Regents Education Program Annual Conference Dr. Debra L. Stuart Vice Chancellor for Administration Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education 405-225-9121.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
Advertisements

UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
TRAVIS REINDL, JOBS FOR THE FUTURE (USA) INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON UNIVERSITY COSTS AND COMPACTS CANBERRA, AUSTRALIA 15 JULY 2008 From Service to Stewardship:
Engagement – The ‘Spirit’ of CQUniversity Dr Pierre Viljoen Pro Vice-Chancellor – Community and Engagement June 2010.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Improving Educational Outcomes Jackie Dowd Special Assistant to the Governor for Career Innovation Indiana Association of Public School Superintendents.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Facilities Management 2013 Manager Enrichment Program U.Va.’s Strategic Planning Initiatives Colette Sheehy Vice President for Management and Budget December.
August 2013 School of Medicine Strategic Planning Community Engagement Committee.
Presented by Doug Henton Collaborative Economics.
Public engagement and lifelong learning: old wine in a new bottle, or a blended malt? Paul Manners Director, National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement.
 Introductions  Charge from President Blake  Timeline  Structure  Outcomes.
Role of Universities in Quality Assurance Quality Culture Project OAQ-CRUS Conference Internal quality assurance at higher education institutions – requirements.
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
1 Engaged Campus – Institutional Level and Department Level presented to Engaged Department Summit CSU Chico – May 5, 2006 Season Eckardt, Administrative.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing PSU AS CATALYST FOR EDUCATIONAL GROWTH Imagining the Creation of an Intellectually Rich and.
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
© American Bar Association Effective Strategic Planning Henry F. White, Jr. Executive Director & Chief Operating Officer American Bar Association 10 th.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
DOES LEADERSHIP MAKE A DIFFERENCE? 1 The importance of school leadership on the quality of schools and the achievements of pupils:
1 MISSION: GRADUATE CASE STUDY. 2 SHARED COMMUNITY VISION.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Achieving Campus Diversity: The University of Central Florida Model
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Davenport-Perth Neighborhood Centre Community Profile Data from Statistics Canada, 2006 Census Profile Series, Community Social Data Strategy (CSDS), 2008.
Report to Professional Council June 4, 2009 By Carla Boone Planning Council: A New Way of Doing Business at COM.
Building Collaborative Initiatives that Enhance Student Learning Nancy Mitchell and Linda Major.
Building a Funders Network HOW YOU CAN CATALYZE CHANGE IN YOUR COMMUNITY.
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
STRATEGIC PLAN Board Presentation August 20, 2013.
STRATEGIC DIRECTION UPDATE JANUARY THE VISION AND MISSION THE VISION: ENRICHING LIVES AND CREATING SUCCESSFUL FUTURES. THE MISSION: EDUCATION EXCELLENCE.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
CCCU PRESIDENT’S CONFERENCE Structuring Tough Choices in Tight Economy Times: JBU’s Strategic Planning to Sustain Mission in Challenging Economic Times.
Strategic Academic Visioning and Empowerment (SAVE) Final Report to UWF BOT December 2011.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Developing the Year One Report: WVC’s Experience as a Pilot College Dr. Susan Murray Executive Director, Institutional Effectiveness.
Lynwood Park Public School Cyclical Review Report Date: 9-13 March 2012.
President’s Office University Strategy University Strategy ‘Leadership through Foresight’ Overview.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
MHC at its Best MHC at its Best.
State Contexts for Setting Goals for the Higher Education Enterprise Patrick Kelly National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
1 Development of STRATEGIC PLAN through DEVELOPMENT STEPS.
School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.
Independent Evaluation Group World Bank November 11, 2010 Evaluation of Bank Support for Gender and Development.
State Center Community College District 2008 Strategic Plan One-Year Status Report December 2008.
S AN D IEGO AND I MPERIAL V ALLEY B ASIC S KILLS N ETWORK Dr. Lisa Brewster.
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
Presidential Summit Commitment to Civic Engagement October 3, 2006 Research Park III Symposium Room.
Integrated Planning = Reacting, Reflecting, Recharging.
Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.
Monitoring and Oversight: College Completion and Attainment Dr. Kevin Reilly & Dr. Sheila Stearns AGB Consultants December 7th, 2015.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Creating Innovation through International collaboration Melanie Relton & Helen Kidd, British Council 7 April 2013, Qatar.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
OKLAHOMA STATE REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Making Place Matter.
2010 NATIONAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PLAN Eva Perez EDIT 654 OL.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
Recruiting and Retaining Diverse Students: Why it’s Different and The Same Presented by Sylvia R. Carey-Butler, PhD Assistant Vice Chancellor, Academic.
Provost’s Report Global Penn State: Our Ongoing Efforts to Be a Truly Global University Dr. Nicholas P. Jones Meeting of the Board of Trustees Friday,
A Shared Commitment to Digital Preservation and Access.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
Expectations What do you expect from: C&I Faculty? Yourself and other students? The Bachelor of Science in Education Program?
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
Supporting Student Success
Dr. Debra L. Stuart Vice Chancellor for Administration
Presentation transcript:

