DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
Advertisements

Robin L. Donaldson May 5, 2010 Prospectus Defense Florida State University College of Communication and Information.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
Children’s subjective well-being Findings from national surveys in England International Society for Child Indicators Conference, 27 th July 2011.
Ethan Young & Lindsey Meteraud Advised by: Susan Wolfgram, Ph.D. University of Wisconsin-Stout Research Problem Just over 42% of students surveyed believe.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
Work motivation among healthcare professionals in the Saudi hospitals Presented by Nouf Sahal Al-Harbi Supervised by: Dr. Saad Al-Ghanim 2008.
SUPERINTENDENT AND BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBER PERCEPTIONS REGARDING PREFERRED LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS FOR SUPERINTENDENTS IN WEST VIRGINIA Keith A. Butcher.
Research Problem: Father involvement plays important role in development of a child; for fathers who are incarcerated; presents challenges that seem insurmountable.
Gender Difference on Academic Workload and Committed Relationships Mallory Van Lin and Amanda Barnes, Advisor: Susan Wolfgram Research Problem In today's.
Attachment as a moderator of the effect of security in mentoring on subsequent perceptions of mentoring and relationship quality with college teachers.
Our Group Plan for a Mixed Methods Study by John W. Creswell, Ph.D. and Vicki L. Plano Clark, M.S. University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Effect of Staff Attitudes on Quality in Clinical Microbiology Services Ms. Julie Sims Laboratory Technical specialist Strengthening of Medical Laboratories.
CORRELATIO NAL RESEARCH METHOD. The researcher wanted to determine if there is a significant relationship between the nursing personnel characteristics.
The Effect of Predisposing Factors and Concussion Rate on DIII College Football Players: A Retrospective Study Jon Purvis, Robert Blume, Jenna Chinburg,
2 Enter your Paper Title Here. Enter your Name Here. Enter Your Paper Title Here. Enter Your Name Here. ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JOB SATISFACTION.
An investigation of factors moderating the relationship between job satisfaction and turnover intention among bank’s staff in Thailand By Warayu Thienpramuk.
THE SOCIAL IMPACTS OF TOURISM ON LOCAL COMMUNITY’S QUALITY OF LIFE Ivana Pavlić, Ana Portolan & Barbara Puh University of Dubrovnik, Department of Economics.
Windy Dorsey Oral Proposal Defense July 27, 2015 Dr. Mary B Ratliff, Ed.D. Committee Member Dr. Steven Bingham, Ed.D. Committee Member Dr. Mary Beth Roth,
Tulane University 1 Tulane University Employee Satisfaction Survey Results October 2012.
Gender INDEPENDENT T-TEST TABLE VariableMalesFemalestdfSig. IFL1.250 (.543) (.810) **0.000 COM1.850 (1.189) (1.488) **0.000.
RESEARCH PROPOSAL: THEORY, RESEARCH QUESTION & HYPOTHESIS
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Indicators of Family Engagement Melanie Lemoine and Monica Ballay Louisiana State Improvement Grant/SPDG.
Everyone Has A Role and Responsibility
Action Research March 12, 2012 Data Collection. Qualities of Data Collection  Generalizability – not necessary; goal is to improve school or classroom.
Organizational Culture for Research Integrity in Academic Health Centers Jim Vander Putten (University of Arkansas-Little Rock) Carol R. Thrush (University.
Male Athlete and Non Athlete Body Image Differences Haley Heikkinen & Jessica Arp Advised by: Susan Wolfgram, Ph.D. University of Wisconsin-Stout Research.
L 1 Chapter 12 Correlational Designs EDUC 640 Dr. William M. Bauer.
Emergency Nurses’ Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Pain Keri Dillon, BSN, RN, CEN; Virginia Morse, PhD, RN; Sharon Ward, MS, RN, CEN Introduction Purpose.
. Relationship between Types of Sex Education and High Risk Sexual Behavior Andrea M. Anderson & Kaitlyn Harlander Advised by: Susan Wolfgram, Ph.D. University.
Engineering Education International Diversity in Graduate Engineering Education: Development of a Multi Institutional Survey Erin Crede Maura Borrego Department.
