLIDATED  Performed one test  Consolidated into the summary of care objective Objective: Capability to exchange key clinical information, among providers of care and patient authorized entities electronically

STAGE 1 EP: MENU EH: MENU PROPOSED STAGE 2 EP: CORE EH: CORE  Requirement: 50%  Numerator: Number of patients where a summary of care was provided  Denominator: Number of transitions of care  Requirement: 60% Paper or electronic 10% electronically  Numerator: Number of patients where a summary of care was provided  Denominator: Number of transitions of care Objective: The EP or EH who transitions their patient to another setting of care should provide summary care record for each transition of care or referral

STAGE 1 EP: CORE EH: CORE PROPOSED STAGE 2 CONSOLIDATED  Requirement: 50%  Numerator: Number of patients receiving their record electronically within 3 business days  Denominator: patient requests for an e-copy  At a minimum: must include Problems, medications, medication allergies, and diagnostic test results  Consolidated into the view, download, transmit objective. Objective: Provide patients with an electronic copy of their health information upon request

STAGE 1 EP: N/A EH: CORE PROPOSED STAGE 2 CONSOLIDATED  Requirement: 50%  Numerator: Number of patients receiving their instructions electronically  Denominator: patient requests for an e-discharge instructions  Consolidated into the view, download, transmit objective. Objective: Provide patients with an electronic copy of their health information upon request

STAGE 1 EP: MENU EH: N/A PROPOSED STAGE 2 CONSOLIDATED  Requirement: 10%  Numerator: Number of patients who have their record displayed online  Denominator: Unique patients  At a minimum: must include Problems, medications, medication allergies, and diagnostic test results  Consolidated into the view, download, transmit objective. Objective: Provide patients with timely electronic access to their health information within four business days of the information being available to the EP

 EP: Must provide information online in 4 business days 50% of unique patients are provided their health information online 10% of patients must access that information Standards  Patient Name  Provider name, practice  Problem List  SNOMED CT  Procedures  ICD-10, CPT-4  Laboratory test results  LOINC  Medication list  Medication Allergy List  Vital Signs  Smoking Status  Demographic Information  Care plan field, including goals and instructions  Additional known care team members

 EP: Must provide information online within 36 hours of discharge 50% of unique patients are provided their health information online 10% of patients must access that information Standards  Admit and discharge date/place  Reason for hospitalization  Providers of care  Problem List  SNOMED CT  Relevant past diagnosis  Laboratory test results  LOINC  Medication list  Medication Allergy List  Vitals at discharge  Demographic Information  Care transition plan  Discharge Instructions

Christopher Geer, MBA Meaningful Use Project Manager Unity Health System Questions?