LBE TF-NGN Budapest 17-18 October 2002. Agenda GÉANT D9.9 deliverable summary Test reports for LBE on GÉANT (Nicolas) Tests for LBE at the edge Limerick.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MB - NG MB-NG Technical Meeting 03 May 02 R. Hughes-Jones Manchester 1 Task2 Traffic Generation and Measurement Definitions Pass-1.
Advertisements

Nicolas Simar – DANTE : Premium IP and LBE transparency on GEANT QoS on GÉANT Premium IP and Less than Best Effort.
Pathload A measurement tool for end-to-end available bandwidth Manish Jain, Univ-Delaware Constantinos Dovrolis, Univ-Delaware Sigcomm 02.
IPv6 TF-NGN 8 Berlin, 2 nd July Agenda Review GTPv6 status D9.6 GEANT deliverable Presentations from participants –JOIN, RENATER, POZNAN 6NET –Outputs,
LMF/TTR Raimo Vuopionperä 6WINIT: Ericsson (Research) Objectives (6WINIT Kick-Off, London) Raimo Vuopionperä (Ph. D.), NomadicLab (LMF/TTR)
Tiziana Ferrari Differentiated Services Test: Report1 Differentiated Service Test REPORT TF-TANT Tiziana Ferrari Frankfurt, 1 Oct.
Connect. Communicate. Collaborate Towards Multi-domain Monitoring for the Research Networks Nicolas Simar, Dante TNC 2005, Poznan, June 2005.
Tiziana FerrariWP2.3 Advance Reservation Demonstration: Description and set-up 1 WP2.3 Advance Reservation Demonstration: Description and set-up DRAFT,
Tiziana FerrariWP2.3 Advance Reservation Demonstration: Description and set-up 1 WP2.3 Advance Reservation Demonstration: Description and set-up DRAFT,
Nicolas Simar – DANTE - TF-NGN Berlin: Premium IP update and LBE tranparency on GEANT Premium IP update and LBE tranparency on GÉANT TF-NGN meeting – BERLIN.
GridPP meeting Feb 03 R. Hughes-Jones Manchester WP7 Networking Richard Hughes-Jones.
Modelli di differenziazione delle prestazioni per il supporto del traffico LHC1 Modelli di differenziazione delle prestazioni per il supporto del traffico.
TCP/IP Tools Lesson 5. Objectives Skills/ConceptsObjective Domain Description Objective Domain Number Using basic TCP/IP commands Understanding TCP/IP3.6.
02 nd April 03Networkshop Managed Bandwidth Next Generation F. Saka UCL NETSYS (NETwork SYStems centre of excellence)
INDIANAUNIVERSITYINDIANAUNIVERSITY TransPAC QBSS “Scavenger Service” Chris Robb Indiana University TransPAC Network Engineer
1: Introduction1 Part I: Introduction Goal: r get context, overview, “feel” of networking r more depth, detail later in course r approach: m descriptive.
Tiziana FerrariQuality of Service for Remote Control in the High Energy Physics Experiments CHEP, 07 Feb Quality of Service for Remote Control in.
Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. 1 SEEREN2 Summer School Heraklion, Sept 25 th Routing Issues: QoS/CoS Jean-Marc Uzé Liaison Research.
Tiziana Ferrari Overview of INFN-GRID WP5: Network 1
Chapter 1 Overview Review Overview of demonstration network
LBE/Scavenger TF-NGN 8 Berlin, July 1 st Overview LBE deliverable D9.9 for GEANT due Aug 31 Need to decide how to press ahead with workplan; had.
Slide 113/09/2015 WP 4 Status. Slide 213/09/2015 Objectives Development and integration of tools for: Topology discovery in multi-domain networks Active.
Tiziana Ferrari Quality of Service Support in Packet Networks1 Quality of Service Support in Packet Networks Tiziana Ferrari Italian.
Tiziana Ferrari Diffserv deployment in the wide area: network design and testing1 Diffserv deployment in the wide area: network design and testing Tiziana.
EGEE-II INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE II - Network Service Level Agreement (SLA) Establishment EGEE’07 Mary Grammatikou.
Performance Monitoring - Internet2 Member Meeting -- Nicolas Simar Performance Monitoring Internet2 Member Meeting, Indianapolis.
Module 12: Routing Fundamentals. Routing Overview Configuring Routing and Remote Access as a Router Quality of Service.
Tiziana Ferrari Discussion on Less-Than Best-Effort services (LBE), TF-NFN Southampton Apr 02 1 Discussion on Less-than Best-Effort Services T.Ferrari.
Nicolas Simar Budapest’s TF-NGN meeting, October 2002 Testbed.
Transmission Control Protocol / Internet Protocol (TCP/IP)