Regents Education Program Annual Conference Dr. Debra L. Stuart Vice Chancellor for Administration Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education

Making Place Matter Project with the American Association of State Colleges and Universities (AASCU)

AASCU Reviewed community engagement and regional stewardship literature Surveyed presidents Visited six institutions Developed conceptual scheme

Stewards of Place Stepping Forward As Stewards of Place, 2002 AASCU

“The publicly engaged institution is fully committed to direct, two-way interaction with communities and other external constituencies through the development, exchange, and application of knowledge, information, and expertise for mutual benefits.”

Place-related Interactive Mutually beneficial Integrated Public engagement is

Embracing public engagement as a core value yields benefits for Community and regional entities Students Faculty Institution

Themes include Addressing the future of the region, community and institution Using formal and informal communications with key indicators to track progress Planning and goal-setting Implementing with consistency

Characteristics of a fully engaged institution include  All partners as a regular part of normal work  Mission statements that identify the region served  Community involvement in setting priorities  Active participation in regional planning

AASCU’s Making Place Matter project  Presentation by AASCU staff  “Tools and Insights” workbook  Trends  Process  Case studies  Seminar for institutions funded by outside grants

Making Place Matter: Opportunities and Insights for Oklahoma Travis Reindl Director of State Policy Analysis/ Assistant to the President AASCU March 1, 2006

Contemporary Realities-- Oklahoma Demographic Age (doubling of 65+ population by 2030, working age/college age/HS grad growth weak) Migration (Net importer, but what is import quality?) Economic Competitiveness benchmarks (e.g. New Economy Index, R&D expenditures)—trails regional leaders, national average Industry trends (health care, retail, admin./support dominate 10-year outlook) Social Educational attainment (lags much of region, nation on bachelor’s degree attainment) Children, families in poverty (close to regional peers, above national average)

Colleges and Universities as Regional Stewards Service/ → Engagement → Stewardship Outreach redefinitioninstitutionalization Narrowly targeted/executed Outside the mainstream of university work One-way (institution as teacher) Limited public policy linkage More broadly targeted/executed Toward the mainstream of university work Two-way (institution learner as well as teacher) Limited public policy linkage Widely focused/executed (across regional priorities) In the mainstream of university work (all colleges/departments/ units participate,as well as students/staff/alumni) Two-way (sense of shared purpose) Significant public policy linkage

Universities in Knowledge Economy From To Ivory Tower 3 Pillars Teaching Research Service Innovation Learning Engagement Stewards of Place 3 Pillars

Regional Stewardship Regional stewardship is commitment to and work in support of the long-term economic and social success of a locale. It reflects the convergence of four “conversations”:  innovative economy  livable community  social inclusion  collaborative governance

Source: Alliance for Regional Stewardship Innovative Economy Preparing people and places to succeed Social Inclusion Ensuring that everyone participates and shares responsibility Collaborative Governance Finding creative ways to govern Livable Community Preserving and creating places to live and work Regional Stewardship Framework

Insights and Lessons Learned Insights Stewardship needs to be defined as a common thread, not an add-on. Stewardship requires a solid “front door.” Stewardship must reach beyond the faculty. Stewardship cannot be run entirely on soft money. Stewardship requires supportive public policy. Stewardship must be measurable. Lessons/Next Steps Establish context and define terms. Celebrate short-term wins. Develop networks beyond the core stakeholder group. Raise policymaker awareness. Continue development of a scholarship of engagement. Form peer/mentoring networks.

Boosting Stewardship Capacity STEP 1: Establish regional context STEP 2: Assess campus-system- state stewardship resources and capacity STEP 3: Develop goals and success measures STEP 4: Develop a stewardship roadmap