Overview of Draft 2 (Version 4.0) ENERGY STAR Specification for Computer Monitors Craig Hershberg US EPA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E NERGY S TAR ® June 9, 2000 Marla Sanchez, EPA Dehumidifiers.
Advertisements

ENERGY STAR ® Commercial Food Equipment Industry Meeting: Hot Food Holding Cabinets Rachel Schmeltz, US EPA Chicago Hilton May 20, 2003.
Residential Single Family Clothes Washer UES Measure Update Christian Douglass Regional Technical Forum February 18, 2015.
ENERGY STAR ® Most Efficient Consumer Electronics Sales Associate Training.
ENERGY STAR ® SALES ASSOCIATE TRAINING Digital-to-Analog Converter Boxes (DTAs)
1 E NERGY S TAR ® Monitor Industry Meeting April 29, 2002 San Francisco, CA Craig Hershberg US EPA
Specification Development Process Update. A Bit of Background….. TV / VCR specification revision (6/01- 6/02) June meeting: EIA, ITI, NEMA and EPA –discuss.
ENERGY STAR ® and Commercial Refrigeration Rachel Schmeltz US EPA Scott Shanklin The Cadmus Group, Inc.
ENERGY STAR Computer Monitor Test Methodology Craig Hershberg US EPA
ENERGY STAR ® SALES ASSOCIATE TRAINING Computers.
Residential Clothes Washers and Dryers Technical Subcommittee Ryan Firestone & Christian Douglass Regional Technical Forum March 10, PM.
1 Proposed ENERGY STAR Specifications for Computer Monitors Craig W. Hershberg ENERGY STAR Office Equipment and Consumer Electronics
ENERGY STAR ® & Air Cleaners January 14, 2003 McCormick Place, Chicago, IL Andrew Fanara, EPA
GREEN IT.  Green IT is basically the use of computers and IT technology in an environmentally sustainable and efficient way  Putting environmental sustainability.
SUSTAINABLE COMPUTERS Rina Takizawa.  OUTLINE  Our computer society  Sustainable computers - Energy Star -EPEAT (Electronic Products Environmental.
1 ENERGY STAR ® and Air Sealing Products: New Program Requirements Doug Anderson, US EPA 1.
Specification Discussion
1 ENERGY STAR ® : A Strategy to Improve the Efficiency of Power Supplies Andrew Fanara US EPA Climate Protection Partnerships Division ENERGY STAR Program.
April 12, Using a screen saver saves my monitor and/or energy. Turning my computer off and on reduces the life of the hard drive. I can use blank.
Enabling High Efficiency Power Supplies for Servers : Update on industry, government and utility initiatives Brian Griffith System Power Architect Intel.
1 Electronic Waste Recycling Act DTSC Final Regulations Workshop Presented by Charles Corcoran and Valetti Lang Department of Toxic Substances Control.
Tracking Energy Savings from the Energy Star % Televisions Program By Christina Steinhoff.
DEVELOPING AN ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY POLICY FOR HARNETT COUNTY SCHOOLS.
ENERGY STAR Program Requirements: Product Labeling July 22, 2003 Ann Bailey, Director ENERGY STAR Product Labeling.
E NERGY S TAR ® E NERGY S TAR Refrigerators and Freezers Richard H. Karney, US DOE July 18, 2001.
ENERGY STAR ® SALES ASSOCIATE TRAINING Televisions.
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE Reducing Standby Power to 1 Watt (and less) Alan Meier International Energy Agency
ENERGY STAR ® Commercial Food Equipment Industry Meeting: Pressureless Steamers Rachel Schmeltz, US EPA Chicago Hilton May 20, 2003.
Active Mode Discussion Chris Calwell Ecos Consulting.
ENERGY STAR ® Engaging Stakeholders: Bringing Social Change Peter Banwell Director, Product Marketing U.S. China Greener Consumption Forum March 22, 2013.
Proposed Deemed Savings Rates for Energy Star 3.0 Plus 30% Televisions By Christina Steinhoff May 2, 2010.
Update on ENERGY STAR ® Dehumidifier Specification Revision Andrew Fanara US Environmental Protection Agency
1 HOME ELECTRONICS ENERGY STAR ® SALES ASSOCIATE TRAINING.
Virginia Information Technologies Agency Green Technology Initiatives
