No 1 2014-02-07 The Swedish National Audit Office RRV: why IT- projects fail. Intosai Motto: More time for discussion Starting with some comments on our.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.

Advertisements

Federal Transit Administration Office of Safety and Security TRANSIT BUS SAFETY AND SECURITY PROGRAM Status of NTSB Recommendations and FTA Responses.

The Path from Reactive Reporting to Proactive Business Intelligence Dwight Taylor Manager Enterprise Informatics Health Care Service Corporation September.

ITIL Foundation Course V1

Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.

Managing Risk CHAPTER SEVEN Student Version Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

| 1 Developments in the Norwegian Model for Quality Assurance in Higher Education and the Role of NOKUT Developments in the Norwegian Model for.

No 1 IT Governance – how to get the right and secured IT services Bjorn Undall and Bengt E W Andersson The Swedish National Audit Office Oman

Two E-Governance Projects Sweden and the United States The INTOSAI Working Group on IT Audit (WGITA) May 2008.

NATIONAL STATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD r.a.virola 29 june 2007 BUILDING STATISTICAL CAPACITY TO MONITOR THE PROGRESS OF SOCIETIES DISCUSSION By Romulo.

1 Australian superannuation data APRAs data collection and publications 24 April 2013.

Quality Improvement in the ONS Cynthia Z F Clark Frank Nolan Office for National Statistics United Kingdom.

1 IT Risk Management in Government Jonathan Smith Sr. Risk Manager Commonwealth Security and Risk Management October 1,

Bring every citizen, school, business and administration on-line - quickly create a digitally literate and entrepreneurial Europe ensure an inclusive information.

EuropeAid Entry points and models for parliamentary development EC support to governance in partner countries – with a focus on the African continent –

1 NORTH CAROLINA COUNCIL OF INTERNAL AUDITING October 31, 2007.

Understanding Basic Components:

Rob Briner Organizational Psychology Birkbeck

Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive CDM 2007 Training Package Session 2 - Clients Version: September 07.

Using Internal Control to Manage Risk Mary C. Braun, CPA, CGFM Management Concepts, Incorporated.

Welcome Maria McChesney Director, IS, City of Hamilton

Knowledge Management at the Gordon – Staff Portal Project Presented by Deirdre Carmichael 12 September 2008.

© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Improving Customer Orientation through Service Charters Seminar.

Time Value of Money – By Prof. Simply Simple

A brief for top management Prepared by the Institute of Quality Assurance Integrated Management Special Interest Group Future management is integrated.

Adaptive Testing Technique Ajay Chhokra and Jitender Danwani.

Test Taking Strategies for Aviation Meteorology (AMT 220)

How to make an effective presentation

5.9 + = 10 a)3.6 b)4.1 c)5.3 Question 1: Good Answer!! Well Done!! = 10 Question 1:

How to commence the IT Modernization Process?

The Mid-Semester Review – Bridge the Gap Barbara Vohmann, Dean Bowyer, Debbie Philipson, Pauline Start, Mark Tree, Dr. Julian Priddle.

Michigan Department of Education, Office of Special Education August 12, 2014 Learning From State Complaints and Due Process Hearing Decisions.

PAS Recent achievements and new proposals Beijing, October/2008 PERFORMANCE AUDIT SUBCOMITTEE.

Internal Control–Integrated Framework

Management Quality - Achieving Excellence in Allied Health Profession’s Services Management Quality Matrix Dr Robert Jones Head of Therapy Services Directorate.

Copyright 2001 Advanced Strategies, Inc. 1 Data Bridging An Overview Prepared for DIGIT By Advanced Strategies, Inc.

Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment

Care and support planning Care Act Outline of content  Introduction Introduction  Production of the plan Production of the plan  Planning for.

Barry Sandison Deputy Secretary, Health and Information Department of Human Services Data: creating value for service delivery.

Service Provider Support of Audit Readiness Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) March 14, 2011.

Public Debt Management with emphasis on PPP 1 Ministry of Finance 08 th Dec 2014.

Mike Fisher Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust 1.

Institutional Processes for Maintaining User-Producer Partnerships in the US IAOS 2014 Contributed Paper Session “User- Producer Partnerships,” October.

1 Guidance for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 By David G. Bullock, Partner Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP.

TRAC / TDR ICPSR Trustworthy Digital Repositories.

Key National Indicators and Supreme Audit Institutions: U.S. and INTOSAI Perspectives Bernice Steinhardt Director, Strategic Issues U.S. Government Accountability.

