Safety ► The safety officer for the entire team is Maia Madrid. ► During launch we will follow NAR safety rules and regulations. ► We will follow standard.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UF Hybrid Rocket Teams Mile High Club Brought to you by Chris Leonard, Ty Morton, Sam Darr, and Josh Childs.
Advertisements

University of Florida PDR Presentation. Vehicle Design Diameter: 5.86 Length: 135 Static Stability Margin: 1.4 Total Weight: 23.6 lbs.
UF Hybrid Rocket Teams Mile High Club Brought to you by Chris Leonard, Ty Morton, Alex Aueron, Sam Darr, and Josh Childs.
BYU Rocket Team Special thanks to:
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Northwestern University Space Technology and Rocketry Society (NUSTARS) NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2015.
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
“ The Other Woman ” National Association of Rocktry Level Three Certification Project By Steve Laird NAR #86948.
Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.
Launch Lug – helps to guide the rocket upward until it reaches enough velocity for the fins to engage. Parachute – assists in the safe recovery of the.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
Our Mission Statement  Launch a high-power rocket to an altitude of one mile carrying the Operation: Epic Beep payload package. At lift off, the rocket’s.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Critical Design Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Flight Readiness Review March Vehicle Criteria Testing and vehicle design Bulkheads: 9-Ply ½” birch plywood made by Public Missiles, Ltd or ¼ inch.
NASA CDR Presentation Spring Grove Area High School.
Alabama A&M University Rocket Program CDR Presentation 2011.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
November 7,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6.00 inches  Mass: oz. / 17.34lbs.  Span: inches  Center of Gravity: inches.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
CDR Clear Lake's Team Rocket 2929 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX
Intercollegiate Rocket Engineering Competition Spring 2015 EML Ethics and Design Project Organization.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
3/19/09. Animal Motor Works (AMW) K475WW High Power Rocket Motor. 54 mm casing, 40.3 cm long, 2.9 seconds burn time, 1394 N-sec total impulse, and
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT ADVANCE.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
Hemodynamics Star Splitters 4-H Club Two Rivers, WI Hemodynamics.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
FAMU PDR Presentation. Table of Contents Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications Static stability margin Plan for vehicle safety verification.
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB CDR PRESENTATION 1.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
Preliminary Design Review Clear Lake High School Team Rocket.
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Project Aegis Preliminary Design Review Team Members:
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
Critical Design Review Presentation
Preliminary Design Review
November 7, 2014.
Sounding Rocket PDR Team Name
November 7, 2014.
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
LESSON LD02 The Model Rocket
Final Readiness Review
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
2019 First Nation Launch – PDR Virtual Review
LESSON LD02 The Model Rocket
Dual-Deploy Launch Checklist
Target Altitude Safety Document
Presentation transcript:

Safety ► The safety officer for the entire team is Maia Madrid. ► During launch we will follow NAR safety rules and regulations. ► We will follow standard shop safety guidelines. ► We will follow MSDS recommendations. ► Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) will be available and used. ► Tools and materials will be handled safely and appropriately.

Vehicle Mission Statement, Requirements, and Success Criteria ► Our mission  Launch rocket close but not exceeding 1 mi. ► Requirements ► Success of mission  Payload close but not exceeding 1 mi.  Safely bring payload to earth under dual parachutes

Vehicle Design at System Level ► Fin assembly  Motor mount ► Recovery system  Avionics ► Overall airframes  Rail buttons ► Payload bay ► Nose cone

Vehicle Evaluation and Verification Metrics ► Stability ► Recovery ► Motor and Motor Retention ► Payload Bay

Vehicle Manufacturing, Verification, Integration, and Operations Plans ► Manufacturing Plan ► Verification Plan ► Integration Plan ► Operations Plan

Vehicle Confidence and Maturity of Design Our NAR certified helper reviewed our design and accepted it. Also, our rocket design is very similar to other rocket designs, so we are confident about our design.

