CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Jürgen Pfingstner Hector Garcia Morales 25 th of January.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATF2: Status Update Glenn Christian (on behalf of FONT group) 10 th ATF Project Meeting.
Advertisements

Tests of DFS and WFS at ATF2 Andrea Latina (CERN), Jochem Snuverink (RHUL), Nuria Fuster (IFIC) 18 th ATF2 Project Meeting – Feb – LAPP, Annecy.
Testing and Development of Feed-Forward System for ATF2 A. Kalinin Accelerator Science and Technology Centre, Daresbury Laboratory, UK Fifth ATF2 Project.
Beam position monitors LCABD Plenary meeting Bristol, 24th March 2009 A. Aryshev, S. T. Boogert, G. Boorman, S. Molloy, N. Joshi JAI at Royal Holloway.
ATF2 FB/FF layout Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group FONT meeting January 11, 2007.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
Simulation of IP beam size with orbit jitter + wakefield in EXT-FF ATF2 Project Meeting K.Kubo.
ATF2 Progress Report For CLIC Workshop Kiyoshi KUBO.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
Progress towards nanometre-level beam stabilisation at ATF2 N. Blaskovic, D. R. Bett, P. N. Burrows, G. B. Christian, C. Perry John Adams Institute, University.
ATF2 Status and Plan K. Kubo ATF2, Final Focus Test for LC Achievement of 37 nm beam size (Goal 1) – Demonstration of a compact final focus.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF February-March 2014 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
High Resolution Cavity BPM for ILC final focal system (IP-BPM) ILC2007/LCWS 2007 BDS, 2007/6/1 The University of Tokyo, KEK, Tohoku Gakuin University,
Discussion on Milestone and schedule Toshiyuki Okugi ATF2 commissioning meeting 1 / 7 / 2009.
Status of very high priority beam tuning software Special ATF2 project meeting, Korea, 1 st October 2008 Cécile Rimbault, on behalf of High Priority task.
ATF2 Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group 5th ATF2 project meeting, KEK December 19-21, 2007.
Kicker Optics – or – Selected ATF-II EXT Line Performance Issues ATF-II Technical Review, April M. Woodley1/40.
CLIC RTML collimation systems and beam stabilisation R. Apsimon CERN, TE-ABT-BTP ECFA LC2013 at DESY, Hamburg 27 th -31 st May 2013.
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) Jürgen Pfingstner Orbit feedback design for the CLIC ML and BDS Orbit feedback design for the CLIC ML.
Technical Board ATF2 GM FF progress report A.Jeremie ATF2 GM System team: K.Artoos, C.Charrondière, A.Jeremie, J.Pfingstner (a lot of figures from him),
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
Mark Woodley, SLACATF2 Software Review (June 18, 2008)1 ATF2 Layout/Optics (v4.0) nBPM (SLAC) nBPM (KEK) FONT Compton / laserwire ODR Existing ATF Extraction.
CERN, BE-ABP-CC3 Jürgen Pfingstner Verification of the Design of the Beam-based Controller Jürgen Pfingstner 2. June 2009.
ATF2 beam commissioning status and beam time request Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 11 / 12 ATF2 Commissioning Meeting.
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Jürgen Pfingstner, Hector Garcia Morales 15 th of.
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Robert Apsimon, Philip Burrows, Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Davide Gamba,
Marc Ross Saturday, June 5, 2004 nanometer BPM status and plans.
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
Wakefield Calculations for the ATF2 Beamline A. Lyapin, Wakefield Calculations for the ATF2 Beamline 1 S. Boogert, J. Snuverink (JAI/RHUL, UK)
Mark Woodley, SLACATF2 Project March 20-21, Summary of Tuning, Corrections, and Commissioning.
J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Optics corrections in the ATF damping ring Jürgen Pfingstner, Yves Renier.
IP BPM Shift Report FONT Meeting: 22 December 2014 Talitha Bromwich.
