TCN – General Points Not a method for monitoring teaching methods but a means to look at the impact changes in our teaching can have on pupils. Not a method.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Stage 3 National Strategy
Advertisements

Performance management guidance
Performance management guidance. Performance management Part C: Appraisers An introduction to the revised Performance Management Regulations January 2011.
Closing the progress gap. Key issues addressed by the study This study explored: – approaches to closing the gap for disadvantaged pupils –effective leadership.
BA (Hons) Primary Education Year Three School Based Training Briefing
Webinar: A Headteacher's Guide to Performance Management with PRP Presented by Josephine Smith.
What makes great teaching?
The role of the mathematics subject leader in leading sustainable improvements Thursday 23 rd September 2010 Jo Lakey School Improvement Officer.
Securing Good www-kis-education-solutions.com. Session 3 Building Capacity –Leadership at all levels –Monitoring and Evaluation –Processes and systems.
1 Core Module Three – The Summative Report Core Module Three: The Role of Professional Dialogue and Collaboration in the Summative Report.
Performance management guidance
Introducing the New College Scheme Seevic Performance Appraisal.
Appraisal and performance management
1 Marking For Improvement Presented by: Mrs G Duffy, VP & Mrs B Bridges, Curriculum Leader Self Evaluation.
1 Marking for Improvement Presented by: Mrs G Duffy, Vice Principal Self Evaluation.
0 Area Network Day - Summer Agenda 09:15 – 10:30 Assessing Pupil Progress 10:30 – 10:45 Break 10:45 – 12:00Raising Standards in Reading using.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Performance Management and the cycle of appraisal.
Please help yourself to a drink. We will start at 9.15a.m.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Seevic Performance Appraisal
Raising your game – improving your subject area Raising your game The Improvement Loop Peter Richards.
Middle Leaders’ Role in School Self-Evaluation
1 Building Evaluative Capability in Schooling Improvement: The Student View Judy Parr,
Birmingham Primary Strategy Team Subject Leader Training Literacy Co-ordinator Session Monitoring Progress - Book Trawls/Scrutinies.
Presented by Linda Martin
Effective collaboration Session 1 – A professional community.
The ILA in Detail. OBJECTIVES 1.To understand the purpose of the ILA 2.To have a clear understanding of how to complete the ILA 3.To have considered the.
Also referred to as: Self-directed learning Autonomous learning
Personalised Learning Donna Wood Putting the learner at the heart of the education system.
Improving the quality of talk and questioning to support pupil learning.
What Ofsted does to reach a judgement about teaching and what can be learned from this by academies?
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Lesson observations: evaluating the quality of teaching and learning.
Action research projects This sequence may help you when planning your case study What does the data identify about this target group? What will.
Ofsted Expectations – 2009 Framework Nicola Pruden St John Payne School 7 th December 2010.
Dromore High School Controlled Co-educational Non-selective years 50 th anniversary Pilot for revised curriculum.
Evaluating gifted and talented students January 2007.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
Developing web-based CPD for group work and argumentation in science Session 2: Developing Argumentation 12/01/12.
Corpus Christi College, Cycle of Change A Self Evaluating School.
The linking learning SET CPD activity Benchmark Reflecting on evidence Self Evaluation Tools (SET)
‘Philosophy for Children’: deepening learning. The impact of ‘thinking through philosophy’ on pupils’ learning  The primary children in this Scottish.
This was developed as part of the Scottish Government’s Better Community Engagement Programme.
Tracking and Target Setting. Ensuring impact on pupil learning  Identify strand from an area of learning in literacy and mathematics  Identify focus.
Session 4 Planning for Implementation of APP. 1 PROCESS Familiarisation with AFs & Standard files Practice in levelling Standard files using APP guidelines.
Assessing, Recording and Reporting Citizenship A Collaborative Approach.
Some Definitions Monitoring – the skill of effectively over- viewing and analysing a learning situation Assessment – is the closer examination of pupil’s.
Teaching Team Role of TAs defined and agreed.. Teaching Team Role of TAs defined and agreed.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
Assessment and PSHE By far the weakest aspect of teaching was the assessment of pupils’ learning which was often less robust for PSHE education than for.
© Crown copyright 2006 Renewing the Frameworks Driving Improvement.
Observation System Kidderminster College January 2012.
© PeopleAdvantage 2013 All Rights Reserved We will Show You How to Easily Conduct Effective Performance Appraisals LCSA Conference 2013.
Appraiser Skills Training Workshop One: Initial Training.
ENGLISH APP TRAINING Cohort 3 NOVEMBER AIMS To be familiar with the APP materials and how they link together To develop understanding of the APP.
Helping to transform autism education: the AET’s 5 year national programme Steve Huggett Director Autism Education Trust Swindon April 2016.
The Future for Assessment? Assessing Pupil Progress (APP) as a tool for effective Teacher Assessment in Primary Science.
Research Project Our school is called Elworth Hall Primary school. We are located in Elworth, a small area within Sandbach. There are approximately.
Analysis of Research and Impact on Practice, Action Planning Monday December 13th.
Assessing Young Learners
UCL Peer Dialogue Scheme
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Why bother – is this not the English Department’s job?
The Literacy Hub Introduction Literacy Toolkit
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
GETTING ‘EVEN’ BETTER: FIVE LEVELS FOR PD EVALUATION
Key issue addressed by the study
Cooperative Learning Concepts
CPD: The Coaching & Mentoring Model
Presentation transcript:

Trusted Colleague Network: Observing Pupil Responses to Changes in Teaching

TCN – General Points Not a method for monitoring teaching methods but a means to look at the impact changes in our teaching can have on pupils. Not a method of appraisal. It is an opportunity to experience another pair of eyes on our teaching from a trusted colleague – something that we usually experience only in high pressure situations (Inspections/PRSD observations).

Initial Preparation Recruit staff (not SLT) around 20 staff members to form a focus group. Provide focus group with results from the pupil voice exercise to show what pupils feel are the key elements of a good lesson. Ask staff to individually answer questions relating to the following four areas:

4 Key Questions What aspect of their current classroom practice would they like to develop? This will be accompanied by a framework for teachers to consider as a point of reference – highlighting skills, knowledge and values. What training do they feel they need in order to bring about improvement in this area? Staff must define what specific aspects of their development require training. How do they feel this improvement will directly impact on the pupils they teach? This will be accompanied by a framework for teachers to consider as a point of reference – highlighting aspects of pupil impact tabulated under the areas of knowledge, skills & attitudes. How do they feel this impact can be effectively measured? How can we tell if it is making a difference? The answer to this or an agreement on this will be reached by the pair of observing teachers after their series of observations is complete. They will think of how these pupil responses will be measured before hand.

Contd Staff questionnaires are collected and staff paired off accordingly, if possible matching their development needs, though this is not essential. Training to be provided for these staff members on how to conduct peer observation and offer constructive feedback.

TCN in Action This should be a recognised process across the school (otherwise it will not be sustained). A lesson observation sheet will be completed as a paired activity for each teacher in the pair. They will refer to their answers from their initial audit when completing this task. They will agree on the parameters for observation i.e. what they expect to see in terms of pupil response. This will ensure that they both feel comfortable addressing the competencies associated with their development area. Teachers will jointly observe each other once per month. They will be given one period to design and draw up a peer observation sheet and agree how long they want to be observed for each area of focus – one lesson, two lessons, whole term. During the lesson the observing teacher should look for and record against the agreed list of pupil responses listed under pupil impact. They should also highlight aspects of the lesson they feel could be used to develop their own practice.

Contd A record of this should be kept in order that pairs can agree if the desired pupil responses were achieved. At the end of this time period staff pairs will meet to discuss the extent to which previously agreed impact on pupil learning had been achieved. During this meeting staff should review notes from the completed lesson observation sheets. Staff should also agree what, if any, obvious next steps are apparent from their mutual experience and discussion. Staff will judge whether to shift the focus if the desired pupil responses are evident. Pairs of staff with different initial foci can swap to accelerate the process for learning.

Sharing of Good Practice Encourage the dissemination of good practice through the operation of a Trusted Colleague Network. Departments to identify one or more active learning strategies as a focus. Teachers can nominate a colleague from within their department to observe their lesson.

The nominated teacher does not have to be the HOD. The HOD can also nominate a departmental colleague to observe his/her lesson. The HOD will keep a record of who has been observed and by whom.

Observations to be completed by 16th December 2013. Teachers will share their observations of the Teaching Strategy, not the teachers, in the departmental meeting on 23rd January 2014. Where the observer is not the line manager of the teacher being observed, the very fact of the observation is sufficient to fulfil the objective.