The Use of Distance Learning Technology by Business Educators for Credentialing and Instruction Christal C. Pritchett, Ed.D. NABTE Research Session Anaheim,
Educators’ Attitudes about the Accessibility and Integration of Technology into the Secondary Curriculum Dr. Christal C. Pritchett Auburn University
Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches
By Cao Hao Thi - Fredric W. Swierczek
DEVELOPEMENT OF A HOLISTC WELLNESS MODEL FOR MANAGERS IN TERTIARY INSTITUTIONS Petrus Albertus Botha Tshwane University of Technology Polokwane Delivery.
Lecture 02.
Chapter 1 Introducing Organizational Behavior People Make the Difference.
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR S T E P H E N P. R O B B I N S W W W. P R E N H A L L. C O M / R O B B I N S T E N T H E D I T I O N © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Intelligent Consumer Chapter 14 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following.
Welcome to todays session!  Please take a moment to check your connection and audio settings.  If this is your first time using LYNC please see the resources.
CALL in TESOL Teacher Training Greg Kessler Ohio University.
A Study of the Causes of Turnover among Erie County’s Child Protective Services Caseworkers: Vicarious Trauma, Supervisory Style, Bureaucratic Structure,
Job Satisfaction among US Probation and Pretrial Services Officers in Buffalo, NY: The Role of Professional Quality of Life, Training, and Agency Culture.
Civility Among Healthcare Employees: The Impact on Patients AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting June 2005  Boston, MA Mark Meterko PhD 1, David Mohr.
Chapter Eight: Quantitative Methods
Chapter Ten: Mixed Methods Procedures. Chapter Outline Components of Mixed Methods Procedures – The Nature of Mixed Methods Research – Types of Mixed.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE) Survey Summary of Fall 2014 Results Presentation to College Council Executive Cabinet August 5, 2015.
Sara Sara, Savannah, Cecilia, Christine.  Large component of the economy stems from small business. › Produces more than half of Gross Domestic Product.
Monday, June 23, 2008Slide 1 KSU Females prospective on Maternity Services in PHC Maternity Services in Primary Health Care Centers : The Females Perception.
Impact of Mentorship Programs to Influence African-American High School Student’s Perception of Engineering By Cameron Denson University of Georgia Under.
Overall NSW Health 2011 YourSay Survey Results YourSay - NSW Health Workplace Survey Results Presentation NSW Health Overall Presented by: Robyn Burley.
Jayne Schaefer, BA Workforce Programs Manager Mather LifeWays Evanston, Illinois Toward Building a Sustainable Long-Term Care Workforce: LEAP.
Hildegalda P. Mushi and Dr Sudai, Boniphace Marwa Presented on 5th National Quality Improvement Forum on Health and Social Welfare 28 th August 2015, Hyatt.
September 26, 2006 From Organizational Assessment to Organizational Change: The University of Maryland Library Experience M. Sue Baughman Johnnie Love.
Assessing College Students’ Desire to Enhance Global Learning Competencies Rosalind R. King, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Literature indicates the urgency to enhance.
Mid Michigan Community College Prepared by President Christine Hammond March 31, 2016 PACE Survey Results Summary.
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville,
A gap analysis based on a modified SERVQUAL instrument (originally developed by Parasuraman et al., 1988) was used on 522 international postgraduate students.
Literature Referenced Relationship of Variables
Logic of Hypothesis Testing
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL SILENCE(OS) AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR(OCB): THE MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT(OC) Naqib.
Lecture 02.
A Path of Learning and Improvement
Chapter 2 Sociological Research Methods
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research Method Issues
THE EXPERIENCE OF ENGINEERS LEADING PROJECT TEAMS: A GENERIC QUALITATIVE INQUIRY Halle Horvath.
Chapter Six: The Purpose Statement
Grace Orlyn SITOMPUL 5th ISC – Oct 30-31, 2017 APIU
Presentation transcript:

DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch

Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative: Two Questions

VariableResearch QuestionSurvey Section Independent: perceptions of diversity and inclusion initiatives Dependent: Work culture Question 1: What are the perceptions of departmental personnel regarding the impact of diversity and inclusion initiatives in improving and sustaining productive work cultures? Question 1a: What are the differences between managers’ and staff members’ ratings with respect to their perceptions of the effectiveness of diversity and inclusion initiatives? Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey: Section 2  Relationship with Team Members  Relationship with Manager  Individual’s Behaviors and Attitudes  Overall Work Culture Independent: perceptions of diversity and inclusion initiatives Dependent: Work culture Question 2: What types of diversity and inclusion initiatives are identified by departmental personnel as useful to their work culture; and what differences if any are identified by managers and staff? Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey: Section 1 Workshops and learning modules Executive coaching Mentoring Team coaching Use of web-based information Independent: perceptions of diversity and inclusion initiatives Dependent: Work culture Question 3: What is the relationship between departmental personnel’s ratings of their perceptions of diversity and inclusion initiatives and work culture scores? Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey: Section 2 and Morehead Model of Workforce Commitment Survey: Each Department’s Tier Score Variables, Research Questions and Quantitative Survey Alignment

Focus Group Questions Quantitative Survey Sections Question 1: What factors influenced your rating of questions on the survey? Question 2: What additional strategies/initiatives do you feel would positively impact your work culture? Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey: Section 2  Relationship with Team Members  Relationship with Manager  Individual’s Behaviors and Attitudes  Overall Work Culture Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey: Sections 1 Workshops and learning modules Executive coaching Mentoring Team coaching Use of web-based information Qualitative Focus Group Questions and Survey Alignment

Four sections: 1. Diverse and Inclusive Work Cultures; 2. Characteristics of Highly Effective Teams; 3. Workplace Diversity Initiatives; and 4. Measures for Assessing Work Cultures

Mixed methods explanatory sequential study including both quantitative and qualitative data collection Explanatory sequential mixed methods design Quantitative data collected Qualitative data collected The survey administered in 60-minute focus group sessions Study includes 5 departments within the hospital health system Researcher worked with the department/area between Department/area increased its work culture Tier score during a one-to-two year period (between ).

Instruments: 1. Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey Modified by the researcher Permission granted from original researcher Validity and reliability established through experts in the field of diversity and piloting the survey Cronbach Alpha: , indicating strong reliability 2. Morehead Model of Workforce Commitment Survey Work culture tier scores 3. Focus Groups Five one-hour sessions

Chapter Organization: Summary of Data in Chapter 4 for each research question Conclusions of Summary Data Research: Chapter 2 Review of Related Literature 1.Diverse and Inclusive Work Cultures; 2. Characteristics of Highly Effective Teams; 3. Workplace Diversity Initiatives; and 4. Measures for Assessing Work Cultures Theoretical Framework Model of Change Theory Two Factor Theory Agency Theory

PositionEmployeesPercent Manager Staff Total Survey Participant Demographics: Job Position

What are the perceptions of departmental personnel regarding the impact of diversity and inclusion initiatives in improving and sustaining productive work cultures? One-Sample Z Test (each department) Section 2 of Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives workshops and learning modules; executive coaching; mentoring; team coaching; and use of web-based information Null Hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis Probability (p-value less than.05) Alternative Hypothesis True (significant relationship) ARS Clickers Utilized Qualitative Question 1: What factors influenced your rating of questions on the survey? Major Themes

Survey ConstructsDepartment ADepartment BDepartment CDepartment DDepartment E Relationship with Team Members p-value not less than.05 p-value less than.05 (Significant Relationship) p-value not less than.05 Relationship with Manager p-value less than.05 (Significant Relationship) p-value not less than.05 p-value less than.05 (Significant Relationship) p-value less than.05 (Significant Relationship) Individual’s Behavior and Attitudes p-value not less than.05 p-value less than.05 (Significant Relationship) Overall Work Culture p-value not less than.05 p-value less than.05 (Significant Relationship) p-value not less than.05 Summary Table of Findings: Research Question 1: Perceptions of Departmental Personnel of Impact of Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives

Department Major Themes Department A Department B Department C Department D Department E Effective Training and Education Open Communication within Department Open Communication with Emphasis on Diversity, Differences and Respect Training and Workshops to Increase Awareness Increase in Teamwork Trusting Atmosphere Diversity Workshops Working Together as a Team Increased Communication Workshops Increased Awareness of Diversity Increased Conversations Among Co-Workers Diversity Workshops Major Themes Reflected by Five Departmental Focus Groups: What Factors Influenced Your Rating of Questions on the Survey?