Vehicle Outline of Final Assembly ► Main Airframe ► Payload Section ► Parachute Airframe ► Nose Cone ► Extras

Vehicle Safety and Environment ► The safety officer for our team is Blayne Vanderloop. ► Risk mitigations are on next slide. ► We do not have any environmental concerns.

Vehicle Risk Mitigations RiskProbabilityMitigation Black powder ignites prematurely during testing LowMake sure ignition sources are not primed when handling the charges Two few personnel on hand to build the rockets LowMake sure we have enough before hand and it there are not enough, find more people Run out of moneyLowMake sure we have enough money before we buy the parts Motor flies through rocketLowTake extra time to carefully epoxy. We will also always have another person watching our work Damage in shipping to HuntsvilleLowCarefully pack and protect the rocket before shipping Loss of a fin during launchLowCarefully epoxy the fins while making sure you use enough epoxy. Also always have another person watching you work Parts don’t fitLowSand down if too large, and make sure you ordered the right parts. Run out of paint during painting session Mid-lowMake sure we have more than enough paint on hand. Mis-measure parts when cuttingLowMake sure there are two people working on the measuring, and measure multiple times No place to build our rocketLowWe will find a place to build at least three weeks before the build starts

Rocket Diagram ► Motor Details – Slide Below

Vehicle Motor Details ► Manufacturer: AeroTech ► Entered: May 25, 2006 ► Last Updated: May 4, 2009 ► Mfr. Designation: K695 ► Brand Name: K695 ► Common Name: K695 ► Motor Type: reload ► Delays: M,L,P ► Diameter: 54.0mm ► Length: 41.0cm ► Total Weight: 1487g ► Prop. Weight: 903g ► Cert. Org.: Tripoli Rocketry Association, Inc. ► Cert. Date: ► Average Thrust: 695.0N ► Maximum Thrust: ► Total impulse: Ns ► Burn Time: ► Case Info: RMS 54/1706

Recovery Overview ► Launch vehicle is designed for dual deployment. ► Apogee and main events controlled by RRC 2 Mini and Aim Altimeters. ► Apogee deployment 24 inch rip stop nylon drogue chute with shock cord. ► Main deployment 84 inch rip stop nylon parachute with shock cord.

Recovery Safety ► Verify proposed parachutes and streamer performance in rocket simulation software. ► Test deployment and parachute/streamer selection in launch vehicle under motors with less thrust. ► Test ejection charges. ► Verify altimeter performance and ability to light proposed ejection charges. ► Test payload while bench testing with parachute.

Payload Changes ► Keeping steady pressure through tubes vs. simulating the pumping of the heart ► Testing effects of entire rocket flight vs. just atmospheric pressure ► Running each tube once throughout the same environment vs. using loops

Payload Overview ► Observe effects of rocket flight on three different simulations of blood pressure in veins. ► Use tubing, a pump, simulated human environment, pressure sensors, and a blood product. ► Use different size tubes, since Pressure = Force/Area. ► Record pressure on ascent, at apogee, and on descent.  On ascent: atmospheric change, G-forces  At apogee: microgravity, atmospheric pressure  On descent: atmospheric change, airframe movement

Payload Safety ► Safety officer of the payload group is Abby Dewane. ► Risks Mitigations in slide below ► Hazards ► Environmental concerns:  Blood  Battery

Payload Risk Mitigations RiskProbabilityMitigation Pipe Burst Low Check for Leaks Battery Leak Low Use Quality Battery Pump Failure Low Get Reliable Pump Wire Break Low Wrap in Electrical Tape Pressure Monitor Failure Low Test Monitor Altimeter Failure Low Get Reliable Altimeter

Educational Outreach ► Completed  4-H Forensics Competition, Manitowoc County ► Planned  Wayside School presentation/activities ► Ideas  Use forensics presentation to present to other 4-H clubs  Present to other schools in similar fashion as Wayside

Budget ► Finished Fundraisers  Ponderosa  Bake Sale  Flower Sale ► Ongoing Fundraisers  Seroogy’s Candy ► Expected Expenses  In Document