Electric Restructuring In Pennsylvania Sonny Popowsky Pennsylvania Consumer Advocate May 10, 2007 Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Transforming.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energy in Todays Economy: Challenges and Opportunities Dr. Kenneth L. Lay Chairman, Enron Corp. Economy Roundtable Austin, Texas January 3, 2001 For further.
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
EMIG Electricity Market Investment Group Presentation to the Ontario Energy Board February 17, 2004.
High Spiking Prices Are Harming Low Income New York Utility Customers Gerald Norlander Executive Director Public Utility Law Project of New York, Inc.
Energy and Telecommunications Interim Committee January 29, 2004.
Groundswell Energy Starter Guide: Clean Energy for Your Organization.
Texas Deregulation – A Success Story The ERCOT Market Framework Has Been A Success Implementation  Bilateral Contracts - Participants contract up to 100%
University of Pittsburgh School of Law 2013 Energy Law and Policy Institute Eric Matheson Energy Advisor to PAPUC Commissioner James H. Cawley August 2,
A Primer on Electric Utilities, Deregulation, and Restructuring of U.S. Electricity Markets W.M. Warwick July 2000 Revised May 2002.
1 Managing Revenues in Regulated Industries Rate Design May 2008 Richard Soderman Director-Legislative Policy and Strategy.
Alternative Models of Electric Industry Restructuring
1 Resource Adequacy and Market Power Mitigation via Option Contracts Hung-po Chao and Robert Wilson EPRI and Stanford University Presentation at POWER.
Electric Restructuring- Experience in other states.
Solutions to California’s Energy Crisis: Real-Time Pricing by Frank Wolak Chairman, Market Surveillance Committee March 17, 2001.
Environmental Regulation in Oligopoly Markets: A Study of Electricity Restructuring Erin T. Mansur UC Berkeley and UC Energy Institute March 22, 2002 POWER.
Retail Competition and Electricity Contracts Richard Green University of Hull and CEPR.
Ron Coutu STRATEGIC MARKET ADVISOR (NOT AN ENGINEER) From the Computer Scientist’s perspective of the Economist view of the Market Wholesale Electricity.
ANALYZING YOUR ELECTRIC BILL Bob Walker Met-Ed November 7, 2007.
Pricing the Components of Electric Service in Illinois Scott A. Struck, CPA Financial Analysis Division Public Utilities Bureau Illinois Commerce Commission.
COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY MARKETS March 15, PA Customer Choice Legislation  Distribution service remains regulated by PAPUC.  Transmission service.
California Energy Commission, May, 1999 California Incentives For Renewable Markets Timothy N. Tutt California Energy Commission (916)
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen 1 © 2011 D. Kirschen and the University of Washington.
Online Energy Procurements: Creating Efficiencies & Reducing Costs November 10, 2010.
Citizens for Pennsylvania’s Future 610 N. Third St. Harrisburg, PA ph: / fax: web:
The California energy crisis Introduction (Wolak March ‘01) –Wholesale: averaged $33 MWH in 1999, $116 MWH in 2000, $310MWH Jan –Natural gas $3-$4.
NASUCA June ELECTRIC DEREGULATION: A LOOK AT THE RETAIL MARKET FOR RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS Barbara R. Alexander Consumer Affairs Consultant 83 Wedgewood.
Increasing Electricity Prices: Are Fuel Costs the Only Explanation? Preliminary Findings Ken Rose Independent Consultant Assessing Restructured Electricity.
Energy Bar Association Market Approaches in Energy Sonny Popowsky Consumer Advocate of Pennsylvania December 3, 2009 Washington, DC PA Office of Consumer.
Overview of the Electricity Marketplace Paul Gromer SEBANE/Peregrine Energy Group Renewable Energy Leadership Summit June 7, 2005.
1 View of Federal Energy Legislation Sonny Popowsky Pennsylvania Consumer Advocate September 16, 2004 Indiana Energy Conference PA Office of Consumer Advocate.
Utility Service Quality Regulation in Pennsylvania A Presentation For The NARUC Consumer Affairs Subcommittee September 27, 2005 By Wayne L. Williams,
Retail Competition: Managing a Difficult Transition David L. O’Connor Commissioner Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources (DOER) Presentation to National.
OPSI Panel Climate Change Sonny Popowsky Consumer Advocate of Pennsylvania October 1, 2009 Annapolis, MD PA Office of Consumer Advocate 555 Walnut Street.
Colombia’s Forward Energy Market Peter Cramton University of Maryland 5 November 2007.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Municipal Electric Aggregation Electric Aggregation Advisory Committee August 22, 2012.
Structuring Electricity Markets Lester B. Lave Electricity Industry Center Carnegie Mellon University January 10, 2008.
1March 24, 2000California PX Demand Responsiveness Workshop Christensen Associates Lessons from California The Role of Demand Response Energy Markets in.
Energy Markets in Turmoil The Consumer Perspective Sonny Popowsky Consumer Advocate of Pennsylvania Illinois State University Institute for Regulatory.
1 Priority 1 = Price Competition Retail price to compare in PA provides for real competition. Wholesale price to compare in CA means few switchers.
To Buy or To Build Is it really one or the other? APPA New Generation Workshop Portland, Oregon August 1, 2007.
INVESTMENT IN GENERATION CAPACITY PAYMENTS IN COLOMBIAN MARKET Luis A. Camargo S. Wholesale Electricity Market Manager Colombia APEx Orlando. October.
Extra electricity slides
Overview of Market Reforms and the WESM
Role Of ERC in the WESM To enforce the rules and regulations governing the operations of the WESM and monitors the activities of the Market Operator and.
1 Dr. Ahmed Kaloko Chief Economist Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Transition from Public Service to Competitive Markets.
Community Choice Aggregation Demonstration Project Marin County Base Case Feasibility Analyses Overview April 5, 2005.
Resource Adequacy and Market Power Mitigation via Option Contracts
PJM Footprint Roundtable
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Pennsylvania - Electricity
Pennsylvania - Electricity
Pennsylvania – Electricity
Pennsylvania – Electricity
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Utility Owned Generation Why It Makes Sense
Homework Ch 13 Electricity Restructuring
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen
Pennsylvania – Electricity
Pennsylvania – Electricity
Dominion Retail Default Service for Smaller Customers
Pennsylvania - Electricity
Electric Service for Residential and Small Business Customers
Pennsylvania – Electricity
Dr. Richard A. Rosen Tellus Institute – Boston, MA
Pennsylvania – Electricity
Tom Clark Vice President, Customer Service & Service Area Development
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Presentation transcript:

Electric Restructuring In Pennsylvania Sonny Popowsky Pennsylvania Consumer Advocate May 10, 2007 Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Transforming the Electricity Market Springfield, Illinois PA Office of Consumer Advocate 555 Walnut Street Forum Place, 5th Floor Harrisburg, PA (717) Telephone ppt

2 Why did Pennsylvania open up the electric utility industry to competition in the first place? What was the problem?

3 Average Residential Price of Electricity in Cents Per Kilowatthour Duquesne Met-Ed Penelec Penn Power PP&L PECO West Penn Pennsylvania Source: Pennsylvania PUC, Electric Power Outlook, July, 1993

4 If significant utility rate disparities were caused by failed electric generation choices, and if electric generation is not a natural monopoly, then one possible solution is to open up that portion of the electric industry to competition.

5 So, what did we think was going to happen?

6 Competition would drive down electric generation costs to the marginal costs of production and would drive down retail rates. Competition would therefore “strand” existing utility generation investments. That is, market prices would not cover the high embedded costs of utility generating plants that were built under the protection of regulation. Utilities therefore were permitted to recover stranded costs.

7 But Just in Case… Just in case the predictions of significant retail competition and lower electricity prices didn’t come true, the Pennsylvania electric restructuring legislation included long-term retail rate caps that prevented the utilities from charging higher rates than they had been charging prior to restructuring.