E NERGY S TAR ® Refrigerated Beverage Vending Machine Industry Meeting Rachel Schmeltz, US EPA Georgia World Congress Center October 22, 2002.
SWEET CORN REGULAR ANALYSIS YEAR TO 01/11/2014. Copyright ©2012 The Nielsen Company. Confidential and proprietary Market Overview 2. Demographics.
1 ENERGY STAR ® Context ENERGY STAR program is voluntary; co-managed by EPA & DOE Specifications initially target the most energy efficient 25% of available.
ENERGY STAR ® SALES ASSOCIATE TRAINING Home Electronics.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
ENERGY STAR ® Commercial Food Equipment Industry Meeting: Fryers Rachel Schmeltz, US EPA Chicago Hilton May 20, 2003.
Circuit Rider Training Program (CRTP) Circuit Rider Professional Association Annual General Meeting and Conference August 30, 2012.
ENERGY STAR Criteria for Clothes Washers Overview of ENERGY STAR Criteria Setting Process and History of Clothes Washer Criteria Richard H. Karney, P.E.
E NERGY S TAR ® Preliminary Draft Specification for Vending Machines October 22, 2002 Rachel Schmeltz, EPA
A new impetus for Europe's energy efficiency policy Paul Hodson Head of Unit DG Energy, European Commission 09/10/2012.
1 Logo Use Guidelines Proper and consistent use of logo builds value and reinforces Sponsor’s connection to a larger national program Remember ENERGY STAR.
SDC I – Oct 02, ENERGY STAR  Founded by the EPA in 1992  Identifies and Promotes energy-efficient products  Computers were the first target 
Proposed Deemed Savings Rates for Energy Star 3.0 Plus 30% Televisions By Christina Steinhoff June 1,
Unit C3 Jacek Truszczynski 10/06/2010 Energy Star Board 10 June 2010.
Enabling Results: Monitoring and Evaluation in the U.S. ENERGY STAR Program September 28, 2012Ashley M. King Environment Officer.
AB 32 Implementation Nuts and Bolts IEP Annual Meeting September 22, 2008 Kevin Kennedy Office of Climate Change California Air Resources Board.
G053 - Lecture 05 Analysis Documentation Mr C Johnston ICT Teacher
Middle Fork Project Relicensing Process Plan April 25, 2006.
Community Based Adult Services (CBAS) Program Stakeholder Update Toby Douglas, Director California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) December 12,
E NERGY S TAR ® E NERGY S TAR Refrigerators and Freezers Richard H. Karney, US DOE July 18, 2001.
Exterior LED Area Lights
Status of and Next Steps for EPEAT® Holly Elwood Environmental Protection Agency Federal Environmental Symposium East 2009.
Buying Energy Efficient Products: Policy Requirements, Purchasing Tools, and Agency Experiences Christopher Payne Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
A University Challenge Program Save energy and the environment.
Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products: Policy Requirements & Purchasing Tools Christopher Payne Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory June 17,
1 NORTHWEST ENERGY EFFICIENCY ALLIANCE TV Initiative Transition to Long-Term Monitoring and Tracking Ty Stober April 8, 2014.
SEAD-funded APEC-CAST Project Proposal Solicitation Update 39 th Meeting of the APEC Expert Group on Energy Efficiency & Conservation 28 February 2012.
1 NORTHWEST ENERGY EFFICIENCY ALLIANCE TV Initiative Webinar Ty Stober & Praveen Chalise March 25, 2014.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Draft Labeling Policy Guidance for N- 60 Testing Claims for Boneless Beef Manufacturing.
Contracting Officer Podcast Slides
All Wales Safeguarding Procedures Review Project
Competent Body Meeting Ecolabel Criteria for ‘Televisions’
1115 Demonstration Waiver Extension Summary
Competent Body Meeting Ecolabel Criteria for ‘Televisions’
Phase 1 Rulemaking Timeline*
The new EU Waste Legislation: Implementing and Delegated Acts
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Draft 2 (Version 4.0) ENERGY STAR Specification for Computer Monitors Craig Hershberg US EPA