The global body for professional accountants Overcoming the challenges of implementing IPSASs & audit landscape Chris Ridley (ACCA Public Sector Global.

Stage 6 Examination Strategies 1MAHS website - stage 6 study skills.

Roads to Recovery by Leslie Riggs Executive Director AusLink.

Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.

Information Management LIS /1/99 Martha Richardson.

Washington State Office of Insurance Commissioner State Insurance Management & Business Application Project Recap November 2007.

The ISSAI implementation in 2011 – ISSAIs for financial audit. The Swedish National Audit Office. Meeting of Experts of SAIs of the Baltic and Nordic countries.

1 Performance elements in budget and reporting process - Norway 5TH ANNUAL MEETING OF OECD SENIOR BUDGET OFFICIALS NETWORK ON PERFORMANCE&RESULTS – 28.

Containing Cost Through Platform-Based Business Process Outsourcing.

ICP 8 – Risk Management and Internal Controls Ekrem Sarper Vice Chair, Implementation Committee San Jose, Costa Rica.

Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission

1 Planning and Programming for Effective Use of External Audit Resources Victor Rezendes Managing Director Strategic Issues U.S. General Accounting Office.

Visibility. Intelligence. response Information Security: Risk Management or Business Enablement? Mike Childs Vice President Rook Security.

My Digital Footprint. How Might Your Digital Foot Print Effect Your Future Opportunities Your Digital Foot Print is an interesting trail that you could.

Leadership Style 101 What is Your Leadership Style?

Good Governance in the Public Sector An international framework

Time Value of Money – By Prof. Simply Simple

The Swedish National audit Office Theme – SAI and Government Oversight Promotion of IT IT support in the Judicial Chain Presentation at the 7th Performance.

Accountability Issues in Proposal Writing

Document Management Don Mitchell March 15, 2019.

Applied Software Project Management

Risk Management = Change Management The Judicial Branch journey in risk management, internal control and consolidated financial reporting. Mary E.

Presentation transcript:

No The Swedish National Audit Office RRV: why IT- projects fail. Intosai Motto: More time for discussion Starting with some comments on our survey of the 231 government IT-projects Then presenting the questions we found interesting

No The Swedish National Audit Office 231 projects It seems agencies have too many projects on hand. Even relatively small agencies have 3-4 projects to manage simultaneously …and it will get even worse beforen e- Goverment takes off

No The Swedish National Audit Office Implementation P(success) < 0.5 Recovery from serious problems is very uncertain. 56% of the projects had their schedules and budgets revised once. 36 % of them relapsed into problems It takes 6-7 months for problems to be clearly detectable

No The Swedish National Audit Office Why? Projects are too big and take too long – 2 yrs. Common wisdom says 6 months is right, but not much happens …. Projects more demanding now… Lead Paper tells it all and very well So does the OECD/PUMA brief So does Standish Group…

No The Swedish National Audit Office Standish Group: Private and Government projects

No The Swedish National Audit Office OECD: To get IT right - establish appropriate governance structures; - think small; - use known technologies; - identify and manage risk; - ensure compliance with best practices for project management; - hold business managers accountable; - recruit and retain talent;

No The Swedish National Audit Office OECD: To get IT right -prudently manage knowledge; - establish environments of trust with private vendors; and - involve end-users. Motto:governments must identify risk, determine which risks they are willing to take, and manage the relevant risk

No The Swedish National Audit Office Projects = Investments Business need and change has often been not a very clear objective: We need a system… The investment processes are often ill- designed and rely on Ad-hoc action = many projects should never have been initiated

No The Swedish National Audit Office Get it right before you start… The fast trigger – slow bullet syndrome Many/most agencies still don´t have a really supportive IT-strategy Practically none have an integrated development strategy, putting IT in it´s right perspectivem

No The Swedish National Audit Office What is behind? Management

No The Swedish National Audit Office KTH, Project Management Institute (Prof Selin)

No The Swedish National Audit Office Do managers learn? Probably, but slowly Projects become more difficult, faster? How do they learn? Processes for learning in place? Should SAI contribute and how?

No The Swedish National Audit Office Invest wisely… (J.D Rockefeller) Projects: The process of implementing the investment One view: don´t worry too much about implementation, look at least as much at decisions and processes behind the projects How should SAI audit them? What about ITIM (GAO)? Does it need supportive legislation like Clinger – Cohen to work?

No The Swedish National Audit Office Do SAIs invest wisely? With few exceptions IT-audit resources in the SAI are very scarce indeed. How should we use them? Foci? What intelligence activities and other measures does it take to put the SAI in a position to invest wisely in audit projects?