Overview of 1366-2001 Full Use Guide on Electric Power Distribution Reliability Indices Panel Session – How to Define Major Events July 22, 2002 Presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
February Best Practices in Advancement Services Customer Service: Benchmarking with the Best Jennifer Houlihan Warwick Loyola Marymount University.
Advertisements

12/09/20021 Engineer Training Program Drivers & AP Installation Guide for N34BS3 Written By Suzanne Yu Uniwill Computer Intl Corp Gateway Blvd. Fremont,
Utility Needs and Smart Grid for Major Storm Events July 11, 2013 Edward Gray, PE Director – Transmission and Distribution Engineering.
Page 1 Outage Management Roy Hoffman 29 Jan 2001.
NERC Footnote b / 12 – Load Loss
Summer Time, Rate, and Productivity Management of Operations Brad C. Meyer.
KNF Pocket Card Klamath NF Pocket Cards Fire Season 2002.
CSCI Intelligent Embedded Systems, Spring A Distributed Location System for the Active Office Andy Harter, Andy Hopper.
/ department of mathematics and computer science TU/e technische universiteit eindhoven WISE 2002December 12, RAL: an RDF Algebra Flavius Frasincar.
Welcome to CMPE003 Personal Computers: Hardware and Software Dr. Chane Fullmer Fall 2002 UC Santa Cruz.
Trends in North American UVM Trends in North American Utility Vegetation Management (UVM) William Porter Principal Author of CN Utility Consulting Utility.
Cocoa Butter Crystallisation
March 14, CMPUT680 - Winter 2006 Topic C: Loop Fusion Kit Barton
Outage Reporting Hierarchy Background Data Capture Structure Next Steps.
Palmer House Hilton – Private Dining Room 9
1 Smart Grid Vision Electric Grid Modernization Steering Committee Grid Facing Technology Subcommittee January 14, 2013.
CE80N Introduction to Networks & The Internet Dr. Chane L. Fullmer UCSC Winter 2002.
Welcome to CMPE003 Personal Computers: Hardware and Software Dr. Chane Fullmer Fall 2002 UC Santa Cruz.
DISPUTES & INVESTIGATIONS ECONOMICS FINANCIAL ADVISORY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING Early Lessons Learned from DOE-EPRI Framework Experience Melissa Chan MA DPU.
European Tax Issues of Mergers & Reorganizations - An Overview - Geerten M.M. Michielse Technical Assistance Advisor to the IMF Georgetown University Law.
January 22, What is a Function?. January 22, What is a Function? Central service agency (CSA) is central to the operation of State government.
Systems Analysis and Design Feasibility Study. Introduction The Feasibility Study is the preliminary study that determines whether a proposed systems.
0 Smart Grid Computational Tool (SGCT) For best results view this presentation in Slide Show mode.
Definition Reliability is a general quality of an object – an ability to perform a desired function, sustaining the values of rated operational indicators.
1 March 1, 2007 Report An Overview October 30, 2006 – Staff Workshop.
October 26, 2001MED Classification1 Major Event Day Classification Rich Christie University of Washington Distribution Design Working Group Webex Meeting.
1 The Utility Breaker Tim Heard DDC Engineer AEP Texas SWEDE 2006.
Rulemaking PacifiCorp Responses to ALJ Ruling May 26, 2015.
1 Power Quality Mary Santori, P.E. Senior Engineer September 12, 2013.
SDG&E Electric Reliability Reporting CPUC Workshops May 26-27, 2015.
McGranaghan US Session 2 Block 4 Question 12 Barcelona May Statistical Framework for Establishing Target Reliability Levels and Classifying.
U.S. Energy Information Administration Independent Statistics & Analysis ERUS 2014 Bulk Power and Reliability Proposed Changes to Form EIA-411.
APPA 2005 E&O Technical Conference Memphis, TN April 19, 2005
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People Performance Targets for the Customer Interconnection Process January, 2008.
Utility Service Quality Regulation in Pennsylvania A Presentation For The NARUC Consumer Affairs Subcommittee September 27, 2005 By Wayne L. Williams,
Real Time Clock Back-up Using EnerChip Solid State Batteries.
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 EL-HADIDY – EG – S5 – 0690 Mohamed EL-HADIDY Dalal HELMI Egyptian Electricity Transmission Company Egypt EXAMPLES OF.
Prepared By :.  Introduction  Techniques Used  Case Study  Advantages  Application  Conclusion OUTLINE.
J A K Douglas UK Session ALPHA2 – Block 4 Barcelona May SETTING OF TARGETS FOR CONTINUITY OF SUPPLY THROUGH BENCHMARKING DOUGLAS J.A.K. and.
© 2012 CenterPoint Energy Proprietary and Confidential Information 2013 SWEDE Conference Utilizing AMI Richard Grasshoff Director Advanced Meter System.
1. 2 NERC Bulk Electric System (BES) Definition (NERC Glossary of Terms Used in Reliability Standards) FERC Order 693 FRCC Handbook Review Task Force.
© ABB PTMV - 1, ABB Overhead Distribution Systems.
IAEC Reliability Webinar Presented by: Regi Goodale and Ethan Hohenadel December 11,
1 Overview of Reliability Requirements XYZ Cooperative Date: abc.
Presentation Identifier (Title or Location), Month 00, 2008 Cost and Benefit Analysis Framework: Update EPRI Smart Grid Advisory Meeting October 14, 2009.
SINTEF Energy Research 1 Fault statistics in distribution network Regulation of quality of supply Gerd Kjølle, Norway, RT3.
Outage Communication – Improving the Flow of Information Presented at the EEI Transmission, Distribution, and Metering Conference Tucson, Arizona October.
On-line Condition Monitoring of Distribution Network Assets – Making the Network Smarter Neil Davies Neil Davies – UK – Session 1: Network Components –
Strategic Plan Development Using KPIs to Develop the Strategic Plan.
Florida Public Service Commission Restoration Workshop January 23, 2006 William H Mayer, P.E. Edison Electric Institute EEI’s Mutual Assistance Program.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
PEPCO AND CONECTIV Customer Service and Reliability Guarantees Report Maryland.
Distribution systems basic techniques and radial networks.
Cindy Tumbarello, RN, MSN, DHA September 22, 2011.
Identifying drivers of expenditure. Reasons for spending money 2 Effective regulation requires an understanding of why a business spends money Many different.
CRICOS No J a university for the world real R Aging Equipment Replacement in Power Systems, Using Reliability and Cost Considerations By Dr. Ghavam.
Quality Framework Proposal
Utility Needs and Smart Grid for Major Storm Events
2016 Benchmarking Insights Conference Boulder, CO
Overhead Distribution Systems
Predictive-Based Maintenance Strategy
35kV Assessment SWEDE 2007 May 10, 2007.
Oliver SCHROEDEL, Michael SCHWAN, Sven KOEPPE, Robert ROSENBERGER
Distribution System Reliability and Performance Standards
Distribution Circuit Reliability Tool
Customized gis applications for Electric DISTRIBUTION Utilities
Workshop on GRP, Quito, Ecuador, 7-9 Nov. 2018
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Full Use Guide on Electric Power Distribution Reliability Indices Panel Session – How to Define Major Events July 22, 2002 Presented by Cheryl A. Warren

