Renewable Energy Delivery, Scheduling, and Firming / Shaping

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RPS Compliance Reporting Working Group: Portfolio Content Category Classification Energy Division Staff: Robert Blackney and Sean Simon September 19, 2013.
Advertisements

Reporting GHG Emissions from Power Purchases CPUC/CEC Workshop on Load-Based Reporting Mike McCormick, Policy Director April 13, 2007.
ENERGY VALUE. Summary  Operational Value is a primary component in the Net Market Value (NMV) calculation used to rank competing resources in the RPS.
GPA Renewable Energy Resource for Guam Power Authority
Technical Conference Avoided Cost Modeling January 6, 2015.
CPUC Procurement Policies Robert L. Strauss California Public Utilities Commission Energy Division - Procurement Section.
Resource Adequacy in PJM
October 18, 2011Policy CommitteePage 1 Powering forward. Together. SMUD Renewable Portfolio Standard Elaine Sison-Lebrilla March 30, 2012.
1.  What is a Renewable Energy Credit (REC)?  What are they used for?  Who uses them?  How is REC ownership tracked?  What is the Renewable Portfolio.
1.  Purpose  To present Staff’s Preliminary Findings on the 2012 Integrated Resource Plans of:  APS – Arizona Public Service Company  TEP – Tucson.
© 2010 Day Pitney LLP NEPOOL GENERATION INFORMATION SYSTEM Paul N. Belval Day Pitney LLP January 2011.
Maine Disclosure and Portfolio Requirements Workshop on Electric Imports and “Emission Leakage” In Support of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative June.
Compare and Contrast ELCC Methodologies Across CPUC Proceedings
INTEGRATION COST. Integration Cost in RPS Calculator While “Integration Cost” is included in NMV formulation, the Commission stated that the Integration.
Energy and Electricity Markets 101
Power Purchase Agreements Alex Sifford Ecos Consulting Portland, Oregon
IMPERIAL VALLEY CONFERENCE July 21, SOLICITATION RENEWABLES PORTFOLIO STANDARD.
PPAs AND CONTRACTS FOR LONG-TERM RENEWABLE ENERGY CREDITS North American Power Credit Organization September 2006 Meeting Presented by: William H. Holmes,
California Energy Commission Renewable Energy in California Rasa Keanini and Heather Raitt Renewable Energy Program Efficiency, Renewables & Demand Analysis.
Introduction to Bonneville Power Administration
Energy and Economy Transition California’s energy system to a highly efficient, renewables-based system and electrify transportation.
Incorporating an Affordability Rate Cap Into a Florida RPS Florida Public Service Commission July 26, 2007 Kim Owens, P.E. JEA Clean Power Coordinator.
1 Implementation of the Solar RPS in New Jersey ABA Renewable Energy Panel November 16, 2005 Jan Pepper.
1 Managing Renewables Integration Valerie Fong Utilities Director Power Association of Northern California September 17, 2013.
Implementing one of the most ambitious renewable energy standards in the country CALIFORNIA’S Implementing one of the most ambitious renewable energy standards.
SAN MATEO COUNTY CCA TECHNICAL STUDY: OVERVIEW Community Choice Energy Advisory Committee June 25 th,2015.
RPS Model Methodology Arne Olson, Partner Doug Allen, Consultant.
PG&E’s Solar Choice Programs
California’s Renewable Energy Credits (REC) Market Update
Avista’s Flexibility Overview James Gall Senior Power Supply Analyst Contact:
2009 Bidders Workshop Attachment D August 3, 2009.
0 CPUC / CEC Workshop Reporting and Tracking GHG Emissions for a Load Based Cap PG&E Reporting Emissions and Estimating Emissions from Unspecified Purchases.
Andrea Coon WREGIS Administrator NARUC Annual Convention Anaheim, California November 12, 2007 Western Renewable Energy Generation.
BPA Wind Integration Services Elliot Mainzer Manager, PBL Pricing Desk Bonneville Power Administration Wind Power Workshop Northwest Power & Conservation.
July 9, 2010, AB 920 Workshop Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Selecting Renewable Projects at Colorado Springs Utilities APPA Conference John Romero GM Acquisition, Engineering and Planning October, 2009.
The Future of Electric Power In Utah January 12, 2010.
Lisa Linowes 2010 Mid-America Regulatory Conference Consumer Forum June 6 - 9, 2010 Kansas City, Missouri Wind Energy: An Assessment.
California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12,20071 Estimating the Generation Resource Mix of Electricity Imports to California – Energy Commission.
March 2012 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY CA REC Market Update FOR.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generating.
Michigan Public Service Commission Renewable Energy Overview 2011 GLREA Energy Fair Jesse Harlow Engineer, Renewable Energy Section Michigan Public Service.
Klondike Wind Power Project, Oregon Donald Furman Senior Vice President - Business Policy and Development December 3, 2009 Energy Bar Association Mid-Year.
THE MIX: FACTS, FIGURES, AND THE FUTURE INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 2013 William A. Monsen MRW & Associates Oakland, California.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION d n ACRE Second Annual Conference California: Successes, Issues, and Opportunities Washington, D. C. July 8, 2003 Terry Surles.
1 Monitoring Potential Emissions Leakage under the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI): Possible Lessons for Load-Based Cap-and-Trade Programs Christopher.
Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting October 4, 2011.
Southern California Edison SM Southern California Edison Company Proposed AB920 Net Surplus Compensation Rate [NSCR] July 9, 2010.
2008 Bidders Workshop Attachment D April 11, 2008.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM REC cost estimation April 23, 2010 Eric Lavik.
What do we mean by “Energy?
Capturing the Cost of Carbon in Electricity Markets Clare Breidenich Consultant Western Power Trading Forum CPUC Reporting Workshop San Francisco, CA April.
Renewable & Alternative Power Senate Energy, Utilities & Communications Committee Stuart R. Hemphill Director, Renewable and Alternative Power Southern.
Eugene Water & Electric Board. Dave Churchman Manager, Power Operations Eugene Water & Electric Board.
The Role of Energy Storage as a Renewable Integration Solution under a 50% RPS Joint California Energy Commission and California Public Utilities Commission.
October 29, Organizational role of Short-Term Planning and Hydro Duty Scheduling Relationship to other groups in BPA Planning and analysis job.
RPS Bidders Workshop May 11, RPS Bidders Workshop Guidance for Inputs to PPA May 11, 2007.
Updated 1/28/2011. Renewables Integration Plans and Challenges March 8, 2011 Jay Caspary ·
Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2011 and 2013 Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Meeting July 21, 2008.
Vermont Public Service Board October 15, 2010 Vermont RPS Study Overview.
Renewables Portfolio Standard Status Report California Public Utilities Commission February 26 th, 2008.
Overview: California Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) Program Presented by Paul Douglas RPS Program Manager California Public Utilities.
RETI Workshop March 16, 2015 Arne Olson, Partner Lakshmi Alagappan, Sr. Managing Consultant Identifying High Value Renewable Resources.
1 PG&E Proposals for Refinements to the Resource Adequacy (RA) Program Compliance Year 2017 RA Workshop February 18, 2016.
CPUC Resource Adequacy Program – LAO briefing May 25, 2009.
Joint Energy Auction Implementation Proposal of PG&E, SCE and SDG&E California Public Utilities Commission Workshop – November 1, 2006.
SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® RETI 2.0 Workshop 03/16/2016 IOU Panel.
Northwest Wind Integration Forum Technical Work Group PSE Wind Activities Joe Hoerner October 29, 2009.
2017 Integrated Resource Plan
ColumbiaGrid Summary of: COI Utilization Report dated May 4, 2011
Presentation transcript:

