Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing Educators for Rater Agreement and Sustainability: Planning for Professional Learning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Day 2: Learning and Teaching Session 3: Effective Feedback NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
Advertisements

RESA Implementation Sessions Day 2 Process Welcome – Before we Begin… Connect to the Internet Give copies of your Professional Development Plans to Facilitator.
RESA Implementation Sessions Day 2 Process Welcome – Before we Begin… Connect to the Internet Visit the Wiki at
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Winter, 2014 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Module 2: Using Instructional and Leadership Frameworks in Educator Evaluation 1.
Creating Highly Effective Building Leadership Teams 18 critical components to help you identify your Building Leadership Team’s level of implementation.
Welcome Back Review of Day 1 Feedback Agenda Review for Day 2.
Handouts and Materials  and-teaching/teacher-principal- evaluation-project/
TPEP Roundtable May 16, Slide/Handouts evaluation-project/
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Module 2: Using Instructional and Leadership Frameworks in Educator Evaluation 1 March 2013.
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Time Management and Crucial Conversations for Principals.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
TWSSP Cape Flattery Winter Workshop Saturday, February 7th, 2015.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Slide 1 TPEP Implementation: Structures, roles and policy implications ESD 112 March 12, 2015.
Session Materials  Wiki 
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing Educators for Rater Agreement and Feedback: Planning for Professional Learning.
Assessment for Learning May 6, 2014 Basia Kiehler Sandy Riley.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Providing High-Quality Feedback for Continuous Professional Growth and Development 1 Revised.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting February,
TPEP Roundtable February 24, Slide/Handouts evaluation-project/
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Gathering Evidence 1 June 2013.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting January, 2014.
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
1 System Implementation and Monitoring: Regional Session Day 1 Spring, 2013 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Spring, 2014 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Session Materials  Wiki
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A
Shelly Rider AMSTI-USA Director.  To understand the effects of the Common Core State Standards on mathematical classroom instruction  To recognize the.
Regional Training Sessions The Arts, Grades 9-12 Day One John Phillips Education Officer, The Arts Ontario Ministry of Education November, 2009.
TPEP Year 3 Day 5 It’s been a long journey..... In remembrance Serving children, staff and communities
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
Instructional Leadership Supporting High Standards.
November/December ISLN December 9, 2015 Today’s materials can be accessed at html.
WestEd.org MA Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Career Vocational Technical Education Institute April 4, 2013 Sheraton, Framingham Robin.
Capacity Building with SAS Day 1 April 18, Welcome What is your Primary Role in your School or District? District level administrator Building level.
RLT Writing Part 2 April 20, Activator Polarity Management ▪ Example ▪ 2 posters ▪ Upside (+) and downside (-) comments ▪ Gallery walk.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Session Materials  Wiki 
Instructional Leadership: Implementing Conditions for Success.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Maximizing Rater Agreement 1 June 2013.
Welcome Back STLN January 27, Agenda Welcome Recap of November Updates ? What’s Next? Tasks/ Work analysis Break More looking at student work Lunch.
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Welcome! CKEC Science Teacher Leader Network November 23, 2015
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
Jump into Blended and Online Course Development We’ll Help You Look Before You Leap! Stephanie Boychuk Learning Technologies Support Specialist Vancouver.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
1 Instructional Framework & Teacher Evaluation. 2 Welcome Name School, Assignment, Years in Education One thing you are hoping to get out of today!
Creating Student Success through the Data Team Process Mason City Community School District Kathryn Schladweiler TJ.
Promoting Perseverance in Mathematics Borough Instructional Leads for Mathematics Math Team Department of STEM December 3, 2015.
1 Sample Introductory Rounds Session, Day 2. Learning Goals By the end of Day 2, we will:  Understand the elements of the instructional core  Be familiar.
Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,
Academic Conversations
Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Show me the evidence!!.
Presentation transcript:

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing Educators for Rater Agreement and Sustainability: Planning for Professional Learning

 Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards Connections  A Virtual Presentation  Sharing Electronic Resources 2 TPEP Sessions for

Today’s Agenda Learning Targets 3  Welcome Back!  Review of Rater Agreement  Examples of Practice  Kelso and Vancouver  Implementing: Sustaining through Professional Growth  Lunch  Team Planning  I can describe the OSPI working definition of rater agreement and the stages of development.  I can explain practices that support high quality professional learning processes for teachers, principals and district offices staff to support quality feedback and rater agreement.  I can describe our district’s plan to create sustainable practice and maximize rater agreement.

 Pausing  Paraphrasing  Posing Questions  Putting Ideas on the Table  Providing Data  Paying Attention to Self and Others  Presuming Positive Intentions Group Norms 4

Professional learning is the underpinning of the evaluation system. TPEP Core Principles 5

Learning – A Review I can describe the OSPI working definition of rater agreement and the stages of development. 6

Learning Content: OSPI Stages of Rater Agreement 10

 Once we reach Stage 3, we do not “graduate.”  Rater agreement is NOT ensured by a single training or certification test.  We must revisit and review key learnings from Stage 1 and Stage 2 to avoid drift.  Provide ongoing professional development including ongoing calibration conversations involving real-life or video-based observation. Continuous Improvement Process: 11

12 OSPI Stages of Rater Agreement IndividuallyDistrict Teams Read/ Review : “Rater Agreement in Washington State’s Evaluation System” 1.Highlight/underline key points that confirms your understanding or challenges your understanding of Rater Agreement. 2.Note questions you may have. Create District Chart: 1.Questions you have. 2.What is taking place in your district that can be applied to the overarching roles and responsibilities chart (page 2)?

Short Break Time Post your District Chart and Move to Job Alike Groups! 13 See you in 7 minutes

Synthesize, Apply and Connect I can explain practices that support high quality professional learning processes for teachers, principals and district offices staff to support sustainability, quality feedback and rater agreement.. 14

 Overarching Roles and Responsibilities Notes Organizer  During Presentation/Job Alike Conversations Gather Examples of Practice:  District Office  Principal  Teachers 15 Suggested Structure for Collecting Examples of Practice

Sharing in Job Alike: What ideas does this example and the strategies shared spark for your district plans to support your work? What will you bring back to your district team that could be added to your plan for rater agreement and sustainability? 16

Short Break Time Return to Job Alike Groups! 17 See you in 7 minutes

18 Sharing in Job Alike: What ideas does this example and the strategies shared spark for your district plans to support your work? What will you bring back to your district team that could be added to your plan for rater agreement and sustainability?

Implementing I can describe our district’s plan to create sustainable practice and maximize rater agreement. Return to District Teams with Chart from This Morning 19

 Content  Culture  Rater Agreement  Data  *as a result of Rater Agreement District Planning Tool Areas of Rater Agreement Includes: 20 Rater Agreement/Sustainability Reflection Tool

 Instructional Framework Specialist Recruitment  OSPI – Due February 9 th  Information on OSPI TPEP files/cffs/icffs/ files/cffs/icffs/  Learning-focused Supervision; Books Available Sustainability Resources 21

 Add to Chart: What did we learn from others today that we might apply to the conversations/activities/protocols in our district?  District Group Share: Identify/share something that is going well and share an area of focus for your district? Activity : District Team 22

 Take a few minutes and create at least three sticky notes for the Stop/Start/Continue Chart on your way out.  Stop: What didn’t work in this session? What should not be included in the future?  Start: What didn’t happen that should have in this session? What should be planned for future sessions?  Continue: What worked well and should be continued in future sessions like this? 23 Debrief StopStartContinue

24 LUNCH! Clock Hours: Instructor: ESD112 Staff “Regional Learning Network Session” VAD Hours Thank you!