QoS on GÉANT - Aristote Seminar -- Nicolas Simar QoS on GÉANT Aristote Seminar, Paris (France), Nicolas Simar,
GPN QoS Implementation Dave Hartzell, Raytheon, Greatplains Network, And the USGS.
ﺑﺴﻢﺍﷲﺍﻠﺭﺣﻣﻥﺍﻠﺭﺣﻳﻡ. Group Members Nadia Malik01 Malik Fawad03.
QoS monitoring -- Nicolas Simar Monitoring Infrastructure SEQUIN workshop, Amsterdam, 1 February 2002 Nicolas Simar DANTE.
IPv6 TF-NGN Budapest October Agenda m6bone and Paris M5 update (Bernard) New IPv6 Land Speed Record (Avgust) GÉANT IPv6 deployment (Roberto)
4061 Session 25 (4/17). Today Briefly: Select and Poll Layered Protocols and the Internets Intro to Network Programming.
Congestion exposure BoF candidate protocol: re-ECN Bob Briscoe Chief Researcher, BT Nov 2009 This work is partly funded by Trilogy, a research project.
1 Network Measurement Summary ESCC, Feb Joe Metzger ESnet Engineering Group Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Less than Best Effort -- Nicolas Simar Less than Best Effort QoS IP 2003, Milan (Italy), Nicolas Simar, Network Engineer.
Analysis of QoS Arjuna Mithra Sreenivasan. Objectives Explain the different queuing techniques. Describe factors affecting network voice quality. Analyse.
Franck Bonnassieux- WP7- n° 1 WP7 Budapest Collaboration with Dante Monitoring & R-GMA GridFTP Logging Network Cost Function MapCenter & TopoGRID Future.
Online-Offsite Connectivity Experiments Catalin Meirosu *, Richard Hughes-Jones ** * CERN and Politehnica University of Bucuresti ** University of Manchester.
Net Flow Network Protocol Presented By : Arslan Qamar.
Mr. Mark Welton.  Quality of Service is deployed to prevent data from saturating a link to the point that other data cannot gain access to it  QoS allows.
MB - NG MB-NG Meeting UCL 17 Jan 02 R. Hughes-Jones Manchester 1 Discussion of Methodology for MPLS QoS & High Performance High throughput Investigations.
1 CSE 5346 Spring Network Simulator Project.
Internet Connectivity and Performance for the HEP Community. Presented at HEPNT-HEPiX, October 6, 1999 by Warren Matthews Funded by DOE/MICS Internet End-to-end.
© 2005 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. BGP v3.2—6-1 Scaling Service Provider Networks Scaling IGP and BGP in Service Provider Networks.
1 Review – The Internet’s Protocol Architecture. Protocols, Internetworking & the Internet 2 Introduction Internet standards Internet standards Layered.
Javier Orellana JRA4 Coordinator Face to Face Partners Meeting University College London 11 December 2003 EGEE is proposed as a project funded by the European.
KYUNG-HWA KIM HENNING SCHULZRINNE 12/09/2008 INTERNET REAL-TIME LAB, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY DYSWIS.
EGEE is a project funded by the European Union under contract IST JRA4 Overview Javier Orellana JRA4 Coordinator EGEE Kick Off Meeting SA2.
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE Network Services Development Network Resource Provision 3 rd EGEE Conference, Athens, 20 th.
Cisco I Introduction to Networks Semester 1 Chapter 6 JEOPADY.
U Innsbruck Informatik - 1 Specification of a Network Adaptation Layer for the Grid GGF7 presentation Michael Welzl University.
QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar QoS Experience on European Backbone TNC 2003, Zabgreb (Croatia),
Kittiphan Techakittiroj (25/06/59 19:10 น. 25/06/59 19:10 น. 25/06/59 19:10 น.) Network Address Translation Kittiphan Techakittiroj
Network Overview. Protocol Protocol (network protocols) - a special set of rules that define communication between two or more devices on a network.
Securing the Network Perimeter with ISA 2004
Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
CS 3214 Computer Systems Networking.
Networking between China and Europe
Implementing Path Control
Chapter 2: Static Routing
Chapter 2: Static Routing
NETWORKING TECHNOLOGIES (II)
IS 4506 Server Configuration (HTTP Server)
File Transfer Issues with TCP Acceleration with FileCatalyst
Data collection methodology and NM paradigms
A tool for locating QoS failures on an Internet path
Presentation transcript:

LBE TF-NGN Budapest October 2002

Agenda GÉANT D9.9 deliverable summary Test reports for LBE on GÉANT (Nicolas) Tests for LBE at the edge Limerick resolutions: –DSCP transparency to Abilene –Common “Scavenger” DSCP value (001000) LBE demo to SC2002 (Lada) LBE deployment scenarios

Summary of D9.9 (LBE) Report contained: –LBE history –LBE service description –Deployment scenarios –LBE test programme –GÉANT tests (Tiziana et al) Detailed results – Nicolas has an overview next… –Proposed edge tests (Tim/Stig) –Sample Juniper configurations –Future work

GÉANT LBE test results Presentation by Nicolas Simar (DANTE) –Work coordinated by Tiziana Ferrari (INFN) Possible implementation alongside Premium IP? –Transparency or “full” queuing policy?

Proposed edge tests Should be run very soon (Oct/Nov) –Southampton – UNINETT Via MAN, JANET, GÉANT, NORDUnet, UNINETT –DSCP transparency end-to-end Apply policy at edges –Contention on router at edge/access networks Cisco router at UoS Limit interface to 10Mbit/s Use Stig’s FTP server patch for LBE Question over best measurement tool(s) –Aim to integrate results into full QOS-2003 paper Notification of acceptance by Nov 20 th

Limerick resolutions Joint meeting including Internet2 people –Special TNC2002 BoF session Proposals –Agree common DSCP (001000) –Implement transparency GÉANT-Abilene –Suggest DSCP usage “policy” to IETF(!) DSCP (8) and transparency achieved Seeking demonstrator for GEANT to I2 –Demonstrate bulk data transfer –Simultaneous “live” application use

Abilene ToS traceroute… #./dtraceroute -t 32 traceroute to ( ), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 servers-router.core.ecs.soton.ac.uk ( ) 1 ms 0 ms 0 ms 2 * ( ) 1 ms * ( ) 2 ms 2 ms 1 ms 4 b54gagesw1-aa.net.soton.ac.uk ( ) 3 ms 2 ms 2 ms ( ) 3 ms 2 ms 2 ms ( ) 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms ( ) 3 ms 3 ms 2 ms ( ) 3 ms 2 ms 3 ms 9 * * * ( ) 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms 11 cosham-bar.ja.net ( ) 3 ms 3 ms 4 ms 12 po9-0.cosh-scr.ja.net ( ) 4 ms 3 ms 3 ms 13 po2-0.lond-scr.ja.net ( ) 5 ms 6 ms 25 ms 14 po0-0.london-bar4.ja.net ( ) 5 ms 6 ms 14 ms 15 geant-gw.ja.net ( ) 5 ms 6 ms 5 ms 16 janet.uk1.uk.geant.net ( ) 5 ms 6 ms 6 ms 17 uk.fr1.fr.geant.net ( ) 12 ms 14 ms 13 ms 18 fr.de1.de.geant.net ( ) 21 ms 40 ms 21 ms 19 de1-1.de2.de.geant.net ( ) 23 ms 21 ms 23 ms 20 abilene-gtren-gw.de2.de.geant.net ( ) 112 ms 112 ms 112 ms 21 clev-nycm.abilene.ucaid.edu ( ) 124 ms 124 ms 124 ms ( ) 139 ms 139 ms 139 ms 23 pos0-0-0.ucaid.mich.net ( ) 140 ms 140 ms 140 ms 24 brubeck.internet2.edu ( ) 139 ms 156 ms 139 ms

