The 2010 Red List of Finnish species: the assessment work in practice Ilpo Mannerkoski Finnish Environment Institute Syktyvkar 29.9.-4.10.2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EIONET Biodiversity NRC- European CHM network November 2012 Bulgarian Information system for BIOdiversity MONitoring (BioMon) Radoslav Stanchev Executive.
Advertisements

CDDA storage and publishing in EUNIS on the European Community Clearing House Mechanism G. LOÏS, EEA-ETC/BD.
IUCNs Red List of Ecosystems: An Evolving Tool for Risk Assessment to Support Priority Setting & Landscape Action Edmund Barrow (Ecosystem Management Programme),
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species IUCN Red List Categories.
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ Red List Criteria: Criterion B.
We are working on a contract with National Grid to undertake a first year of survey for wild blue lupines and Karner blue butterflies/Frosted Elfins under.
Biological Valuation Map Short presentation of the Biological Valuation Map Evaluation criteria A few lessons from the BVM BVM and international instruments.
Development of a Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy for Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division.
USE OF RED DATA LIST IN SPECIES CONSERVATION: PRACTICAL EXAMPLES International workshop on the CONSERVATION STATUS ASSESSMENT OF ENDANGERED SPECIES IN.
The IUCN Red List categories Dr. Esko Hyvärinen Senior Environmental Adviser Ministry of the Environment, Finland Syktyvkar, Republic of Komi, Russia,
Metapopulation Research Group Survival of species in fragmented forest landscapes Ilkka Hanski.
458 Estimating Extinction Risk (the IUCN criteria) Fish 458; Lecture 24.
Priority Species Indicator Aichi Target 12: By 2020 the extinction of known threatened species has been prevented and their conservation status, particularly.
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Introduction to the IUCN Red Listing Process.
SPECIES AT-RISK Chapter 1.2 Chapter 1.3. What’s Out There? "Scientists were startled in 1980 by the discovery of a tremendous diversity of insects in.
Classification of living organisms The Kingdoms All living things are divided into 5 kingdoms: 1.Prokaryotes - Single celled organisms.
Monika Böhm Indicators & Assessments Unit The importance of Regional Red Lists for conservation: from assessments.
INSTITUT PENYELIDIKAN PERHUTANAN MALAYSIA FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE MALAYSIA ISO Certified5S BrandLaureate Best Brand.
Review of the KBA process in Indo-Burma First iteration of KBAs identified by BirdLife International in collaboration with the Bird Society of Thailand,
Alliance for Zero Extinction Conserving Sites for the World’s Most Imperiled Species.
Factors of Extinction Why are some species more or less prone to extinction?
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ Using the IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional Levels.
Nick Isaac, Tom August & Gary Powney Trends in British Biodiversity since
Hanna Koivula FINNISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Deployment of INSPIRE (Annex III in Finland) Hanna Koivula.
Assessment of beetles and birds: Problems and solutions Ilpo Mannerkoski Finnish Environment Institute Syktyvkar
Animal Species Database of China JI, Li-Qiang Institute of Zoology, CAS Beijing, China CODATA, 2006, Beijing.
[] Where Did Those GBIF Occurrences Come From? Providing Digital Access to NatureServe's Reference Database: Report on a Project in the Early Stages of.
Presented by James Atherton (Conservation Outcomes Manager, CI Pacific Islands Program) KBA Review and Lessons Learned Workshop Washington DC July 25-28,
Conservation Assessment and Management Plan/ Prioritization (C.A.M.P. ) A methodology for Rapid Assessment of Conservation Status.
Survey Priorities Discussion Group Participants: Wang Hao, Cristiano, Megan, Wiggy, Curtis, Simon, Henni, Kristen, Naamal, Matt, Lisa, Leeanne, Tom L.
The World Conservation Union (IUCN) Red List Criteria are used to determine extinction risk and set numerical thresholds for qualification for three globally.
Development of the database on the threatened biodiversity in Central Asia with examples of migratory vertebrates Elena A. Kreuzberg, Elena A. Bykova,
Regional Red List Assessment of Crop Wild Relatives in Europe Marianne Mitchell.
Red List Assessment of CWRs in Spain. Implications for genetic reserve conservation. José M. Iriondo and Lori J. De Hond Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
The gathering and application of invertebrate data Brian Nelson, National Museums Northern Ireland.
Monitoring for Conservation Planning and Management Elizabeth Kennedy Conservation International 5-8 June 2007 Intervention Monitoring Exchange, Wang Lang.
Photo: Terhi Ryttäri HELCOM Red List of Species and Biotopes Progress of the project HELCOM RED LIST Fishes 28 February-1 March 2012 Project Coordinator.
ARKive Geographic Exploring the World’s Biodiversity.
IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Examples. THE IUCN CATEGORIES  A. Declining Population  B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation  C.
Chapter 18 Conservation of Biodiversity. The 6 th Mass Extinction Extinction- when there are no longer any of the species in the world. We are currently.
Chapter 18 Conservation of Biodiversity. The 6 th Mass Extinction Extinction- when there are no longer any of the species in the world. We are currently.
Causes of Extinction. Non-human causes of extinction: Volcanic events Ocean temperature change Sea level changes Meteorites Glaciations Global climate.
Monitoring Programme. What is monitoring? Environmental monitoring is the systematic observation, measurement and calculation of the condition of the.
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Definitions of terms used in the IUCN Categories & Criteria Location.
Organization of the assessment and general results Dr. Esko Hyvärinen Senior Environmental Adviser Ministry of the Environment, Finland Syktyvkar, Republic.
THE NEW REPORTING SYSTEM Photo: Kristina Eriksson Mats Eriksson N2K Group.
Assessing status and trends of birds in the European Union: Assessing status and trends of birds in the European Union: Reviewing methods and experience.
Warm-up13APR2015 Make a list of all the animal species you observed today.
INVENTARIO NACIONAL DE BIODIVERSIDAD Coordination mechanism & national expert panel model national expert panel model for the Bird Report in Spain.
CEPF Strategic Funding Direction 3 Meeting: 28 th June, 2006 Outcomes Monitoring: Status & trends in biodiversity Establishing standard regional monitoring.
Centre for Environmental Data and Recording - CEDaR Established in 1995 to collect, collate and disseminate all biodiversity and geodiversity records for.
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) risk of extinction The IUCN Red List assessment estimates risk of extinction What is the likelihood.
Towards a methodology to define „Favourable Conservation Status“ for birds examples from Austria Michael Dvorak, BirdLife Österreich.
Patrick McIntyre Lead Scientist- California Natural Diversity Database California Department of Fish and Wildlife Biogeographic.
Streamlining European Biodiversity Indicators 2010 – update May 2007
Supporting information IUCN Red List assessments
IUCN and Biodiversity Assessment
Reminder EU & European Red lists produced so far:
Structure of the guidelines Reminder on next steps
Results from Article 17 & 12 reports - Some data related issues Douglas Evans European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity Expert Group on Reporting.
WP 2: Align / synchronise progress reporting under both directives
International Conservation Efforts
The new Article 12 reporting system under the Birds Directive
The IUCN Red List.
Northern Quoll, Dasyurus hallucatus
Typical Species Included in the definition of ‘Favourable Conservation Status’ No definition given in the Directive For Article 17 assessments treated.
European Red List of Habitats
Chapter 18 Conservation of Biodiversity
Fig. 1 Global primate species richness, distributions, and the percentage of species threatened and with declining populations. Global primate species.
Presentation transcript:

The 2010 Red List of Finnish species: the assessment work in practice Ilpo Mannerkoski Finnish Environment Institute Syktyvkar

Contents IUCN-categories Criteria National applications Work in practice Documentation Data Problems

Mannerkoski, I., Ryttäri, T. (toim.) Eliölajien uhanalaisuuden arviointi: maailman luonnonsuojeluliiton (IUCN) ohjeet. Helsinki, Suomen ympäristökeskus. 143 s. Ympäristöopas. Guidebook for red-listing of organisms in Finland – the IUCN Guidelines In Finnish, contains also the original text of IUCN 2001, 2003 Finnish manual for the assessment

IUCN categories

A – Population reduction B – Geographic range, fragmentation, continuing decline, fluctuations C – Small population size, continuing decline, population structure, fluctuations D – Very small or restricted population E – Quantitative analysis Only one criteria needs to be met; only the criteria for the highest category met should be listed CR A2cd; B2ab(i,ii,iii); C2a(i) Criteria

Changes in criteria after year 2000 A two new subcriteria, changed limit values B one new level of hierarchy C minor changes D, no national application of D2 used No changes in criteria after 2010

A1 A2 A3 A4 10 yrs/3 generations New time windows in Criteria A Today If the causes behind the decline are reversible AND known AND have ceased. Old A1 Old A2 90%, 70%, 50% 80%, 50%, 30% New time windows and reduction percentages in Criteria A

National applications Habitat (primary and other habitats) Causes of threat Threat factors Proposal for the threatened species list in Nature Conservation Degree Sub-regional assessment

Work was done in expert groups (14): gathering of data documentation assessment in the steering group manual and extra guidance inspection of the documentation and lists Vascular plants Lichens Beetles Bryophytes Lepidoptera Hemiptera Hymenoptera Diptera Fungi Aquatic insects Molluscs Arachnida Birds Mammals Fishes

Documentation Things required by IUCN Some national additions Distribution Habitat (primary and other habitats) Causes of threat Threat factors Comment fields on occurrence, habitats, etc. relevant for the assessment Regional status (RT) (not all species groups)

Documentation Nomenclature, taxonomy Status in Finland: breeding, occasional Extent of occurrence Extent of occupancy Distribution in forest vegetation zones Habitat: primary, other Length of generation Observation period Population size Reduction of the population during the observation period Fluctuations Fragmentation Effect of populations outside Finland Causes of threat Threat factors Application of criteria (all criteria met) IUCN category 2000 Criteria 2000 IUCN category 2010 Criteria 2010 Reason for category change Range of uncertainty Reliability of the assessment Global IUCN-category Probably extinct Latest observation

Examples of habitat classification and causes of threat

Checklists maintained mostly by expert groups Databases maintained by expert groups Databases maintained by authorities and museums Published data Assessment of threatened habitat types in Finland (published 2008) included 368 habitat types and supported the assessment of species Data used in assessment

Research programme of deficiently known and threatened forest species (PUTTE) books and other publications Data: research, books

Threatened species database (part of Environmental Information System HERTTA ), observation sites Databases of Finnish Museum of Natural History (Hatikka, Kastikka, Bird Atlas, Plant Atlas) Tiira (BirdfLife), birds observations (now 11,5 million) Databases of expert groups (Hemiptera , Coleoptera > , etc.) Insect Database (Lepidoptera , Diptera ) Monitoring databases for butterflies and moths Data, databases

white 1999 Data: distribution maps

Problems Shortage of information Complexity of the criteria Keeping the schedule Shortage of resources High proportion of volunteer work High number of assessors (eg. different views in interpretation of data, collaboration) Laborious documentation in species-rich groups Last minute corrections etc. No common database for observation data

Thank you!