Experiences from a national medical library ICOLC Stockholm, Tuesday 2nd October 2007 Kjell Tjensvoll, Consortium Manager
Tuesday 2nd October Mission To improve health care quality by providing free and easy access for health personnel to useful and reliable knowledge Provide free access to medical information resources for: – all Norwegian health personnel – students at medical colleges and universities
Tuesday 2nd October 20073
4 Organisation First deal with Ovid from 1st January 2005 Officially opened 6th June 2006 Seven employees Financed through public funds: owned by The Directorate of Health and Social Services and the regional health trusts. Hosted by The Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services – Organised as a publication/journal; editor in chief – Editor manage according to statutes – Independent of both owners and host organisation
Tuesday 2nd October Economy Annual budget ca. EUR 5 mill (USD 7,2 mill) Norway is a rich country – Are the libraries rich? Publishers expect better prices We get less content for the same amounts of money VAT
Tuesday 2nd October
Tuesday 2nd October 20077
8 Four access levels... Open Access – Linking to resources – Institutional repository – BioMed Central National access – Recognition of national IP range (GeoIP) Access for health personnel and students – Medical colleges – Universities Access for health personnel
Tuesday 2nd October Journals and databases National access – BMJ (24 Journals), JAMA (and 9 archives), Annals of Internal Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine, Cochrane Library, Clinical Evidence Access for health personnel and students – Five bibliographic databases –AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO – ProQuest Medical Databases – Lippincott C100 (collaboration with universities) – PsycARTICLES ? Access for health personnel – Norwegian Medical Handbook (NEL)
Tuesday 2nd October National procurement EU regulations; threshold values – USD , national tender – USD , international tender Letter of the law is to tender for everything above the threshold values Direct procurement – Only below USD Exceptions – Specific titles/resources with no competitors
Tuesday 2nd October Tender process – useful tools... Choose correct process – Open tender – Negotiations Energy consuming process Very powerful – dictate conditions – reservations disqualifies – vendors are subject to laws and regulations Award criteria – more complicated after – critical to do well Contracts – standard contracts – tender documents appendix – additional appendix
Tuesday 2nd October Current tender for journals and databases Open competition; no negotiations Journal package – Content and cost Databases, same, same but different... – Unsatisfactory market situation – Vendors are not customer friendly –EBSCO, Wolters Kluwer, Elsevier,... Using tender to make our view clear and to encourage competition Does it work?
Tuesday 2nd October Search functionality Tender process – 10 months! – Tender with negotiations – Hired consultants Limited funds Contenders – IntelliSearch, FAST, Google, Vivisimo, open source, … – Missing: Autonomy, Endeca, Mondosoft, … Winner: Vivisimo
Tuesday 2nd October
Tuesday 2nd October
Tuesday 2nd October