Doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/220r0 Submission March 2002 A. Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Proposal for a 4 Channel Option to Increase Capacity in the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2006, ##### Design Issues for Wireless Networks Across Diverse and Fragmented Spectrum Collaborators: Bell Labs India:
Advertisements

Bluetooth / IEEE Coexistence Reliability of IEEE WLANs in Presence of Bluetooth Radios Jim Zyren
Doc.: IEEE /037r1 Submission March 2001 Khaled Turki et. al,Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Simulation Results for p-DCF, v-DCF and Legacy DCF Khaled.
Legacy Coexistence – A Better Way?
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [General Atomics – Interference Analysis of IEEE a.
Doc.: IEEE /513r0 Submission November 2001 Anuj Batra, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [Considerations for Supporting the MAC Over.
Doc.: IEEE /320r0 Submission May 2002 Gerhard Fettweis, Systemonic AGSlide 1 ¼ Giga-Bit/s WLAN Gerhard Fettweis Gunnar Nitsche Systemonic AG.
Updated China's 5GHz Spectrum Regulation
Doc.: IEEE /533r0 Submission September 2002 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems et alSlide 1 Preparation of PAR and 5 Criterion addressing Japans 4.9-5GHz.
Doc.: IEEE /315 Submission September 2000 Jim Zyren, IntersilSlide 1 Regulatory Ad Hoc Group Report Scottsdale, AZ, USA September 2000.
Doc: IEEE r0 Submission May 2001 S. Halford, et al Intersil Corporation Slide 1 Minor Technical Change for TGg Steve Halford Mark Webster Jim.
Doc.: IEEE /015r0 Submission March 2003 Andy Gowans - UK RA Bands A & B update Andy Gowans Private Business Systems Unit UK Radiocommunications.
Frequency Domain Modulators for b
Doc.: IEEE yy/0847r0 Submission Slide 1Leonardo Lanante, Ochi Lab, KIT July 2009 IEEE802.11ac Preamble with Legacy a/n Backward Compatibility.
1 IEEE MBWA Standard Project Contribution: C xx Date: May RF Performance Evaluation Criteria Dan Gal
Simulation and Evaluation of Various Block Assignments Evaluation of multiple carriers deployed in a channel block evaluation criteria section.
Doc.: IEEE /0026r0 Submission July 2005 Stephen R Whitesell, VTech CommunicationsSlide 1 Cordless Telephone Coexistence Considerations Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /082r0 Submission January 2001 Anuj Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /082r1 Submission January 2001 Anuj Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 An Intelligent Frequency Hopping Scheme for Improved Bluetooth.
Doc.: IEEE /0006r0 Submission January 2006 Gerald Chouinard, CRCSlide 1 TV bands White Spaces and DTV receiver RF front-end performance and protection.
Doc.: IEEE P /359r0 TG4 July 2001 NOTE: Update all red fields replacing with your information; they are required. This is a manual update in appropriate.
Doc.: IEEE /081r0 Submission January 2001 Shoemake, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [Staccato UWB PHY Proposal for TG4a] Date Submitted:
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS) Submission Title: [Staccato UWB PHY Proposal for TG4a] Date Submitted:
Doc.: IEEE /290r0 Submission May, 2005 Celestino A. Corral et al., FreescaleSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /341r0 Submission 12Sept2003 John R. Barr (Motorola) Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Submission Page 1 January 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.RR-02/018A-d1 Andrew Myles, Cisco Systems Report of ad hoc group relating to DFS and JPT5G proposal Andrew.
UWB Channels – Capacity and Signaling Department 1, Cluster 4 Meeting Vienna, 1 April 2005 Erdal Arıkan Bilkent University.
Doc.: IEEE /0060r0 Submission January 2004 Christopher Hansen, BroadcomSlide 1 Thoughts on TX Spectral Masks for n Christopher J. Hansen.
Doc.: IEEE /249 Submission May 2001 Zyren, Webster, Halford Intersil FCC Further Notice ET Docket Zyren, Webster, Halford Intersil.
Technical discussion on Re-channelization Proposal for DSRC band coexistence Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1062r2 Submission Zhendong Luo, CATR September 2010 RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China Date: Authors: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /543r0 Submission April 2006 Richard van Nee, Airgo NetworksSlide 1 Transmitter CCA Issues in 2.4 GHz April /543r0 Richard van.
