1 Mohammed M. Olama Seddik M. Djouadi ECE Department/University of Tennessee Ioannis G. PapageorgiouCharalambos D. Charalambous Ioannis G. Papageorgiou.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2005, it - instituto de telecomunicações. Todos os direitos reservados. Pedro Santos Traian Abrudan Ana.
Advertisements

1 12. Principles of Parameter Estimation The purpose of this lecture is to illustrate the usefulness of the various concepts introduced and studied in.
Fast Bayesian Matching Pursuit Presenter: Changchun Zhang ECE / CMR Tennessee Technological University November 12, 2010 Reading Group (Authors: Philip.
Shashika Biyanwila Research Engineer
From Bayesian to Particle Filter
Oklahoma State University Generative Graphical Models for Maneuvering Object Tracking and Dynamics Analysis Xin Fan and Guoliang Fan Visual Computing and.
Visual Recognition Tutorial
Artificial Learning Approaches for Multi-target Tracking Jesse McCrosky Nikki Hu.
SES 2007 A Multiresolution Approach for Statistical Mobility Prediction of Unmanned Ground Vehicles 44 th Annual Technical Meeting of the Society of Engineering.
Volkan Cevher, Marco F. Duarte, and Richard G. Baraniuk European Signal Processing Conference 2008.
Sérgio Pequito Phd Student
Nonlinear and Non-Gaussian Estimation with A Focus on Particle Filters Prasanth Jeevan Mary Knox May 12, 2006.
Discriminative Training of Kalman Filters P. Abbeel, A. Coates, M
Particle Filters for Mobile Robot Localization 11/24/2006 Aliakbar Gorji Roborics Instructor: Dr. Shiri Amirkabir University of Technology.
Estimation and the Kalman Filter David Johnson. The Mean of a Discrete Distribution “I have more legs than average”
Course AE4-T40 Lecture 5: Control Apllication
1 OUTLINE Motivation Distributed Measurements Importance Sampling Results Conclusions.
Novel approach to nonlinear/non- Gaussian Bayesian state estimation N.J Gordon, D.J. Salmond and A.F.M. Smith Presenter: Tri Tran
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 11 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
1/23 A COMBINED APPROACH FOR NLOS MITIGATION IN CELLULAR POSITIONING WITH TOA MEASUREMENTS Fernaz Alimoğlu M. Bora Zeytinci.
Muhammad Moeen YaqoobPage 1 Moment-Matching Trackers for Difficult Targets Muhammad Moeen Yaqoob Supervisor: Professor Richard Vinter.
1 Miodrag Bolic ARCHITECTURES FOR EFFICIENT IMPLEMENTATION OF PARTICLE FILTERS Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Stony Brook University.
Time of arrival(TOA) Prepared By Sushmita Pal Roll No Dept.-CSE,4 th year.
Object Tracking using Particle Filter
Computer vision: models, learning and inference Chapter 19 Temporal models.
From Bayesian Filtering to Particle Filters Dieter Fox University of Washington Joint work with W. Burgard, F. Dellaert, C. Kwok, S. Thrun.
SIS Sequential Importance Sampling Advanced Methods In Simulation Winter 2009 Presented by: Chen Bukay, Ella Pemov, Amit Dvash.
Particle Filtering (Sequential Monte Carlo)
November 1, 2012 Presented by Marwan M. Alkhweldi Co-authors Natalia A. Schmid and Matthew C. Valenti Distributed Estimation of a Parametric Field Using.
Multiuser Detection (MUD) Combined with array signal processing in current wireless communication environments Wed. 박사 3학기 구 정 회.
An Enhanced Received Signal Level Cellular Location Determination Method via Maximum Likelihood and Kalman Filtering Ioannis G. Papageorgiou Charalambos.
Kalman Filter (Thu) Joon Shik Kim Computational Models of Intelligence.
Probabilistic Robotics Bayes Filter Implementations.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: Deterministic vs. Random Maximum A Posteriori Maximum Likelihood Minimum.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring
Overview Particle filtering is a sequential Monte Carlo methodology in which the relevant probability distributions are iteratively estimated using the.
Michael Lunglmayr Particle Filters for Equalization Page 1 Infineon A FEASIBILITY STUDY: PARTICLE FILTERS FOR MOBILE STATION RECEIVERS CSNDSP 2006 Michael.
Abdul-Aziz .M Al-Yami Khurram Masood
Forward-Scan Sonar Tomographic Reconstruction PHD Filter Multiple Target Tracking Bayesian Multiple Target Tracking in Forward Scan Sonar.
HQ U.S. Air Force Academy I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Improving the Performance of Out-of-Order Sigma-Point Kalman Filters.
Chapter 4: Motivation for Dynamic Channel Models Short-term Fading Varying environment Obstacles on/off Area 2 Area 1 Transmitter Log-normal Shadowing.
-Arnaud Doucet, Nando de Freitas et al, UAI
Adaphed from Rappaport’s Chapter 5
PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS FOR ENGINEERING Hossein Sameti Department of Computer Engineering Sharif University of Technology Principles of Parameter Estimation.
5-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. May 28, 2009 Inventory # Chapter 5 Six Sigma.
Maximum a posteriori sequence estimation using Monte Carlo particle filters S. J. Godsill, A. Doucet, and M. West Annals of the Institute of Statistical.
A Semi-Blind Technique for MIMO Channel Matrix Estimation Aditya Jagannatham and Bhaskar D. Rao The proposed algorithm performs well compared to its training.
The Restricted Matched Filter for Distributed Detection Charles Sestok and Alan Oppenheim MIT DARPA SensIT PI Meeting Jan. 16, 2002.
Sequential Monte-Carlo Method -Introduction, implementation and application Fan, Xin
Mixture Kalman Filters by Rong Chen & Jun Liu Presented by Yusong Miao Dec. 10, 2003.
Computer simulation Sep. 9, QUIZ 2 Determine whether the following experiments have discrete or continuous out comes A fair die is tossed and the.
Short Introduction to Particle Filtering by Arthur Pece [ follows my Introduction to Kalman filtering ]
Spectrum Sensing In Cognitive Radio Networks
Nonlinear State Estimation
1 On the Channel Capacity of Wireless Fading Channels C. D. Charalambous and S. Z. Denic School of Information Technology and Engineering, University of.
Paging Area Optimization Based on Interval Estimation in Wireless Personal Communication Networks By Z. Lei, C. U. Saraydar and N. B. Mandayam.
The Unscented Particle Filter 2000/09/29 이 시은. Introduction Filtering –estimate the states(parameters or hidden variable) as a set of observations becomes.
Smart Sleeping Policies for Wireless Sensor Networks Venu Veeravalli ECE Department & Coordinated Science Lab University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Chance Constrained Robust Energy Efficiency in Cognitive Radio Networks with Channel Uncertainty Yongjun Xu and Xiaohui Zhao College of Communication Engineering,
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado 1 STATISTICAL ORBIT DETERMINATION Kalman Filter with Process Noise Gauss- Markov.
Gil McVean, Department of Statistics Thursday February 12 th 2009 Monte Carlo simulation.
Problem 1: Service System Capacity CustomersServed Customers Queue Server Problem: Can a server taking an average of x time units meet the demand? Solution.
12. Principles of Parameter Estimation
Advanced Wireless Networks
PSG College of Technology
Propagating Uncertainty In POMDP Value Iteration with Gaussian Process
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 11
Shashika Biyanwila Research Engineer
12. Principles of Parameter Estimation
Kalman Filter: Bayes Interpretation
Presentation transcript:

1 Mohammed M. Olama Seddik M. Djouadi ECE Department/University of Tennessee Ioannis G. PapageorgiouCharalambos D. Charalambous Ioannis G. Papageorgiou Charalambos D. Charalambous ECE Department/University of Cyprus Estimation of Mobile Station Position and Velocity in Multipath Wireless Networks Using the Unscented Particle Filter Conference on Decision and Control 2007 CDC 2007 CDC 2007 December 14, 2007

2 Outline 1.Motivation and objective. 2.Aulin’s wave scattering channel model. 3.State and measurement models. 4.The unscented particle filter. 5.Numerical example. 6.Conclusion.

3 Applications Emergency 911. Promising Market Commercial Vehicle fleet management Location sensitive billing Fraud protection Mobile yellow pages Technological Power control enhancement System capacity enhancement

4 Motivation (1) The current literature and standards in estimating the mobile location are based mostly on time signal information, such as TDOA, OTDOA, E-OTD, GPS, etc. However, most of them require new hardware since localization is not inherent in the current wireless systems, for instance, GPS demands a new GPS receiver and TDOA, E-OTD, OTDOA require additional location measurement units in the network. In this paper, we consider estimating the mobile location and velocity based on the received signal level.

5 Motivation (2) The standard target tracking literature rely on linearized motion models, measurement relations, and Gaussian assumptions Here particle filtering (sequential Monte Carlo methods) is used for the estimation process, which considers linear/non-linear state and measurement models, and Gaussian/non- Gaussian assumptions.

6 Objective Developing a new method for tracking mobile location and velocity in cellular networks based on the instantaneous electric field measurements. The proposed method supports existing network infrastructure and channel signaling. It takes into account NLOS and multipath propagation environments, which are usually encountered in wireless fading channels.

7 Aulin’s Scattering Channel Model

8 Aulin’s Scattering Model where The received signal at any receiving point is given by (Aulin, 1979) Amplitude Doppler shift Phase shift Phase Velocity of mobile Spatial angles of arrival Wavelength White Gaussian noise Total number of paths Direction of motion

9 State Model  The dynamics of the mobile can be written as: the Cartesian coordinates of the mobile at time k the velocities of the mobile in the X and Y directions at time k The measurement interval between time k and k + 1 Independent, discrete zero-mean state noise processes at time k  We choose the case when the velocity of the mobile is not known and is subject to unknown accelerations.

10 Measurement Model  The measurement equation is found from the discretized version of Aulin’s scattering model as where discrete zero-mean measurement noise process at time k.

11 Comments Clearly, the measurement equation is a non- linear function of the state-space vector. If we assume knowledge of the channel parameters, which is attainable either through channel estimation at the receiver (e.g., GSM receiver), or through various estimation techniques (e.g., least-squares, Maximum Likelihood), then this problem falls under the broad area of non-linear parameter estimation from noisy data. This problem can be solved using particle filtering.

12 The Particle Filter (PF) The PF is simply a sequential Monte Carlo simulation. It produces a discrete weighted approximation to the true posterior as: The weights are chosen using the principle of importance sampling as: where is the importance proposal distribution function that generates the samples.

13 The Particle Filter (PF) The choice of the proposal distribution function is one of the most critical design issues and determines the type of the PF. Optimal: Analytical evaluation of the optimal proposal function is not possible for many models, and thus has to be approximated using local linearization or the unscented transformation (the UPF). Simple: The generic PF.

14 The Generic PF The time-updated samples are obtained by the state equ The measurement-update stage can be performed by evaluating the following likelihood for each sample as: We define a discrete density over with probability mass associated with each sample. Then we get the measurement-update samples through a resampling process, such that for any i.

15 The SUT The SUT method approximates the proposal distribution by a Gaussian distribution, but it is specified using a minimal set of deterministically chosen sample points. These sample points completely capture the true mean and covariance of the Gaussian distribution, and when propagated through the true nonlinear system, captures the posterior mean and covariance accurately to the 3rd order for any nonlinearity.

16 The UPF The UPF uses the same framework as the regular PF, except that it approximates the optimal proposal distribution by a Gaussian distribution using the SUT method. Evaluating the importance weights as: Resampling as the generic PF.

17 Numerical Results/System Setup The wireless communication network has the following parameters: The envelope of the received signal for all paths, r n ’s, are generated as Rayleigh iid RVs with parameter 0.5. and are generated as uniform iid RVs in [0, 2π], [0, 0.2π], and [0, 2π], respectively. The total number of paths P is 6, which represents urban environments. The cell radius is 5000 meters.  The particle filter has the following parameters: Number of particles is Monte Carlo simulations were performed. The mean estimate of all particles is used as the final estimate.

18 Numerical Results/Location and Velocity Estimates

19 Numerical Results/Location and Velocity RMSE

20 Performance Comparison  100 Monte Carlo simulations were performed. MLEEKF EKF/MLE PFUPF Diverged runs _39622 Position RMSE (m) Velocity RMSE (m/sec) _

21 Robustness We want to see how robust the particle filtering approach is. Thus, we assume that we only know the channel parameters within certain tolerances where, and are the nominal (actual) values of the channel parameters.

22 Numerical Results/ Robustness

23 Conclusions A new estimation algorithm based on received signal measurements is proposed to track the position and velocity of a MS in a cellular network based on the unscented particle filter. It takes into account multipath propagation environment and NLOS conditions, which are usually encountered in wireless fading channels. The assumptions are partial knowledge of the channel and access to the instantaneous received field, which are obtained through channel sounding samples from the receiver circuitry. Numerical results for typical simulations show that they are highly accurate, robust, and consistent.