Federal Aviation Administration 0 FTFAM – Version 11 Update May 19 th, 2010 0 Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Version 11 Update Steve Summer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Federal Aviation Administration 0 The Impact of Synthetic Fuels on FAA Flammability Requirements June 24, The Impact of Low Flashpoint Fuels on.
Advertisements

International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Conference Fuel Tank Inerting Modeling Ivor Thomas Consultant to FAA
Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research – Lisbon, Portugal In-Flight Fuel Tank Flammability Testing The 4th Triennial Int’l Aircraft Fire and.
Modeling of Fuel Tank Inerting for FAA OBIGGS Research
Emission Inventory System Reports Course Sally Dombrowski
William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J
1 Northeast Corridor Cost Benefit Assessment Status Mark Kipperman SAIC July 14, 2003.
Cargo Bay Fire Protection with a Fuel Tank Inerting System William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal Aviation Administration.
An Update on FAA Fuel Tank Ullage Modeling
State of the Art of Fuel Tank Ullage Oxygen Concentration Measurement William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
Aviation Weather Hazards: Density Altitude
16/27/2015 3:38 AM6/27/2015 3:38 AM6/27/2015 3:38 AMTesting and Debugging Testing The process of verifying the software performs to the specifications.
Statistics: Categorical Variables. Do Now:  Give the context/ label the variables for the following situation:  The Federal Aviation Administration.
Modeling of Single Bay Fuel Tank Inerting for FAA OBIGGS Research
Federal Aviation Administration FAA Fire Safety Branch September FRM: Nitrogen System Validation Federal Aviation Administration AAR-440 Fire Safety.
The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method Flammability.
Modeling In-flight Inert Gas Distribution in a 747 Center-Wing Fuel Tank William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
Inerting Background Inerting refers to rendering the ullage (air above fuel) unable to propagate a reaction given flammable conditions and ignition source.
Flight Testing of the FAA OBIGGS On the NASA 747 SCA
Towards the Enhancement of Aircraft Cargo Compartment Fire Detection System Certification using Smoke Transport Modeling Walt Gill and Jill Suo-Anttila.
Section 03 - Altimetry (cont) Lesson 09
Analysis and Visualization Approaches to Assess UDU Capability Presented at MBSW May 2015 Jeff Hofer, Adam Rauk 1.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability April 2-3, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Jet Fuel Vaporization and Condensation: Modeling and Validation C.E. Polymeropoulos Robert Ochs Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey International.
Systems Fire Protection Working Group DTA - Grenoble, France June 21-22, 2003 FAA Inerting System Flight Testing on an Airbus A320 William Cavage AAR-440.
California Energy Commission 2015 IEPR Self-Generation Forecast Sacramento, CA 7/07/2015 Asish Gautam Demand Analysis Office Energy Assessments Division.
FAA R&D Efforts Leading to Fuel Tank Inerting
Presented to: International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group. Atlantic City, NJ By: Dave Blake. FAA Technical Center. Atlantic City, NJ.
Copyright © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Chapter 2.
Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation Human Space Flight Occupant Safety Telecon Telecon 6 – Fault Tolerance, Margin and Reliability.
International Civil Aviation Organization Measurement of environmental benefits Saulo Da Silva Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology.
0 eCPIC User Training: Dependency Mapper These training materials are owned by the Federal Government. They can be used or modified only by FESCOM member.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: 2008 US/Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: Robert W. Reich, Asst Manager (Operations), Seattle.
Consumer Taxation Program Branch IFTA Fraud Part 1 - Administrative Focus September 22, 2005.
1 International Helicopter Safety Team May Metrics: Are We Meeting the 80% Reduction Goals? 3 May 2007 AHS Forum 63 Roy Fox Chief, Flight Safety.
© Buddy Freeman, Independence of error assumption. In many business applications using regression, the independent variable is TIME. When the data.
Federal Aviation Administration Measuring Ullage Oxygen Concentration November 17-18, Measuring Oxygen Concentration in a Fuel Tank Ullage Federal.
IASFPWG – Seattle, WA Jet-A Vaporization Computer Model A Fortran Code Written by Prof. Polymeropolous of Rutgers University International Aircraft.
Reticulated Foam Advantages: 100% protection Passive System
Background Numerous FAR’s mandate fire protection in aircraft powerplant fire zones Parts 23, 25, 27, 29, 33… FAR Part 1 Section 1.1 – Definitions and.
Overview Background Harmonization Goals
Sensitivity Analysis A systematic way of asking “what-if” scenario questions in order to understand what outcomes could possibly occur that would effect.
Cargo Bay Fire Protection with a Fuel Tank Inerting System
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability November 20, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing.
6/13/02IASFPWG – London, UK Ongoing Fuel Flammability Work at the FAA Technical Center International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group London,
Federal Aviation Administration Measuring Ullage Oxygen Concentration February 10-12, Measuring Oxygen Concentration in a Fuel Tank Ullage Federal.
OBIGGS Sizing Data for Transport Canada Trade Study William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal Aviation Administration.
March 26-27, 2003 International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Phoenix, Az Inerting of a Scale 747SP Center-Wing Fuel Tank During a Typical.
October 30-31, 2002 International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ Inerting of a Scale 747SP Center Wing Fuel Tank During.
1 The Software Development Process ► Systems analysis ► Systems design ► Implementation ► Testing ► Documentation ► Evaluation ► Maintenance.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 19 th, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 20, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Microsoft ® Excel ® 2013 Enhanced Excel Tutorial 3 Calculating Data with Formulas and Functions.
IASFPWG – Ottawa, Canada In-Flight Fuel Tank Flammability Testing Steve Summer Project Engineer Federal Aviation Administration Fire Safety Branch.
Systems Fire Protection Working Group DTA - Grenoble, France June 21-22, 2003 Preliminary Results of FAA Fuel Tank Inerting Flight Testing on the NASA.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
________________________________________________________ GBI Cost Analysis SAE Advances in Aviation Safety April 11th, 2000 SAE Advances in Aviation Safety.
IASFPWG – Atlantic City, NJ Limiting Oxygen Concentration (LOC) Work Update International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 11, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
IASFPWG – Ottawa, Canada Low Fuel Load Flammability Work International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Ottawa, Canada February.
The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method Steve Summer.
Wing Tank Flammability Testing William Cavage Steven Summer AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal Aviation Administration International.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
AFTERMATH AND ACTIONS TAKEN On 20 October 2004, the Transportation Safety Board of Canada issued Safety Advisory A (Verification of Cargo Weights)
Jon Hadler and Dr. David Ison
Graphic showing EGPWS Activation
Pen-size Optimization Workbook for Experimental Research design
Energy Performance Trends
SFAR 88 (EAPAS) Workshop Talking Points
Regulatory Impact Analysis for Enabling Regulations: The Federal Aviation Administration's Small UAS Rule Deborah Vaughn Aiken, Phd Director of Regulatory.
Presentation transcript:

Federal Aviation Administration 0 FTFAM – Version 11 Update May 19 th, Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Version 11 Update Steve Summer Federal Aviation Administration Fire Safety Branch Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group CAA Aviation House West Sussex, United Kingdom May 19th, 2010

Federal Aviation Administration 1 FTFAM – Version 11 Update May 19 th, Background The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method (FTFAM) is an Excel © based macro based on work originally performed by the 1998 ARAC Fuel Tank Harmonization Working Group. It is a comparative analysis tool to examine airplane fuel tank flammability. The program utilizes Monte Carlo statistical methods to determine several unknown variables, using standardized distributions in order to calculate the fleet average flammability exposure time of a given fuel tank. From 1998 – Present, the FAA has utilized input from industry and information gained from various research activities to help refine and improve the model’s capabilities.

Federal Aviation Administration 2 FTFAM – Version 11 Update May 19 th, Background The current version 10 FTFAM was released with the Fuel Tank Flammability Reduction Rule in July, Since the release of version 10, there have been several minor corrections needed to the model. The descent profile used in the model did not match what was in the regulation There was a typo in the temperature lapse rate calculations There were some calculation errors on the “FRM” worksheet The FRM flammability time was not transferred onto the “Summary of n Cases” worksheet

Federal Aviation Administration 3 FTFAM – Version 11 Update May 19 th, Version 11 Changes Descent Profile Regulation states a descent rate of 2500 ft/min down to 4000 ft, and 500 ft/min from 4000 ft to touchdown. Version 10 calculated the descent time based on this profile, but then utilized a constant descent rate throughout based on this calculated descent time. This resulted in a varying descent rate from flight to flight. The code in V.11 has been corrected so that the model now utilizes the prescribed descent rates as in the regulation. The effect of this change over 1,000 flights, using a set of standardized inputs, is a flammability exposure of 55.72% vs % prior to the change.

Federal Aviation Administration 4 FTFAM – Version 11 Update May 19 th, Version 11 Changes Temperature Lapse Rate Calculation The lapse rate calculation in V.10 used 3.57°F/1000 ft up to 10,000 ft and then 3.75°F/1000 ft above 10,000 ft. This was a typo and was corrected in V.11 to 3.57°F/1000 ft throughout. The effect of this change over 1,000 flights, using a set of standardized inputs, is a flammability exposure of 52.64% vs % prior to the change.

Federal Aviation Administration 5 FTFAM – Version 11 Update May 19 th, Version 11 Changes FRM Worksheet Errors In the FRM Results table, the column labeled “Contribution to whole” was miscalculated. It has now been adjusted so that the results are displayed properly. This error has no impact on flammability results, as the information in this table is displayed for informational purposes only. Ex: 23.1=66/ =(flam time)/(total flam time) Corrected Table as Seen in Model

Federal Aviation Administration 6 FTFAM – Version 11 Update May 19 th, Version 11 Changes FRM Flammability Time There was an error in the Visual Basic code which made it so that the total FRM flammability time was not transferred onto the 'Summary of n Cases' worksheet. This error was corrected, and has no impact on results. Net effect of all changes: Using a set of standardized inputs, over 1,000 flights these changes resulted in a flammability exposure of 55.45% as compared to 52.90% prior to the implementation of the changes.

Federal Aviation Administration 7 FTFAM – Version 11 Update May 19 th, Release of Version 11 An internal review of the updates to the model is in the process of being conducted. Once complete, the updated model will be released and available on the FAA Fire Safety website ( Until that time, users should continue to use V.10

Federal Aviation Administration 8 FTFAM – Version 11 Update May 19 th, Standardized Inputs Used for Comparison Purposes