SPF SIG State-Level Evaluation COMMUNITY LEVEL INSTRUMENT (CLI): PART 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Managing to Outcomes Creating a Result-Driven Culture September 15, 2010 Jewel Bazilio-Bellegarde, CNCS Ken Terao and Anna Marie Schmidt, Project STAR.
Advertisements

Program Evaluation. Overview and Discussion of: Objectives of evaluation Process evaluation Outcome evaluation Indicators & Measures Small group discussions.
Evaluation Capacity Building Identifying and Addressing the Fields Needs.
SRC Participation in Comprehensive Statewide Needs Assessment STATE REHABILITATION COUNCIL DISCUSSION POINTS JUNE 24,
Local Evaluator Meeting June 19, 2012 University of Maryland School of Pharmacy.
What I Did During My Summer Internship! STEP-UP Leadership 2008 Summer Internship Final Project Madelyn James UIC – Ph.D. Candidate.
Faculty Learning Circle Introduction The goal of Achieving College Success Now! project is to impact post-secondary academic success of students with disabilities.
Cross-Site Evaluation. What are the Acronyms? DACCC – Data Analysis Coordination and Consolidation Center DITIC – Data Information Technology Infrastructure.
Governor’s Prevention Initiative for Youth: Evaluation Jane A. Ungemack, Dr.P.H. Evaluator University of Connecticut Health Center.
1 © 2006 by Smiths Group: Proprietary Data Smiths Group Online Performance Review Tool Training.
Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Data Bigger Picture Updated 5/22/14.
MAI SPF MRT Minority Aids Initiative Strategic Planning Framework Management and Reporting Tool (MAI SPF MRT) HIV Cohort 7 Grantee Meeting HIV Cohort 7.
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Presented By: Tracy Johnson, Central CAPT
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.
SPF SIG State-Level Evaluation PARTICIPANT LEVEL INSTRUMENT (PLI)
A Tool to Monitor Local Level SPF SIG Activities
First 5 Placer Summary of Demographics, Services Provided & Accomplishments.
This product was developed by Florida’s Positive Behavior Support Project through University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
TITLEIIA(3) IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM 1.
SPF SIG Evaluation Closeout Amy Mason, LMSW Evaluation Coordinator Iowa Consortium for Substance Abuse Research and Evaluation.
Substance Abuse Prevention Collaborative (SAPC) Orientation August 18 th, 2015 Massachusetts Technical Assistance Partnership for Prevention Amanda Doster.
Community-Level Instrument (CLI) Part I Training MSPF Evaluation Team Pharmaceutical Health Services Research Department.
MSPF Evaluation Meeting Wednesday, September 18, 2013 at The University of Maryland School of Pharmacy.
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Perspectives on Impact Evaluation Cairo, Egypt March 29 – April 2, 2009 Presented by: Wayne M. Harding. Ed.M., Ph.D., Director of Projects, Social Science.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
Welcome to the Youth Suicide Prevention Webinar: The Nuts and Bolts of Data Collection Forms For Audio: call and enter participant code:
TRACKING AND REPORTING PROGRESS AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT AmeriCorps Program Directors’ Kickoff: 2015 –
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
Evaluation Requirements and South Dakota-PLI Webinar January 5, 2015 BROOKE BLAALID, MSW AND DOUG PIPER, PHD SPF PFS EVALUATION B CONSULTING, LLC 1.
Overview June,  Sub-recipients grant applications will go to ADAMHS/ADAS Boards only.  ADAMHS/ADAS Boards will be expected to identify a primary.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
Grantee Briefing for the FY 2012 Supplemental Funding for Quality Improvement in Health Centers Interim Report U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Director of Evaluation and Accountability Manager, UW’s Grand Rapids, Michigan Robert McKown, CIRS Director of Evaluation and Accountability Sherri.
Early Identification of, and Referrals to, Early Identification Services for Autism and Other Developmental Delays Request for Proposals Information Session.
SOUTH DAKOTA’S Partnership for Success Evaluation Brooke Blaalid, MSW Evaluation Manager B Consulting, LLC November 21, 2014 Chamberlain, SD B Consulting,
2013 NEO Program Monitoring & Evaluation Framework.
Doug Piper Brooke Blaalid Manda Walters Population Health Institute School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin – Madison Webinar 10 January.
Evaluating a Cultural Competency Curriculum for Disaster Preparedness and Crisis Response Guadalupe Pacheco, MSW HHS Office of Minority Health Eileen Hanrahan.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Bureau of Federal Educational Programs Updates _________________________________.
Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.
Brooke Blaalid, MSW Evaluation Manager B Consulting, LLC October 16, 2014 Chamberlain, SD B Consulting, LLC 1.
CaMSP Cohort 8 Orientation Cohort 8 State and Local Evaluation Overview, Reporting Requirements, and Attendance Database February 23, 2011 California Department.
State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs State Incentive Grant Project Overview Michael Cunningham Deputy Director, Program Services.
Reporting Updated 05/2014. Handbook References Chapter 3: Administrative Guidance – Demographic Report – Match Report – Annual Report – Deaf and Hard.
Adult Education Block Grant Webinar October 23, 2015
 Mission: To reduce the impact of substance abuse and mental illness on America’s communities  Roles: ● Voice & Leadership ● Funding-Service Capacity.
Building a Comprehensive Approach Part 2: Using Complementary Strategies Erica Schmitz MESAP: Maine’s Environmental Substance Abuse Prevention Center Medical.
Click to edit Master title style SNAP-Ed NEOPB FFY GUIDANCE FUNDING APPLICATION REQUEST Informational Conference Call October 21, :30-11:30am.
Iowa Partnerships for Success (IPFS) Orientation Webinar Iowa Department of Public Health, Division of Behavioral Health.
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
INTRODUCING THE PSBA-GTO ACT FOR YOUTH CENTER OF EXCELLENCE IN CONSULTATION WITH HEALTHY TEEN NETWORK Planning for Evidence-Based Programming.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
TRAC e-Training. What are the TRAC Annual Goals? Required for all grantees Specific to TRAC activities o Number of consumers served o Infrastructure indicators.
Integrity Accountability Solutions RSAT Program Performance Measures National Workshop – Chicago 2014 Jimmy Steyee Deputy Program Manager at CSR, Incorporated.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration December 9 th, 2014 Presented by: Division of Youth Services.
Lessons Learned: The Minnesota Young Adult Alcohol Survey American Evaluation Association Annual Conference October 26, 2012.
STRATEGIC PLANNING January 12-13, Where are we in the planning process? Needs assessment data collection and prioritization - Consequence - Consumption.
1 Effectively Addressing Administrative Challenges of Implementing Title I, Part D Katie Deal, Rob Mayo, Liann Seiter, and Jake Sokolsky.
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Sample Fit-Gap Kick-off
BSAS Quarterly Coordinator Meeting Friday, October 28, 2016
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
ECCO Hours and Reach Webinar
Presentation transcript:

