[Facility Name] [Presenter Name] [Date]. Objectives 2 After this session, you will be able to 1. describe Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and Plan-Do-Study-Act.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Regulatory Perspective
Advertisements

Agenda For Today! School Improvement Harris Poll Data PDSA PLC
Agenda For Today! Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) School Improvement Snapshot School Improvement.
Tools for Change Plan, Do, Study, Act The PDSA Cycle Explained
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
The Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd Continuous Improvement in Residential Aged Care.
Accident Incident Policy Changes to Policy September 2007.
Title: The title should accurately describe the issue to be addressed and can never contain a proposed countermeasure. Overview Note: Remember that the.
Bridging Research, Information and Culture An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Your Name Your Institution.
CERT Program Manager: Training and Exercises
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Statistical Project Monitoring Section B 1.
1 Using Root Cause Analysis to Reduce Hospital Readmissions Jennifer Wieckowski, MSG Health Services Advisory Group of California, Inc. (HSAG-California)
Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.
The Mouse Trap® Experience:
Baseline Assessments Hospital: Pressure ulcer Incidence 8-13% Pilot Ward (Anglesey): Baseline incidence rate - 4.5% Nutritional assessment - 50% Pressure.
Change Starts Here. The One about Outcomes and Indicators ICPC National Coordinating Center This material was prepared by CFMC (PM CO 2011), the.
Delmar Learning Copyright © 2003 Delmar Learning, a Thomson Learning company Nursing Leadership & Management Patricia Kelly-Heidenthal
Telehealth & Medicare Hospice Conditions of Participation Deborah Randall JD, Attorney/Telehealth Consultant,
Clinical Audit How to make it work Clinical Audit Department Last revised July 2009.
Publication MO NH January 2012 This material was prepared by Primaris, the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization for Missouri, under contract.
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
Health & Safety Risk Assessments.
Quality Indicators & Safety Initiative: Group 4, Part 3 Kristin DeJonge Ferris Stat University MSN Program.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Unit 2: Managing the development of self and others Life Science and Chemical Science Professionals Higher Apprenticeships Unit 2 Managing the development.
University of Palestine software engineering department Testing of Software Systems Fundamentals of testing instructor: Tasneem Darwish.
Family Medicine and Public Health Clerkship Rotation University of Manitoba Amanda Condon MD CCFP.
University of Palestine software engineering department Testing of Software Systems Fundamentals of testing instructor: Tasneem Darwish.
1 October, 2005 Activities and Activity Director Guidance Training (F248) §483.15(f)(l), and (F249) §483.15(f)(2)
Stop Managing for Survey; Start Managing for Quality! Kathy Owens, MSN, RN, NP Donna Kelsey, MS, NHA.
Everyone Has A Role and Responsibility
Quality Directions Australia Improving clinical risk management systems: Root Cause Analysis.
© Mahindra Satyam 2009 Defect Management and Prevention QMS Training.
Florida Quarterly Meeting Root Cause Analysis Florida Quarterly Meeting Root Cause Analysis January 12, 2011 Christy Hormann, MSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIPs.