7/22/20022 Foundations of the Definition Purpose is to partition the data into normal and abnormal days. Rigorously analyze and report on abnormal events above and beyond the normal process. Use normal events for trending, internal goal setting, and Commission mandated targets.

7/22/20023 Foundations of the Definition Definition must be understandable by all and easy to apply. Executives and Commissioners must be able to understand and feel comfortable with the approach. Definition must be specific and calculated using the same process for all utilities. Must be fair to all utilities. Large and small, urban and rural….

7/22/20024 Foundations of the Definition Definition must be extensible. The approach must address varying levels of data collection. ØSome utilities have little reliability data. Others have been collecting it with flawed system. Others have very sophisticated systems that track interruptions to the customer level.

7/22/20025 Process To Date Members agreed that the current definition should be reevaluated. A subgroup was formed to further analyze approaches. Jim Bouford, Rich Christie, Dan Kowaleski, John McDaniel, Dave Schepers, Cheri Warren, Charlie Williams & Joe Viglietta Members discussed the options and performed analysis using real data. This panel session will share some of the background behind the current thinking.

7/22/20026 Summary The assembled panel will describe the proposed methodology, why one is needed, and potential benefits of the proposed approach.

7/22/20027 Presenters Rich Christie University of Washington Charlie Williams Florida Power Corp A Progress Energy Company Dan Kowalewski Exelon – ComEd Dave Schepers Ameren Energy Jim Bouford National Grid

Major Reliability Events Self - Defining? Charlie Williams, P.E. Florida Power Senior Member IEEE

7/22/20029 Major Event Definitions P1366 (old)- 10% of customers in a 24 hour period Regulatory Agencies - Severe Storms (Hurricane, Ice Storm, Tornado, Other) P1366 (new) - statistical outlier definition

7/22/ Other Major Event possibilities Severe Lightning Storm Earthquake Dust Storm Other??????

7/22/ Reliability Accountability Some events are severe - power systems cannot be reasonably or economically designed to withstand them. What kind of events should the utility design consider? With PBR these issues take on a potential economic impact to the utility and shareholders as well as rate payers.