What are the differences between managers’ and staff members’ ratings with respect to their perceptions of the effectiveness of diversity and inclusion initiatives? Two-Sample Z Test (each department) Section 2 of Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey Null Hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis Probability (p-value less than.05) Alternative Hypothesis True (significant relationship)

Survey ConstructsDepartment ADepartment BDepartment CDepartment DDepartment E Relationship with Team Members p-value not less than.05 p-value less than.05 (Significant Difference) p-value not less than.05 p-value less than.05 (Significant Difference) Relationship with Manager p-value not less than.05 p-value less than.05 (Significant Difference) p-value not less than.05 p-value less than.05 (Significant Difference) Individual’s Behavior and Attitudes p-value not less than.05 p-value less than.05 (Significant Difference) Overall Work Culture p-value not less than.05 p-value less than.05 (Significant Difference) Summary Table of Findings: Research Question 1a: Differences Between Managers’ and Staff Members Ratings on Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey Section 2

What types of diversity and inclusion initiatives are identified by departmental personnel as useful to their work culture; and what differences if any are identified by managers and staff? Researcher worked with departments All departments not exposed to each initiative Section 1 of Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives workshops and learning modules; executive coaching; mentoring; team coaching; and use of web-based information Qualitative Question 2: What additional strategies/initiatives do you feel would positively impact your work culture?

Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives Department ADepartment BDepartment CDepartment DDepartment E Workshops and Learning Modules Manager & Staff Ranked 1 Manager Ranked 1 Staff Ranked 2 Manager & Staff Ranked 1 Manager Ranked 1 Staff Ranked 2 Manager & Staff Ranked 1 Executive Coaching Not RankedManager Ranked 3Not Ranked Mentoring (one-on- one) Not Ranked Team Coaching Manager & Staff Ranked 2 Manager Ranked 2 Staff Ranked 1 Manager & Staff Ranked 2 Manager Ranked 1 Staff Ranked 2 Manager & Staff Ranked 2 Use of Web-based Information Manager & Staff Ranked 3 Not Ranked Manager Ranked 3Not Ranked Summary Table of Findings: Research Question 2: Rankings of Top Three Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives Identified by Departmental Personnel as Most Impactful (Useful) to their Work Culture

Department Strategies/Initiatives Department A Department B Department C Department D Department E Team Building Workshops Become Comfortable with the Uncomfortable Provide Ownership/Involvement Continue to Increase Communication Huddle time in AM for about 5-Minutes Walk Together in Spare Time Use Respectful Tones with Everyone Continue to Work on Effective Communication Model Respectful Behavior Daily Continue to Work as a Team Continue to Communicate Effectively Practice More Active Listening Continue Inclusive Meetings Continue Workshops and Trainings Major Strategies/Initiatives Reflected by Five Departmental Focus Groups: What Additional Strategies/Initiatives do you Feel Would Positively Impact Your Work Culture?

What is the relationship between departmental personnel’s ratings of their perceptions of diversity and inclusion initiatives and work culture scores? Two Step Analysis Multiple Regression T-test for Regression Slope Section 2 of Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey Null Hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis Probability (p-value less than.05) Alternative Hypothesis True (significant relationship)

Tier Ranges Tier 1 desired level ( 4.15 & higher) Tier 2 (3.80 – 4.14) Tier 3 (3.79 and below) DepartmentPre-Tier ScorePost-Tier Score A B C D E

Survey ConstructsDepartment ADepartment BDepartment CDepartment DDepartment E Relationship with Team Members No Significant Relationship Significant Relationship Existed No Significant Relationship Relationship with Manager Significant Relationship Existed No Significant Relationship Significant Relationship Existed Individual’s Behavior and Attitudes Significant Relationship Existed No Significant Relationship Significant Relationship Existed No Significant Relationship Overall Work Culture No Significant Relationship Significant Relationship Existed No Significant Relationship Summary of Findings :Research Question 3: Relationship Between Departmental Personnel’s Ratings on Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey Section 2 and Work Culture Tier Scores

1. It is recommended that this study be replicated to include a larger sample of departments/areas. 2.It is recommended that further investigation to determine initiatives/factors that are perceived to increase Work Culture Tier Scores. 3.It is recommended that further investigation should be conducted to determine how mediating variables such as staff satisfaction, staff relationship with manager and staff overall performance influence Work Culture Tier Scores.