Hospice Through a ‘[insert community]’ Lens: Brief Basics, Gaps, and Opportunities Barry K. Baines, MD.
Steps for Success in EHR Planning Bill French, VP eHealth Strategies Wisconsin Office of Rural Health HIT Implementation Workshop Stevens Point, WI August.
Director of Evaluation and Accountability Manager, UW’s Grand Rapids, Michigan Robert McKown, CIRS Director of Evaluation and Accountability Sherri.
Division of Primary Health Care An evaluation of the effectiveness of ‘care bundles’ as a means of improving hospital care and reducing re-admission for.
Project monitoring and Control
Overall Quality Assurance, Selecting and managing external consultants and outsourcing Baku Training Module.
LORNA MARTIN CAH & SMALL RURAL LEARNING COMMUNITY APRIL 25, 2012.
NOR-MAN RHA Falls Prevention and Management Program February 2012.
Successfully Conducting Employee Performance Appraisals Wendy L. McCoy Director HR & Benefits Florida Conference of The United Methodist Church.
GHA Hospital Engagement Network HAC Learning Collaborative Webinar ~ May 16, 2012 Kathy McGowan, GHA Kelley Dotson, GHA Anne Hernandez, A LLIANT | GMCF.
Improvement Model and PDSA Cycles. Organ Donation The Service Improvement Model provides a framework to test, implement and sustain change ideas to overcome.
Improving Clinical Processes: The Million Hearts ® Hypertension Control Change Package for Clinicians Erica K. Taylor, PhD, MPH, MA Million Hearts ® Minority.
Project management Topic 7 Controls. What is a control? Decision making activities – Planning – Monitor progress – Compare achievement with plan – Detect.
Global Aim Assessment Theme Change Ideas Specific Aim Measures SDSA P DS A P D S A P DS A PDSA We are monitoring a list of 199 patients with.
Summary of Action Period 1 TN Patient Safety Collaborative: Reducing Physical Restraints Learning Session 2 April 7, 8 & 9 th, 2009.
Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ February 2, 2016
More on PDSAs Connie Sixta, RN, PhD MBA Patricia L. Bricker, MBA.
Summary of Action Period 2 TN Patient Safety Collaborative: Reducing Physical Restraints Learning Session 3 October 6, 7 & 8 th, 2009.
Health IT for Post Acute Care (HITPAC) Stratis Health Special Innovation Project Candy Hanson, BSN, PHN December 5, 2012.
TAIS: Root Cause Analysis Keela McGraw, Billy Schewee ESC Region 11.
Serendipity Early Learning Centre Outdoor environment policy review 2015 (Ella childcare, n.d.)
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Funded by HRSA HIV/AIDS Bureau Titles I & II Technical Assistance (TA) Webex January 11, 2007 Donna Yutzy, NQC Consultant Quality Management 101.
Governing Body QAPI 2013 Update for ASC
Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Manager May 25, 2016
Post Survey Protocol Kenny williamson keith Harbuck keith & holmes llc
Performance Improvement Project on [insert topic]
Nursing Process Applied to Community Health Nursing
Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
Lucrecia Johnson MSW, LSW Mary Bartlett MSW, LISW-S
Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Manager
2019 Model of Care Training University of Maryland Medical Systems Health Plans, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.
Introduction to Quality Improvement Methods
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
Quality Assurance in Clinical Trials
Presentation transcript:

[Facility Name] [Presenter Name] [Date]

Objectives 2 After this session, you will be able to 1. describe Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) to your colleagues, 2. apply concepts of RCA to identify deeper causes of problems, and 3. develop an action plan to begin testing changes that will address the deeper causes.

Purpose of RCA RCA helps you identify the primary cause(s) of a problem, so that you can 1. determine what happened, 2. determine why it happened, and 3. figure out what to do to reduce the likelihood of it happening again. 3

Philosophy of RCA Focuses on systems and processes — NOT on individuals! The true problem must be understood before action is taken. i.e., causal/contributing factors or root cause(s) 4

RCA Uses a Systems Focus “Errors are often a result of worker carelessness.” “We need to train and motivate workers to be more careful.” “We don’t have the time or resources to really get to the bottom of this problem.” 5 “Errors are the result of defects in the system. People are only part of the process.” “We need to find out why this is happening and implement mistake-proofing so it won’t happen again.” “We need to fix it for good or it will come back.” Symptom Approach Systems Approach

The Root in RCA 6 The RCA approach addresses underlying causes. Symptom of the problem: the Weed above the surface (obvious) The underlying causes: the Root below the surface (not obvious) How do you kill a weed?

RCA Applications understand unexpected events and outcomes, examine close calls, identify trends, discern changes that will lead to improvement, and direct action plans. 7 Use RCA to

RCA 5-Step Process 8 Gather Initial Information and Define the Problem Fill in the GapsAnalyze/Identify the Root Cause(s) Develop Action Plan(s)Recommend and Implement Solutions(s)

RCA Step 1: Gather Initial Information and Define the Problem The initial information will likely be on an incident report. What are you trying to correct? – Detail who, what, when, where, how. – Brainstorm together to define a single problem. 9

RCA Step 1 continued… 10

RCA Step 2: Fill in the Gaps Consult your interdisciplinary team. Discuss other sources that might have additional information regarding the problem: – interviews/re-interviews (staff, resident, family) – documentation – observations 11

RCA Step 3: Analyze/Identify the Root Cause(s) What conditions allowed the problem to occur? What other factors impact the problem? What are the underlying reasons each causal factor exists? Can you impact the contributing factor? 12

RCA Step 3 continued… The 5-Whys is a question-asking method used to uncover the underlying causes of an event. Ask "Why?" questions until all logical causes (and/or root causes) can be identified. Uncovering the root cause leads to an Action Plan that is more likely to prevent the event from happening again. 13 THE 5-WHYs

RCA Step 3 continued… 14 Resident fell in room.She tripped over a chair.She didn’t see the chair.The room was dark (no nightlight).Nightlight not part of plan of care. Resident assessed as NOT at risk for falling. Why? Plan: Decide if chair is needed and move or remove the chair. Plan: Put nightlights in all the rooms. Plan: Review fall risk assessment process; update if needed. 5-Whys Example

RCA Step 4: Develop Action Plan Address system-level causal factors instead of people. Ensure your plan will likely keep the event from happening again. Define SMARTS objectives. 15

RCA Step 4 continued… SMARTS Objectives 16 S pecific M easurable A ttainable R ealistic T ime frame S upported

RCA Step 5: Recommend and Implement Solutions How will the solution be implemented? Who will be responsible for it? When will it be completed? Follow up to determine whether the solution was effective. Monitor on an ongoing basis and modify as necessary. 17

The PDSA Cycle 18 What changes are to be made? Next cycle? Analyze data Compare results to predictions Summarize what was learned Objective Predictions Plan to carry out the cycle (who, what, where, when) Plan for data collection Carry out the plan Document observations Record data How do we know changes put into place produce desired outcomes? PDSA

. 19 “What can we do by next Friday?” The PDSA Cycle

PDSA Cycle at Work 20

Three Fundamental Improvement Questions 21 The Model for Improvement What are we trying to accomplish? How will we know that a change is an improvement? What changes can we make that will result in improvement? Aim Measure Change

Fundamental Question: Aim 22 By January 31, 2013, our facility will reduce the incidence of pressure ulcers among high-risk residents to 6% or less. Think SMARTS: S – Specific M – Measurable A – Achievable R – Realistic T – Time frame S – Supported What are we trying to accomplish?

Fundamental Question: Measure How will we know that a change is an improvement? 23 We will track the incidence of pressure ulcers among high-risk residents by conducting weekly skin audits (by nurse) and daily skin checks (by CNA).

Fundamental Question: Change What changes can we make that will lead to improvement? 24 We will document and implement turning schedules for residents with mobility limitations.

PDSA for Continuous Quality Improvement 25 Changes that result in improvement Learning Hunches, theories, ideas e.g., action plans or interventions Monitor and modify effectiveness.

What the Regulations Say… Identify contributing factors and risk(s). Evaluate and analyze contributing factors and risk(s). Implement interventions to address contributing factors and reduce risk(s). Monitor for effectiveness and modify interventions when necessary. Apply a systems approach. 26

What We Did Today Described RCA and PDSA. Applied concepts of RCA to identify deeper causes of a problem in your facility. Developed an action plan to begin testing changes that will address the deeper causes and set the stage for continuous improvement. 27 Plan

Next Steps Do Set a date for a Qsource quality improvement specialist to check in Study Look at your results Act Determine if it worked: Adapt, Adopt, Abandon 28

Contact Information 29 For more information on Reducing Restraints: This material was prepared by Qsource, the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) for Tennessee under contract with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service (CMS), an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Contents do not necessarily reflect CMS policy. 12.IPC-HAC C Contact Information [Presenter Name] [Title] [ ] [Phone]