Renewable Energy Delivery, Scheduling, and Firming / Shaping Iberdrola Renewables, Inc. California Public Utilities Commission Energy Division Workshop April 23, 2010

Iberdrola Renewables, Inc. Own or control the output of renewable generation in California: Shiloh Wind Project (150 MW, Solano County) Dillon Wind Project (45 MW, Riverside County) Mountain View III Wind Project (22 MW, Riverside County) High Winds Wind Project (162MW controlled, Solano County) Developing new renewable resources in California Manzana Wind Project (~250 MW, Kern County) Tule Wind Project (~200 MW, San Diego County) Solar portfolio (miscellaneous) Biomass portfolio (miscellaneous)

Iberdrola Renewables, Inc. Owner/operator/provider of renewable generation from WECC to California utilities: Klondike 3 Wind Project ( 75 MW, Oregon) Klondike 3A Wind Project (75 MW, Oregon) Star Point Wind Project (100 MW, Oregon) Pebble Springs Wind Project (100 MW, Oregon) Big Horn Wind Project (200 MW, Washington) Simpson-Tacoma Biomass Project (45 MW, Washington) Pleasant Valley Wind Project (128 MW controlled, Wyoming) Provider of delivery service and/or firming and shaping energy services for most of these projects

Generation and Delivery: Why We Do What We Do We provide a superior product: predictable, manageable, delivered renewable energy Complies with RPS Fits into customers’ portfolios We offer these services to deliver a value-added product: Renewable energy Delivery Firming and shaping Scheduling

California and WECC are Integral California is electrically interconnected to the WECC California is an organized market within a larger multi-state western market California benefits from diverse sources of generation and delivery both inside and outside the State Providing energy and transmission to California displaces California LSEs’ highest-cost, least-desirable resources, no different from in-state renewable generation Surplus hydro delivery from the Northwest to California, and surplus thermal delivered from California to the Northwest, have been mutually beneficial for decades

Firm Transmission Delivering Baseload Renewable Generation Iberdrola Renewables has a long-term PPA with SMUD to deliver the full output of the Simpson-Tacoma Biomass Project (California RPS Certification # 60697A). Iberdrola Renewables has reserved 45 MW on the following transmission segments: Tacoma Public Utilities BPA Network BPA Southern Intertie In delivering Project Output to SMUD, the NERC E-tag identifies the generation source, the transmission path, the point of delivery, and the load-serving entity. The E-tag also captures the CEC renewable facility certification number. Thus, the Project directly serves California loads.