SPF SIG State-Level Evaluation COMMUNITY LEVEL INSTRUMENT (CLI): PART 2

 SAMHSA/CSAP cross-site evaluation overview  Purpose of the CLI: Parts 1 & 2  Data collection required for the CLI: Part 2  Roles and responsibilities  Timing and submission deadlines  Resources available WEBINAR AGENDA

 All communities funded by the SPF SIG are required to submit cross-site evaluation data.  Quick Cross-site evaluation terms in cross-site evaluation tools:  “Grantee” (State of AK who received the SPF SIG)  “Subrecipients” (6 funded communities in Alaska) SAMHSA CROSS-SITE EVALUATION INSTRUMENTS

 CLI: Part 1 –progress through the Strategic Prevention Framework  CLI: Part 2 –information about the specific interventions being implemented (adaptations, # reached, demographics)  PLI – participant change in alcohol consumption resulting from individual level interventions  Completed annually throughout the SPF SIG (Steps 1-5)  Completed quarterly for each intervention once implementation begins (Step 4)  Completed by participants of individual level interventions at pre, post, & follow-up (Step 4) SAMHSA CROSS-SITE EVALUATION INSTRUMENTS

5 PURPOSE OF COLLECTING CLI: PART 1 AND 2 DATA  Assess  community implementation of the SPF process  changes in communities’ prevention infrastructure  types of interventions implemented  challenges to the implementation of the SPF process and alcohol prevention interventions  overall impact of the SPF SIG initiative  Identify  characteristics of community-level interventions  approaches that are most effective in producing population- level and participant-level outcomes.

Complete Q163 in CLI:Part 1 for each intervention being implemented in your Strategic Plan (We will individually work with you on this): 1.Intervention Name 2.Strategy Name (if a multi-component intervention) 3.CSAP Strategy Type  Alternative Drug-free Activities  Prevention Education  Problem Identification and Referral  Information Dissemination  Environmental Strategies  Community-Based Processes Complete CLI:Part 2 for each strategy identified in Q163 HOW ARE CLI: PART 1 AND 2 INSTRUMENTS LINKED TOGETHER?

