Introduction to Ethics in Health Sector. 2 Why Is Ethical Analysis Needed? Problems are not just technical How do we know which problems are important?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Libertarianism and the Philosophers Lecture 4
Advertisements

Justice.
Utilitarianism Maximize good.
Medical Ethics What’s it all about?.
Ethical Theories & Decision-Making Models
Rawlsian Contract Approach Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Theory of distributive.
Why Ethics? Should I bring my personal beliefs into my organisation? Should not an employer determine standards of behaviour for all employees? Should.
Introduction to Political Theory
Frameworks for Moral Arguments
Utilitarianism.
Ethics in Action HST II Class. Objectives / Rationale Health care workers must understand ethical and legal responsibilities, limitations, and the implications.
Comments on Arizona Case Papers. Libertarian Views of the Arizona Case Libertarians believe in negative rights based on respect for individuals’ capacity.
Ethics (presentation adapted from Prof. J. Christman’s and A. Lau’s Workshop on Ethics) Our goal: systematic approach Definition Ethical Frameworks.
Ethical Issues in Public Health
Applying Moral Philosophies to Business Ethics
6 When Values Clash Theoretical1 Chapter 6 When Values Clash Theoretical Approaches Utilitarian Strategies: Finding a Single Measure Goods Versus Other.
Utilitarianism Explored Marc J. Roberts Professor of Political Economy and Health Policy Harvard School of Public Health ID250 November 12,
Ethical Principles, Quick Tests, And Decision-Making Guidelines
Ethics and Morality Theory Part 2 11 September 2006.
The Goals of Public Health and the Ethics of Public Health Policy Christian Munthe Department of Philosophy, Göteborg University EuroPHEN, financed by.
THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY: Bentham
Ethical Principle of Justice principle of justice –involves giving to all persons their "rights" or "desserts" –the distribution of various resources in.
Ethics and Ethical Theories
Economic Systems SSEF4 The student will compare and contrast different economic systems and explain how they answer the three basic economic questions.
Utililitarianism John Stuart Mill John Stuart Mill Rejected Christianity Believed that only consequences matter in making moral judgments.
Utilitarianism: calculation of costs(-) and benefits(+) Universalism: duty Virtue: character Relativism: societal consensus.
Principles of Management Core Principles
Ethical Theory and Business Chapter Two
Ethics of Administration Chapter 1. Imposing your values? Values are more than personal preferences Values are more than personal preferences Human beings.
Ethical Issues in Health Research in Developing Countries Rio de Janeiro November 19, 2009 Daniel Wikler, Ph.D. Harvard School of Public Health The Global.
Chapter 1 Understanding Ethics
Bioethics 101 Lesson two.
“To be able under all circumstances to practise five things constitutes perfect virtue; these five things are gravity, generosity of soul, sincerity, earnestness.
Business Ethics Week 3. Article on: You See, the Ends Don’t Justify the Means: Visual Imagery and Moral Judgment Visual imagery and Moral judgement –
Ethics - 1 Key Definitions  Moral: “relating to principles of right and wrong”  Ethics: “the discipline of dealing with what is good and bad and with.
Consequentialism Utilitarianism. John Stuart Mill ( ) Principle of Utility: actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness,
Act and Rule Utilitariansim
Theories of Morality Kant Bentham Aristotle. Morality  Morality: Action for the sake of principle  Guides our beliefs about right and wrong  Sets limits.
Literacy Inequalities: Who cares? BALID Workshop on ‘Literacy, Marginalisation and Inequality’. 23 rd April 2009, John Adams Hall, London Presented by.
Ethics and Health Sector Reform Marc J Roberts Professor of Political Economy and Health Policy Harvard School of Public Health 1.
PEP 570, DeGeorge, Chp. 3 10/28/20151 Chapter Three: Dr. DeGeorge Utilitarianism: Justice and Love.
CODE TO WORD: ETHICS IN THE WORKPLACE Florida Gulf Coast University Hudson Rogers Fall 2003.
The Nature and Method of Economics 1 C H A P T E R.
Utilitarianism. Types of Theory Teleological Teleological The consequence of the moral act is the important thing.
CHAPTER EIGHT: SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY P H I L O S O P H Y A Text with Readings TENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z.
McGraw-Hill© 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill© 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter.
LIBERTY, EQUALITY AND JUSTICE GONDA YUMITRO. LIBERTY Liberty is the ultimate moral ideal. Individuals have rights to life, liberty, and property that.
AREA 1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES SECTION 3 Consequences (Utilitarian Ethics) Duty and Reason (Kantian Ethics)
Flagship Program on Health Sector Reform and Sustainable Financing.
Business Ethics Chapter # 3 Ethical Principles, Quick Tests, and Decision-Making Guidelines  The best kind of relationship in the world is the one in.
ETHICALETHICALETHICALETHICAL PRINCIPLESPRINCIPLESPRINCIPLESPRINCIPLES.
Chapter 1 Introduction McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Three Modern Approaches. Introduction Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Have significant new approaches Have significant new approaches.
Basic Principles: Ethics and Business
Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. and the Legal Environment, 10 th edition by Richard.
ETHICS: THE BASIC QUESTION n Is an action right or wrong? n How do you decide?
WEEK 2 Justice as Fairness. A Theory of Justice (1971) Political Liberalism (1993)
Moral Principles Paul L. Schumann, Ph.D.
Utilitarianism.
Act and rule Utilitarianism
LD Debate (yay!).
Consumerism and Ethical Responsibility
Ethical Theories Ethical Theories Unit 5.
Consumerism and Ethical Responsibility
Utilitarianism.
Philosophy 2030 Class #11 4/12/16 Take-home / open book midterm
What is philosophical ethics?
Moral Decision-Making
Medical Ethics -frameworks
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Ethics in Health Sector

