OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME Information Society 3rd Community Support Framework 2000-2006 for Greece June 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Twenty years of EU co-financed programmes in Greece:
Advertisements

Putting partnership into context Anna Koziel Forum of Non Governmental Organizations (FIP) Association European Project Brussels 2006.
European Commission DG Research SMcL Brussels SME-NCP 23 October 2002 THE 6th FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME Economic & Technological Intelligence S. McLaughlin.
Steps towards E-Government in Syria
EU – ACP PROGRAMME FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS AND CAPACITY BUILDING (PSTICB) 9 ACP RPR 61.
Online Government June/2002 Public FTAA.ecom/inf/141/Add.3 June 4, 2002 Original: Spanish Translation: FTAA Secretariat.
Cyprus Project Management Society
N.Vakalis, MEP, ITRE “Greek experiences in using Structural funds for regional development” Conference "Research and Innovation - an Opportunity for Convergence.
European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.
Helping to shape the EU Structural Funds The role of Social Enterprises 24th June ’13.
Entrepreneurship youth
Seminar on community-led local development Keeping it simple Brussels, 6 February
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Department of Rural Development LEADER+ TYPE MEASURE IN POLAND International Conference: „Future of European.
S3 Project aim The main goal, thus expected result, of the S3 project would be to strengthen tools used for Structural Fund policies (SF), through the.
1 MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTORATE GENERAL PROGRAMMING OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT Operational Programme Regional Development.
Community Initiative Programme Interreg III A Greece – Italy February 2006.
INFORMATION SOCIETY DEVELOPMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA “Information Society perspectives in South-Eastern Europe” Thessaloniki, 29 & 30 June 2001.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Event – date, place About INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG IVC Joint Technical Secretariat Iruma Kravale, The.
Core Indicators in the Finnish ERDF programming documents DG REGIO EVALUATION NETWORK MEETING Brussels, 26 June 2008 Harri Ahlgren Ministry of.
1 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD Rural Development Policy
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
EU-Regional Policy and Cohesion Structural Funds and Accession 1 SPP BUILDING IMPLEMENTATION CAPACITY Training seminar on evaluation Prague February.
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
Preparation of Bulgaria for future use of EU Structural Instruments Lyubomir Datzov Deputy Minister of Finance.
1 MINISTRY OF LABOUR, SOCIAL SOLIDARITY AND FAMILY ESF HEAD OF MISSION MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR SECTORAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME FOR HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT.
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland Experience and new arrangements Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Poland Athens,
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE C.S.F M.A SPECIAL COORDINATION SERVICE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE OPERATIONAL PROGRAMMES COMMUNITY SUPPORT.
Management of Structural Funds The Austrian Approach Belgrade, June 23, 2011 Markus Gruber.
INTERREG IVC 1 EUROPEAN INTERREGIONAL COOPERATION 2007/13 Interreg IVC General overview 21 March 2007.
Project Implementation Plan and Principal Activities
March 2007, Smolyan Angelos SANOPOULOS, Euroconsultants SA CROSS BORDER COOPERATION Bulgaria-Greece Greek State Structure and Partner Identification.
ICT policies and the Lisbon Agenda Baltic IT&T 2005 Riga, 7 April 2005 Frans de Bruïne Director “Lisbon Strategy and Policies for the Information Society”
European Commission Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP)
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Innovation and the Structural Funds, Antwerp, 16 January 2007 Veronica Gaffey Innovative Actions Unit.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
STRUCTURAL FUNDS MANAGEMENT IN GREECE: The experience of the Management Organisation Unit of the CSF Presented by: Dex. Agourides Director General M.O.U.
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE MANAGING AUTHORITY CSF Promoting Regional Partnership, Networking and Cooperation between Greece & Czech Republic.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
KAZLOD Programme: EU support to Regional Development in Kazakhstan IV Astana Economic Forum May 3-4, 2011 Aigul Zharylgassova.
1 SMEs – a priority for FP6 Barend Verachtert DG Research Unit B3 - Research and SMEs.
Institutional structures for Structural Funds assistance Ministry of Finance September 10, 2003.
Mission & Activities Cristina Dorati Warsaw, 18 January 2008 [Regional Agency for Education, Training and Employment]
1 The Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA) Framework and implementation European Commission DG Enlargement Christine Meisinger EastAgri 2008.
Launching conference of the ClusterCoop Project The future role of clusters in Central Europe Budapest, 13th of July 2011 Polish clusters and cluster policy.
March 2007, Smolyan Angelos SANOPOULOS, Euroconsultants SA CROSS BORDER COOPERATION Bulgaria-Greece Experiences, Framework and New Operational.
The RDI Governance System Vasileios Pitsinigkos Head of Managing Authority of Eastern Macedonia - Thrace Region.
Strategy on creation of the system for continuous professional training of staff employed in social assistance system (for ) draft Ministry of.
1 EUROPEAN FUNDS IN HALF-TIME NEW CHALLENGES Jack Engwegen Head of the Czech Unit European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy Prague,
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
Jela Tvrdonova, The EU priorities:  Use the Leader approach for introducing innovation in the thematic axis  better governance at the local level.
Session 4. Evaluation of publicly funded research development and innovation: The Integral Monitoring and Evaluation System (SISE) Alfonso Beltrán García-Echániz.
AlpCity AlpCity Final Conference Prà Catinat, 16 October 2006 Ivan Curzolo - JTS Alpine Space Programme.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
The delivery of rural development policies: Some reflections on problems and perspectives in EU countries INEA conference: The territorial approach in.
Sectoral Operational Programme “INCREASE OF ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS” October 2005 MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND TRADE.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
Best Practices Presentation SEPVE The Programme is co-funded by the European Union (ERDF) and National Funds of Greece and Bulgaria.
"The role of Rural Networks as effective tools to promote rural development" TAIEX/Local Administration Facility Seminar on Rural Development Brussels,
Leader Axis Rural Development Policy by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Operative Programmes Anita Gulam Ana Kovačević Ministry of Environmental and Nature Protection, Republic of.
SOCIAL INCLUSION IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA TOWARDS MAINSTREAMING AND RESULTS SOCIAL INCLUSION IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA TOWARDS MAINSTREAMING.
Rural Development experiences of Hungary
NSRF and National Development Planning in Greece
European Commission Initiatives for eGovernment
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
Introduction to the training
ESF IMPLEMENTATION IN CYPRUS
National Confederation of Disabled People –N.C.D.P.
Presentation transcript:

OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME Information Society 3rd Community Support Framework for Greece June 2001

1. The OPIS: structure, content and funding The OPIS is:  an innovative horizontal, cross-departmental programme  the main instrument for realizing the government’s IS strategy  the tool for achieving the targets set by e-Europe  It aims at promoting the IS in a a coherent and integrated manner It involves:  overall coordination by the Ministries of National Economy and Public Administration  decentralised implementation + supporting mechanisms  a new public-private partnership

The OPIS budget and its structure

Action Line 1. Education and Culture  Measure 1.1. Equiping and networking schools and universities  Measure 1.2. New technologies in the educational process  Measure 1.3. Documentation, management and promotion of the Greek cultural heritage

Action Line 2. Services to citizens and an improved quality of life  Measure 2.1. Government on line: Business plans, studies, pilot projects  Measure 2.2. Government on line  Measure 2.3. Administration of the Structural Funds and transition to the Euro  Measure 2.4. Regional geographic information systems and innovative actions  Measure 2.5 Training and modernisation in the public administration  Measure 2.6. ICT applications in health and welfare  Measure 2.7. Training and organisational reform in health and welfare  Measure 2.8 “Intelligent transport”

 Measure 3.1. A ¨digital¨ environment for the new economy  Measure 3.2. Businesses in the digital economy  Measure 3.3. Research and technological development for the IS  Measure 3.4. Skills upgrading  Measure 3.5. Employment promotion for the Information Society Action Line 3. The digital economy, employment and social cohesion

