RFX-mod 2009 programme Workshop, January 20-22, 2009 Report on experimental proposals submitted to TF1 ‘RFP performance: high current operation and advanced scenarios’ R. Lorenzini and F. Milani Consorzio RFX, Euratom-ENEA Association, Padova, Italy

RFX-mod 2009 programme Workshop, January 20-22, during 2009 the work on the High Current operation will proceed along two synergistic main projects: Project 1: optimization of the 1.5 MA scenario Project 2: initial exploration of the current regime between 1.5 and 2 MA Why TF1? Report ‘Guidelines and strategy for the preparation of the 2009 experimental programme’ P. Martin and M.E. Puiatti... we expect that the achievement of a baseline 2 MA plasma, ready for full exploitation of confinement, will be the subject of both the 2009 and 2010 experimental campaigns.

RFX-mod 2009 programme Workshop, January 20-22, 2009 Part 1: a bit of statistics...

RFX-mod 2009 programme Workshop, January 20-22, 2009 General info and remarks about proposals Number of Proposals submitted to TF1: 24 Number of Days required: 111 Number of Effective Days : 64 In this talk we present a simple statistical analysis of only these proposals: hence the results we present could be not valid if many proposals requiring high current were not been addressed to TF1 but only to other TFs (we do not know yet...) A description of the proposals will be also presented: this description will be brief because many (almost all) proposals have already been described by other TFLs

RFX-mod 2009 programme Workshop, January 20-22, 2009 What does ‘High Current’ mean for proponents? I (MA)DaysDays% ≥ ≥ ≥ ≥ I (MA)ProjectNumber of Proposals ≥ 11 and 25 ≥ and 25 ≥ 1.51 and 27 ≥ almost all the proposals are at I ≥ 1 MA (except 1, I < 0.4 MA) the level of current is specified with I ≥ 1 proposal with a current scan 1 proposal with current not specified

RFX-mod 2009 programme Workshop, January 20-22, 2009 Investigation of the equilibrium: request on F Typical request on F : Not specified NSP (hence shallow, since in 2008 we operated essentially at F shallow ?) Only few experimental days are requested to explore equilibria different from F shallow.

RFX-mod 2009 programme Workshop, January 20-22, 2009 Request on density: Typical request regarding the density : Not specified (NSP) maybe because we feel we aren’t able to control it?

RFX-mod 2009 programme Workshop, January 20-22, 2009 Which is the preferred item of research for TF1? The preferred item of research at high current (as one could guess) is QSH, better if SHAx Many aspects of QSH are of interest: magnetic topology, transport and so on... QSH is favourite at shallow reversal: this is the reason why (maybe) there is not much interest in exploring different equilibria.

RFX-mod 2009 programme Workshop, January 20-22, 2009 What about advanced scenarios? Only 25% of the experimental time is dedicated to explore advanced scenarios (OPCD, PPCD, OFCD) 75% of the time is dedicated to study standard plasma This is a comprehensible attitude resulting from the experience of the past year. Standard plasma behaves better than OPCD plasma

RFX-mod 2009 programme Workshop, January 20-22, 2009 QSH: spontaneous vs stimulated QSH is the favourite item: most of proposals regard spontaneous QSH This is a comprehensible attitude resulting from the experience of the past year. Standard plasma is so efficient in producing QSH that it seems useless to stimulate it by means of an external action. Anyway we should not stop trying...

RFX-mod 2009 programme Workshop, January 20-22, 2009 High overlapping with the other TFs Proposals submitted only to TF1: 4 on Days on 111 ( ~ 20% ) TF1 shares proposals with all the other TFs. This is an obvious consequence of the fact that ‘high current’ is a plasma regime to study MHD, transport...

RFX-mod 2009 programme Workshop, January 20-22, 2009 Part 2: going deeper...