Doc.: IEEE /1255r0 Submission TX Mask for Noncontiguous 160 MHz Date: Youhan Kim et al.Slide 1 Authors: November 2010.
Doc.: IEEE /0613r0 Submission May 2012 Ron Porat, Broadcom US Channelization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
January 6, 2002doc.: IEEE /044r0 SubmissionRishi Mohindra, MAXIMSlide 1 Proposal for IEEE802.11g Receiver Adjacent Channel Rejection Requirement.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission May 11, 2011 Steve Jillings, SemtechSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /0018r0 Submission May 2004 Steve Shellhammer, Intel CorporationSlide 1 IEEE Wireless Coexistence TAG Steve Shellhammer
January 2002 Khaled Turki et. al, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /022r0 Submission TID Field Usage in QoS CF-Poll Khaled Turki and Matthew.
Doc.: IEEE /286r0 Submission May 2001 Shoemake and Batra, TI Range vs. Rate Comparison of Remaining IEEE g Proposals: PBCC and CCK-OFDM.
Doc.: IEEE /1342r1 Submission November 2010 Matthew Fischer, BroadcomSlide 1 Spectral Mask Absolute vs Relative Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /443r0 Submission October 2001 Anuj Batra, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE MHz-11n-impact-on-bluetooth Submission July 2008 Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 IEEE n 40 MHz Impact on BT Performance.
Doc.:IEEE /0103r1 Submission Laurent Cariou January 19, 2010 Slide 1 Gains provided by multichannel transmissions Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE g Submission March 15, 2011 Steve Jillings, SemtechSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Issues with CSMA-CA in ]
Doc.: IEEE /0309r1 Submission March 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 1MHz Waveform in Wider BW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1123r0 Submission September 2010 Zhu/Kim et al 1 Date: Authors: [TXOP Sharing for DL MU-MIMO Support]
Doc.: IEEE Submission May 2011 Paul Stadnik (Biotronik) et al.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Cyclic Shift Diversity Design for IEEE aj (45GHz)
July 2002doc.: IEEE /420r0 Submission Rishi Mohindra, MAXIMSlide 1 2-Channel Option for 11g (proposal) Rishi Mohindra MAXIM Integrated Products.
Doc.: IEEE /1062r0 Submission Zhendong Luo, CATR September 2010 RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China Date: Authors: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /0039r2 Submission Nov 2010 Raja Banerjea, Marvell SemiconductorSlide 1 Transmit Spectral Mask Changes Date: Authors:
Matthew B. Shoemake, Ph.D. Anuj Batra, Ph.D.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Options for PBCC 22 Proposal
Options for PBCC 22 Proposal
80-MHz Non-Contiguous Channel Spectrum
2-Channel Option for 11g (proposal)
July 2010 doc.: IEEE xxx May 2011 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
May 2003 doc.: IEEE /141r3 May, 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Ultra-Wideband.
Spectral Control Issues for TGg
White Space Regulatory Issues
Multi-block OFDM for TVWS Operation
Multi-block OFDM for TVWS Operation
4 Channel Special Committee Report
Spectral line suppression for MC-OOK
80-MHz Non-Contiguous Channel Spectrum
RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /220r0 Submission March 2002 A. Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Proposal for a 4 Channel Option to Increase Capacity in the 2.4 GHz ISM Band Anuj Batra Kofi Anim-Appiah Matthew B. Shoemake Texas Instruments March 12, 2002

doc.: IEEE /220r0 Submission March 2002 A. Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 2 Motivation (1) To use the spectrum in the 2.4 GHz ISM band more efficiently. To increase the number of simultaneous users that can be supported in a given network. To make network planning in enterprise environments easier. Even though the primary focus for IEEE g has been on data rate extensions, capacity extensions are just as important. Should consider methods for increasing capacity that will prolong the utility of the IEEE g standard.