Action Line 4. Communications  Measure 4.1. Supporting and consolidating the liberalisation process  Measure 4.2. Development of local access network infrastructure  Measure 4.3. Advanced telecommunications services for the citizen  Measure 4.4. Development and modernisation of postal services  Measure 4.5. Training in the communications sector

Action Line 5. Technical Assistance  Measure 5.1. Management and implementation  Measure 5.2 Technical Assistance ΕSF  Measure 5.3 Technical Assistance ΕRDF

2. Management and implementation mechanisms The basic design:  Overall coordination for a coherent and integrated approach to IS development  Decentralised implementation by agencies  Creation of supporting mechanisms The new structures:  The Managing Authority  The Information Society S.A.  The IS Observatory

The Managing Authority of the OPIS  An independent service within the Ministry of National Economy  Headed by a Special Secretary, reports directly to Minister/D.Minister  A staff of 40, with strict selection criteria & competitive salaries  Organised in 4 units: A. Programming and evaluation B1. Monitoring and Management of Action Lines 1,2 B2. Monitoring and Management of Action Lines 3,4,5 B2. Audits C. Admin support (includes Website, indicators, etc.)  Timetable for its creation u Round 1 (20 people on secondment from the public sector) completed u Round 2 (20 people from private sector) September-October

The Information Society S.A.  An Implementing Organisation that assists agencies in all stages of ITC project design, implementation and follow-up  A public company (S.A) with economic and managerial autonomy  A staff of 30-40, with strict selection criteria & competitive salaries  Organised in units dealing with (a) support to final beneficiaries, (b) project management, (c) admin  Timetable for its creation u Staffing: July first round

The Information Society S.A. What it does:  Supports agencies (with experts/studies) in the preparation of business plans and of the management structures for project implementation  Prepares specifications and RFPs, evaluates tenders, assists final beneficiaries in designing contracts  Follows the project implementation process in terms of quality of services delivered  Supports final beneficiaries after projects are completed in terms of assimilation, organisational change and continuous development

The Information Society Observatory  Composed of personalities and high-evel experts, with a small permanent secretariat (10 people)  Disseminates best practice methods, assists the exchange of experiences, know-how and information, provides training tools  Collects statistics, undertakes or commissions benchmarking studies  Works in close consultation with similar EU-wide and regional organisations  Timetable for its creation: end-2001

Management, implemantation and advisory structures work together  Before a project funding decision is made by the MA, the MA works with the IS S.A. and the programming authority and/or the final beneficiary to establish and help put in place the necessary preconditions for a succesful completion of the project  After a project funding decision is made by the MA, the MA refers the implementing agency to the IS S.A. in order to determine the exact way that it will be supported; the MA and the IS S.A. exchange information throughout the project implementaion phase  The work of the IS Observatory (benchmarking, best-practices, etc.) directly assists the tasks of both the MA and the IS S.A.

3. Preparing the ground for launching: The story so far...  An emphasis on openness and a ‘partenariat’: u A number of seminars/conferences on the OPIS during 1999 and 2000 u The OP and the Guide in u OPIS presentation to representatives from Ministries and Regions on different occasions  Work on preparing the legal/organisationl framework u The legal texts (for the MA, the IS S.A) u Procedure simplification (elaboration of joint proposals with IT industry)  Programming Complement u Approved by the Monitoring Committee

3. Preparing the ground for launching: The story so far...  Pre - Funding of certain projects (120 million Euro) regarding: u Business Plans of Actors u Transition to Euro u Education – Support with equipment and access to the Internet u Connecting SMEs to the Internet ( GoDigital) u Online - Public and regional Administration

4. Getting the actors ready: the Business Plan Who needs a business plan?  Anyone with projects to be funded by the OPIs and without one What kind?  Business plan, after plan, rolling action plan….a case by case decision An indicative ToC  The current situation  Operational and strategic planning  The action plan

5. Next Steps: a timetable

Supporting Services Help Desk