Emittance Measurements and Related Experimental Results 15th ATF2 Project Meeting, January M. Woodley1/44.
ATF2 Software tasks: - EXT Bunch-Bunch FB/FF - IP Bunch-Bunch FB - FB Integration Status Javier Resta-Lopez JAI, Oxford University FONT meeting 1th August.
J. Pfingstner, LCWS13 Jitter and ground motion studies November 13, 2013 Beam jitter at ATF2: A. Source localisation and B. Ground motion correlation Jürgen.
1 H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration Low Emittance Beam Generation in ATF H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration BPM electronics improvement emittance tuning.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
Mark Woodley, SLAC5th ATF2 Project Meeting (December 19, 2007)1 ATF2 Layout/Optics (v3.8) nBPM (SLAC) nBPM (KEK) FONT Compton / laserwire ODR Existing.
J. Pfingstner Imperfections tolerances for on-line DFS Improved imperfection tolerances for an on-line dispersion free steering algorithm Jürgen Pfingstner.
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Jürgen Pfingstner, Hector Garcia Morales 12 th of.
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) Jürgen Pfingstner Adaptive control scheme for the main linac of CLIC Jürgen Pfingstner 21 th of October.
… Work in progress at CTF3 … Davide Gamba 01 July 2013 Study and Implementation of L INEAR F EEDBACK T OOLS for machine study and operation.
Beam Based Optics Measurements CTF3 Collaboration meeting CERN Yu-Chiu Chao, TJNAF.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF November 2013 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
Summary of Tuning, Corrections, and Commissioning ( Short summary of ATF2 meeting at SLAC in March 2007 ) and Hardware Issues for beam Tuning Toshiyuki.
Ground motion studies at ATF2 June 11, 2014 Orbit jitter source identification via ground motion studies at ATF2 (Results of the June run) Marcin Patecki,
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) Garcia, Pfingstner, Renier ATF operations training Report about the ATF operations training Hector Garcia.
Electron beams in order to sense nm-size mechanical vibrations? CERN: Marek Gasior: BBQ electronics (Andrea Boccardi: VME electronics) Juergen Pfingstner:
Tools in CTF3 Simona Bettoni for the CTF3 operation team.
FJPPL-FKPPL ATF2 Workshop Jitter studies March 18, 2014 Beam jitter localization and identification at ATF2 Marcin Patecki Jürgen Pfingstner 18 th of March.
Report and plan of the tilt monitor Daisuke Okamoto Tohoku University.
Status and plan of Beta-matching in Extraction line Kiyoshi Kubo.
Wakefield effect in ATF2 Kiyoshi Kubo
2nd ATF2 Project Meeting (May 30, 2006)M. Woodley [SLAC]1 ATF2 Layout/Optics (v3.3) nBPM (SLAC) nBPM (KEK) FONT Compton / laserwire ODR Existing ATF Extraction.
J. Snuverink and J. Pfingstner LinSim LinSim Linear Accelerator Simulation Framework with PLACET an GUINEA-PIG Jochem Snuverink Jürgen Pfingstner 16 th.
Progress in CLIC DFS studies Juergen Pfingstner University of Oslo CLIC Workshop January.
Studies of emittance preservation methods and the status of their experimental validation Erik Adli 1, W. Farabolini 2, Reidar Lillestol 1, Jürgen Pfingstner.
Effects of Accelerating Cavities on On-Line Dispersion Free Steering in the Main Linac of CLIC Effects of Accelerating Cavities on On-Line Dispersion Free.
Expected hardware status and Priority of the commissioning task
Beam jitter experiment of exchanging power supplies
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
Further Tracking Studies and March Trip Plan
Emittance Diagnostics
Wake field limitations in a low gradient main linac of CLIC
March Trip Plan Mikey Davis 01 March /7.
3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
Phase Feedforward in 2015 & Plans for 2016
Towards a ground motion orbit feed-forward at ATF2
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Presentation transcript:

