Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. Safe Routes to School Program Presentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Safe Routes to School Improving Health, Safety and Transportation Lenexa, KS.
Advertisements

Can A Schools Location Make A Kid Fat? Arizona Safe Routes To School Program.
Safe Routes to School: INSERT SCHOOL INSERT NAME.
ALABAMA WALK Featuring THE WALKING SCHOOL BUS Program Guide Neighborhood School.
Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Increasing Active Transportation among Elementary Schoolchildren Plaistow, NH Student, Plaistow, NH.
Applicants Videoconference January 17,  MnDOT funding began in 2005 with federal transportation bill (SAFETEA-LU)  This solictation uses remaining.
+ Establishing Safe Communities in Madison County, Kentucky Presentation by: Ruth Hawkins, MSN, RN, CHES Lloyd Jordinson, RN Dorathy Lachman, MD Creating.
Louisiana Safe Routes To School Program
Steve Dittmer Supervising Engineer Curb Ramp Prioritizations Capital Improvement Planning.
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. Keeping Our Children Safe Throughout the Day.
Presentation to the TRSD School Board April 17, 2014 Michael Hollow, Grade 5.
Developing & Implementing Master Bike & Pedestrian Plans Heleen Dewey Spokane Regional Health District March 2010.
Safe Routes To School Improving Health, Safety and Transportation Lenexa, KS.
An Iowa Safe Routes to School Project Funding provided by.
Additional Content By Schreiber/Anderson Associates, Inc. Safe Routes to School Improving Health, Safety and Transportation Madison, WI.
WalkSafe’s Approach : Five E’s Prevention Model Parent and community involvement Monroe County Public Schools Funded by SRTS infrastructure Dept of Public.
Safe Routes. Many child pedestrian fatalities in Denmark, 1970s Odense pilot program reduced the number of injured school children by 30% to 40% Caught.
County Wide Active Transportation Study (CWATS) Master Plan Active Communities Summit – October 3, 2011.
Florida Safe Routes to School Walking School Bus Program John Egberts FL SRTS Walking School Bus Program.
Danielle Hewson, MPH CHES N.C. Division of Public Health Healthy Schools Summer Institute: Casting Your Net for Partners in Health Friday, June 27, 2014.
Safe Routes to School (SR2S) INSERT SCHOOL NAME AND PRESENTER.
Safe Routes to School Improving Health, Safety and Transportation Lenexa, KS.
Moving Toward Safer Routes to School. GOALS What is the problem? What are the barriers to walking and biking? What is Safe Routes to School?? How do we.
Safe Routes to School Improving Health for Connecticut’s Children and Communities June 23, 2010 Martha Page, MPH, CPH Material supplied by Sandy Fry, CRCOG.
Safe Routes to School Improving Health, Safety and Transportation Lenexa, KS.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Highway Safety Provisions Elizabeth Alicandri FHWA.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Safety Provisions Federal Highway Administration.
Safe Routes to School in the ATP Jeanie Ward-Waller Senior California Policy Manager Active Transportation Program Cycle 2 Caltrans District Workshops.
Out of ‘ Site,’ Out of Mind Increasing Community Connectivity and Physical Activity through Healthy School Site Planning.
Safe Routes to School: An update on programs, practice and how public health is playing a role Nancy Pullen, MPH, Program Manager September 14, 2006.
Active transportation is good for kids. Walk or bike to school for exercise Improves academic performance It’s a wellness initiative that happens before/after.
BUILDING SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL SPRING Goals of Safe Routes To School Create opportunities and increase the number of children who actively commute.
Presentation to Beloit SRTS Taskforce Wednesday February 1, 2012 Safe Route to School (SRTS) Program.
Safe Routes to School Improving Health, Safety and Transportation.
Safe Routes to School Improving Health, Safety and Transportation Lenexa, KS.
Safe Routes To School Lenexa, KS. Additional Content Added by: City, Unified School Dist, & NCWRPC Why Safe Routes To School? 1.Fewer kids walk and bike.
Brett Hondorp Alta Planning + Design. Suggested Routes to School Details Primary Goals 1.To develop suggested route maps for 18 elementary and middle.
Local Government Partners with Schools to Celebrate International Walk to School Day Naperville, IL.
2010 Wisconsin Safe Routes to School Funding SRTS Project Application Cycle Applications available January 2010 Applications due April 2, 2010 Approximately.
Safe Routes To School Lenexa, KS. Additional Content Added by: City, Unified School Dist, & NCWRPC Why Safe Routes To School? 1.Fewer kids walk and bike.
School-based projects from a Transportation Act program.
Building a New Generation of Healthy & Safe Walkers, Bike Riders & Bus Riders.
Project Scoping Fundamentals Alan Lively Project Delivery Specialist Local Government Section April 6, 2010.
Funding Opportunities Safe Routes to School program Approximately $1.5 million available per year Future funding is uncertain Held 5 application cycles.
Safe Routes to School Technical Assistance Resource Center Walk It Out: Walking to Transform Individual and Community Health June 7, 2013 Lake Merritt.
Chicago Department of Transportation Bobby L. Ware, Commissioner Richard M. Daley, Mayor Metropolitan Planning Council November 3,
Safe Routes to School  First word is “Safe”  Physical fitness.  Reduced congestion.  Clean air.  A fun way to get to school.
City of Santa Rosa Pilot Safe Routes to School Program Julia Gonzalez Grant Administrator, City of Santa Rosa, Safe Routes to School Program.
Louisiana Safe Routes to School. Where it’s safe, get kids walking and biking Where it’s not safe, make it safe Safe Routes to School goals.
Safe Routes to School Improving Health, Safety and Transportation Lenexa, KS.
TM. Overview What is Safe Routes to School? The Five Es SR2S Action Plan Steps SR2S Resources
1 Your Health Matters: Growing Active Communities Prioritize Strategies.
Louisiana Safe Routes To School Program NON INFRASTRUCTURE.
Why Safe Routes to School?. U.S. youth overweight rates.
Where is the Safe Routes to School program in Fairfax County?
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Advancing Safety through SAFETEA-LU Michael Halladay FHWA Office of.
Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. HOPE Program Helping Our Parents Effectively.
This is a story of the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.
Proposed Wedgefield K-8 School safe routes to school begin with school siting Board of County Commissioners’ meeting February 24, 2015.
Safety Data Initiatives in Reauthorization – What Can We Expect? Kathy Krause, FHWA Office of Safety 30 th Annual International Traffic Records Forum July.
Vermont Agency of Transportation Safe Routes to School Program at [INSERT NAME OF SCHOOL] Date.
PROMOTING BIKING AND WALKING AS FUN, HEALTHY FORMS OF TRANSPORTATION IN PHILADELPHIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS.
Healthy Community Element City of South Gate General Plan 2035 (adopted 12/08/09)
Safe Routes to School Getting Started Locally Safe Routes to School
Walking and Bicycling to School:
Finance Committee & City Council August 8, 2016
Walking and Bicycling to School:
Katie Chennisi, MPH Harris County Public Health
Safe Routes to School Program Overview Cassandra Gascon Bligh
Safe Routes to School John Schaefer State Coordinator.
Presentation transcript:

Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. Safe Routes to School Program Presentation Border to Border Conference November 15, 2012 Ponciano N. Longoria P.E. C.F.M City of Edinburg – Director of Public Works

Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. Barriers to walking and bicycling to school Community Design Safety Time and Convenience

Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. Reasons to do a Safe Routes to School Program Reasons to do a Safe Routes to School Program Increased physical activity Improved pedestrian skills Community design Less reliance on automobile More social interaction Increased independence Decreased neighborhood/ school traffic Reduced fear of crime

Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. The Need for Safe Routes to School 1.Fewer kids today walk and bike to school 2.Unintended consequences have resulted 3.SRTS programs can be part of the solution

Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. 1. Fewer kids are biking and walking More parents are driving % walked or biked13% walked or biked 12% driven44% driven (U.S. DOT, 2009) Parents driving their children to school account for up to 25% of morning rush hour traffic. (Parisi Associates, 2003; Morris, 2001)

Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. 2. What are the unintended consequences of less walking and bicycling? 1.Physical Inactivity: Prevalence of overweight children has tripled- Nationally there are 25 million obese or overweight children! Sharp increase in cases of Type 2 Diabetes in children. 2.Poor Air Quality Asthma rates have increased 160% in the past 15 years in children.

Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. Safe Routes to School Programs a Key to the Solution Develop the Plan - Steps to start a SRTS Program 1.Identify people who want to make walking & bicycling to school safe and appealing for children. 2.Share concerns, interests, & knowledge among a variety of community members with diverse expertise can enable groups to tackle many different issues. 3.Hold a kick-off meeting-two main goals: to create a vision & generate next steps. 4.Gather information & identify issues-collecting information can help to identify needed program elements & provide a means to measure the impact of the program later. 5.Identify solutions-to issues identified by the group will include a combination of education, encouragement, engineering & enforcement strategies. 6.Develop a SRTS Plan-include all 5 E’s, time schedule, & map 7.Get the Plan & people moving-There are things that can be done right away without major funding? 8.Evaluate, adjust & keep going-after beginning, careful monitoring will identify which strategies are working well & which are not going as planned.

Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. What is a SRTS Plan? 1.Describes existing conditions 2.Identifies existing problems 3.Proposes solutions 4.Describes coordination efforts 5.Details evaluation methods

Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. 1.Describes Existing Conditions Location of School(s) Environment type (urban, suburban, rural) Enrollment Type of school (elementary/middle) Student participation data (# of students, % students within 2 mi, % of students walking or biking, potential walking/biking outside 2 mi), % participating in free or reduced lunch prgm)

Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. 2.Identifies Existing Problems ID current walking & bike routes to school (include graphic representation-pictures), highlights potential for improvement Current travel modes including student survey results (including walk, bike, bus, auto) Detailed analysis of existing conditions & impediments to safe biking/walking (physical barriers, safety issues, awareness) Traffic, safety, & other relevant data including citations, crashes, injuries and/or fatalities, if applicable

Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. 3.Proposes Solutions ID program “champion” person(s) to spearhead the effort ID team or action committee that will develop/implement the plan & subsequent projects or activities ID stakeholders-parents, students, teachers, elected officials & how they might contribute to development or execution of the plan

Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. 4.Describes Coordination Efforts Policy Statement defining intent/mission Outreach & publicity strategy Responsibilities & tasks for enacting plan

Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. 5.Details Evaluation Methods Activities to monitor, review & update process How initiatives will be sustained Methods & measures of success for the strategies Reference to or inclusion of a non-motorized master plan or similar document

Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. SRTS Joint Program Projects Awarded

Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. SRTS Phase I School NameEngineering Design Award Construction Award Total Project Eisenhower Elementary / Memorial Middle School $38,414.82$370,000.00$408, Monte Cristo Elementary / Villarreal Elementary$32,223.88$380,760.00$412, De Zavala Elementary$40,846.26$381,900.00$422, Truman Elementary$40,611.11$382,870.00$423, Guerra Elementary$37,845.19$382,600.00$420, B.L. Garza Middle School$53,436.50$380,900.00$434, Austin Elementary$38,769.12$372,650.00$411, Lincoln Elementary$41,610.37$369,875.00$411, Total Funding$323,757.25$3,021,555.00$3,345,312.25

Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. SRTS Phase II School NameEngineering Design Award Construction Award Total Project South Middle School $50,592.09$380,470.00$431, Robert E. Lee Elementary$39,201.31$382,960.00$422, Harwell Middle School$41,299.99$382,560.00$423, Freddy Gonzalez Elementary$37,380.63$382,560.00$419, De la Vina Elementary$37,706.51$382,560.00$420, L.B. Johnson Elementary$34,507.24$381,480.00$415, Norma Linda Trevino Elementary$54,273.88$380,760.00$435, Jefferson Elementary$42,747.47$381,480.00$424, Canterbury Elementary$34,506.38$380,470.00$414,976.38

Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. SRTS Phase II (cont.) School NameEngineering Design Award Construction Award Total Project Jose De Escandon Elementary $49,634.08$381,490.00$431, Cano Gonzalez Elementary$30,475.72$378,960.00$409, San Carlos Elementary & J.F. Kennedy Elementary$37,866.58$381,070.00$418, Travis Elementary$40,371.93$373,360.00$413, Carmen Avila Elementary$37,941.64$382,200.00$420, Thomas Esparza Elementary & Betts Elementary$38,970.56$371,360.00$410, Cayetano Cavazos Elementary$30,549.31$286,870.00$317, Total Funding$637,855.35$5,990,610.00$6,628,465.35

Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum. Totals SRTS Phase I & II Total ECISD Schools27 Campuses Total Miles of New Sidewalk Miles Total ADA New Ramps 634 Ramps Total Crosswalks (New/Upgrade) 11 Crosswalks Total New School Beacons70 Beacons Total New Bike Racks161 Bike Racks Total Engineering Design Award$921, Total Construction Award$9,012, Total Project $9,973,777.60

Nam dapibus, nisi sit amet pharetra consequat, enim leo tincidunt nisi, eget sagittis mi tortor quis ipsum.

Ponciano N. Longoria P.E. C.F.M. Director of Public Works City of Edinburg 415 W. University Dr. Edinburg, Texas (956)