2 Agenda and Goals for Today’s Meeting Present and discuss changes between the Draft 1 and Draft 2 specification Present an overview of the test data provided by manufacturers Discuss completion of the computer monitor test methodology Discuss Partner Commitments, including labeling of computer monitors GOALS: Provide EPA’s rationale for the Draft 2 specification Gather industry feedback on Draft 2 Outline next steps and a timeline for finalizing the Version 4.0 specification

3 Time-Frame for How We Arrived at Today’s Meeting July 1999: Monitor MOU Version 3.0 went into effect April 2002: Computer monitor stakeholders meeting in California. Collected feedback on Draft 1 Version 4.0 specification May 2002: European computer monitor stakeholders meeting in France June 2002 – February 2003: Test methodology development phase (EPA and industry) February – May 2003: Data collection and testing phase (EPA and industry) May – July 2003: Data analysis phase, and development of Draft 2 Version 4.0 specification (EPA) July 22, 2003: Stakeholder meeting to discuss Draft 2 specification

4 Highlights of the Draft 2 Specification Designed to be a performance-based specification –Does not differentiate based on technology (CRT, LCD, etc.) –Recognizes best performing monitors in the marketplace (in terms of energy-efficiency) Based on test data voluntarily submitted to EPA by many manufacturers Includes detailed test methodology for how to test in all three modes Contains Tier 1 and Tier 2 maximum allowable power consumption for On, Sleep, and Off modes Allows various screen sizes, technologies, and brand-names of computer monitors to qualify under the Tier 1 requirements Establishes partner commitments (to be discussed later today) –Labeling –Grandfathering Provides extended effective dates to accommodate the removal of grandfathering

5 Overview of Data Submitted to EPA by Manufacturers

6 Overview of Data {1} 2 rounds of voluntary testing –February - April and May - June 19 manufacturers represented (15 brand-names and 4 additional OEMs) –49 CRTs, 40 LCDs, 1 Plasma display 87 models included in analysis (3 represented models excluded due to testing at incorrect voltage/frequency combination)

7 Overview of Data {2} For perspective: Only 265 computer monitor models in 2002 with retail sales over 100 units (data from NPD) 15 top selling models from Q represented –10 out of top 20 selling CRTs – Top 5 selling LCDs Data represents 15” to 24” models and one 30” model Manufacturers encouraged to submit testing data on latest, highest resolution models –Many models EPA has test data for are highlighted as “NEW” on manufacturer Web sites Several models from data set reviewed in June 2003 issue of Consumer Reports

8 Changes to Draft 2 from Draft 1

9 Several Minor Changes to Definitions Operational mode definitions reordered and clarified –Now listed from highest to lowest power consumption –Examples of “a request from a user” are included Does Version 4.0 effectively differentiate between computer monitors and televisions? –“A commercially available electronic product with a display screen….capable of displaying output information from a computer via one or more inputs, such as VGA, DVI, and/or IEEE 1394.” –Specification attempts to differentiate TVs and computer monitors based on how they are marketed and sold Is it clear as to what can and cannot qualify under Version 4.0, or is further discussion needed?

10 Draft 2 Version 4.0 Energy-Efficiency Requirements

11 Energy-Efficiency Requirements Tier 1 Requirements On Mode:Y=33X+30 Sleep Mode:  4 watts Off Mode:  2 watts Effective Date: November 1, 2004 Tier 2 Requirements On Mode: If X 1 megapixel, then Y=26X-5 Sleep Mode:  2 watts Off Mode:  1 watt Effective Date: November 1, 2005

12 On Mode Requirement Tier 1 Set at Y=33X+30 Y = watts (rounded up to nearest whole number) X = number of megapixels (in decimal form) 60% of all monitors in EPA’s data set meet Tier 1 in On Mode Example: A computer monitor with 1,920,000 pixels (resolution of 1600 x 1200) has maximum power consumption allowance of 94 watts 33(1.92)+30=93.36 or 94 watts

13 Sample Tier 1 On Mode Values Resolution*Total PixelsMaximum Power Allowed Tier I 640 x ,20041 watts 800 x ,00046 watts 1024 x ,43256 watts 1280 x 10241,310,72074 watts 1600 x 12001,920,00094 watts 1800 x 14402,592, watts 2048 x 15363,145, watts * CRT = Preferred pixel format with highest resolution intended to be driven at 75 Hz LCD = Native Resolution