2 Why Is Ethical Analysis Needed? Problems are not just technical How do we know which problems are important? How do we know a good solution?

3 Ethical Theory Alone Is Not Sufficient Philosophical terms often are not clearly defined Using ethical analysis to guide decisions requires practice Moving back and forth between cases and theory can help

4 Three Categories of Ethical Argument Consequences (outcomes):  Utilitarianism Rights (starting points):  Liberalism Virtues (character):  Communitarianism

5 Each Perspective Has Unresolved Issues How do we measure consequences? Which rights do citizens have? Who defines the community and its values?

6 Utilitarianism Policies should be judged by their consequences What matters is well-being of individuals All individuals count equally The best action is decided by adding up the gains and losses to all individuals “The greatest good for the greatest number”

7 It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied. John Stuart Mill - Utilitarianism

8 How Can We Measure Utility? Individuals evaluate their own situation: subjective utilitarianism Experts devise an index to measure everyone’s well-being: objective utilitarianism objective utilitarianism

9 Subjective Utilitarian Ask consumers about their “willingness to pay” Use data about prevalence, costs, and prices to calculate costs and benefits

10 Problems with Subjective Utilitarianism Suppose consumers are foolish or uninformed? Does “willingness to pay” really measure changes in well-being? How do we account for the fact that the rich can pay more?

11 Objective Utilitarianism Construct an index to measure health (e.g., Disability-Adjusted Life Years) Calculate health losses for different diseases Set priorities based on cost- effectiveness

12 biggest bang for the buck

13 Problems with Objective Utilitarianism Who determines the index? Accountability and transparency Technical decisions can mask value choices: Time Age of death Disability vs. death

14 General Problems with Utilitarianism Concerned with aggregate welfare not with distribution Lack of respect for individuals Can justify inequality Technical calculations can mask values

15 Liberalism Individuals have the capacity to make moral choices about life  Therefore, they are entitled to respect to choose their own life plan  Therefore, they have a right to preconditions for such choices

16 What Rights Do People Have? Negative rights - to be left alone, to be free to choose, to speak, buy and sell: libertarianismtarian Positive rights – to resources needed for a reasonable range of opportunity: egalitarian liberalism

17 Libertarians Right to control your own body Right to purchase health care Priority to market, with minimal state limits on individual choice No redistribution by state

18 Egalitarian Liberals Basic right to opportunity: health itself Role of state to redistribute resources to assure fairness Example: Right to AIDS drugs for worst-off in society

19 Problems With Liberalism What positive rights to citizens have in the health care arena? Do we treat those who cause their own ill health? What geographic scope for redistribution? Are universal rights another form of cultural imperialism?

20 Communitarianism Individuals live in society – not in isolation A good society requires citizens with “virtuous” character Society should instill virtue and create a desirable social order

21 Who Decides What Is Virtuous? Each society decides for itself what is virtue (relative communitarianism) There is one definition of virtue for all societies (universal communitarianism)

22 Problems for Relative Communitarians How do we know the boundaries of communities? How far can communities go to suppress dissent?

23 Problems for Universal Communitarians Lack of tolerance for local or minority cultures What happens when those with conflicting visions meet? How do we know whose vision is correct?

24 Broader Question of Justification Faith Intuition Logic The World There is no justification

25 Mixed Positions Using more than one theory Principled construction of a mixed ethical position – some examples: Utilitarian who respects some rights Egalitarian liberal sensitive to local customs

26 Implications (1) You cannot make health policy without values Conflicts in values often occur in making policy decisions Conflicts occur even “inside” a theory because its implications may be ambiguous

27 Implication (2) Ethical analysis can help identify implicit values in varying policy positions Ethical analysis can help someone clarify their own position Ethical analysis can increase consistency, transparency, and accountability

28 That’s all, folks!