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Jürgen Pfingstner Hector Garcia Morales 25 th of January 2013

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Content 1.Measurement and analysis setup 2.Results: damping ring 3.Results: ATF2 beam line 4.Conclusions Many thanks to Y. I. Kim, J. Snuverink, G. White and M. Woodley for supporting us with all necessary information at ATF and for the many very helpful discussions !

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 1. Measurement and analysis setup

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Intention of the jitter studies Intention: 1.Study beam motion in damping ring and ATF2 beam line -> Beam jitter has to be reduced from 10-20% to below 5% 2.Locate beam motion sources, especially beam jitter sources 3.Study the performance of already operating orbit feedback systems and try to make suggestions for possible improvements if necessary Setup: 1.Some scripts to read BPM data in the damping ring and the ATF2 beam line have been written 2.Several data set have been taken under different conditions between the 13 th and 18 th of December 2012

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Used BPM systems and EPICS Used BPM systems 1.96 button-BPMs in the damping ring, resolution of 20μm, only 90 used since others did not work properly 2.12 strip-line BPMs at the beginning of the ATF12beam line, resolution 5μm 3.34 cavity BPMs in the end of the ATF2 beam line, resolution 0.1μm EPICS system 1.The Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System (EPICS) is a collection of software tools to create distributed soft real-time applications for large scientific applications. 2.EPICS data (PVs) of BPMs have been accessed via Matlab commands

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Correlation coefficient: Power spectral density (PSD) estimated as: Integrated root mean square (IRMS): Full and differential motion: x k … full beam motion data … differential beam motion data Analysis tools … standard deviation … cross correlation … DFT of x k … acquisition time of x k … sample number in x k

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Beam motion source search method (for beam lines) Search method Correlate BPM with all others (correlation coefficient) If correlation starts at BPM, there is a jitter source close by Remove detected correlation (see talk of Hector) and search for next jitter source Especially good if correlation starts between BPMs with same phase advance. Otherwise one BPM does not sample full oscillation and several BPMs have to be used for one source Source types 1.Dipole kicks Location of the source is upstream of the BPM where correlation is detected -> kick needs a phase advance to become an offset. 2. Wakefield kicks: Location of the source is close to the BPM where correlation is detected -> kick is proportional to beam offset in source We have to search up- and down- stream of the BPM and cannot predict exact location.

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 2. Results: damping ring

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Differential beam motion in the damping ring Differential beam motion is only slightly correlated in the damping ring (strong signal contribution of BPM noise). In the ATF2 beam line hardly any effect has been observed -> no orbit jitter from the damping ring (but only orbit data used) Correlation coefficient of BPM MB46R (number 25) with all other BPMs

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 3. Results: ATF2 beam line

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Small correlation from the start of the beam line (kicker?) Data of strip-line BPMs had to be shifted by one time step wrt. cavity BPMs. Correlation can be assigned to begin of beam line (maybe the kicker) Only small effect for the beam jitter at the end of the beam line But …

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Signal and noise levels From this plot it is questionable if the data measured by the strip-line BPMs are dominated by noise.

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 First beam jitter source Located between BPMs 97 and 102 (MQF7X and MQD12X). Probably several sources but strongest signal from BPM 102 Candidates: FONT equipment Correctors: ZH5X, ZH6X, ZV8X QPs: QF11X, QD12X, QD13X, QD14X, QK2X But it could also be a noise level artifact. Cavity BPMs instead of strip- line BPMs would help

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Second beam jitter source 1/2 Located at BPM 112 (MQM16FF) Very strong source Candidates: Wire scanner: MW3X, MW4X Profile monitor: OTR3X Correctors: ZH1FF, ZV1FF QP: QM16FF

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Second beam jitter source 2/2 Measured vertical beam position data of the BPMs 111 (left) and 112 (right) versus BPM 134. A strong change in correlation can be seen.

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Third beam jitter source Located at BPMs 118 and 119 (MQD10BFF and MQD10AFF) Candidates: Ref. cavity: MF3FF Monitor MFB1FF QPs: QD10B, QD10AFF, QM11FF Wakefield effect observed?

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 4. Conclusions Beam motion/jitter 1.No significant effect of beam motion in the damping ring on the beam motion in the ATF2 beam line has been observed. However, only orbit data have been used instead of single turn data. 2.Three locations in the ATF2 beam line have been identified in which most likely beam motion/jitter is created 3.No dispersive patterns have been observed. Therefore, the influence of the beam energy seems to be negligible. 4.No indications have been found that the extraction kicker creates a significant amount of beam jitter, but this could be due to limited resolution if the strip-line BPMs. Feedback performance 1.The damping ring feedback system could act slightly stronger and the actuation itself could be smoother. 2.The ATF2 beam line feedback works very well, but an adaptive controller with e.g. PSD estimation could improve mode-like changes.

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 More Details Hector’s talk CLIC note 986 will also be very soon on-line available There will be also an ATF note

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Thank you for your attention!