Www.designcenter.umn.edu Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist Cairssa Schively Design for Health.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Missoula Planning Summit Milestone 14 August, 2008 Missoula, Montana.
Advertisements

CITY OF MIAMI CITY OF MIAMI. Health District Traffic Study July 21, 2008 Miami Partnership.
Impacting Local Government Updating Functional Classification Using GIS September 12, 2013 Bentonville, Arkansas.
Design for Health April 2009 APA Presentation Design for Health: Strategies for Addressing Health in Local Plans, Policies, and.
What is SBCAG? Voluntary council of governments Established in 1966 under a JPA executed by local governments 13 member Board of Directors: – 5 County.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Small Area Analysis.
Background Why Plan For Transportation? Facts You Should Know Expectations Projects and Costs Conclusions/ Next Steps.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
From KY 89 at the northern city limits of McKee to the recently improved section of US 421 just north of the Jackson-Rockcastle County line. Six-Year Highway.
Integrating Community Planning and Hazard Mitigation Planning Amanda Engstfeld FEMA Region X
Metro Vision 2035 Regional Growth Scenarios. Scenario Workshop.
Endeavors in Transportation Health Impact Assessment LCDR Joseph Ralph, MPH, CHES Healthy Community Design Initiative June 2015 National Center for Environmental.
Talking Freight Seminars November 19, 2008 Caroline A. Mays, AICP Atlanta Regional Commission Integrating Freight and Land Use in the Atlanta Region.
ICM San Antonio – IH-10 Corridor Brian Fariello, TxDOT.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
Functional Classification Maranda Obray, Transportation Planner Idaho Transportation Department.
An assessment of Metro’s Westside Subway Extension Presented by: Tamanna Rahman PP 224A Winter 2012 Midterm.
Out of ‘ Site,’ Out of Mind Increasing Community Connectivity and Physical Activity through Healthy School Site Planning.
Rapid Transit System Steering Committee Meeting December 4, 2012.
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
August 2004 Hickory by Choice Linking Land Use and Air Quality Planning.
Community Development Department Neoga Lakes – Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Master Planned Development (MPD) Rezoning Application.
North Slope Rapid Ecoregional Assessment Intermediary results on human footprint and social and economic MQs Update to the AMT and Techteam October 20,
Community Development & Planning Grant Pre-Application Meeting April 17,
The Health Impact Assessment (HIA): Promising Best Practices in Transportation Eloisa Raynault | | Transportation, Health and.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Richmond Highway Transit Center Feasibility Study Briefing with the Fairfax County Transportation.
Mid Wales LTP Stakeholder Workshop 3 rd October Presentation by Ann Elias and Janice Hughes.
Implementing the Freeland Subarea Plan Zoning and Development Regulations Island County Planning & Community Development 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update.
Climate Change Council November 2011 draft ACT Planning Strategy.
Where the Home Is Matters Planning for Healthy and Equitable Communities Julie West, MPH Jim Krieger, MD, MPH Public Health – Seattle & King County May.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
RPS Modeling Results Presentation to RPS Policy Committee Brian Gregor Transportation Planning Analysis Unit June 6,
On the Road to a New Metropolitan Transportation Plan Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health April 25, 2013.
Creating the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Today’s Presentation Now Developing the Next RTP  Very Early Stages of Development  Website: 2040Plan.org.
FREIGHTSUPPORTIVE LAND USE PLANNINGGUIDELINESFREIGHTSUPPORTIVE PLANNINGGUIDELINES FHWA Talking Freight Series May 18/05 Video Seminar on Context Sensitive.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
Design for Health May 12, 2008 Design for Health HIA Training Workshop Ann Forsyth.
Health Impact Assessment for Healthy Places: A Guide for Planning and Public Health Module 2: Screening Goal: The goal of screening is to determine if.
High Desert Corridor -New State Route 138/E-220 Agency coordination Meeting March 2011 “We’re here to get you there!”
San Joaquin Valley Sustainable Communities Strategies (SCS) Update July 25,
The Fargo/Moorhead Area Interstate Operations Study Opportunities and Planned Activities Presentation for the Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating.
Chris Coombe & Donele Wilkins May 21, Framework Zones.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary.
Baseline Scenario Quality Growth Strategy.
Design for Health August 13, 2007 Health Impact Assessment Kevin Krizek Design for Health.
Comprehensive Plan Update. General, far-reaching vision to benefit the whole community Takes a long term view of issues Focuses on physical development.
Regional Concept for Transportation Operations: An action plan to address transportation operations in Southeast Michigan Talking Technology & Transportation.
Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015 Freight Master Plan.
1 Regional Activity Centers and Clusters Presentation to National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Paul DesJardin Department of Human Services,
Multnomah County Brownfield Initiative Mapping Health Equity Multnomah County Environmental Health Services.
CEE 970 Colloquium Final Presentation Khalid Aljuhani Veronica Asare-Yeboah Ethan Frost Issam Kayssi Hannah Silber.
UNIT 3 – MODULE 1: Introduction to GIS *. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GIS) Allows the visualization & interpretation of data through “layers” of linked/categorized.
Title Evaluating the potential for Bus Rapid Transit and MnPASS Express Lanes in the southwest metro Investigating options for improved bus service between.
A Strategic Agenda for Pinellas County’s Future Growth Whit Blanton, FAICP Pinellas Planning Council & Pinellas Metropolitan Planning Organization August.
Design for Health May 24, 2007 Health Impact Assessment: Threshold Analysis Kevin Krizek Design for Health.
Project Manager & Author: Kim Perrotta Presenting to the CHNET-Works May 26, 2011 Public Health and Land Use Planning: How Ten Public Health Units are.
Highlights  Describe Our Missoula Growth Policy Project  Relationship to Rattlesnake Neighborhood Plan  Next Steps.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
Objectives Today Introduction Key Items  Passing 100,000 population  3 rd largest city in region  Community of workers  Housing affordability edge.
Health Impact Assessments And the Built Environment What’s the Connection, ANYWAYS?
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
STAMFORD CAPACITY AND LIMITS TO GROWTH STUDY SOUTH KESTEVEN DISTRICT COUNCIL FINAL REPORT PRESENTATION PRESENTERS: UNA McGAUGHRIN JESSE HONEY 14 TH DECEMBER.
2035 General Plan Update Planning Commission Study Session on Draft Circulation Element February 2, 2016.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
2017 Comprehensive Plan Update
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project
Health Impact Assessment in Michigan
Design for Health Health Impact Assessment: Threshold Analysis
Recommended Methods for Assessing VMT
Presentation transcript:

Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist Cairssa Schively Design for Health

Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist Summary Introduction to HIA Changes in Preliminary Checklist Overview of the Preliminary Checklist HIA 2.0 Application of HIA to proposal and plan Outcomes of the HIA process Carissa Schively

Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist Overview First step in HIA process Checklist/survey of health issues Determine if further assessment is needed Quick Point-based Carissa Schively

Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist Overview Assesses significance of project, plan, or policy in terms of its size and scope Is it significant enough to assess? Does the plan or proposal meet some initial thresholds for a healthy community? Initial scan of impacts Helps determine whether additional analysis is needed Carissa Schively

Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist Overview What’s new in Preliminary Checklist 2.0? More intuitive language Higher scores mean more assessment is needed Additional social capital threshold Carissa Schively

Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist (Image centered left to right, 2.5 up from bottom, 2.0 from top) Part I: Is it significant enough to assess? 1.Geographic extent 2.Reversibility 3.Population or workforce increase 4.Cumulative impact 5.People affected 6.Land use change 7.Institutional capacity Carissa Schively

Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist Part 1: Is it significant enough to assess? Key QuestionsNoUncertain Yes Geographic extent: Does it apply to a geographic area of a full city block or larger? 01 2 Cumulative impact: Is it occurring in a place where specific local health problems have been identified (e.g. traffic safety, air quality, lack of health foods, contaminated brownfields)? 01 2 People affected: Does the project or plan affect vulnerable groups (e.g. children, older people, people with lower incomes)? 01 2 Total+ += If total score is 11 or greater, HIA may be needed, less than 7, move to Part 2. If total score is 7-10, a HIA is potentially needed, moving to Part 2 recommended. If total score is 6 or less, no HIA required. You may wish to do one on a targeted area or problem.

Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist (Image centered left to right, 2.5 up from bottom, 2.0 from top) Part 2: Does the plan/policy/project meet thresholds? 1.Accessibility 2.Physical Activity 3.Social capital 4.Air Quality 5.Water Quality 6.Food 7.Safety Carissa Schively

Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist Key QuestionsNoUncertain Yes Accessibility: Is there regularly scheduled transit service within ¾ miles of all residential and employment areas? 21 0 Air quality: Are there any residential areas or schools within 200 meters of a major auto- related transportation corridor such as a freeway or road with six or more lanes? 01 2 Food: Are there supermarkets or fruit and vegetable stores located within a mile of each home? 21 0 Total+ += If total score is 13 or greater, it is recommended that you conduct an HIA. If total score is 8-12, an HIA is potentially needed. If total score is 7 or less, no HIA required. You may wish to do an HIA on a targeted area or problem. Part 2: Does the plan or proposal meet some initial thresholds for a health community?

Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist Completing the Preliminary Checklist What information is needed? Where do I get information? Who should be involved? How do you use it for a proposal or plan? Project proposal (e.g. Excelsior & Grand) Corridor plan (e.g. Central Corridor Development Strategy) Carissa Schively

Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist Completing a Preliminary Checklist (Part 1) - Proposal Key QuestionsWhat info?Where to get it?Who has it? Geographic extent: Does it apply to a geographic area of a full city block or larger? Proposed project boundaries Street network Site plan Master streets plan Developer Planning Public works Cumulative impact: Is it occurring in a place where specific local health problems have been identified (e.g. traffic safety, air quality, lack of healthy foods, contaminated brownfields)? Proposed land use Health data Site conditions Traffic conditions Site plan Comprehensive plan Environmental review Transportation plan CIP Developer Planning Environmental services Public works Health agency EPA People affected: Does the project or plan affect vulnerable groups (e.g. children, older people, people with lower incomes)? Existing and proposed land use Demographic information Site plan Comprehensive plan Census Developer Planning Housing/service providers School district

Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist Completing a Preliminary Checklist (Part 2) - Proposal Key QuestionsWhat info?Where to get it?Who has it? Accessibility: Is there regularly scheduled transit service within ¾ miles of all residential and employment areas? Proposed land use Transit routes Site plan Transit system map Developer Planning Public works Transit providers Air quality: Are there any residential areas or schools within 200 meters of a major auto- related transportation corridor such as a freeway or road with six or more lanes? Proposed land use Roadway locations and functional classification Site plan Comprehensive plan Transportation plan (local, county, state) CIP (local, county, school district) Developer Planning Public works County Mn/DOT School district Food: Are there supermarkets or fruit and vegetable stores located within a mile of each home? Existing and proposed land use Permit information Site plan Comprehensive plan Business license files Developer Planning Housing services Business licensing agency

Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist Completing a Preliminary Checklist (Part 1) - Plan Key Questions What info?Where to get it?Who has it? Geographic extent: Does it apply to a geographic area of a full city block or larger? Proposed project boundaries Street network Draft plan Master streets plan Planning Public works Cumulative impact: Is it occurring in a place where specific local health problems have been identified (e.g. traffic safety, air quality, lack of healthy foods, contaminated brownfields)? Proposed land use and station locations Health data Site conditions Traffic conditions Draft plan Comprehensive plan Environmental review Transportation plan CIP (local, county, school district) Planning Environmental services Public works Health agency EPA County Metro Transit People affected: Does the project or plan affect vulnerable groups (e.g. children, older people, people with lower incomes)? Existing and proposed land use and station locations Demographic information Draft plan Comprehensive plan Census Planning Housing/service providers School district County Metro Transit

Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist Completing a Preliminary Checklist (Part 2) - Plan Key Questions What info?Where to get it?Who has it? Accessibility: Is there regularly scheduled transit service within ¾ miles of all residential and employment areas? Proposed land use Transit routes Draft plan Transportation plan (local and regional) Planning Public works Metro Transit County Air quality: Are there any residential areas or schools within 200 meters of a major auto- related transportation corridor such as a freeway or road with six or more lanes? Proposed land use Roadway locations and functional classification Draft plan Comprehensive plan Transportation plan (local, county, state) CIP School district plan Planning Public works County highway agency Mn/DOT School district Metro Transit County Food: Are there supermarkets or fruit and vegetable stores located within a mile of each home? Existing and proposed land use Permit information Draft plan Comprehensive plan Business license files Planning Housing services Business licensing agency Metro Transit County

Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist Using the HIA Who is involved? City staff – planners, engineers, parks, public health, others Public Elected/appointed officials Other agencies/organizations What is required? Time varies Basic knowledge of the project, plan, or policy Carissa Schively

Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist Using the HIA What are the outcomes of a preliminary checklist? Knowledge about the connections between health and planning Additional HIA may be needed Key health concerns may emerge Need for scoring adjustments to reflect local values and conditions Carissa Schively

Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist Summary Introduction to HIA Changes in Preliminary Checklist Overview of the Preliminary Checklist HIA 2.0 Application of HIA to proposal and plan Outcomes of the HIA process Carissa Schively