Entergy Teamwork Arkansas Annual Luncheon February 9, 2005 Automotive Site Selection Process Presented by Dr. Buzz Canup Canup & Associates, Inc. Presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluating Standards for Site Certification Presented to: American Public Power Association Presented by: Robert M. Ady, President Ady International Company.
Advertisements

Network Design in the Supply Chain
Eastern Virginia Airport I. Introduction The Eastern Virginia Airport System Study (EVASS) was an analysis designed to help the Commonwealth identify a.
Planning Production Activity Preview Planning Manufacturing Facilities Quantitative Tools in Production Planning Production Planning and Control Flexible.
Farmlands Office Of Environmental Services Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation.
The Alberta Social Credit Party A Proud Past A Promising Future.
Final Program Environmental Impact Report Gillespie Field Development Council January 17, 2012 Item #5.
AIRPORT AREA INFRASTRUCTURE TIF DISTRICT: Public Hearing Presentation Oct 21, 2013.
Public Hearing FY 2011 Budget 1. City Council Goals FY 2011 Flood Recovery and Protection –Identify Funding and Sources for Flood –Restore Affordable.
Grand Traverse Next Michigan Development Corporation What does it mean for the communities of Grand Traverse County?
Tax Increment Financing Town Center Project Midwest City, OK.
Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.
1 Why Kentucky? Governor Ernie Fletcher Commonwealth of Kentucky September 28-30, 2004.
Washington County Economic Development Council Utah Alliance for Economic Development RICHFIELD MEETING Friday, 13 July 2012.
ECOS Strategic Economic Planning: Future Industrial Land and Space Supply All data collected from Garnett Consulting Reports; Allen & Brooks Report,
Missouri Certified Sites Program Missouri Department of Economic Development Presented By: Hal Van Slyck Program Administrator.
Missouri Certified Sites Program Missouri Department of Economic Development Presented By: Joel McNutt & Jo Ann Dent.
Amer ican Association of State Highway Transportation Officials Standing Committee on Rail Transportation 2010 National Meeting September 20, 2010 Karen.
Location Strategy.
Location Strategy. Introduction What – Location Decisions Where – Important to company Why – Costly to change.
VACO Conference Transportation Programs Update November 14, 2011 Gregory A. Whirley, Sr. Commissioner.
SEA RAY BOATS, FLAGLER MARINE CENTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES.
SS8E4: The student will identify revenue sources for and services provided by state & local governments A. Trace sources of state revenue such as sales.
Anaheim – Los Angeles Project EIR/EIS California High-Speed Rail Authority HIGH-SPEED TRAINS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Orange County Business Council- Infrastructure.
Study conducted for the Coalition of Alabama Waterway Associations by Troy University Center for International Business and Economic Development.
Bridging the Finance Gap Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
San Antonio: Continuing the Toyota Momentum. San Antonio’s Long-Term Commitment to Japan and Toyota Community decision to target Japanese investment in.
State Financing Programs for Brownfield Redevelopment.
1 Invest in Kentucky December Welcome to Kentucky HOFBRAUHAUS NEWPORT..
U.S Conference of Mayors August 2004 Mayor’s ’04 Metro Agenda Bipartisan Priorities Statement Directed for candidates in Presidential and Congressional.
CONFIDENTIAL U.S. – Korea Pharma CEO Forum Christopher D. Lloyd November 4, 2010 Economic Considerations for U.S. Operations.
Chapter 5 Network Design in a Supply Chain
2009 Budget City of Melfort An Overview of the 2009 Budget.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Meeting March 28, 2006 Item No. xx Supp. Meeting.
State and Local Government Budgets Chapter 14 Section 3 and Chapter 25 Section 2.
Location Planning and Analysis
Developing and opening a new facility. Stages in hospitality facility development There are five (5) steps in the development of a hospitality facility:
CHAPTER EIGHT LOCATION PLANNING AND ANALYSIS Chapter 8 Location Planning and Analysis.
Proposed SAHA Fiscal Year Consolidated Budget.
8 - 1 Chapter 8: Location Strategies Outline  The Strategic Importance of Location  Factors That Affect Location Decisions  Labor Productivity.
© Anita Lee-Post Facility Location Part 1 by Anita Lee-Post.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Policy and Staff Briefing March 14, 2006 Item No. xx Supp.
Initiated the discussions that led to Measure R on the November 2008 ballot:  a ½ cent sales tax increase to raise $40 billion for LA County transportation.
Spokane Certified Site Program WEDA Conference 2012.
City of Marshall Development Proposal to Action Manufacturing, Inc. February 11, 2014.
GABB NOVEMBER GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: ► WHO WE ARE: marketing and sales arm of the State of Georgia ► WHAT WE DO: Strategically.
ITTS Freight in the Southeast Conference Charlotte, North Carolina February 9, 2011.
Transportation Project Process: From Concept to Completion Kate Daniel, TPO Staff October 8, 2015.
Capacity Planning and Facility Location Chapter 9.
Factors That Affect Location Decisions The Basics: Country Decision Region/Community Decision Site Decision.
Coquina Coast Seawater Desalination Project TERMS Base Contract TasksBase Contract Tasks – Must be completed – Negotiated and included in the Base Allowance.
Information from the experts: Michelle Comerford, Principal Comerford Consulting Group LLC J. Michael Mullis, President & CEO J. M. Mullis, Inc. Food Industry.
Local Incentives in North Carolina Presentation to the NC Joint Select Committee on Economic Development Incentives December 16, 2008 By Bill Schweke and.
MEAG Power Economic Development Forum Reynolds Plantation, Lake Oconee Thursday, April 2, 2009 The Company’s Perspective for Site/Community Selection Michael.
Site Selection Certification Presented by: Dirk B. Vanderleest, CM April 27, 2016.
Tunica Metro Mega Site ENTERGY QUALIFIED SITE Strict standards of qualification Factors identified as important Best possible conditions for a company.
April 29, 2014 Which Way is Up? Mapping the Incentives Landscape Patrick McHugh, Ph.D. Fiscal Analyst, Fiscal Research Division North Carolina General.
Attraction of investments into tourism sector in the EU member states The existing practice of special economic regime of natural resources management.
The Transportation Logistics Company Indiana Logistics Summit Infrastructure Needs and Opportunities September 26, 2007.
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GLOBAL COMMERCE August 27, 2014.
Facility Location.
Strategic Sites Inventory Program Freight Logistics Zone Development
Site and situation factors of industry
SHOVEL READINESS NEW YORK STATE economic Development council
Site and situation factors of industry
Chapter 5 Network Design in the Supply Chain
Site Readiness Program
Transportation, Logistics, and Economic Development
Facility Location Part 1
Presentation transcript:

Entergy Teamwork Arkansas Annual Luncheon February 9, 2005 Automotive Site Selection Process Presented by Dr. Buzz Canup Canup & Associates, Inc. Presented by Dr. Buzz Canup Canup & Associates, Inc.

PHASE I: MACRO ANALYSIS PHASE 0: PRE- PROJECT ANALYSIS PHASE II: MICRO ANALYSIS PHASE III: FINAL NEGOTIATIONS Location and Site Selection A SYSTEMATIC AND PROVEN PROCESS

EVERY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IS DRIVEN BY A “NEED!” THE “NEED” ESTABLISHES PROJECT CRITERIA

TWO TYPES OF PROJECT CRITERIA “MUSTS” AND “WANTS”

“Must” Criteria Criteria 1. Property Size 2. Rail Available 3. Airport - 1 hour 4. Water Available 5. Gas Available Yes No Yes Are absolute for success Can not be compromised Go/No Go Screen Alternative Eliminated

“WANT” CRITERIA IMPORTANT!!! BUT NOT ABSOLUTE Willing to concede in one area to gain in another Criteria 1. Labor Size 2. Operating Cost 3. Logistics Cost 4. Incentives 5. Competitor Locations MostLeastImportant

Typical “Musts” for Assembly Plants Labor Competitor Location Avoidance Transportation Site & Infrastructure Air Quality Status

Typical “Wants” for Assembly Plants Recruitment & Training Acceptable Recurring Costs Acceptable Investment Costs Risk Minimization Competitive Incentives

The Cold Hard Facts About Site Location Searches DEFINE DELINEATE DISCRIMINATE Eliminate

Evaluating MEGA Project Sites What Is the Objective? Eliminate? Define How to Make it Work? Spend Whatever It Takes?

SITE CONSULTANT’S JOB: FIGURE OUT WHY A SITE WILL NOT WORK ECONOMIC DEVELOPER’S JOB: FIGURE OUT HOW TO MAKE THE SITE WORK

Typical Site Factors Size, Configuration & Control Environmental & Geotechnical Conditions Utilities, Zoning & Neighboring Land Use Ingress & Egress

NISSAN & MISSISSIPPI AN EXAMPLE OF A MEGA PROJECT SUCCESS STORY

NISSAN $930 M Investment 4,000 Jobs 1.5 M Sqft Facility 250,000 Vehicles/Year MISSISSIPPI $295 M Investment Infrastructure Pad Ready Site Custom Incentives The Commitments Phase I Announcement November 9, 2000

The Commitments Phase II-A Announcement June 24, 2002 NISSAN $500 M Investment 1,300 Jobs 1.0 M Sqft Addition 150,000 Vehicles/Year MISSISSIPPI $68.5 M Investment Infrastructure Upgrades Site Development Grant Extended Incentives

Total Commitments Phase I & II-A NISSAN $1.43 Billion Investment 5,300 Jobs 2.5 M Sqft Facilities 400,000 Vehicles/Year MISSISSIPPI $363.5 M State Investment $ 24.6 M Federal Highway Funds $ 17.0 M Federal Highway Funds $ 20.0 M County Investment $415.1 M Total

Mississippi Investments by Category Category Phase I Phase II-B Totals Site & R-O-W Acquisition$40.0 $0.0 $40.0 Site Development$40.0 $15.0 $55.0 Roads & Highways$30.0 $2.0 $32.0 Water, Sewer, Gas Pre-treatment $42.0 $18.0 $60.0 Transportation Cost Off-set$28.0 $10.0 $38.0 Recruit & Training$80.0 $23.5 $103.5 University – CAVS$28.0 $0.0 $28.0 Advertising & Marketing$5.0$0.0 $5.0 Administration & Miscellaneous$2.0 $0.0 $2.0 Totals$295.0 $68.5 $363.5 Totals$295.0 $68.5 $363.5 Federal Highway Funds$24.6 $17.0 $41.6 County Bonds$20.0 $0.0 $20.0 Grand Totals$339.6 $85.5 $415.1 Grand Totals$339.6 $85.5 $415.1

NISSAN PHASE I BREAK EVEN A break-even point during 2007… when revenues of the project exceed cost to the State A break-even point during 2007… when revenues of the project exceed cost to the State $ $

TOTAL TAXES TO MISSISSIPPI 2005$ 63,390, $258,971, $727,629,412 By 2025, a total of nearly $1 billion in quantifiable taxes will have been contributed to the state treasury by Nissan Phase I. NISSAN PHASE I REVENUES

Questions & Answers