US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Greater New Orleans Hurricane and Storm Damage Risk Reduction System Armoring Brief Team New Orleans U.S.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BUILDING STRONG ® Do not include this Slide. This template is a guide for preparing power points presentations. The information requested is important.
Advertisements

Permanent Protection System Opinion of Probable Cost May 2010 Courtesy USACE Photograph Courtesy USACE.
Recent NERC Standards Activities RSC – Jan. 5, 2011 NSRS Update Date Meeting Title (optional)
HSDRRS Wave Overtopping Risk Reduction for Return Events Greater than 100 yr. By: John Monzon, P.E. Flood Protection Division Chief and Rickey Brouillette,
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Levee Safety Program Engineer Circular Development US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Michael Bart, P. E. Chief,
Public Information Meeting #6 City of Fargo Flood Risk Reduction Projects Rose Creek Coulee October 9, 2012.
Detention / Infiltration Structure. Figure 21–1 Point Discharge and Downstream Stability Analysis Procedure.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Louisiana Coastal Area Modification of Davis Pond Study Overview Governor’s Advisory Commission on Coastal.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® FOLSOM DAM MODIFICATIONS APPROACH CHANNEL EIS/EIR Major Robert Dion and Cameron Sessions Project Managers.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ®. Slide 2.
A Dutch Perspective on Coastal Louisiana Flood Risk Reduction and Landscape Stabilization Jos Dijkman (Deltares / Delft Hydraulics)
COMMUNITY PRESENTATION
Mathijs van Ledden, Maarten Kluijver (Haskoning Inc.), Bob Bass, Nancy Powell (USACE) and Bob Dean (University of Florida) HINDCAST OF WAVE OVERTOPPING.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Overview of Public Law (PL) Advanced Measures Contingency Operations Directorate.
Hydraulic Screening and Analysis Needed for USACE Review
Measuring Learning Outcomes Evaluation
Toronto, May 6-8, 2008Flood Defence1 Risk assessment in trans-boundary cooperation between the Netherlands and Germany Jan Stijnen.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Flood Risk Management Update Stephanie Bray 12/10/2013.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Assessment for Dam Failure Simulations Kurt Buchanan, CFM Economist Mapping, Modeling, and Consequences.
Briefing to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board on Status of the FCSA July 12, 2013 Central Valley Integrated Flood Management Study.
PILOT PROJECT: External audit of quality assurance system on HEIs Agency for Science and Higher Education Zagreb, October 2007.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Prioritizing Investments within the USACE Levee Safety Program Process and Methodology Overview Jason Needham,
Coastal Texas Protection and Restoration Project
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Coastal Storm Risk Management Planning.
Regional Flood Plain Management Council April 15, 2015 H-GAC December 2nd.
2006 Reliability Study Scope Name Date. DRAFT 2 Purpose of Study Assess the PEC and Duke transmission systems’ reliability Develop a single reliability.
1 Technological Innovations and Future Vision of Technical Support Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration and Mississippi Coastal Improvements Program.
BUILDING STRONG ® Do not include this Slide. This template is a guide for preparing power points presentations. The information requested is important.
WRRDA and WRDA: How are they different, and does it make any difference? Inland Rivers, Ports and Terminals, Inc. Tuesday, April 29, 2014 James A. Kearns.
Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable 1 Addressing the Flood Risk Challenge.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions 1 What is Engineering Risk and Reliability? Why We Use It? Robert C.
An Unnatural Disaster Social, Legal, and Ethical Considerations for Engineering Managers MEM 604.
One Team: Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable 1 MRGO Closure Status Next Steps & Status USACE & State negotiate and sign MOA Plans & Specifications for.
Planning and Community Development Department Housing Element City Council February 03, 2014.