doc.: IEEE /220r0 Submission March 2002 A. Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 3 Motivation (2) IEEE b standard currently allows for only three non-overlapping channels: –Channels 1, 6, and 11 (channel spacing = 25 MHz). IEEE a standard uses a channel spacing of 20 MHz. Total available spectrum = 83.5 MHz. Could we use a channel spacing of 20 MHz for the IEEE g standard? If we could reduce the channel spacing, then it would be possible to place four non-overlapping channels in the ISM band.

doc.: IEEE /220r0 Submission March 2002 A. Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 4 Implications / Constraints Reducing the channel spacing to 20 MHz: –Primarily affects single-carrier signals: Barker, CCK, and PBCC, in the IEEE g draft. –Need to verify that we can restrict the bandwidth of the single-carrier signals to 20 MHz. –Should not have an impact on the multi-carrier signals in the IEEE g draft, because those signals were designed to work with a channel spacing of 20 MHz. Need to verify that it is still possible to transmit at least 20 dBm on each channel when the channel spacing is reduced. The exact transmit power levels will depend on factors such as: –Spectral regrowth introduced by the PA. –Noise from DAC. –EVM of the transmitted signal.

doc.: IEEE /220r0 Submission March 2002 A. Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 5 By using spectral shaping, it is possible to restrict the bandwidth of a single-carrier signal to 20 MHz. –Ex: SR-RC filter ( = 0.6) that extends over 4 symbols (before PA). –99.994% of the energy is contained within 20 MHz of f c (42-db BW = 20 MHz). Spectral Shaping for Single-Carrier Signals

doc.: IEEE /220r0 Submission March 2002 A. Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 6 FCC Regulations Need to ensure that new channelization scheme meets FCC out-of-band requirements ( and ). Restricted bands of operation (15.205): –2310 MHz – 2390 MHz (band below the ISM band). – MHz – 2500 MHz (band above the ISM band). For frequencies in the restricted bands above 960 MHz, the emissions from an intentional radiator shall not exceed a field strength of 500 V/m when measured at a distance of 3m (15.209). –Equivalent to an average radiated power of –41.25 dBmi in any 1 MHz band. –The transmission duty cycle within a 100msec period must also be considered when measuring the average radiated power.

doc.: IEEE /220r0 Submission March 2002 A. Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 7 Proposed 4 Channel Option Define CHNL_ID = 0 to correspond to a center frequency of 2407 MHz. Propose the following optional 4 channel scheme for the IEEE g draft. –Channel spacing = 20 MHz. –Channels 0 and 12 are approximately the same distance from the forbidden bands.

doc.: IEEE /220r0 Submission March 2002 A. Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 8 Total transmit power for each channel is 20 dBm (Resolution BW = 1 MHz). SR-RC transmit filter ( = 0.6) that spans 4 symbols. Rapp Model with p = 3. Spectrum for Single-Carrier Modulation

doc.: IEEE /220r0 Submission March 2002 A. Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 9 Spectrum for Multi-Carrier Modulation Total transmit power for each channel is 20 dBm (Resolution BW = 1 MHz). Tapering transition duration of T TR = 150 ns. Rapp Model with p = 3.

doc.: IEEE /220r0 Submission March 2002 A. Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 10 Conclusion Proposed a new optional channelization scheme for the IEEE g standard that accommodates 4 non-overlapping channels. Showed that it may be possible to transmit at least 20 dBm on each of the 4 channels and still meet FCC requirements. –Further study is needed.