And to WIDE… #./dtraceroute -t 32 traceroute to ( ), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 servers-router.core.ecs.soton.ac.uk ( ) 1 ms 0 ms 0 ms ( ) 1 ms * 1 ms ( ) 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 4 b54gagesw1-aa.net.soton.ac.uk ( ) 3 ms 2 ms 2 ms ( ) 3 ms 2 ms 3 ms ( ) 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms ( ) 3 ms 2 ms 2 ms ( ) 3 ms 3 ms 2 ms 9 * * * ( ) 5 ms 4 ms 4 ms 11 cosham-bar.ja.net ( ) 3 ms 4 ms 5 ms 12 po9-0.cosh-scr.ja.net ( ) 4 ms 3 ms 3 ms 13 po2-0.lond-scr.ja.net ( ) 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms 14 po0-0.london-bar4.ja.net ( ) 20 ms 5 ms 8 ms 15 geant-gw.ja.net ( ) 7 ms 5 ms 6 ms 16 janet.uk1.uk.geant.net ( ) 5 ms 5 ms 6 ms 17 uk.fr1.fr.geant.net ( ) 12 ms 13 ms 13 ms 18 fr.de1.de.geant.net ( ) 21 ms 21 ms 21 ms 19 de1-1.de2.de.geant.net ( ) 37 ms 21 ms 31 ms 20 abilene-gtren-gw.de2.de.geant.net ( ) 112 ms 111 ms 111 ms 21 wash-nycm.abilene.ucaid.edu ( ) 112 ms 112 ms 112 ms 22 chinng-nycmng.abilene.ucaid.edu ( ) 132 ms 140 ms 132 ms 23 iplsng-chinng.abilene.ucaid.edu ( ) 145 ms 135 ms 153 ms 24 ipls-iplsng.abilene.ucaid.edu ( ) 135 ms 136 ms 136 ms 25 kscy-ipls.abilene.ucaid.edu ( ) 145 ms 145 ms 145 ms 26 dnvr-kscy.abilene.ucaid.edu ( ) 156 ms 156 ms 157 ms 27 sttl-dnvr.abilene.ucaid.edu ( ) 183 ms 194 ms 184 ms 28 TRANSPAC-PWAVE.pnw-gigapop.net ( ) 187 ms 184 ms 184 ms ( ) 298 ms 298 ms 298 ms 30 wide-tpr3.jp.apan.net ( ) 306 ms 299 ms 298 ms

And to Greece (sorry :-) #./dtraceroute -t 32 traceroute to achilles.noc.ntua.gr ( ), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 servers-router.core.ecs.soton.ac.uk ( ) 1 ms 0 ms 1 ms ( ) 1 ms * 1 ms ( ) 2 ms 1 ms 2 ms 4 b54gagesw1-aa.net.soton.ac.uk ( ) 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms ( ) 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms ( ) 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms ( ) 3 ms 2 ms 2 ms ( ) 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms 9 * * * ( ) 4 ms 3 ms 3 ms 11 cosham-bar.ja.net ( ) 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms 12 po9-0.cosh-scr.ja.net ( ) 4 ms 3 ms 5 ms 13 po2-0.lond-scr.ja.net ( ) 6 ms 5 ms 5 ms 14 po0-0.london-bar4.ja.net ( ) 9 ms 5 ms 6 ms 15 geant-gw.ja.net ( ) 5 ms 6 ms 6 ms 16 janet.uk1.uk.geant.net ( ) 6 ms 19 ms 6 ms 17 uk.gr1.gr.geant.net ( ) 106 ms (TOS=0!) 107 ms 123 ms 18 grnet-gw.gr1.gr.geant.net ( ) 106 ms 106 ms 106 ms …….

LBE/Scavenger I2 demo Presentation by Lada Lhotka (CESNET) –Suggestion for SC2002, Nov 16 th ->

LBE scenario discussion Where might we use LBE first? –(implied usage of TCP not UDP!) –Bulk data transfer (GRID) –Data mirrors, FTP servers –Separating production and test traffic –Support of new transport protocols (TCP tuning) –Student dormitory networks (enforced) –Remote network backups –Non-disruptive available bandwidth measure? –Others? Where is the real congestion? Possibility to run IPv6 LBE in 6NET WP4