7/22/ Suncoast Lightning Storm Major Event not defined as severe. No definition of severe lightning by NWS Lightning data shows it as a once in 10 year event. Outside help required to assist with restoration

7/22/200213

7/22/200214

7/22/200215

7/22/ Self Defining? Outage and Reliability statistics clearly show this event as an outlier Customer Expectations ???????

7/22/ New Major Event Definition Statistical process to establish normal reliability parameters for daily outage statistics based on historical data Establish limits for major events Review these limits annually

7/22/ Statistical Analysis of Reliability Data

7/22/ Comparison of Event Definition vs. Statistical Definition

7/22/ Conclusion Statistical Definition is definitive and non-ambiguous Leaves little room for debate on major events. Only excludes events that are of significant impact to the system.

IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting Reliability Surveying Criteria David J. Schepers, IEEE Member Manager, Distribution Operating Ameren - St. Louis, MO

7/22/ Why New Survey Criteria? Desire to Benchmark Utility Companies Regulators Performance-Based Rates Continuous Improvement - Determine what makes a Difference Need for comparative statistics

7/22/ Problems with Current Surveys No Company Identification Issues of Data Accuracy Whats Included/Excluded Storms Diverse Companies Geography Data Collection Capabilities SCADA/DA Implementation AMR Outage Reporting Lack of Common Reporting Standards

7/22/ Major Event Definition Problem Storm-excluded indices are most valuable for benchmarking Current published IEEE definition vague Applied by 50% of respondents using 10% customers out, some >24 hours in a region (whats a region?) Need a definition that puts everyone on a common standard IEEE Working Group on System Designs new definition - Major Events

7/22/ The OMS And Connectivity Automated vs. Manual OMS Extent Of Connectivity Customer to transformer Transformer to protective device Protective device to upstream protective device Protective device to substation breaker Breaker to bus How many customers are really out?

7/22/ AMR Outage Reporting Accurate maintenance outage records Supplement phone calls for more accurate outage records Number of customers affected Outage start time

7/22/ Outage Definition Sustained vs. momentary Time definition (IEEE 1366: >5 minutes) Human intervention Exclusions Maintenance outages Public-caused outages Different definitions by cause by utility

7/22/ DA/Scada Affects CAIDI/SAIDI Opportunity to change sustained interruptions into momentary (SAIFI/MAIFI) Knowing the extent of implementation allows for better comparison

7/22/ System Geography Urban/Suburban/Rural Network vs. radial Urban radial (many feeder ties) vs. rural radial (few feeder ties) Circuit length issues Customer density

7/22/ New Questions In EEI Survey Do you have an automated OMS with Full Connectivity? Percentage of Customers with AMR Outage Reporting Percentage of Customers served by SCADA Substations Percentage of Customers on Distribution Circuits with Automated Switching Urban/Suburban/Rural Geography Does your OMS have Partial Restoration Capability? Will your utility identify itself for others willing to do likewise?

7/22/ What to Report to EEI Standard IEEE Indices SAIFI, CAIDI, SAIDI, MAIFI Percentage of Interruptions and Hours by Cause, by System Location Actual & Normalized for Major Events Percentage of Customers with 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or more Normalized Interruptions (CEMI)

7/22/ Data and Indices Definitions Use IEEE 1366 Definitions for Standard Indices Sustained Interruptions >5 minutes No outage types excluded other than Customer Outage caused by Customer Equipment

7/22/ Summary Need exists for benchmarking for utilities and regulators alike Current surveys do not allow for accurate comparisons More segmentation is needed and possible EEI Reliability Survey is moving in this direction today

The Need to Segment (Exclude) Abnormal Events from the Calculation of Reliability Indices Presented by Jim Bouford National Grid

7/22/ I. Reasons for Measuring Reliability Identification of Problems Allocation of Resources Accepted Measure of Customer Service Performance Based Ratemaking Comparison with Other Utilities

7/22/ II. Requirements of Measurements Comparable Year-to-Year ( Trends ) Utility-to-Utility ( Regulatory ) Universally Applicable Correlates Output to Input

7/22/ III. Design and Operation Realities Systems are NOT built to withstand all contingencies Workforce levels are set to handle routine activities Systems are designed and operated to deal with a defined level of adverse occurrences Abnormal occurrences stress the design and/or the operation of the system and Require Abnormal Operational Response

7/22/ IV. Simple Truths Expected Occurrences only Require Normal Response Abnormal Occurrences Require Abnormal Response Abnormal Occurrences Will Distort the Measures; Requirements of Measurement Will Not be Met

7/22/ V. What To Do Separate Abnormal from Normal Occurrences Review the Response to the Abnormal Occurrence Use Normal Occurrences for Measurements