Verification: NERC E-Tag and CEC RPS Certification

Firmed and Shaped Deliveries from Intermittent Resources What? Our product delivers incremental energy resources to California Smoothes out the over- and under-generation of intermittent resources Why? Customer knows what it will get LSE can more easily integrate into resource portfolio Efficient use of scarce transmission Predictable long-term renewable product more easily displaces high cost conventional resources

Big Horn Wind Project – Washington Actual Hourly Output, October 2009 744 Hours 9

Firm Transmission Alternatives Using Same Big Horn Example 100% Firm Transmission Coverage of Nameplate 34% 20% 0% 744 Hours 34% = Project Average Annual Capacity Factor 20% = Iberdrola Proposed Firm Transmission Threshold 0% = All Non-Firm Transmission 10

Iberdrola Delivery Requirement Using Same Big Horn Example Under the Big Horn arrangement, Iberdrola provides flat delivery across the month based on expected monthly energy and using like amount of firm transmission 744 Hours October 2009 Results Iberdrola delivered expected monthly energy flat across the month (approx 30.6% CF, 61 MW, 45,484 MWh) In this month, actual wind production = 29.7% CF (44,154 MWh) Customer RECs, verified by WREGIS = 44,154 11

Firming and Shaping Balances Actuals and Delivered MWhs Market Other Project Energy Project Energy Energy Mix for Managing Shaping & Firming Scheduled 5,000 Actuals 6,000 Surplus 1,000 4,000 Deficit 1,000 RECs = 10,000 Scheduled 10,000 Over Generation Period Schedules = Actuals

Firmed and Shaped Delivery of Intermittent Renewable Generation Iberdrola Renewables (IBR) project LLC and California LSE enter into a 15-year PPA to acquire the output of a 100 MW wind power project with a 33% Capacity Factor. IBR and California LSE enter into firming and shaping contracts for IBR to deliver 33 MW every hour at COB, for 15 years. IBR has firm transmission from John Day to COB for 33 MW. IBR schedules day-ahead and hour-ahead based on forecasts, and secures resources to ensure the firm obligation will be met. Firming resources may come from other IBR renewable facilities, IBR thermal (Klamath gas), or system generation. When the facility generates at or above the firm obligation, 33 MW is delivered to COB from the facility and the firming resources. Excess generation is sold in the market. When the facility under-generates, IBR will deliver 33 MW from the facility and firming resources to COB. RECs from the period of over-generation are assigned to the power delivered from the period of under-generation in a periodic true-up. REC credit is always the lesser of renewable power generated or energy delivered. BPA Network Southern Intertie 13

NERC E-Tag: Klondike 3 to PG&E

Verification: Klondike 3 to PG&E NERC E-Tag and CEC RPS Certification

Verification: NERC E-Tag for Klondike 3 Firming Power with CEC RPS Certification

Metered vs. Delivered: the Audit Trail Bundled Power Purchase Agreement for Metered Output Energy (as generated MWh) = Metered Output RECS = Metered Output Energy Delivered Via Firming & Shaping Agreement Scheduled Energy Quantities (MWh) True-Up between Metered Output & Scheduled Energy Delivery Quantities: Invoice Quantities & E-Tags Delivery Proof: NERC E-Tags WREGIS Certificates = Metered Output RECs retired are lesser of Scheduled or Metered Output for the generation period 17

Benefits to California of Firmed and Shaped Delivered Intermittent Renewables California gets renewable generation, displacing conventional generation California LSEs get portfolio diversity Technology diversity Locational diversity California LSEs get more procurement choices to meet least-cost objectives Intermittency is managed outside California – CBAAs are relieved of this requirement when firmed and shaped renewables are delivered

Recommendations Re-define “bundled transaction” to include firm deliveries and firmed and firmed and shaped deliveries from eligible renewable facilities that do not have a first point of interconnection with a CBAA: Demonstrate Delivery Use NERC E-tags and WREGIS certificates as audit trail Require a threshold level of transmission availability Suggest 75 percent of expected average delivery or 20 percent of nameplate capacity to allow for flexibility Place requirement on the last leg of multiple wheels Narrow true-up window Rolling quarterly instead of calendar-based annual window

Iberdrola Renewables, Inc. kevin.lynch@iberdrolausa.com Thank You Iberdrola Renewables, Inc. kevin.lynch@iberdrolausa.com