RFX-mod 2009 programme Workshop, January 20-22, proposals, 23 at high current P1: 2, 11, 13, 15, 31, 32, 34, 53, 55, 56, 66, 69, 70, 73, 81, 82, 96, 117, 127 P2: 41, , 11, 13, 15, 31, 32, 34, 41, 42, 43, 53, 55, 56, 66, 69, 70, 73, 81, 82, 96, 117,

RFX-mod 2009 programme Workshop, January 20-22, proposals addressed only to TF1 41)Lorenzini et al. ’Dependence of the plasma properties on the equilibrium ’, 1< I < 2MA 42)Lorenzini et al. ’QSH characterisation at 2 MA ’ 96) Bolzonella et al. ’ High Current Oscillating Field Current Drive on RFX ’, I > 1.3 MA till the maximum reachable in sustained and non sustained discharges, polarimeter 127) K. McCollam at al. ‘ High-Plasma-Current, Low-Frequency OFCD on RFX ’, I > 1.3 MA up to the maximum reachable in sustained and non-sustained discharges, polarimeter, long pulses

RFX-mod 2009 programme Workshop, January 20-22, Proposals are shared with TF2 (MHD): part 1 Effect of the QSH on edge properties: 2) Carraro et al. ‘Influence of QSH dominant mode on particle influxes (QSH-SHAx)’ 56) Spolaore at al. ’Edge particle flux monitoring in high current discharges’ Advanced Scenarios: 34) Terranova et al. ‘OPCD evolution and scan in global plasma parameters’ 43) Lorenzini et al. ‘OPCD in low density condition’ Magnetic field topology investigation by means of two ‘new’ diagnostics: impurity pellet injector and the polarimeter: 53) Terranova et al. ‘Internal magnetic field structure investigation by means of pellet injection’ 31 e 32) Auriemma et al. ‘q profile measurement in SHAx/MH high current regimes’

RFX-mod 2009 programme Workshop, January 20-22, Proposals are shared with TF2 (MHD) : part 2 QSH control and investigation: 70) Zuin et al. ‘m=0 knocks for QSH sustainment’ 73) Zuin et al. ‘QSH study through F scan at high current’ Comparison between other machines and RFX-mod 117) Masamune et al. ’Comparative study of neoclassical effect in RFX-mod and RELAX by using the equilibrium reconstruction code (RELAXFit)’ Scalings 55) Spolaore et al. ‘Plasma current parameter scaling on CMC discharges’

RFX-mod 2009 programme Workshop, January 20-22, Proposals shared with TF3 (transport) Impurity transport 11) Carraro et al. ‘Evaluation of medium mass impurity transport parameters in RFX-mod in QSH and MH regimes’ 13) Carraro et al. ‘Evaluation of heavy impurity transport parameters in RFX-mod in QSH and MH regimes’ QSH investigation 15) Valisa et al. ‘Highly radiating regimes and QSH’ Advanced scenarios 59) Spolaore et al. ‘Edge plasma monitor of QSH states induced by OPCD operations and not null reference on the dominant mode’ (low current: I <0.4 MA) Momentum transport 66) Vianello et al. ’Shafranov shift scan at high current for flow asymmetry investigation’. Energy transport by means of a brand new diagnostic! 69) Zuin et al. ‘Ion temperature measurements in helical plasmas by means of NPA diagnostics ’

RFX-mod 2009 programme Workshop, January 20-22, Proposals shared with TF4 (Optimization) QSH investigation: 81)Cavazzana et al., ‘QSH and SHAx at High Density’, Efficient F control to avoid loss of reversal 82)Cavazzana et al., ‘Extreme F ~ 0- RFP’, Development of an F control system capable of maintaining a precise equilibrium avoiding loss of reversal in different plasma condition. From Project 1 to Project 2: 52) All TFLs ‘The 1.8 and 2 MA discharges ’...

RFX-mod 2009 programme Workshop, January 20-22, 2009 Special requirements of 52 (see also talk of L. Zanotto) Critical: ensure correct operation of PVAT and of equilibrium control system to avoid unexpected full poloidal protection. need to transiently exceed the maximum nominal PVAT current (6.25 kA), to 6.5 kA for ~ 50ms. Recommended : correction systematic error at 120 deg (MHD controller) correction of error field during startup (MHD controller) plasma shape (horizontal equilibrium controller use of GDC H 2 preload and Pellet injector best would be to carry out experiments not far from Boronization efficient F control in order to avoid loss of reversal during the discharge Control of field errors Control of density Control of equilibrium