Hurricanes. Katrina approaching New Orleans August 2005.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Texoma and Missouri Region JETS Training Symposium Resiliency Planning Through Hazard Vulnerability Analysis.
National Levee Safety Act, Title IX, WRDA 2007 Update for Levee Summit Eric Halpin, P.E. Special Assistant for Dam and Levee Safety Headquarters, US Army.
Update on the SOUTHWEST COASTAL LA Project Governor’s Advisory Commission Meeting August 7, 2013 Abbeville, LA committed to our coast.
Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority June 8, 2007 Presentation to the State Reclamation Board Proposed Feather River Setback Levee.
LS506 Unit 7 Seminar Professor Michele Wolf. Welcome! Contact Info: Office Hours: Sun 7-8 PM & Sat AM.
One Team: Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable US Army Corps of Engineers 1 Coastal Protection and Restoration Advisory Committee 3 April 2006 D
05C112011B Template Master – Update Tracking Number and Date Information Here Update tracking number and date on this slide Template Master – Update Tracking.
Planning for Non-Routine Activities
Risk Analysis for Major Rehabilitation. Major Rehabilitation Background  Prior to FY 1992  Funded under Operation and Maintenance, General, Appropriation.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mat Sinking Unit John W. Cross Commander, Vicksburg District March 2015 Exploring Redesign and Replacement.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Boise River Feasibility Study Ellen Berggren, PMP Outreach Coordinator/ Project Manager Idaho Governor’s Roadless.
New Orleans Hurricane Protection System Overview by Mike Park HPS Program Manager Task Force Hope U.S. Army Corps of Engineers March 19, 2008.
Catharine Cyr Ransom Principal The Accord Group. Stafford Act Structured approach to disasters Partnership between local, state, Federal governments Authority.
Request for Service (RFS) Process and Metrics Update June 24, 2008.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Emergency Response Policy Revision Update ( ER & EP ) Jeffrey Jensen CECW-HS USACE Flood Risk Management.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 8A Informational Briefing Presented By Board Staff and CH2MHill Consultants Model Funded.
US Army Corps of Engineers PLANNING SMART BUILDING STRONG ® SMART PLANNING TO SUPPORT FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT USACE Flood Risk Management and Silver Jackets.
High Assurance Products in IT Security Rayford B. Vaughn, Mississippi State University Presented by: Nithin Premachandran.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Levee Safety Program US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® December 2013 Update for the NAFSMA Annual Meeting.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Name of Levee Segment Presenter Name Presenter Title Duty Location Date of Presentation.
APPLICATION NO LEVEE DISTRICT No. 1 Of SUTTER COUNTY STAR BEND SETBACK LEVEE SUTTER COUNTY April 17, 2009.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
Climate Change Threat Sea-Level Rise 1. Potential Impacts from Sea-Level Rise How might our community be impacted by sea-level rise? 2.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study Collaboration Webinar Series #5: Policy Challenges and Institutional.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Miles City, Montana Section 205 Gwyn M. Jarrett - Project Manager Omaha District April 27, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Inland Marine Transportation System Capital Investment Strategy Jeanine Hoey, PE, PMP Program Manager 15.
OVERVIEW OF CLARA MODEL IMPROVEMENT TESTING Kenneth Kuhn – RAND Corporation Jordan Fischbach – RAND Corporation David Johnson – Purdue University.
K1 Proposed National Levee Safety Program An Introduction for the Tribal Assistance Coordination Group May 12, 2011.
Prepared By: Cutcher & Associates, Inc. Coastal Engineers
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Coastal Storm Risk Management
North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study Collaboration Webinar Series #2: Ecosystem Goods and Services U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Coastal Storm Risk.
DOD’S PHASED SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
Sacramento Environmental Commission January 2019.
Presentation transcript:

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Greater New Orleans Hurricane and Storm Damage Risk Reduction System Armoring Brief Team New Orleans U.S. Army Corps of Engineers July 20, 2011

BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Authority  Congress stated in the 4 th and 6 th supplement: “…armor critical elements of the New Orleans hurricane and storm damage risk reduction system….” 2

BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Definition of Armoring  A natural of artificial material placed on or around a levee, floodwall or other structure to reduce the risk to the system or component, to prevent breaching or major damage when confronted with wave attack, overflow and overtopping associated with a greater and 100-yr storm surge event. 3

BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Research and Development  Colorado State: ► Erected world’s largest wave flume ► Tested erosion resistance of an array of common levee construction and armoring materials  Texas A&M: ► Modeling / Analysis of Transition Armoring ► Erosion resistance testing of compacted clay and stabilized soil  LSU ► Grass / Root study  ERDC ► Flood side erosion technical publication  International Subject Matter Experts ► Flume design (Dr. van de Meer) ► Testing methodology (Drs. van de Meer and Hughes) ► Interpret test results / establish performance ranges of armoring materials (Royal Haskoning, Dr. Thornton and Dr. Hughes) 4

HSDRRS Armoring Brief CSU Test Results 5 Material Test No. Material Max. Flow Tested At flow Total Hours Tested Result 1Clay0.2 cfs/ft Failed after 1hr 0.2cfs/ft 2Bermuda Grass4.0 cfs/ft424No Visible Erosion 3Bahia Grass3.0 cfs/ft417No Visible Erosion 4TRM/Bermuda4.0 cfs/ft39.0No Visible Erosion 5HPTRM/Bermuda4.0 cfs/ft39.0No Visible Erosion 6Bermuda Grass w/ruts4.0 cfs/ft36.0No propagation 7Bermuda w/ruts & bare spot4.0 cfs/ft33.0No propagation 8Lime Stabilized Clay4.0 cfs/ft0.30.4Failure at 1.0 cfs/ft 9ACB4.0 cfs/ft33No Visible Erosion 10Dead Bermuda Grass2.5 cfs/ft13.2Failed at 2.0 cfs/ft 11Dead Bermuda Grass w/HPTRM4.0 cfs/ft36.0No Visible Erosion

BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Performance Ranges Material Range cfs/ft Grass HPTRM ACB>4 6

HSDRRS Armoring Brief Armoring Types Articulated Concrete Block & TRM Installing Articulated Concrete Block Turf Reinforcement Mat Articulated Concrete Block after 4 months of Grass Growth 7

HSDRRS Armoring Brief Using B.C Spillway Clay, Grass Grown at ERDC & Trucked to CSU Grass Growth & Wave Overtopping Testing at CSU 8

BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief 9

BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Risk Informed Decision Making  Commissioned members of IPET Risk Assessment Team to run probabilistic analyses of flood inundation that might be expected with each of the armoring alternatives in place for 500-yr and 750-yr storm surge events  Used IPET risk assessment model to analyze armoring alternatives based on fragilities to make recommendations 10

BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Alternative Formulation  Analyzed overtopping rates for storms of varying intensities (500-yr and 750-yr) impacting the perimeter  Developed alternative armoring configurations based on performance ranges of armoring materials as established by completed R&D  Project Delivery Team included membership of non-federal sponsor and flood protection authorities 11

BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Alternative Evaluation Process  Conducted in phases to allow maximum consideration of NFS perspectives  Multi-criteria decision analysis  Alternatives evaluated against 5 weighted criteria ► Risk and Reliability (Performance) – 45% ► Operation and Maintenance – 30% ► Cost – 10% ► Schedule – 10% ► Environmental – 5% 12

BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Armoring Alternative Configurations 500-yr Alternatives  Alt 1 – Uniform 500-yr resiliency  Alt 2 – Hardened crown, adjust armoring material in accordance with resultant overtopping rate  Alt 3. – Uniform 500-yr resiliency plus risk informed additions 750-yr Alternatives  Alt 4 – Uniform 750-yr resiliency  Alt 5 – Hardened crown, adjust armoring material in accordance with resultant overtopping rate  Alt 6. – Uniform 750-yr resiliency plus risk informed additions 13

BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Alternative Evaluation Process (cont.)  Analyzed 6 alternatives (25 May) ► Team recommendation: Alternative 3  Summary of outcome provided to NFS (6 June)  Follow-up meeting conducted (20 June)  Written feedback from NFS provided (24 June) ► Use no TRM or ACB ► Use gravity walls to lower overtopping rate below 1 cfs (within erosion resistance of grass) ► Gravity wall alternative found inconsistent with authorization Exceeds 100-yr system authorization Fails to add resiliency for over topping 14

BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Armoring Alternative Configurations  Final AEP conducted 28 June – Alternative 7 added to minimize use of TRM / ACB ► Alt 7 – Uniform 500-yr resiliency plus risk informed additions (enhanced grass in lieu of TRM for risk informed additions) 15

BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Alternatives RankAlternativeDescription yr Overtopping resiliency and Risk Assessment Results (HPTRMS only) yr Overtopping resiliency + hardened crown yr Overtopping resiliency and Risk Assessment Results (HPTRMS only) yr Overtopping resiliency and Risk Assessment Results (HPTRMS only) + NFS O&M considerations yr Overtopping resiliency + hardened crown yr Overtopping resiliency only yr Overtopping resiliency only 16

HSDRRS Armoring Brief 17

HSDRRS Armoring Brief 18

BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Challenges  Future Levee Lifts  Future Authority for Armoring  NFS O&M Concerns  Expedited Implementation 19

BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Path Forward  Re-allocation of Funds for Armoring  Complete Design – Dec 2011  Begin Construction – Mar 2012  Armoring In Place – 1 June

BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Discussion 21

BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Sponsor / Stakeholder Participation  Project Delivery Team participation since July 2010  Formulation of armoring alternative for evaluation 22