8 What actually happened?

9 Projections of PJM Energy Prices Used by PPL to Estimate Stranded Costs vs. Actual ($ per mwh) YearPPL EstimateAnnual Average PJM LMP 1999 $ 22 $ $ 23 $ $ 24 $ $ 24 $ $ 25 $ $ 26 $ $ 26 $ $ 27 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 37

90941.ppt

11

12 In a single market clearing price market design, such as the one used in PJM, the price bid for the last (most expensive unit) dispatched in any hour establishes the price paid to all the units in the spot market in that hour. These spot prices also affect forward contracts and the prices negotiated for bilateral contracts over time.

13 The use of a single market clearing price causes all wholesale electricity prices to increase when natural gas and other fossil fuel prices rise.

14

15

16 Results of New Jersey Wholesale Auction – 3-Year Bids (¢ per kwh) 2003 (34- month) PSEG Rockland Atlantic Electric JCPL ppt

17 Results of NYISO POLR Auction Pike County Light & Power Company Residential Customers Generation Rate % Change First 1,000 kwh ¢/kwh ¢/kwh129% Over 1, 000 kwh ¢/kwh ¢/kwh129% ppt Total Bill % Change Residential Customer using 700 kwh/month $75.50$ %

18 What’s Next? Will the next round of wholesale price auctions in the Eastern PJM states be substantially lower than the last (post- Katrina) round, or will prices be “stickier” on the way down than they were on the way up?

19 What About Retail Competition? As wholesale prices in PJM increased, retail competition in Pennsylvania declined. For utilities that had lower historic generation rates, the level of residential shopping has approached zero.

20

21 In my view, there is nothing wrong with that as long as the default service is reliable and reasonably priced. Default service for residential customers should be as good as, or better than, traditional regulated generation service.

22 To the extent that competitive retail marketers can offer residential customers reliable service at lower prices – or can offer other value-added products such as renewable or “green” products – then the benefits of restructuring will be even greater.

23 The Wrong Answer: If competitors are unable to offer a service that is better than default service, let’s change the rules to make default service worse than competitive service. OR Let’s make default service so ugly – that is, so expensive and so volatile – that consumers will have no choice but to switch.

24 In my view, the goal is not to get all residential customers to switch to competitive generation suppliers. Retail switching is a means to an end, not an end in itself. The goal is reliable service at reasonable prices, whether provided through default service or from the competitive retail marketers.

25 The Default Service Happy Meal Would you like fries with that transmission and distribution service? Do the additional marketing, acquisition, and transaction costs involved in residential retail generation competition outweigh the potential savings to individual customers that the competitors can offer?

26 What Next? As initial rate caps expire, retail default prices in Pennsylvania are supposed to reflect prevailing wholesale market prices, but they should not, in my view, be based only on spot market or short term contract prices. Nor should they be based on one- time auctions, in which the default provider rolls the dice and obtains generation for all of its load at a single point in time.

27 Default service for residential customers should be based on a portfolio approach. The default provider should secure a portfolio of resources through a variety of competitive methods. Default service should include short term and long term contracts and spot purchases; renewable and non-renewable resources; supply side and demand side resources. The goal should be a reasonable and stable price for the vast majority of customers who do not choose (or cannot choose) to switch.

28 Default customers should pay a rate that reflects the overall costs to the default service provider of this portfolio of resources. The price can change annually to reflect the changes in the resource portfolio.

29 Conclusions(1) The likely end state for residential customers in restructured states like Pennsylvania is one in which most customers will continue to be served by their incumbent utility default service provider. In my view, the best model for that service is one in which the customers can receive stable, reasonably priced service from a default service provider who acquires a portfolio of resources through a variety of competitive methods. Even without substantial retail shopping, it is imperative that the PJM wholesale market provide reliable, truly competitively priced wholesale supply services to all retail providers.

30 Conclusions(2) To the extent that retail competitors can attract customers by offering a cheaper, greener, or otherwise “better” service, we should encourage such competition. But the primary goal is not competition for the sake of competition. The primary goal, in my view, is the universal provision of reliable electric service at reasonable and affordable prices.