14 Sleep and Off Mode Requirements Tier 1 Sleep Mode:  4 watts –One Sleep Mode requirement –References to Sleep Mode Default Time have been removed from the computer monitor specification –30-minute default time for Sleep Mode defined in computer agreement 60-minute default time for Deep Sleep Mode not applicable –87% of all monitors in EPA’s data set meet Tier 1 in Sleep Mode Off Mode:  2 watts –78% of all monitors in EPA’s data set meet Tier 1 in Off Mode

15 Tier 1 Qualifying Models: All Operating Modes Units That Meet All 3 Modes Monitor TypeNumberTotalPercent CRT84717 LCD PDP010 Don’t Meet44-- Total87--

16 Tier 1 Line of Qualification 17% of all CRTs qualify 90% of all LCDs qualify

17 49% of Models Meet Tier 1 Levels Allows approximately 49% of all monitors from EPA’s data set to qualify for ENERGY STAR under Tier 1 –(17% of 47 CRTs and 90% of 39 LCDs)

18 Draft 2 Version 4.0 Energy-Efficiency Requirements Tier 2

19 On Mode Requirement Set at: If X 1 megapixel, then Y=26X-5 Y = watts (rounded up to nearest whole number) X = number of megapixels (in decimal form) 22% of all monitors in EPA’s current data set meet Tier 2 in On Mode Example: A computer monitor with 786,432 pixels (resolution of 1024 x 768) has maximum power consumption allowance of 20 watts A computer monitor with 1,920,000 pixels (resolution of 1600 x 1200) has maximum power consumption allowance of 45 watts 26(1.92)-5=44.92 or 45 watts

20 Sleep and Off Mode Requirements Sleep Mode:  2 watts –63% of all monitors in EPA’s current data set meet Tier 2 in Sleep Mode Off Mode:  1 watt –57% of all monitors in EPA’s current data set meet Tier 2 in Off Mode –Will harmonize with FEMP –Will follow 1-watt level that many ENERGY STAR specifications are moving towards

21 Tier 2 Line of Qualification 31% of all LCDs qualify 31% of all LCDs qualify now

22 Proposed Tier 1 and Tier 2 Lines of Qualification

23 Tier 2 Qualifying Models: All Operating Modes 14% of all monitors from EPA’s current data set qualify for ENERGY STAR –Tier 2 provided as an “energy-efficiency roadmap” for manufacturers – will be revisited prior to taking effect, to ensure it is still applicable to the marketplace at that time

24 Big Picture: Potential Savings Projected Savings by 2010 = Energy: approximately billion kWh Dollars: approximately $14 billion CO 2 : approximately 37.6 billion lbs, or equivalent to taking approximately 2.9 million cars off the road Per Unit Savings = Energy: Up to 147 kWh annually Dollars: Up to $ annually Notes: Savings (1) Include On, Sleep, and Off Modes, and (2) Assume CRTs are replaced with a mix of ENERGY STAR qualified LCDs and CRTs, with increases in market penetration going to LCDs.

25 # 1 in Carbon, kWh, and $ Savings for 2010

26 Timeline and Version 4.0 Effective Dates

27 August 12, 2003: Deadline for feedback on Draft 2 September 2003: Distribute Draft 3 Version 4.0 specification October 2003: Finalize and distribute Version 4.0 November 1, 2004: Tier 1 effective date –All products with a date of manufacture on or after November 1, 2004 must meet new Version 4.0 requirements to qualify as ENERGY STAR November 1, 2005: Tier 2 effective date –All products with a date of manufacture on or after November 1, 2005 must meet Tier 2 requirements to qualify as ENERGY STAR Timeline and Proposed Effective Dates for Version 4.0 Specification {1}

28 Timeline and Proposed Effective Dates for Version 4.0 Specification {2} November 2003 November 2004 November 2005 Issue New Spec Effective Date of Tier 1 Effective Date of Tier 2 Transition Period Current Specification (Version 3.0) New Specification (Version 4.0) Tier 1 qualification based on date of manufacture Tier 2 qualification based on date of manufacture July 2003

29 Removal of Grandfathering Language EPA has removed grandfathering language from ENERGY STAR specifications –Delivers on consumer expectations of high efficiency performance and energy savings –Ensures that ENERGY STAR's ability to differentiate more efficient products is not undermined by high percentages of labeled products qualifying at less stringent performance levels EPA plans to accommodate manufacturers by extending effective dates of the Version 4.0 specification

30 Thank You