7 THINGS TO KEEP IN MIND  Interventions/ Strategies are planned activities intended to change alcohol related behavior (not general capacity building)  Defining strategies accurately in Q163 is important because it determines which questions are asked in CLI Part II.  Detailed guidance, including examples, can be found in the document “Detailed Guidance for Completing Q163.” Again, we will work closely with you to complete Q163!!

 Uses a combination of multiple choice, fill in the blank, and open-ended questions to gain information about your implemented strategies.  Completed quarterly online for each strategy  Some information is best tracked on a regular basis to provide accurate number in quarterly reports  Completed by Project Directors and Evaluators  May take up to 3 hours to complete each quarter CLI: PART 2

Strategy Information  Consumption pattern the strategy targets  Intervening variables the strategy targets  Date strategy first funded  Whether or not strategy is evidence-based  Criteria to determine whether it was evidence-based  Areas served by strategy (city, zip code, estimated population)  Cost of strategy during reporting period  Percent of funding from SPF SIG funds COMPONENTS OF CLI: PART 2

Strategy Adaptations  Whether or not it is a new strategy  Whether or not any adaptations were made:  Target population  Curriculum or manual  Dosage  Duration  Setting  Cultural appropriateness  Whether or not any participant satisfaction was conducted on cultural appropriateness COMPONENTS OF CLI: PART 2

Strategy Outcomes  Whether or not any outcome data was collected during reporting period (attitudes, behaviors, knowledge)  Sampling strategy for outcome data collection  Whether any outcome data was analyzed during reporting period  Which CSAP National Outcome Measures were collected during reporting period COMPONENTS OF CLI: PART 2

Strategy Subforms (one is required for each strategy depending on which CSAP 6 category your strategy falls under):  Alternative Drug-free Activities  Community-Based Processes  Prevention Education  Information Dissemination  Problem Identification and Referral  Environmental Strategies All are a little bit different in their content COMPONENTS OF CLI: PART 2

 IOM Classification (Universal, Selective, Indicated) To be reported quarterly for each strategy:  Number of participants reached in total  Number of new participants reached  Demographics of new participants reached  Number of females/males reached  Number of individuals reached within age categories (0-11, 12-17, , 21-25, 26+)  Number of individuals reached within ethnic categories (American Indian/AK Native, Asian, Black or African American, White, Multiracial, Other, Unknown) CLI: PART 2 STRATEGY SUBFORMS: PREVENTION EDUCATION, ALTERNATIVE DRUG-FREE ACTIVITIES, AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION/REFERRAL

 Unduplicated count of individuals reached during fiscal reporting period (since last October 1 st)  percentage of individuals who were reached since last October 1st  % female/male  % within age categories (0-11, 12-17, 18-20, 21-25, 26+)  % reached within ethnic categories (American Indian/AK Native, Asian, Black or African American, White, Multiracial, Other, Unknown) Percentages should equal 100% CLI: PART 2 STRATEGY SUBFORMS: COMMUNITY BASED PROCESSES, ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES, AND INFORMATION DISSEMINATION SUBFORMS

Some examples…… Social Marketing Environmental strategies  # of radio ads created  # of radio ads aired Enforcement Environmental Strategies  # of compliance checks conducted  # of sobriety checkpoints established OTHER QUESTIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES

Reporting Period Subrecipient Data Entry State Evaluator Review & Feedback Final Subrecipient Edits Final Submission by State Evaluator Due Dates SUBMISSION DEADLINES FOR CLI: PART 2 …..Continue with same schedule throughout life of grant

17  Local assistance by state evaluators  Submission deadlines schedule  Guidance documents  1) Question by Question (QxQ) guides for CLI Parts I and II  2) Detailed Guidance document for Q163  3) Checklist for Reviewing the CLI Parts I and II  Frequently Asked Questions  Federal Cross-site evaluation team collects grantee questions and disseminates FAQ document to grantees regularly.  CLI Response Report  Communities can print reports showing what responses they have given in previous reporting periods. WHAT ASSISTANCE IS AVAILABLE?

18 WHAT ASSISTANCE IS AVAILABLE TO COMMUNITIES? (CONT’D)  On-line Instrument Training Video  Interactive videos demonstrating navigation through the web-based MRT system. sGLICLIPLITrainingVideos/tabid/1114/Default.aspx sGLICLIPLITrainingVideos/tabid/1114/Default.aspx  Help Line  If you experience technical difficulties in using the web-based system, contact the DITIC Help Desk by or phone DITIC-4-U ( ) Monday - Friday, 9:00 am - 8:00 pm EST